Transcript of Ahmadinejad's U.N.

Speech

Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Saturday offered proposal on nuclear program.

The following is full text of President Ahmadinejad before the Sixtieth Session of the United Nations General
Assembly:
"In the Name of the God of Mercy, Compassion, Peace, Freedom and Justice
"Mr. President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
"Today we have gathered here to exchange views about the world, its future and our common
responsibilities towards it. It is evident that the future of the world is intertwined with its current state and the
prevailing trends ,which exhibit signs of hope and despair.
"On the one hand certain hopes and opportunities exist, and this august Assembly is convened on such
hopes. Today human thought reflects outstanding commonalities which provide appropriate grounds to build
upon. With the passing of the era of agnostic philosophies, today humanity is once again joined in
celebrating monotheism and belief in the Creator as the originator of existence. This is the common thread
which binds us all.

"Faith will prove to be the solution to many of today's problems.

The Truth will shine the light of faith and ethics on the life of human beings and prevent them from
aggression, coercion and injustice and will guide them towards care and compassion for fellow beings.

"Another hope is the common global appreciation of the sources of knowledge. Although reason, experience
and science are among valuable sources of knowledge, the darkness of the Middle Ages deprived major
portions of the Western world of appreciating. This reactionary tendency deprived many of access to various
scientific findings and knowledge and led to the exclusion of other sources of knowledge namely God and
knowledge based on revelation from the life of human beings in the West; Divine knowledge that was carried
and disseminated by such prophets as Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Mohammad (peace be upon
them).
"Today, agnostic thinking is on the decline and presently humanity is equally enamored with religion
knowledge and spirituality. This is an auspicious beginning. Divine prophets teach us about proper regard
for the exalted state of human beings on earth.

"The human being is blessed with dignity, most importantly manifested in being the viceroy of the Almighty
on earth. The Almighty placed humans on earth to develop it, institutionalize justice, overcome their egoistic
tendencies and praise no lord but the Almighty.

"Faith and good deeds can bring deliverance and the good life even in this world. Attaining this depends on
human will, that is the will of each and every one of us. We must heed the call of our common primordial
nature and achieve the realization of this good life.

"On the other hand, the prevalence of military domination, increasing poverty, the growing gap between rich
and poor countries, violence as a means to solve crises, spread of terrorism, specially state terrorism,
existence and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the pervasive lack of honesty in interstate
relations, and disregard for the equal rights of peoples and nations in international relations constitute some
of the challenges and threats.

"Although these challenges are very real, we believe we are not predestined to experience them. Our
common will not only can change this course but in fact can lead us to a life filled with hope and prosperity.
Divine revelation teaches us that "The Almighty changes the fate of no people unless they themselves show
a will for change" (Holy Quran, 13:11).

"How can we influence the future of the world? When and how will peace, tranquility and well-being for all
come about? These are the fundamental questions before us.

"We believe that a sustainable order, nurturing and flourishing peace and tranquility, can only be realized on
the two pillars of justice and spirituality. The more human society departs from justice and spirituality, the
greater insecurity it will face, so much so that a relatively small crisis, such as a natural disaster, leads to
various abnormalities and inhuman behavior.

"Unfortunately, the world is rife with discrimination and poverty.

Discrimination produces hatred, war and terrorism. They all share the common root of lack of spirituality
coupled with injustice. Justice is about equal rights, the correct distribution of resources in the territories of
different states, the equality of all before the law and respect for international agreements.

"Justice recognizes the right of every one to tranquility, peace and a dignified life. Justice rejects intimidation
and double standards. As the eminent daughter of the Prophet of Islam has said, "justice brings tranquility
and harmony to our hearts."
"Today, the world is longing for the establishment of such justice. If humanity heeds the call of its primordial
nature with firm resolve, justice will emerge. This is what the Almighty has promised and all people of good
will from all religions are waiting for. If the prevailing discourse of global relations becomes one of justice and
spirituality, then durable peace will be guaranteed.

"Conversely, if international relations are defined without justice and spirituality and void of moral
considerations, then the mechanisms for promoting confidence and peace will remain insufficient and
ineffective.

