Professional Documents
Culture Documents
:r _€€
.* {}-
H*
5*
ze
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR GOURT OF JUSTICE
Electronically issued
: 23-Apr-2018
D6fivr6 par voie 6lectronique
Barrie
E' E I UU E E II.
PATRICK BROWN
Plaintiff
-and-
CTV, a division of BELL MEDIA lNC., BELL MEDIA lNC., WENDY FREEMAN,
LISA LAFLAMME, GLEN McGREGOR, RACHEL AIELLO, JANE OR JOHN DOE
#1 (being the producers of the Defamatory Words), JANE OR JOHN DOE#2
(being the editors of the Defamatory Words), JANE OR JOHN DOE #3 (being the
researchers in respect of the Defamatory Words), JANE OR JOHN DOE#4
(being the fact checkers in respect of the Defamatory Words), CP24, a division of
BELL MEDIA lNC., and TRAVIS DHANRAJ
Defendants
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
TO THE DEFENDANTS
lF YOU WISH TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING, you or an Ontario lawyer acting for
you must prepare a statement of defence in Form 18A prescribed by the Rules of Civil
Procedure, serve it on the plaintiffs lawyer or, where the plaintiff does not have a lawyer,
serve it on the plaintiff, and file it, with proof of service in this court office, WITHIN
TWENTY DAYS after this statement of claim is served gn-you, if you are served in
Ontario. l
lf you are served in another province or territory of Canada or in the United States of
America, the period for serving and flling your statement of defence is forty days. lf you
are served outside Canada and the United States of America, the period is sixty days.
2
lnstead of serving and filing a statement of defence, you may serve and file a notice of
intent to defend in Form 188 prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure. This will entitle
you to ten more days within which to serve and file your statement of defence.
CLAIM
1. The plaintiff, Patrick Brown ("Mr. Brown") claims as against each defendant, jointly
and severally:
their possession and control all broadcasts and publications that allege, in their
natural and ordinary meaning or by innuendo, that Mr. Brown illegally provided an
underage high school girl with alcohol, or words of like or similar effect;
e) A permanent injunction,
i) Requiring the defendants to remove from all media in their possession and
control the Defamatory Words, defined herein, or words of like or similar effect;
and
way disseminating, in any manner whatsoever, the Defamatory Words, and the
h) Such further and other relief as counsel may advise and this Honourable Court
may permit.
The Plaintiff
2. Mr. Brown resides in the township of Oro Medonte. From the time that he was a
teenager volunteering with the local PC Riding Association and becoming National
President of the PC Youth Federation, to being elected to City Council in Barrie at the
age of 22, to being elected as a Member of Parliament ("MP") for Barrie in 2006, to
being re-elected as an MP in 2008 and in2011 (by over 21,000 votes), to winning the
and soon after being elected as a Member of Provincial Parliament ("MPP") for the
riding of Simcoe North, Mr. Brown has dedicated his life to politics and public service.
3 Prior to the broadcast and publication of the Defamatory Words, polls indicated that
under Mr. Brown's leadership, the ON PC Pafi was set to overtake the Wynne
Liberals. Members of the ON PC Party, under Mr. Brown's leadership, were winning
by-elections in expected seats by large margins and winning seats that had never
been held or had not been held for many years by the ON PC Party. According to the
defendant CTV, Mr. Brown was "an ascending star in the Canadian political universe"
who "now threatens to topple Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne and become Ontario's
next premier in the June provincial election." Mr. Brown was the presumptive next
Premier of Ontario.
6
4. Mr. Brown's "People's Guarantee" platform was well received by many, even praised
by the Toronto Star, a newspaper that has a history of endorsing left-leaning political
candidates and their parties during provincial and federal elections. Mr. Brown
Words delivered an almost immediate death blow to Mr. Brown's reputation and
political career:Within hours, Mr. Brown was forced to resign as Leader of the ON PC
6 Having been ejected from the Tory caucus, Mr. Brown currently sits as an Independent
7" With a provincial election only months away, the defendants'false, malicious, unfair
and irresponsible reporting has subverted the democratic process in Ontario and has
altered, for the foreseeable future, the political landscape and governance of Ontario.
The Defendants
8. The defendant Bell Media lnc. ("Bell Media") owns CTV and approximately 30 local
television stations. lt is Canada's largest radio broadcaster; operates more than 200
websites; and provides live and on-demand content to, among others, CTV News and
cP24.
