Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Geotechnical Report
May 2014
Prepared for:
Prepared by:
GeoKinetics
77 Bunsen
Irvine, California 92618
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Table 1 - Document Search Results
Within Project Area
Addresses Results
Geocon- Report
8639 South Lincoln
5/22/2006
Page 1 of 1
Table 2 - Regional Faults Within 50 Km of Site
Page 1 of 1
Table 3 - Seismic Design Parameters
Factors Values
Site Class D
Page 1 of 1
Table4ͲDynamicSettlementEstimates
CPT-1 50 0.4
CPT-2 50 0.4
CPT-3 50 0.3
CPT-4 50 4.6
CPT-5 50 0.6
CPT-6 50 1.1
CPT-7 50 0.4
CPT-8 50 0.4
CPT-9 45 0.7
CPT-10 50 0.5
Page1of1
Table 5 - Methane and Methane Buffer Zones
Page 1 of 1
Sheet: 1 of 2
Elevation (Feet)
BORING LOG NO.: B-1
Sample Type
Moisture (%)
Depth (Feet)
(Blows/Foot)
Dry Density
Penetration
Resistance
Lithology
(pcf)
Description of Subsurface Materials: % % Void
Classification, (USCS) color, mixture, consistency, etc. Comp Saturation Ratio
SM
5
6.3 112.1 4/5/7 R SM/SC Silty fine Sand (SM/SC): Reddish brown, moist, dense, semi 33.5 0.50
well graded, to clayey sand.
8/18/
SPT Silty fine Sand (SM): Yellow tan, moist to dry, dense, well
29
20 graded.
SM
SM Sand (SM): Yellow tan, very dense, dry to moist, well graded,
6.5 98.1 24/40/ grains are sub-angular. Small to coarse grains.
50 R 35 Coarse Sand with Silt (SP-SM): Damp, dense. 24.4 0.72
(SP-
SM)
SM Silty Fine Sand to medium well graded (SM) very dense. Tan/
15/24/ yellow with 1 cm pockets of tan white burrows of finer sand.
SPT
35
Sample Types:
Location: B-1 Logged by: GS
B Bulk Sample
C Rock Core Date Drilled: 1/23/13 Equipment Used: CME-75 Ring Type:
R Ring Sample Ground Elevation: Notes:
Project Name: LAX Northside S Standard Split
Spoon
Project No.: T Tube Sample
Sheet: 2 of 2
Elevation (Feet)
BORING LOG NO.: B-1 (cont.)
Sample Type
Moisture (%)
Depth (Feet)
(Blows/Foot)
Dry Density
Penetration
Resistance
Lithology
(pcf)
Description of Subsurface Materials: % % Void
Classification, (USCS) color, mixture, consistency, etc. Comp Saturation Ratio
Silty fine Sand (SM): Orange yellow to pale yellow tan, inter-
tonguing colors, well graded silts and fine sand. Moist to
damp. Very dense.
6.8 93.0 37/50 SM Silty fine Sand (SM): Orange yellow to pale yellow tan, inter- 22.7 0.81
for 5” R 45 tonguing colors, well graded silts and fine sand. Moist to
damp. Very dense.
Silty fine Sand (SM): Yellow tan, very dense, damp, well
graded. Fine to medium coarse grains, sub-angular.
15/26/
SPT
37 50
Total Depth = 50.5 ft bgs
Groundwater not encountered.
Hole backfilled.
55
60
65
70
75
Sample Types:
Location: B-1 Logged by: GS
B Bulk Sample
C Rock Core Date Drilled: 1/23/13 Equipment Used: CME-75 Ring Type:
R Ring Sample Ground Elevation: Notes:
Project Name: LAX Northside S Standard Split
Spoon
Project No.: T Tube Sample
Sheet: 1 of 2
Elevation (Feet)
BORING LOG NO.: B-2
Sample Type
Moisture (%)
Depth (Feet)
(Blows/Foot)
Dry Density
Penetration
Resistance
Lithology
(pcf)
Description of Subsurface Materials: % % Void
Classification, (USCS) color, mixture, consistency, etc. Comp Saturation Ratio
4/4/4 Fine to medium Sand (SM): Reddish brown, more red, moist
SPT 10 to damp. loose to firm, poorly graded.