"If some, relying on their superior military and economic might, attempt to expand their rights and privileges,
they will be performing a great disservice to the cause of peace and in fact will fuel the arms race and
spread insecurity, fear and deception. If global trends continue to serve the interests of small influential
groups, even the interests of the citizens of powerful countries will be jeopardized, as was seen in the recent
crises and the even natural disaster such as the recent tragic hurricane.
"Today, my nation calls on other nations and governments to "move forward to a durable tranquility and
peace based on justice and spirituality."
"Mr. President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
"The Islamic Republic of Iran is born out of a movement, based on the pure primordial nature of a people
who rose up to regain their dignity esteem and human rights. The Islamic Revolution toppled a regime,
which had been put in place through a coup, and supported by those who claim to be advocates of
democracy and human rights, thwarted the aspirations of the nation for development and progress for 25
years through intimidation and torture of the populace and submission and subservience to outsiders.

"The Islamic Republic of Iran is the manifestation of true democracy in the region. The discourse of the
Iranian nation is focused on respect for the rights of human beings and a quest for tranquillity, peace, justice
and development for all through monotheism.

"For 8 years, Saddam's regime imposed a massive war of aggression and occupation on my people. It
employed the most heinous weapons of mass destruction, including chemical weapons against Iranians and
Iraqis alike. Who, in fact, armed Saddam with these weapons? What was the reaction of those who now
claim to fight against WMDs regarding the use of chemical weapons back then? The world is witness to the
fact that the Islamic Republic of Iran, because of its humanitarian principles, even during the most testing of
times and when it was sustaining the highest number of casualties, never allowed itself to use such
weapons.

"Thousands of nuclear warheads that are stockpiled in various locations coupled with programs to further
develop these inhuman weapons have created a new atmosphere of repression and the rule of the
machines of war, threatening the international community and even the citizens of the countries that
possess them.

"Ironically, those who have actually used nuclear weapons, continue to produce, stockpile and extensively
test such weapons, have used depleted uranium bombs and bullets against tens and perhaps hundreds of
thousands of Iraqis, Kuwaitis, and even their own soldiers and those of their allies, afflicting them with
incurable diseases, blatantly violate their obligations under the NPT, have refrained from signing the CTBT
and have armed the Zionist occupation regime with WMDs, are not only refusing to remedy their past deeds,
but in clear breech of the NPT, are trying to prevent other countries from acquiring the technology to
produce peaceful nuclear energy.
"All these problems emanate from the fact that justice and spirituality are missing in the way powerful
governments conduct their affairs with other nations.

"After September 11, a particular radical group was accused of terrorist activities -- although it was never
explained how such huge intelligence gathering and security organizations failed to prevent such an
extensive and well planned operation.

"Why powers that, not so long ago, were supporting the activities of such groups in Afghanistan and thus
portraying themselves as supporters of human rights and the Afghan people have over night turned into their
most fierce critic?
"Are we to believe that their benefactors ,i.e. the very same hegemonic powers have lost control?
"If the answer is yes, would it not be better for those powers to adopt an honest and transparent approach to
the international community, provide precise information about the main elements and their arms and
financial support system, and accept responsibility for their inhuman actions against nations and countries,
and thereby assist peoples and nations to correctly, wisely and sincerely fight the roots of terrorism.

"We must endeavor to achieve sustainable tranquility and peace based on justice and spirituality.

"Mr. President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

"Terrorism and WMDs are two major threats before the international community. The Islamic Republic of
Iran, as one of the main victims of terrorism and chemical weapons, fully appreciates the difficulties that lie
ahead in the road to combat these menaces.

"Today, the most serious challenge is that the culprits are arrogating to themselves the role of the
prosecutor. Even more dangerous is that certain parties relying on their power and wealth try to impose a
climate of intimidation and injustice over the world make bullying, while through their huge media resources
portray themselves as defenders of freedom, democracy and human rights.