7
9. Bell Media is owned by BCE Inc., Canada's largest communications company. Bell
Media broadly disseminated the Defamatory Words through its television and radio
broadcast stations and through its online content, including on CTV News and CP24
and other broadcasting stations and/or websites currently unknown to Mr. Brown.
10.The defendant CTV, a division of Bell Media, is Canada's #1 television network and
largest private broadcaster. CTV has a number of divisions, including CTV News,
which Bell Media claims is Canada's mostwatched news organization both locally and
nationally, and operates the websites wvrnrv.ctv.ca and www.ctvnews.ca, among others
national newscast and has an average audience of 1.1 million viewers on any given
weekday. CTV first broadcast the Defamatory Words on the January 24,2018 edition
of this newscast and continues to broadcast the Defamatory Words to the date of this
Claim on www.ctvnews.ca, CTV News' Facebook page, CTV News'and CTV National
News' Twitter pages, and other Bell Media websites unknown to Mr. Brown.
12.The defendant Wendy Freeman ("Freeman") is president of CTV News and has
13.The defendant Lisa LaFlamme ("LaFlamme") is the Chief News Anchor and Senior
Editor of CTV NationalNews with Lisa LaFlamme. LaFlamme played a key role in
the broadcast and publication of the Defamatory Words. LaFlamme did, or may have,
in whole or in part, initiate, investigate, fact-check, edit, produce, and/or co-author the
Defamatory Words. Further, LaFlamme did, or may have, in whole or in part, conduct
8
on-tape and other interviews of, among others, Accuser 1, defined herein, and
herein, was edited in a manner that conceals LaFlamme's role in any ontape or other
interviews with Accuser 1 and Accuser 2in an attempt to, among things, lead viewers
to believe that LaFlamme was more independent in relation to her reporting on Mr.
News. McGregor played a key role in the broadcast and publication of the Defamatory
Words. McGregor did, or may have, in whole or in part, also initiate, investigate, fact-
or may have, in whole or in part, conduct on-tape and other interviews of, among
others, Accuser 1 and Accuser 2. The January 24 Broadcast was edited in a manner
that suggests that only McGregor conducted on-tape interviews of Accuser 1 and
Accuser 2.
15. Rachel Aiello ("Aiello") is the Online Politics Producer of CTV News. Aiello played a
key role in the broadcast and publication of the Defamatory Words. Aiello did or may
have, in whole or in part, also initiate, investigate, fact-check, edit, produce, and/or co-
author the Defamatory Words. Further, Aiello did or may have, in whole or in part,
conduct ontape and other interviews of, among others, Accuser 1 and Accuser 2.
16.The defendant, CP24, a division of the defendant Bell Media, is a CTV News operation
providing a 24-hour local news channel based in Toronto. lt focuses on news from
the greater Toronto area and southern Ontario as well as national and international
news. CP24 employs the defendant Travis Dhanraj ("Dhanraj") and broadcast and
lT.Dhanraj is a reporter for CTV News Toronto. Dhanraj played a key role in the
broadcast and publication of the Defamatory Words. Dhanraj did or may have, in
whole or in part, also initiate, investigate, fact-check, edit, produce, and/or co-author
the Defamatory Words. Further, Dhanraj did or may have, in whole or in part, conduct
on-tape and other interviews of, among others, Accuser 1 and Accuser 2.
18. The defendant Jane or John Doe #1 played a key role in the broadcast and publication
of the Defamatory Words. He or she did, in whole or in part, produce the Defamatory
Words.
19. The defendant Jane or John Doe #2 played a key role in the broadcast and publication
of the Defamatory Words. He or she did, in whole or in part, edit the Defamatory
Words.
20. The defendant Jane or John Doe #3 played a key role in the broadcast and publication
of the Defamatory Words. He or she did, in whole or in part, research the Defamatory
Words.
10
21.The defendant Jane or John Doe #4 played a key role in the broadcast and publication
of the Defamatory Words. He or she did or may have, in whole or in part, fact-check
22.The defendants, alone and together, falsely, maliciously, unfairly and irresponsibly
23. The defendants, alone and together, intended and knew or ought to have known, that
the Defamatory Words would be broadly disseminated across Ontario and Canada
and throughout the world and would be repeated by other media organizations; which
they were.