SM
Silty fine Sand (SM): Two colors intermixed, yellow tan and
reddish brown. Large pockets with discrete transitions on 45.0 0.58
9.6 107.0 9/15/
R 15
edges, reddish brown pockets are more cemented. Tan and
20 yellow pockets, dense, moist.
15/25/
30 SPT
Sample Types:
Location: B-2 Logged by: GS
B Bulk Sample
C Rock Core Date Drilled: 1/23/13 Equipment Used: CME-75 Ring Type:
R Ring Sample Ground Elevation: Notes:
Project Name: LAX Northside S Standard Split
Spoon
Project No.: T Tube Sample
Sheet: 2 of 2
Elevation (Feet)
BORING LOG NO.: B-2
Sample Type
Moisture (%)
Depth (Feet)
(Blows/Foot)
Dry Density
Penetration
Resistance
Lithology
(pcf)
Description of Subsurface Materials: % % Void
Classification, (USCS) color, mixture, consistency, etc. Comp Saturation Ratio
SM Silty fine Sand (SM): Orange tan with pockets of tan / white
tan silty sand, very dense. Damp, poorly graded.
20/30/
SPT
40 50
Total Depth = 50.5 ft bgs
Groundwater not encountered.
Hole backfilled.
55
60
65
70
75
Sample Types:
Location: B-2 Logged by: GS
B Bulk Sample
C Rock Core Date Drilled: 1/23/13 Equipment Used: CME-75 Ring Type:
R Ring Sample Ground Elevation: Notes:
Project Name: LAX Northside S Standard Split
Spoon
Project No.: T Tube Sample
Sheet: 1 of 2
Elevation (Feet)
BORING LOG NO.: B-3
Sample Type
Moisture (%)
Depth (Feet)
(Blows/Foot)
Dry Density
Penetration
Resistance
Lithology
(pcf)
Description of Subsurface Materials: % % Void
Classification, (USCS) color, mixture, consistency, etc. Comp Saturation Ratio
SM
Silty fine Sands (SM): Reddish brown, dense, damp,
poorly graded. Fine sub-rounded grains.
? ? ?
Sandy Silt (ML), soft gray brown, silts and fine sand, moist,
ML cobbles encountered, semi-angular.
5
5.4 108.2 10/12/ 26.2 0.56
16 R Silty Sand (SM): Reddish brown, dense fine sand and silt,
poorly graded, damp.
SM
Silty Sand (SM): Orangish red and yellow tan cross bedded
7/10/ pockets, tan is loosely cemented, red is iron cemented sands
14 SPT 10 and more dense. Damp.
Silty fine Sand (SM): Yellow tan and reddish brown. Damp,
very dense.
17/36/
37 SPT 30
Elevation (Feet)
BORING LOG NO.: B-3
Sample Type
Moisture (%)
Depth (Feet)
(Blows/Foot)
Dry Density
Penetration
Resistance
Lithology
(pcf)
Description of Subsurface Materials: % % Void
Classification, (USCS) color, mixture, consistency, etc. Comp Saturation Ratio
Silty fine Sand (SM): Whitish tan, fine gravel present, rounded
oblate (1-2 cm) (20-30%) little cross bedding, poorly graded
6.2 92.9 40/50 20.5 0.81
R matrix.
for 5” 45 SM
55
60
65
70
75
Sample Types:
Location: B-3 Logged by: GS
B Bulk Sample
C Rock Core Date Drilled: 1/23/13 Equipment Used: CME-75 Ring Type:
R Ring Sample Ground Elevation: Notes:
Project Name: LAX Northside S Standard Split
Spoon
Project No.: T Tube Sample
Sheet: 1 of 2
Elevation (Feet)
BORING LOG NO.: B-4
Sample Type
Moisture (%)
Depth (Feet)
(Blows/Foot)
Dry Density
Penetration
Resistance
Lithology
(pcf)
Description of Subsurface Materials: % % Void
Classification, (USCS) color, mixture, consistency, etc. Comp Saturation Ratio
Sand and Gravel - FILL: Silty Sands with gravels and debris
(asphalt, crushed concrete (~1 in), loose, moist, well graded.
af
5
11.8 122.6 11/12/ Silty Sand (SM): Reddish brown, fine sand, rounded grains. 84.7 0.38
15 R
Dense, damp to moist, poorly graded, 5% coarse sand.