"People around the world are fully aware of what is happening in the occupied Palestine. Women and
children are being murdered and adolescents taken prisoner. Houses are being demolished and farms burnt
down. Yet, when the people of Palestine resist these conditions, they are accused of terrorism. At the same
time, the occupier, which does not abide by any principles and terror is part of its pronounced and routine
policy enjoys the support of the previously mentioned governments. Let me be blunter. State terrorism is
being supported by those who claim to fight terrorism.

"How can one talk about human rights and at the same time blatantly deny many the inalienable right to
have access to science and technology with applications in medicine, industry and energy and through force
and intimidation hinder their progress and development? "Can nations be deprived of scientific and
technological progress through the threat of use of force and based on mere allegations of possibility of
military diversion? We believe that all countries and nations are entitled to technological and scientific
advancement in all fields, particularly the peaceful technology to produce nuclear fuel. Such access cannot
be restricted to a few, depriving most nations and by establishing economic monopolies, use them as an
instrument to expand their domination.
"We have gathered here to defend human rights in accordance with Charter of UN and prevent certain
powers from claiming that "some countries have more rights "or that" some countries do not have the right to
enjoy their legitimate rights".

"We must not, at the beginning of the 21st century, revert to the logic of the dark ages and once again try to
deny societies access to scientific and technological advances.

"Mr. President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

"The UN must be the symbol of democracy and the equal rights of nations. If we talk about the equal rights
of nations in political forums, we must talk of the same concept in this forum as well.

"Similarly, if we talk about the right of sovereignty, then all nations must be allowed to exercise their rights
on an equal footing and in a democratic process.

"The UN can be the standard bearer of democracy in the world, when it, itself, is a manifestation of
democratic process. I reiterate that durable tranquility and peace can only be built on justice and spirituality.
"Mr. President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
"The Islamic Republic of Iran is a symbol of true democracy. All officials including the Leader, President,
members of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, city and village councils are elected through the vote of the
citizens. The Islamic Republic of Iran has held 27 national elections in 27 years. This showcases a vibrant
and dynamic society in which people widely participate in the political life.

"Because of its key importance and influence in the important and strategic Middle East region, the Islamic
Republic of Iran is committed to contribute actively to the promotion of peace and stability in the region.

"Saddam, Taliban regimes were both the products of foreign powers.

The people of Afghanistan and Iraq know very well who supported these two regimes.
"Today, to establish peace and security in the region, foreign occupation forces must leave and completely
hand over the political and economic sovereignty of these two countries to their peoples. "The Islamic
Republic of Iran will continue to provide full and comprehensive support to the people of Iraq and
Afghanistan and their elected governments, and will actively help them in the establishment of order and
security. My country will continue and expand its sincere cooperation and interaction with them.

"In Palestine, a durable peace will be possible through justice, an end to discrimination and the occupation
of Palestinian land, the return of all Palestinian refugees, and the establishment of a democratic Palestinian
state with Al-Quds Al-Sharif as its capital.

"Mr. President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

"Today, more than ever, nations need constructive, positive and honest cooperation and interaction in order
to enjoy a dignified, tranquil and peaceful life based on justice and spirituality. Let us enter into a collective
covenant to realize this legitimate aspiration of our nations.

"Here, I would like to briefly talk about the approach and initiative of the Islamic Republic of Iran on the
nuclear issue.

Nuclear weapons and their proliferation, and attempts to impose an apartheid regime on access to peaceful
nuclear energy, are two major threats, challenging international tranquility and peace.

"Keeping in mind that in past years no serious efforts complimented by practical mechanisms -- have been
made to move towards full disarmament and more specifically implement the decisions and outcomes of the
NPT Review Conferences of 1995 and 2000, I suggest that the General Assembly, as the most inclusive UN
organ, mandate an ad-hoc committee to compile and submit a comprehensive report on possible practical
mechanisms and strategies for complete disarmament.

"This Committee should also be asked to investigate as to how contrary to the NPT -- material, technology
and equipment for nuclear weapons were transferred to the Zionist regime, and to propose practical
measures for the establishment of a nuclear-weapons-free zone in the Middle East.

"Some powerful states practice a discriminatory approach against access of NPT members to material,
equipment, and peaceful nuclear technology, and by doing so, intend to impose a nuclear apartheid.