24.The defendants, jointly and severally, falsely, maliciously, unfaidy and irresponsibly
broadcast and/or published the following newscasts, news articles, Tweets and
Facebook posts of and concerning Mr. Brown in Ontario and Canada and worldwide
on the Internet:
a) Tweet on CTV News Twitter account on January 24,2018, beginning with the text:
b) Tweet on CTV National News Twitter account on January 24,2018, beginning with
the text: 'EXCLUSIVE: Two women come forward with graphic sexual misconduct
text: "EXCLUSIVE: Two women come forward with graphic sexual misconduct
d) CP24 Facebook post on January 24,2018, beginning with the text: '#BREAKING
CTV News has learned that two women have come fonrvard with graphic sexual
e) Newscast on CTV National News with Lisa LaFlamme on January 24,2018 live at
1Opm on CTV News Channel, CTV News GO and ctvnews.ca with hourly repeats
until 2am the next day headlined as, among other things, 'CTV News Exclusive,
Disturbing allegations of sexual misconduct against the man who wants to be the
allegations against Patrick Brown" and "Women accuse Patrick Brown of sexual
"Patrick Brown denies sexual misconduct allegations from two women" (the
"January 24 Article");
t2
"Patrick Brown denies sexual misconduct allegations from two women, resigns as
i) Tweet on CTV National News Twitter account on January 25,2018, beginning with
the text: "EXCLUSIVE TONIGHT: Two more women in Patrick Brown's home
k) Tweet from CTV News Twitter account on February 13, 2018, reading: "Patrick
"Patrick Brown denies sexual misconduct allegations from two women, resigns as
Newscasts, articles, and social media posts broadcast and/or published on such
further dates and on such further times as Mr. Brown is currently unaware (collectively,
25.The Defamatory Words were and continue to be broadcast and/or published online at
on such further and other websites and social media accounts as Mr. Brown is
currently unaware.
26.The Defamatory Words in their natural and ordinary meaning and/or by inference or
innuendo are false, malicious and defamatory of Mr. Brown, were broadcast and
published maliciously, unfairly and irresponsibly, have subjected and will subject Mr.
Brown to ridicule, hatred and contempt and have caused and will continue to cause
damage to his reputation personally and in the way of his office, profession, trade and
calling.
27.Mr. Brown intends to rely on the entirety of the Defamatory Words, including all
accompanying headlines, display, graphics, audio, pictures, and text and the manner
writing the Defamatory Words in support of his Claim. He further intends to rely on all
28.In particular, Mr. Brown complains of the words set out below in respect of each
29.ln particular, in relation to the January 24 Social Media Posts, the January 24
Broadcast, the January 24 Article, the January 25 Dhanraj Tweet, the January 24
Article (Updated January 25), and the January 24 Article (Updated February 22), Mr.
EXCLUSIVE: Two women come forward with graphic sexual misconduct allegations
against Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader Patrick Brown. Allegations, which
Brown denies, date back to when he was a federal MP. Watch @glen_mcgregofs report
tonight. #cdnpoli #onpoli
EXCLUSIVE: Two women come forward with sexual misconduct allegations against
Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader Patrick Brown which he denies
#BREAKING: CTV News has learned that two women have come forward with graphic
sexual misconduct allegations against Brown
A CTV News exclusive - disturbing allegations of sexual misconduct against the man who
wants to be the next Premier of Ontario
Patrick Brown's accusers (hereinafter in the Claim referred to as "Accuser 1" and "Accuser
2" respectively
He continued fo kiss me and he laid me down on the bed and got on top of me
...in an exclusive report, two women have come forward, accusing the leader of Ontario's
Progressive Conservative Party, Patrick Brown, of sexual misconduct. Brown, a former
federal MP, is currently campaigning for the job of Ontario Premier
The women were both teenagers at the time of the alleged abuse. Neither wanted their
faces on camera.
Glen McGregor, has the details, and a warning that some of the language is very graphic.
15
Patrick Brown is a young conservative and an ascending star in the Canadian political
universe. But, tonight there are disturbing allegations against Brown by two women who
spoke to CTV News.
One, still in high school when she says Brown asked her for a sex act.
He pulled down his pants and said - I don't know if he said suck my dick or
put this in your mouth or something along those lines.
The high school student met him in a bar...when she was under Ontario's legal drinking
age. Brown, who she says wasn't drinking, invited them both back to his home. She was
drunk.
When we got to his room he kind of shut the door on me and stafted making
some moves. After about five or ten minutes. So, / kind of came to... I was
frantic, Iike, you need to let me out, |m leaving. lt was, like, a controlling thing.
Another woman came forward with a similar story about Brown... She was 1 8 and in first
year university...
And I laughed it off as, you know, an older man kind hitting on me a little bit.