SM
ML
SP Sand (SP): Yellow tan, fine grain rounded sands, moist, very
dense, some cross bedding, poorly graded.
3.5 102.4 22/40/
R 14.7 0.65
50-3” 25
14/26 Sand (SP): Yellow tan, fine grain rounded sands, moist, very
37 SPT 30 dense, some cross bedding, poorly graded.
28.6 93.9 10/17/ Clay - mottled clay and silt clasts, color is olive gray clay,
30 R 35 97.2 0.80
red/brown and tan silts. Not laminated. Moist, very stiff,
CL semi-plastic.
Sand (SP): with some silts, fine grained sand, poorly graded,
SP yellow tan.
11/27/
40 SPT
Sample Types:
Location: B-4 Logged by: GS
B Bulk Sample
C Rock Core Date Drilled: 1/23/13 Equipment Used: CME-75 Ring Type:
R Ring Sample Ground Elevation: Notes:
Project Name: LAX Northside S Standard Split
Spoon
Project No.: T Tube Sample
Sheet: 2 of 2
Elevation (Feet)
BORING LOG NO.: B-4
Sample Type
Moisture (%)
Depth (Feet)
(Blows/Foot)
Dry Density
Penetration
Resistance
Lithology
(pcf)
Description of Subsurface Materials: % % Void
Classification, (USCS) color, mixture, consistency, etc. Comp Saturation Ratio
SP
6/7/15 Silt (ML): Sandy silt, light brown/red colored swirls, moist,
SPT
50 sands are fine to medium grained, semi-plastic elastic silt.
ML
clays.
60
65
70
75
Sample Types:
Location: B-4 Logged by: GS
B Bulk Sample
C Rock Core Date Drilled: 1/23/13 Equipment Used: CME-75 Ring Type:
R Ring Sample Ground Elevation: Notes:
Project Name: LAX Northside S Standard Split
Spoon
Project No.: T Tube Sample
GREGG DRILLING & TESTING, INC.
GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION SERVICES
GeoKinetics
Attn: Greg Shagam
The following report presents the results of GREGG Drilling & Testing’s Cone Penetration Test
investigation for the above referenced site. The following testing services were performed:
A list of reference papers providing additional background on the specific tests conducted is
provided in the bibliography following the text of the report. If you would like a copy of any of
these publications or should you have any questions or comments regarding the contents of this
report, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (925) 313-5800.
Sincerely,
GREGG Drilling & Testing, Inc.
Peter Robertson
Technical Director, Gregg Drilling & Testing, Inc.
2726 Walnut Ave. x Signal Hill, California 90755 x (562) 427-6899 x FAX (562) 427-3314
www.greggdrilling.com
GREGG DRILLING & TESTING, INC.
GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION SERVICES
-Table 1-
CPT Sounding Date Termination Depth of Groundwater Depth of Soil Depth of Pore
Identification Depth (feet) Samples (feet) Samples (feet) Pressure Dissipation
Tests (feet)
CPT-01 1/23/13 50 - - -
CPT-02 1/23/13 50 - - -
CPT-03 1/23/13 50 - - -
CPT-04 1/23/13 50 - - -
CPT-05 1/23/13 50 - - -
CPT-06 1/23/13 50 - - -
CPT-07 1/23/13 50 - - -
CPT-08 1/23/13 50 - - -
CPT-09 1/23/13 50 - - -
CPT-10 1/23/13 50 - - -
2726 Walnut Ave. x Signal Hill, California 90755 x (562) 427-6899 x FAX (562) 427-3314
www.greggdrilling.com
GREGG DRILLING & TESTING, INC.
GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION SERVICES
Bibliography
Lunne, T., Robertson, P.K. and Powell, J.J.M., “Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice”
E & FN Spon. ISBN 0 419 23750, 1997
Roberston, P.K., “Soil Classification using the Cone Penetration Test”, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 27,
1990 pp. 151-158.
Mayne, P.W., “NHI (2002) Manual on Subsurface Investigations: Geotechnical Site Characterization”, available
through www.ce.gatech.edu/~geosys/Faculty/Mayne/papers/index.html, Section 5.3, pp. 107-112.
Robertson, P.K., R.G. Campanella, D. Gillespie and A. Rice, “Seismic CPT to Measure In-Situ Shear Wave Velocity”,
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ASCE, Vol. 112, No. 8, 1986
pp. 791-803.
Robertson, P.K., Sully, J., Woeller, D.J., Lunne, T., Powell, J.J.M., and Gillespie, D.J., "Guidelines for Estimating
Consolidation Parameters in Soils from Piezocone Tests", Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 29, No. 4,
August 1992, pp. 539-550.
Robertson, P.K., T. Lunne and J.J.M. Powell, “Geo-Environmental Application of Penetration Testing”, Geotechnical
Site Characterization, Robertson & Mayne (editors), 1998 Balkema, Rotterdam, ISBN 90 5410 939 4 pp 35-47.
Campanella, R.G. and I. Weemees, “Development and Use of An Electrical Resistivity Cone for Groundwater
Contamination Studies”, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 27 No. 5, 1990 pp. 557-567.
DeGroot, D.J. and A.J. Lutenegger, “Reliability of Soil Gas Sampling and Characterization Techniques”, International
Site Characterization Conference - Atlanta, 1998.
Woeller, D.J., P.K. Robertson, T.J. Boyd and Dave Thomas, “Detection of Polyaromatic Hydrocarbon Contaminants
Using the UVIF-CPT”, 53rd Canadian Geotechnical Conference Montreal, QC October pp. 733-739, 2000.
Zemo, D.A., T.A. Delfino, J.D. Gallinatti, V.A. Baker and L.R. Hilpert, “Field Comparison of Analytical Results from
Discrete-Depth Groundwater Samplers” BAT EnviroProbe and QED HydroPunch, Sixth national Outdoor Action
Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada Proceedings, 1992, pp 299-312.
2726 Walnut Ave. x Signal Hill, California 90755 x (562) 427-6899 x FAX (562) 427-3314
www.greggdrilling.com
Cone Penetration Testing Procedure
(CPT)
Gregg Drilling carries out all Cone Penetration Tests (CPT) using an integrated
electronic cone system, Figure CPT. The soundings were conducted using a 20 ton
capacity cone with a tip area of 15 cm2 and a friction sleeve area of 225 cm2. The cone
is designed with an equal end area friction sleeve and a tip end area ratio of 0.80.
When the soundings are complete, the test holes are grouted. The grouting procedures
generally consist of pushing a hollow tremie pipe with a “knock out” plug to the
termination depth of the CPT hole. Grout is then pumped under pressure as the tremie
pipe is pulled from the hole. Disruption or further contamination to the site is therefore
minimized.
Cone Penetration Test Data & Interpretation
The Cone Penetration Test (CPT) data collected from your site are presented in graphical
form in the attached report. The plots include interpreted Soil Behavior Type (SBT) based on
the charts described by Robertson (1990). Typical plots display SBT based on the non-
normalized charts of Robertson et al (1986). For CPT soundings extending greater than 50
feet, we recommend the use of the normalized charts of Robertson (1990) which can be
displayed as SBTn, upon request. The report also includes spreadsheet output of computer
calculations of basic interpretation in terms of SBT and SBTn and various geotechnical
parameters using current published correlations based on the comprehensive review by
Lunne, Robertson and Powell (1997), as well as recent updates by Professor Robertson. The
interpretations are presented only as a guide for geotechnical use and should be carefully
reviewed. Gregg Drilling & Testing Inc. do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of
any of the geotechnical parameters interpreted by the software and do not assume any
liability for any use of the results in any design or review. The user should be fully aware of
the techniques and limitations of any method used in the software.