"We are concerned that once certain powerful states completely control nuclear energy resources and
technology, they will deny access to and thus deepen the divide between powerful countries and the rest of
the international community. When that happens, we will be divided into light and dark countries.
"Regrettably, in the past 30 years, no effective measure has been implemented to facilitate the exercise of
the legally recognized right of NPT state-parties to have access to and use peaceful nuclear energy in
accordance with article IV. Therefore, the General Assembly should ask the IAEA in accordance with article
2 of its Statute to report on violations by specific countries that have hindered the implementation of the
above article and also produce practical strategies for its renewed implementation.

"What needs our particular attention is the fact that peaceful use of nuclear energy without possession of
nuclear fuel cycle is an empty proposition. Nuclear power plants can indeed lead to total dependence of
countries and peoples if they need to rely for their fuel on coercive powers, who do not refrain from any
measure in furtherance of their interests. No popularly elected and responsible government can consider
such a situation in the interest of its people. The history of dependence on oil in oil rich countries
under domination is an experiment that no independent country is willing to repeat.
"Those hegemonic powers, who consider scientific and technological progress of independent and free
nations as a challenge to their monopoly on these important instruments of power and who do not want to
see such achievements in other countries, have misrepresented Iran's healthy and fully safeguarded
technological endeavors in the nuclear field as pursuit of nuclear weapons. This is nothing but a propaganda
ploy. The Islamic Republic of Iran is presenting in good faith its proposal for constructive interaction and a
just dialogue.

"However, if some try to impose their will on the Iranian people through resort to a language of force and
threat with Iran, we will reconsider our entire approach to the nuclear issue.

"Allow me, as the elected President of the Iranian people, to outline the other main elements of my country's
initiative regarding the nuclear issue:
"1. The Islamic Republic of Iran reiterates its previously and repeatedly declared position that in accordance
with our religious principles, pursuit of nuclear weapons is prohibited.

"2. The Islamic Republic of Iran believes that it is necessary to revitalize the NPT and create the above-
mentioned ad-hoc committee so that it can combat nuclear weapons and abolish the apartheid in peaceful
nuclear technology.

"3. Technically, the fuel cycle of the Islamic Republic of Iran is not different from that of other countries which
have peaceful nuclear technology.

"Therefore, as a further confidence building measure and in order to provide the greatest degree of
transparency, the Islamic Republic of Iran is prepared to engage in serious partnership with private and
public sectors of other countries in the implementation of uranium enrichment program in Iran. This
represents the most far reaching step, outside all requirements of the NPT, being proposed by Iran as a
further confidence building measure.

"4. In keeping with Iran's inalienable right to have access to a nuclear fuel cycle, continued interaction and
technical and legal cooperation with the IAEA will be the centerpiece of our nuclear policy.

"Initiation and continuation of negotiations with other countries will be carried out in the context of Iran's
interaction with the Agency.

"With this in mind, I have directed the relevant Iranian officials to compile the legal and technical details of
Iran's nuclear approach, based on the following considerations:
"4.1. International precedence tells us that nuclear fuel- delivery contracts are unreliable and no legally
binding international document or instrument exists to guarantee the delivery of nuclear fuel.

"On many occasions such bilateral contracts stopped altogether for political reasons. Therefore, the Islamic
Republic of Iran, in its pursuit of peaceful nuclear technology, considers it within its legitimate rights to
receive objective guarantees for uranium enrichment in the nuclear fuel cycle.

"4.2. In its negotiations with the EU3 ,Iran has tried in earnest to prove the solid and rightful foundations of
its nuclear activity in the context of the NPT, and to establish mutual trust. The selection of our negotiating
partners and the continuation of negotiations with the EU3 will be commensurate with the requirements of
our cooperation with the Agency regarding non-diversion of the process of uranium enrichment to non-
peaceful purposes in the framework of the provisions of the NPT. In this context, several proposals have
been presented which can be considered in the context of negotiations. The Islamic Republic of Iran
appreciates the positive contribution of South Africa and H.E. President Mbeki personally in the resolution of
the nuclear issue and cognizant of South Africa's active role in the IAEA Board of Governors would welcome
its active participation in the negotiations.