At an after party in a local nightclub, the woman, then legal age, says Brown and others
provided her with a string of free drinks.
The woman says she was drunk by the time Brown - who again, wasn't drinking -invited
herand a malefriend of histo his bedroom...thefriend left, leaving herand Brown sitting
on the bed.
That scenario, Iike, of a very inebriated young employee in the bedroom of her boss,
alone with him, uh, who hasn't had a drop of alcohol all night...that's an intimidating
situation, and I was ah not sure what to do about it.
The nextthing I know, he's kissrng me, and sifting beside me kissing me...then I kind
of just froze up ...he continued fo klss me and he laid me down on the bed and got on
top of me...
I remember consciously trying to not move my mouth... I was just not moving... so /
was lying there immobile and he kept kissing me.
I could feel his erection on my legs, uh, when he was on top of me, so, lfelt that...it
would have gone to sexual intercourse if I had not done anything.
... he pressed her to join him as an assistant on his India trip, promising all expenses would
be paid, and he also gave her a raise.
...five key people resigned including Brown's Campaign Manager, Chief of Staff, Deputy
Campaign Manager and Press Secretary - All quit.
In a statement they said they learned of the allegations today and had urged Brown to
step down.
The women allege inappropriate behaviour by the rising political figure throughout his
tenure as an elected official
One was still in high schoolwhen she says Brown, a well-known Barrie politician, asked
her to perform oral sex on him.
Both incidents are alleged to have happened inside Brown's home... after the women had
been drinking in his presence.
The first incident occurred more than 10 years ago. The woman, a high school student in
Barrie at the time. said she and a mutualfriend met Brown at a bar.
Brown then invited them back to his home and provided them with alcohol, though the
woman was under the legal drinking age at the time.
She says she was drunk when Brown invited her for a tour of his home. When the pair
entered the bedroom, Brown closed the door and exposed his penis to her.
"He pulled down his panfs sard, and I don't know if he said'suck my dick'or'put this in
your mouth,' but something along those lines," she said.
The woman alleges that he then asked her to perform oral sex, which she did for a short
time before stopping.
"lt was like a controlling thing... like ljust remember lwanted to go, but that wasn't
happening."
Brown gave the woman his phone number and the names of Barrie bars that he'd be at
that night...even though she was 18 at the time-below Ontario's legal drinking age.
I7
The woman says she was extremely drunk when Brown invited her and a male friend of
his to Brown's bedroom...
Brown's friend then left, leaving her and Brown to sit alone on the bed.
"The next thing I know he's kissing me. Sitting besrde me, kissing me and then I was, I
kind of just froze up. He continued fo kiss me and he laid me down on the bed and got on
top of me. I remember consciously trying not to move my mouth and I was just not moving,
so / was laying there immobile and he kept krssrng me," she said.
"l felt it was sexual. I could feel his erection on my legs when he was on top of me so I felt
that it would have gone to sexual intercourse if I had not done anythingl," she said. "/ would
characterize that as a sexualassau/f."
"That scenario, like of a very inebriated young employee in the bedroom of her boss, a/one
with him, who hasn't had a drop of alcohol all night,Tusf fhafb an intimidating situation and
I was not sure what to do about it'
In relation to the January 24 Article (Updated January 25), Mr. Brown complains of the
words repeated from the January 24 Article particularized above and the additional
following words:
Patrick Brown has resigned as Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader after serious
allegations of sexual misconduct from two women
A separate statement from Ontario PC deputy leaders Sylvia Jones and Steve Clark... said
they unanimously agree Brown couldn't continue serving as the party's leader.
After becoming aware of the allegations late Wednesday, a number of Brown's closest
advisors resigned.
Campaign Manager Andrew Boddington, Chief of Staff Alykhan Velshi, and Deputy
Campaign Manager Dan Robertson released a joint statement saying "earlier today, all
three of us became aware of allegations about Patrick Brown. After speaking with him,
our advice was that he should resign as Ontario PC Party leader. He did not accept that
advice."
As well, Ontario PC press secretary Nick Bergamini, staffer Ken Bossenkool and deputy
campaign manager Joshua Workman all tweeted their resignations.