Some interpretation methods require input of the groundwater level to calculate vertical
effective stress. An estimate of the in-situ groundwater level has been made based on field
observations and/or CPT results, but should be verified by the user.
A summary of locations and depths is available in Table 1. Note that all penetration depths
referenced in the data are with respect to the existing ground surface.
Note that it is not always possible to clearly identify a soil type based solely on qt, fs, and u2.
In these situations, experience, judgment, and an assessment of the pore pressure
dissipation data should be used to infer the correct soil behavior type.
ZONE SBT
Figure SBT
Gregg CPT Interpretation Software 1.1., 2007
The following provides a summary of the methods used for the interpretation. Many of
the empirical correlations to estimate geotechnical parameters have constants that have a
range of values depending on soil type, geologic origin and other factors. The software
uses ‘default’ values that have been selected to provide, in general, conservatively low
estimates of the various geotechnical parameters.
Input:
1 Units for display (Imperial or metric) (atm. pressure, pa = 0.96 tsf or 0.1 MPa)
2 Depth interval to average results,( ft or m). Data are collected at either 0.02 or
0.05m and can be averaged every 1, 3 or 5 intervals.
3 Elevation of ground surface (ft or m)
4 Depth to water table, zw (ft or m) – input required
5 Net area ratio for cone, a (default to 0.80)
6 Relative Density constant, CDr (default to 350)
7 Young’s modulus number for sands, D (default to 5)
8 Small strain shear modulus number
a. for sands, SG (default to 180 for SBTn 5, 6, 7)
b. for clays, CG (default to 50 for SBTn 1, 2, 3 & 4)
9 Undrained shear strength cone factor for clays, Nkt (default to 15)
10 Over Consolidation ratio number, kocr (default to 0.3)
11 Unit weight of water, (default to Jw = 62.4 lb/ft3 or 9.81 kN/m3)
Column
1 Depth, z, (m) – CPT data is collected in meters
2 Depth (ft)
3 Cone resistance, qc (tsf or MPa)
4 Sleeve friction, fs (tsf or MPa)
5 Penetration pore pressure, u (psi or MPa), measured behind the cone (i.e. u2)
6 Other – any additional data, if collected, e.g. electrical resistivity or UVIF
7 Total cone resistance, qt (tsf or MPa) qt = qc + u (1-a)
Notes:
1 Soil Behavior Type (non-normalized), SBT Lunne et al. (1997)
listed below
(qt /p a ) § I ·
= 8.5 ¨1 c ¸
N 60 © 4.6 ¹
8 Equivalent SPT (N1)60 blows/ft (N1)60 = N60 CN,
where CN = (pa/Vcvo)0.5
1 ª § qc · º
10 Friction Angle, I', (degrees) tan I' = « log ¨ ¸ 0.29»
2.68 ¬ © V' vo ¹ ¼
Only SBTn 5, 6, 7 & 8 Show’N/A’ in zones 1, 2, 3, 4 & 9
11 Young’s modulus, Es Es = D qt
Only SBTn 5, 6, 7 & 8 Show ‘N/A’ in zones 1, 2, 3, 4 & 9
1 3x 10-8 1x 10-8
2 3x 10-7 1x 10-7
3 1x 10-9 3x 10-10
4 3x 10-8 1x 10-8
5 3x 10-6 1x 10-6
6 3x 10-4 1x 10-4
7 3x 10-2 1x 10-2
8 3x 10-6 1x 10-6
9 1x 10-8 3x 10-9
1 111.4 17.5
2 79.6 12.5
3 111.4 17.5
4 114.6 18.0
5 114.6 18.0
6 114.6 18.0
7 117.8 18.5
8 120.9 19.0
9 124.1 19.5
10 127.3 20.0
11 130.5 20.5
12 120.9 19.0
Dry Moisture
Depth Soil
Boring Wet Density (pcf) Density Content Saturation (%) Void Ratio
(feet) Type
(pcf) (%)
Page 1 of 2
Summary of Laboratory Testing Results
Dry Moisture
Depth Soil
Boring Wet Density (pcf) Density Content Saturation (%) Void Ratio
(feet) Type
(pcf) (%)
Page 2 of 2