"4.3. The discriminatory approaches regarding the NPT that focuses on the obligations of state-parties and
disregards their rights under the Treaty should be discontinued.
"As the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, I assure you that my country will use everything in its
power to contribute to global tranquility and peace based on the two maxims of spirituality and justice as well
as the equal rights of all peoples and nations.

My country will interact and cooperate constructively with the international community to face the challenges
before us.

"Dear Friends and Colleagues,

"From the beginning of time, humanity has longed for the day when justice, peace, equality and compassion
envelop the world. All of us can contribute to the establishment of such a world. When that day comes, the
ultimate promise of all Divine religions will be fulfilled with the emergence of a perfect human being who is
heir to all prophets and pious men. He will lead the world to justice and absolute peace.

"O mighty Lord, I pray to you to hasten the emergence of your last repository, the promised one, that perfect
and pure human being, the one that will fill this world with justice and peace.

1416/1412

Transcript of Ahmadinejad's U.N. Speech

text size A A A
September 19, 2006
The following is a transcript of remarks by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to the United
Nations General Assembly in New York.

Madam President, Distinguished Heads of State and Government, Distinguished Heads of

Delegation, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

I praise the Merciful, All-Knowing and Almighty God for blessing me with another opportunity to
address this Assembly on behalf of the great nation of Iran and to bring a number of issues to the
attention of the international community.

I also praise the Almighty for the increasing vigilance of peoples across the globe, their
courageous presence in different international settings, and the brave expression of their views
and aspirations regarding global issues.
Today, humanity passionately craves commitment to the Truth, devotion to God, quest for Justice
and respect for the dignity of human beings. Rejection of domination and aggression, defense of
the oppressed, and longing for peace constitute the legitimate demand of the peoples of the
world, particularly the new generations and the spirited youth, who aspire a world free from
decadence, aggression and injustice, and replete with love and compassion. The youth have a
right to seek justice and the Truth; and they have a right to build their own future on the
foundations of love, compassion and tranquility. And, I praise the Almighty for this immense
blessing.

Madame President, Excellencies,

What afflicts humanity today is certainly not compatible with human dignity; the Almighty has not
created human beings so that they could transgress against others and oppress them.

By causing war and conflict, some are fast expanding their domination, accumulating greater
wealth and usurping all the resources, while others endure the resulting poverty, suffering and
misery.

Some seek to rule the world relying on weapons and threats, while others live in perpetual
insecurity and danger.

Some occupy the homeland of others, thousands of kilometers away from their borders, interfere
in their affairs and control their oil and other resources and strategic routes, while others are
bombarded daily in their own homes; their children murdered in the streets and alleys of their own
country and their homes reduced to rubble.

Such behavior is not worthy of human beings and runs counter to the Truth, to justice and to
human dignity. The fundamental question is that under such conditions, where should the
oppressed seek justice? Who, or what organization defends the rights of the oppressed, and
suppresses acts of aggression and oppression? Where is the seat of global justice?

A brief glance at a few examples of the most pressing global issues can further illustrate the
problem.

A. The unbridled expansion of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons

Some powers proudly announce their production of second and third generations of nuclear
weapons. What do they need these weapons for? Is the development and stockpiling of these
deadly weapons designed to promote peace and democracy? Or, are these weapons, in fact,
instruments of coercion and threat against other peoples and governments? How long should the
people of the world live with the nightmare of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons? What
bounds the powers producing and possessing these weapons? How can they be held
accountable before the international community? And, are the inhabitants of these countries
content with the waste of their wealth and resources for the production of such destructive
arsenals? Is it not possible to rely on justice, ethics and wisdom instead of these instruments of
death? Aren't wisdom and justice more compatible with peace and tranquility than nuclear,
chemical and biological weapons? If wisdom, ethics and justice prevail, then oppression and
aggression will be uprooted, threats will wither away and no reason will remain for conflict. This is
a solid proposition because most global conflicts emanate from injustice, and from the powerful,
not being contented with their own rights, striving to devour the rights of others.

People across the globe embrace justice and are willing to sacrifice for its sake.