Brown, a well-reported teetotaller, was not drinking alcohol at the time of the alleged
incidents
Mr. Brown complains of the words set out above from the January 24 Article and the
January 24 Article (Updated January 25)which were republished in the January 24 Article
30. Mr. Brown states that, in relation to the January 24 Social Media Posts, the January
24 Broadcast, the January 24 Article, the January 25 Dhanraj Tweet, the January 24
Article (Updated January 25), and the January 24 Article (Updated February 22), the
words complained of, alone and/or cumulatively, in their natural and ordinary meaning,
and by innuendo, meant and were understood to mean one or more of the following:
an underage high school girl with alcohol and then sexually assaulted her,
c) As a result of the conduct described in (a) and (b) above, Mr. Brown is a sexual
predator;
d) In respect of the reports of Accuser 1 and Accuser 2, the allegations against him,
31.In particular, in relation to the January 25 CTV Tweet, Mr. Brown complains of the
following words:
EXCLUSIVE TONIGHT: Two more women in Patrick Brown's home riding of Barrie go on
the record about his alleged behaviour. Plus reaction from his two accusers on his
resignation as Ontario PC Leader. Watch @glen_mcgregor's report tonight. #cdnpoli
#onpoli".
32. Mr. Brown states that, in relation to the January 25 Tweet, the words complained of,
in their natural and ordinary meaning and by innuendo, meant and were understood
to mean that:
a) Two more women reporting that he had sexually assaulted them have come
fonrvard:
b) The reports of the two additional women corroborate the truth that he sexually
assaulted Accuser 1 and Accuser 2:
20
c) As a result of the accounts of the now four women, he is a serial sexual predator;
33. In particular, in relation to the February 13 Tweet and February 13 Article, Mr. Brown
The two women who accused former Progressive Conservative leader Patrick Brown of
sexual misconduct are not backing down despite a concerted effort to refute their
allegations and discredit them publicly...
"l stand absolutely by the truth of what lsard fo CTV..." said the woman who accused
Brown of dropping his pants and telling her to perform oral sex in his home about 10 years
ago...
"The comments that I have been subjected to ignore altogether the abuse of power by an
older sober man over a young intoxicated woman," she said.
She now says that she was of legal drinking age and out of high school. Brown was a
Conservative member of Parliament at the time of the alleged incident.
The first accuser maintains the incident happened during a visit to Brown's home with a
mutualfriend.
So I kind of came to, frantic, like 'you need to let me out, l'm leaving,"'the first accuser
said.
In that same home, a second allegation, from a former employee of Brown's who was 19
and in first-year university. She alleged the then-35-year-old MP got on top of her and tried
to kiss her when she was very drunk.
"l continue to stand by the detailed account of these events that I have previously provided
to CTV." the second accuser said
2l
CTV News asked Brown today if he thinks the two women accusing him of sexual
misconduct are lying. He has not responded.
"These are the softs of collateral details that inevitably fade over time."
34. Mr. Brown states that, in relation to the February 13 Tweet and the February 13 Article,
the words complained of, in their natural and ordinary meaning and by innuendo,
teenaged female employee with alcohol and then sexually assaulted her;
c) As a result of the conduct described in (a) and (b) above, he is a sexual predator;
d) ln respect of the reports of Accuser 1 and Accuser 2, the allegations against him,
35. Mr. Brown states that the Defamatory Words, cumulatively, in their natural and
ordinary meaning, and by innuendo, meant and were understood to mean that:
d) In respect of the reports of Accuser 1 and Accuser 2, the allegations against him,
36.The defendants published the Defamatory Words, and the innuendo arising from
them, unfairly, irresponsibly and with express malice, intending or knowing that the
Defamatory Words and the innuendo arising from them were false and defamatory or
with reckless disregard as to whether they were true or false and in utter disregard of
37. Further, the defendants broadcast and published the Defamatory Words intending or
knowing that the Defamatory Words, and the innuendo arising from them, would be
23
defendants are jointly and severally liable for all such rebroadcast and republication.
38.In aggravation of the damages caused, the defendants have persisted in repeating
and asserting the truth of the Defamatory Words and the innuendo arising from them
applications owned and operated by Bell Media to the date of this Claim.
39.ln two further broadcasts on January 25,2018 and February 13,2018, the defendants,
in addition to repeating and re-asserting the truth of the Defamatory Words and the
Early this morning it was PC leader in Ontario, Patrick Brown, a move that followed damning
details on this broadcast of alleged sexual misconduct with teenaged girls.
[Prime Minister Trudeau]: My thoughts turn immediately to the women who came fotward,
knowing how difficult rt rs, ft can be ... uh ... to salute them for their courage and their
leadership.
Patrick Brown publicly denied those allegations last night. And shortly after that statement,
almost every top member of Brown's staff stepped down.
