ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-31 06-07-2018 1/4 EC PT

Original: English No.: ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18

Date: 5 July 2018

PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I

Before:
Judge Péter Kovács, Presiding Judge
Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut
Judge Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou

REQUEST UNDER REGULATION 46(3) OF THE REGULATIONS OF THE

COURT

PUBLIC
With Confidential Annexes I, II and III

Registry’s Report on the implementation of the Decision Inviting the Competent

Authorities of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar to Submit Observations
pursuant to Rule 103(1) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence on the
“Prosecution’s Request for a Ruling on Jurisdiction under Article 19(3) of the
Statute”

Source: The Registry

No. ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18 1/4 5 July 2018

 ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-31 06-07-2018 2/4 EC PT

Document to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the

Court to:

The Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for the Defense

Fatou Bensouda
James Stewart

Legal Representatives of the Victims Legal Representatives of the Applicants

Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants for

Participation/Reparation

The Office of Public Counsel for The Office of Public Counsel for the
Victims Defence

States’ Representatives Amicus Curiae

REGISTRY
Registrar Defence Support Section
Peter Lewis

Victims and Witnesses Unit Detention Section

Victims Participation and Reparations Other

Section

No. ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18 2/4 5 July 2018

 ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-31 06-07-2018 3/4 EC PT

I. Introduction

1. The Registry hereby submits to Pre-Trial Chamber I (“Chamber”) its

implementation report of the Chamber’s “Decision Inviting the Competent

Authorities of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar to Submit Observations

pursuant to Rule 103(1) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence on the

‘Prosecution’s Request for a Ruling on Jurisdiction under Article 19(3) of the

Statute’”(“Decision”).1

II. Classification

2. In accordance with regulation 23bis(1) of the Regulations of the Court (RoC),

the annexes to the present submission are classified as confidential as they

contain names and contact details of staff members of the Court.

III. Applicable Law

3. This submission is made on the basis of rule 13(1) of the Rules of Procedure

and Evidence.

IV. Submission

4. On 22 June 2018, the Registry transmitted via Note Verbale 2 the Decision and

the Request to the Embassy of the Republic of the Union Myanmar to the

Kingdom of Belgium. The Embassy of the Republic of the Union Myanmar to

the Kingdom of Belgium did not accept the delivery of said Note Verbale which

was returned to the Court.

1 ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-28
2 Annex 1.

No. ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18 3/4 5 July 2018

 ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-31 06-07-2018 4/4 EC PT

5. On 28 June 2018, the Registry transmitted via Note Verbale ,3 the Decision and

the Request to the Permanent Mission of the Republic of the Union of

Myanmar to the United Nations. On 2 July 2018, the Permanent Mission of the

Republic of the Union of Myanmar to the United Nations did not accept the

delivery of the Note Verbale.4

Marc Dubuisson, Director of the Division of Judicial Services

On behalf of
Peter Lewis, Registrar

Dated this 5 July 2018

At The Hague, the Netherlands

3 Annex 2.
4 Annex 3.

No. ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18 4/4 5 July 2018