Would it not be easier for global powers to ensure their longevity and win hearts and minds
through the championing of real promotion of justice, compassion and peace, than through
continuing the proliferation of nuclear and chemical weapons and the threat of their use?

The experience of the threat and the use of nuclear weapons is before us. Has it achieved
anything for the perpetrators other than exacerbation of tension, hatred and animosity among
nations?

B. Occupation of countries and exacerbation of hostilities

Occupation of countries, including Iraq, has continued for the last three years. Not a day goes by
without hundreds of people getting killed in cold blood. The occupiers are incapable of
establishing security in Iraq. Despite the establishment of the lawful Government and National
Assembly of Iraq, there are covert and overt efforts to heighten insecurity, magnify and aggravate
differences within Iraqi society, and instigate civil strife.

There is no indication that the occupiers have the necessary political will to eliminate the sources
of instability. Numerous terrorists were apprehended by the Government of Iraq, only to be let
loose under various pretexts by the occupiers.

It seems that intensification of hostilities and terrorism serves as a pretext for the continued
presence of foreign forces in Iraq.
Where can the people of Iraq seek refuge, and from whom should the Government of Iraq seek
justice?

Who can ensure Iraq's security? Insecurity in Iraq affects the entire region. Can the Security
Council play a role in restoring peace and security in Iraq, while the occupiers are themselves
permanent members of the Council? Can the Security Council adopt a fair decision in this
regard?

Consider the situation in Palestine:

The roots of the Palestinian problem go back to the Second World War. Under the pretext of
protecting some of the survivors of that War, the land of Palestine was occupied through war,
aggression and the displacement of millions of its inhabitants; it was placed under the control of
some of the War survivors, bringing even larger population groups from elsewhere in the world,
who had not been even affected by the Second World War; and a government was established in
the territory of others with a population collected from across the world at the expense of driving
millions of the rightful inhabitants of the land into a diaspora and homelessness. This is a great
tragedy with hardly a precedent in history. Refugees continue to live in temporary refugee camps,
and many have died still hoping to one day return to their land. Can any logic, law or legal
reasoning justify this tragedy? Can any member of the United Nations accept such a tragedy
occurring in their own homeland?

The pretexts for the creation of the regime occupying Al-Qods Al-Sharif are so weak that its
proponents want to silence any voice trying to merely speak about them, as they are concerned
that shedding light on the facts would undermine the raison d'être of this regime, as it has. The
tragedy does not end with the establishment of a regime in the territory of others. Regrettably,
from its inception, that regime has been a constant source of threat and insecurity in the Middle
East region, waging war and spilling blood and impeding the progress of regional countries, and
has also been used by some powers as an instrument of division, coercion, and pressure on the
people of the region. Reference to these historical realities may cause some disquiet among
supporters of this regime. But these are sheer facts and not myth. History has unfolded before
our eyes.

Worst yet, is the blanket and unwarranted support provided to this regime.

Just watch what is happening in the Palestinian land. People are being bombarded in their own
homes and their children murdered in their own streets and alleys. But no authority, not even the
Security Council, can afford them any support or protection. Why?
At the same time, a Government is formed democratically and through the free choice of the
electorate in a part of the Palestinian territory. But instead of receiving the support of the so-called
champions of democracy, its Ministers and Members of Parliament are illegally abducted and
incarcerated in full view of the international community.

Which council or international organization stands up to protect this brutally besieged

Government? And why can't the Security Council take any steps?

Let me here address Lebanon:

For thirty-three long days, the Lebanese lived under the barrage of fire and bombs and close to
1.5 million of them were displaced; meanwhile some members of the Security Council practically
chose a path that provided ample opportunity for the aggressor to achieve its objectives militarily.
We witnessed that the Security Council of the United Nations was practically incapacitated by
certain powers to even call for a ceasefire. The Security Council sat idly by for so many days,
witnessing the cruel scenes of atrocities against the Lebanese while tragedies such as Qana
were persistently repeated. Why?

In all these cases, the answer is self-evident. When the power behind the hostilities is itself a
permanent member of the Security Council, how then can this Council fulfill its responsibilities?