The party he led said it could no longer follow him after hearing accusations from those two
women about incidents that took place - again - when they were teenagers.
The allegations pile up in front of Patrick Brown's office, the Ontario legislature...
24
Brown resigned less than 4 hours later, after a conference call with fellow PC MPPs, who all
agreed he had to leave because of sexual misconduct allegations from two young women,
raised in an exclusive CTV News report - allegations he denies.
In the city Brown represents, the claims were not a complete shock.
...someone that was running for MP would be paftying with, like, basically underage girls.
I was still in high school. No, l'm not going with this. So, / was like I really want to go. I want
out of this room. I want to go home.
When I was lying there motionless, my mind was reeling with all of the ways that um if I
rejected him, all of the ways that he could ruin my reputation or hold this over me in some
way.
[Kathleen Wynne]: I would say to those young women that they were very brave and I want
to, I acknowledge that, um, that it was very courageous for them to step forward.
So, we didn't show their faces but they are not anonymous to us, after extensive fact-checking.
February 13,2018 GTV National News with Lisa LaFlamme Broadcast (the "February 13
Broadcast")
CTV News has learned the online abuse has only intensified since Brown put together another
team including private eyes and PR experts to find dirt on his accusers.
[McGregor quoting Brown] "lt was she who tried to kiss me, while the woman I was seeing
was in another room", Brown said. "l stopped immediately and offered to drive her home,
which I did."
40. McGregor intentionally misquoted Mr. Brown in the February 13, 2018 Broadcast,
omitting the word "her" when quoting Mr. Brown's Facebook statement, which reads:
41 . The defendants knew or ought to have known that the flood of stories from competing
media and others, many of which remain available online and which repeat the
allegations of illegal and criminal conduct was a predictable result of the defendants
25
putting forth a sensational news report about the person expected to become Ontario's
next Premier.
42.The defendants further knew or ought to have known that their broadcast and
publication of the Defamatory Words on the Internet facilitated and encouraged the
43.As a result of the broadcast and publication of the Defamatory Words, and all
repetitions, republication and broadcast of them, and the malicious, unfair and
irresponsible conduct of the defendants, Mr. Brown has been injured in his feelings,
in his personal and professional character and reputation, and in his office, profession,
trade or calling.
44.Mr. Brown also did and continues to suffer from stress, anxiety, hurt, humiliation and
45.The swift demolition of his personal and professional reputation on national television
left Mr. Brown in a complete state of shock and disbelief. Mr. Brown did not want to
46.Shunned in the political community, Mr. Brown was abandoned by his Campaign
team, forced to resign as Leader of the ON PC Party, ejected from the Tory caucus,
47.As a result of the foregoing, Mr. Brown has suffered and will continue to suffer
damages for which the defendants are jointly and severally liable.
48. Until the defendants destroyed his personal and professional reputation and
demolished his political career, Mr. Brown was expected to become the next Premier
of Ontario.
articles, Tweets and Facebook Posts just over 4 months in advance of the Ontario
Provincial election, knowing or having ought to have known or expecting that it would
bring about Mr. Brown's resignation in disgrace and change the course of the political
landscape in Ontario. As such, the defendants knew or ought to have known that the
50. The devastating impact of the Defamatory Words, and the innuendo arising from them
was heightened by the way in which the defendants edited the January 24 Broadcast
and subsequent broadcasts: The defendants showed Accuser 1's and Accuser 2's
faces in shadow, warned viewers of graphic content, and in respect of Accuser 2, cut
to McGregor as interviewer, nodding and with a serious expression on his face, all of
51 . CTV News, as Canada's most watched news organization, had an enormous capacity
52.Given the seriousness of the allegations against Mr. Brown, including allegations of
illegal and criminal conduct, the defendants had an obligation and a duty, which they
Accuser 1 and Accuser 2, in order to verify the truth, and ensure balance and fairness
in their reporting.
53.The defendants further had an obligation and a duty, which they failed to fulfill, to
report information in their knowledge, or which they could reasonably ascertain, which
was inconsistent with the accounts of Accuser 1 and Accuser 2, and to provide Mr.
54.While the defendants produced and prepared the January 24 Broadcast and January
24 Article, likely weeks or months in advance, the defendants ambushed Mr. Brown
by email mere hours before the scheduled January 24 Broadcast, requesting a last-
minute on-camera interview (the "Ambush Email"). The defendants placed Mr. Brown
55.1n fact, by way of example, Mr. Brown, with the benefit of a reasonable period of time
to respond, would have been able to advise the defendants that the day after the
alleged event Accuser 2 was smiling and giggly as she told a co-worker friend that
she had kissed Mr. Brown and that she was adamant that nothing else happened.