C. Lack of respect for the rights of members of the international community

Excellencies,

I now wish to refer to some of the grievances of the Iranian people and speak to the injustices
against them.

The Islamic Republic of Iran is a member of the IAEA and is committed to the NPT. All our
nuclear activities are transparent, peaceful and under the watchful eyes of IAEA inspectors. Why
then are there objections to our legally recognized rights? Which governments object to these
rights? Governments that themselves benefit from nuclear energy and the fuel cycle. Some of
them have abused nuclear technology for non-peaceful ends including the production of nuclear
bombs, and some even have a bleak record of using them against humanity.

Which organization or Council should address these injustices? Is the Security Council in a
position to address them? Can it stop violations of the inalienable rights of countries? Can it
prevent certain powers from impeding scientific progress of other countries?
The abuse of the Security Council, as an instrument of threat and coercion, is indeed a source of
grave concern.

Some permanent members of the Security Council, even when they are themselves parties to
international disputes, conveniently threaten others with the Security Council and declare, even
before any decision by the Council, the condemnation of their opponents by the Council. The
question is: what can justify such exploitation of the Security Council, and doesn't it erode the
credibility and effectiveness of the Council? Can such behavior contribute to the ability of the
Council to maintain security?

Excellencies,

A review of the preceding historical realities would lead to the conclusion that regrettably, justice
has become a victim of force and aggression. Many global arrangements have become unjust,
discriminatory and irresponsible as a result of undue pressure from some of the powerful; Threats
with nuclear weapons and other instruments of war by some powers have taken the place of
respect for the rights of nations and the maintenance and promotion of peace and tranquility;

For some powers, claims of promotion of human rights and democracy can only last as long as
they can be used as instruments of pressure and intimidation against other nations. But when it
comes to the interests of the claimants, concepts such as democracy, the right of self-
determination of nations, respect for the rights and intelligence of peoples, international law and
justice have no place or value. This is blatantly manifested in the way the elected Government of
the Palestinian people is treated as well as in the support extended to the Zionist regime. It does
not matter if people are murdered in Palestine, turned into refugees, captured, imprisoned or
besieged; that must not violate human rights.

- Nations are not equal in exercising their rights recognized by international law. Enjoying these
rights is dependent on the whim of certain major powers.

- Apparently the Security Council can only be used to ensure the security and the rights of some
big powers. But when the oppressed are decimated under bombardment, the Security Council
must remain aloof and not even call for a ceasefire. Is this not a tragedy of historic proportions for
the Security Council, which is charged with maintaining the security of countries?

- The prevailing order of contemporary global interactions is such that certain powers equate
themselves with the international community, and consider their decisions superseding that of
over 180 countries. They consider themselves the masters and rulers of the entire world and
other nations as only second class in the world order.

Excellencies,

The question needs to be asked: if the Governments of the United States or the United Kingdom
who are permanent members of the Security Council, commit aggression, occupation and
violation of international law, which of the organs of the UN can take them to account? Can a
Council in which they are privileged members address their violations? Has this ever happened?
In fact, we have repeatedly seen the reverse. If they have differences with a nation or state, they
drag it to the Security Council and as claimants, arrogate to themselves simultaneously the roles
of prosecutor, judge and executioner. Is this a just order? Can there be a more vivid case of
discrimination and more clear evidence of injustice?

Regrettably, the persistence of some hegemonic powers in imposing their exclusionist policies on
international decision making mechanisms, including the Security Council, has resulted in a
growing mistrust in global public opinion, undermining the credibility and effectiveness of this
most universal system of collective security.

Excellencies,

How long can such a situation last in the world? It is evident that the behavior of some powers
constitutes the greatest challenge before the Security Council, the entire organization and its
affiliated agencies.

The present structure and working methods of the Security Council, which are legacies of the
Second World War, are not responsive to the expectations of the current generation and the
contemporary needs of humanity.