28
56. By failing to inform CTV National News' approximately 1.1 million viewers of the unfair
last-minute notice given to Mr. Brown and by referencing Mr. Brown's blanket denial
in the January 24 Broadcast, the defendants created the impression that the
Defamatory Words and the innuendo arising from them are true and that Mr. Brown
was, in fact, given a reasonable opportunity to respond, but was unwilling or unable
to.
57. Further, in the Ambush Email, McGregor misled Mr. Brown, claiming that the first
incident involved an underage high school girl wfio was then attending Innisdale
Secondary School in Barrie. The defendants now admit that this was untrue.
McGregor further failed to provide Mr. Brown with Accuser 1's name or the day, month
and year in which the alleged incident occurred. The false and vague statements
contained in the Ambush Email guaranteed that Mr. Brown would be unable to
58. The defendants maliciously, unfairly and irresponsibly proceeded with the January 24
Broadcast and the January 24 Article, intending to deny Mr. Brown a reasonable
opportunity to respond, and knowing they had failed to provide Mr. Brown with a
59.lt is clear from the below timeline, that CTV had determined to run the January 24
Broadcast regardless of any response from Mr. Brown and the attempt to obtain a
response from Mr. Brown was transparent lip service only to the obligation of
responsibility and good faith.
29
60.At about 4.24pm, McGregor sent the Ambush Email to Mr. Brown's Communications
Advisor with a note addressed to Alykhan Velshi ("Velshi"), Mr. Brown's then Chief of
"l am a reporterwith CTV National News in Ottawa. We are looking into allegations
against you of sexual misconduct, made by two women. We would like to arrange
61.At about 4:58 pm, Velshi advised McGregor by email that he had not yet reached Mr.
Brown and requested to know when CTV planned to "run the story".
62.4t about 4:59pm, McGregor responded "We are planning to run a story tonight,
63.4t about 8:14pm, counselto Mr. Brown advised McGregor by emailthat, among other
things, Mr. Brown denied the false and defamatory allegations and putting McGregor
on notice that that the last-minute request for an on-camera interview hours before
64.Sometime before its 1Opm broadcast, CTV National News published a sensational
"teaser" tweet: "EXCLUSIVE: Two women come forward with graphic sexual
65.At about 9.45pm, Mr. Brown, after being ambushed by the defendants and aware that
CTV National News intended to broadcast their story at 10pm, speaks at a news
conference, denying the defamatory allegations set out in the Ambush Email.
30
66.At about 9:55pm, Velshi, Chief of Staff, Andrew Boddington, Campaign Manager, and
Dan Robertson, Deputy Campaign Manager resigned via Twitter after becoming
67.At 1Opm, CTV commenced the January 24 Broadcast and published the January 24
Article.
68. Soon after or during the January 24 Broadcast, Nick Bergamini, ON PC Party Press
Secretary and Joshua Workman, Deputy Campaign Manager, resigned via Twitter
69.At about 1:30am on January 25,2018, only hours after the broadcast and publication
70.In their publication of the Defamatory Words, the defendants gave the appearance of
Mr. Brown. ln fact, the defendants crafted a distorted and false narrative, omitting
facts counter to the narrative and failing to verify the accuracy of others that would
a) Prior to the January 24,2018 broadcast and publication of the Defamatory Words,
failed to fact check whether Accuser 1 was an underage girl attending high school
at the time of the reported incident. On February 13, 2018 at 11pm, after Mr.
31
Brown's reputation was demolished, the defendants admitted that Accuser 1 was
b) Prior to the January 24,2018 broadcast and publication of the Defamatory Words,
failed to contact and seek corroboration of Accuser 1's account from the "mutual
friend" who the defendants reported drove Accuser 1 to Mr. Brown's house.