Today, it is undeniable that the Security Council, most critically and urgently, needs legitimacy
and effectiveness. It must be acknowledged that as long as the Council is unable to act on behalf
of the entire international community in a transparent, just and democratic manner, it will neither
be legitimate nor effective. Furthermore, the direct relation between the abuse of veto and the
erosion of the legitimacy and effectiveness of the Council has now been clearly and undeniably
established. We cannot, and should not, expect the eradication, or even containment, of injustice,
imposition and oppression without reforming the structure and working methods of the Council.
Is it appropriate to expect this generation to submit to the decisions and arrangements
established over half a century ago? Doesn't this generation or future generations have the right
to decide themselves about the world in which they want to live?

Today, serious reform in the structure and working methods of the Security Council is, more than
ever before, necessary. Justice and democracy dictate that the role of the General Assembly, as
the highest organ of the United Nations, must be respected. The General Assembly can then,
through appropriate mechanisms, take on the task of reforming the Organization and particularly
rescue the Security Council from its current state. In the interim, the Non-Aligned Movement, the
Organization of the Islamic Conference and the African continent should each have a
representative as a permanent member of the Security Council, with veto privilege. The resulting
balance would hopefully prevent further trampling of the rights of nations.

Madame President,

Excellencies,

It is essential that spirituality and ethics find their rightful place in international relations. Without
ethics and spirituality, attained in light of the teachings of Divine prophets, justice, freedom and
human rights cannot be guaranteed.

Resolution of contemporary human crises lies in observing ethics and spirituality and the
governance of righteous people of high competence and piety.

Should respect for the rights of human beings become the predominant objective, then injustice,
ill-temperament, aggression and war will fade away.

Human beings are all God's creatures and are all endowed with dignity and respect.

No one has superiority over others. No individual or states can arrogate to themselves special
privileges, nor can they disregard the rights of others and, through influence and pressure,
position themselves as the "international community".

Citizens of Asia, Africa, Europe and America are all equal. Over 6 billion inhabitants of the earth
are all equal and worthy of respect. Justice and protection of human dignity are the two pillars in
maintaining sustainable peace, security and tranquility in the world.

It is for this reason that we state:

Sustainable peace and tranquility in the world can only be attained through justice, spirituality,
ethics, compassion and respect for human dignity.

All nations and states are entitled to peace, progress and security.

We are all members of the international community and we are all entitled to insist on the creation
of a climate of compassion, love and justice.

All members of the United Nations are affected by both the bitter and the sweet events and
developments in today's world.

We can adopt firm and logical decisions, thereby improving the prospects of a better life for
current and future generations.

Together, we can eradicate the roots of bitter maladies and afflictions, and instead, through the
promotion of universal and lasting values such as ethics, spirituality and justice, allow our nations
to taste the sweetness of a better future.

Peoples, driven by their divine nature, intrinsically seek Good, Virtue, Perfection and Beauty.
Relying on our peoples, we can take giant steps towards reform and pave the road for human
perfection. Whether we like it or not, justice, peace and virtue will sooner or later prevail in the
world with the will of Almighty God. It is imperative, and also desirable, that we too contribute to
the promotion of justice and virtue.

The Almighty and Merciful God, who is the Creator of the Universe, is also its Lord and Ruler.
Justice is His command. He commands His creatures to support one another in Good, virtue and
piety, and not in decadence and corruption.

He commands His creatures to enjoin one another to righteousness and virtue and not to sin and
transgression. All Divine prophets from the Prophet Adam (peace be upon him) to the Prophet
Moses (peace be upon him), to the Prophet Jesus Christ (peace be upon him), to the Prophet
Mohammad (peace be upon him), have all called humanity to monotheism, justice, brotherhood,
love and compassion. Is it not possible to build a better world based on monotheism, justice, love
and respect for the rights of human beings, and thereby transform animosities into friendship?

I emphatically declare that today's world, more than ever before, longs for just and righteous
people with love for all humanity; and above all longs for the perfect righteous human being and
the real savior who has been promised to all peoples and who will establish justice, peace and
brotherhood on the planet.

0, Almighty God, all men and women are Your creatures and You have ordained their guidance
and salvation. Bestow upon humanity that thirsts for justice, the perfect human being promised to
all by You, and make us among his followers and among those who strive for his return and his
cause.