Rather:
ii) On February 13, 2018, the mutual friend indicated to McGregor that he never
iii) The defendants later published the February 13 Article, intentionally misstating
the mutual friend's account and/or failing to include the full account provided by
him, all of which maliciously, unfairly and irresponsibly perpetuated the false
iv) Further, after McGregor asked the mutual friend whether he knew Jordana
Springgay, the mutual friend told McGregor that Accuser 1 and Ms. Springgay,
who works at CTV News Vancouver, were friends in high school. The
defendants knew, or in the alternative, had failed to determine and report this
c) The defendants failed to include accounts from witnesses who denied and/or did
not corroborate Accuser 2's account of the alleged incident or who would have
32
things:
i) Failed to include the account of the unnamed "male friend" who was reported
January 24 Article, the male friend made it clear to McGregor that it was not
reported.
ii) Failed to include witness accounts that did not corroborate the narrative that
iii) Failed to report the account of a former female staff member of Mr. Brown's
who provided information to McGregor that did not support the defendants'
false narrative.
d) Failed to report in the January 24Broadcast and January 24 Article, among others,
that Accuser 2 appeared to have remained an open supporter of Mr. Brown in the
e) By intentionally misquoting Mr. Brown during the February 13, 2018 Broadcast,
unfairly cast Mr. Brown in the worst possible light to further the defendants' false
narrative.
JJ
71.The defendants' desire for a "BREAKING" and "EXCLUSIVE' scoop does not excuse
their malicious, unfair and irresponsible reporting of the Defamatory Words. There
was no urgency in broadcasting and publishing the Defamatory Words on January 24,
2018 that would justify failing to fully investigate and verify the facts as reported. The
defendants knew or ought to have known that their investigation fell short of the
standards expected from Canada's #1 television network and knew or ought to have
known that to proceed with the January 24, 2018 broadcast and publication of the
72.ln their broadcasts and publications of the Defamatory Words, the defendants failed
to disclose the personal relationships between various CTV News personnel and
a) Aiello and Accuser 2 were co-workers at The HillTimes, a politics and government
newsweekly based in Ottawa; co-authored one or more Hill Times articles; and
appeared in one or more pictures together at Hill Times events beside each other
b) A CTV News Vancouver producer and Accuser 1 are friends from high school.
73.The existence of the relationships and the defendants' failure to disclose them,
demonstrate the malice and lack of fairness and independence related to their
reporting.
34
74. Disclosure of the relationships would have significantly altered the way in which the
Defamatory Words were perceived by the public and other media reporting on them.
75.In an effort to mitigate the damages caused to him by the Defamatory Words, Mr.
Brown delivered a Notice of Libelto the defendants on February 23,2018. Mr. Brown
expressly notified the defendants that the Defamatory Words and the innuendo arising
from them, were false and defamatory, and sought the immediate broadcast and
publication of a full apology and retraction. At no time have the defendants formally
corrected, retracted or apologized for their false, malicious and defamatory reporting
and the damage to Mr. Brown that arose from it. Rather, the defendants continue to
strenuously defend their reporting and reaffirm the truth of the Defamatory Words and
76.Twenty days after the airing of the January 24 Broadcast and the publication of the
January 24 Article, it became public that Accuser 1 was not underage and was not in
high school at the relevant time, contrary to what was repeatedly reported by the
defendants. Rather than apologize to Mr. Brown for their egregious error, the
77. Further, the defendants continue to broadcast and/or publish online that Mr. Brown
illegally provided alcohol to an underage high school girl, knowing that it is false.
35
damages to reflect the exceptional harm done to Mr. Brown and to ensure that the
defendants are appropriately punished for their conduct and that they and others are
April 23,2018
JULIAN PORTER, Q.C.
Suite 1600, 1 First Canadian Place
100 King Street West
Toronto, Ontario MsX 1G5
LSO No. 10104E
Tel: 416-8624297
Fax: 416-862-7661
Email : julian. porter@ulianporterqc.com
=d xtD
v
o
z=
g)
:f,
o-
go
o{
rh
{
o5
a
J
q,
_g
J-
6
a
5- ryil'' 5f JE= Tn'{ 6"'agb o0
oz
asi --J =d-- *s: odo=F
o= qO=
€o dxt d.x- cO
-F
6 z=4:F F -tl
o;;d frd -dHf, Edd
q'-- FF,=d2 f!
a^ g=4 -?gFE fu, rD
; gesH H=
E='"^('' *,= 6- ]TI
3=;d qiP : 9c ZF
t D5
tH esni
eqq n?=tF=
v,
{ [il
iF
9=
]Tl
g
3
+ #=
ilE ^:a
Err
* d
n
="9
e 0r\
c Fqgh
i d!',
{
1TI
5 89
F
z
I
Eg
55
6b
ETEEE
3
g tr iq
8q- =
rn
z{
o d E*
P
o
FT
33 a 5 # '11
fi od P
z fi
o L.
H
o
r
.TI
i-,
Pr C-
o
3
= xg
no
m]Tl