Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experiment Number : 14
To use cyclic voltammetry for determination the E° and n values of the [Fe(CN)6]3-
/[Fe(CN)6]4- couple.
To study the effect of changing in the sweep rate, concentration of electroactive
species, supporting electrolyte, electrode material and irreversibility are evaluated.
Theory :
This triangular potential excitation signal sweeps the potential of the electrode between
two values. The excitation signal in above figure causes the potential to first scan negatively
from 0.8V- 0.2V vs SCE at which point the scan direction is reversed, causing a positive scan
back to the original potential of 0.8V. The scan rate, as reflected by the slope, is 50mV/s. A
second cycle is indicated by the dashed line. Modern instrumentation enables switching
potentials and scan rates to be easily varied.
The important parameters of a cyclic voltammogram are the magnitudes of the anodic peak
current (ipa), cathodic peak current (ipc) , anodic peak potential (Epa) and cathodic peak
potential (Epc). These parameters are labelled in above figure. One method for measuring ip
involves extrapolation of a base-linecurrent as shown in the figure. The establishment of a
correct base line is essential for the accurate measurement of peak currents. This is not
always easy, particularly for more complicated systems.
A redox couple in which both species rapidly exchange electrons with the working electrode
is termed an electrochemically reversible couple. The formal reduction potential for a
reversible couple is centered between Epa and Epc :
Epa +Epc
𝐸° =
2
The number (n) of electrons transferred in the electrode reaction for a reversible couple can
be determined from the separation between the peak potentials:
∆E=Epa-Epc=0.059/n
The peak current for a reversible system is described by the equation for the forward
sweep of the first cycle
Where ;
ipa
=1
ipc
However, the ratio can be significantly influenced by chemical reaction coupled to the
electrode process.
Pre Lab Questions :
Convection – Occurs when we technically mix the solution. The most common form of
convection is stirring the solution.
2) Diffusion
3) To avoid migration we can use a supporting electrolyte ant by avoiding stirring we can
get rid of convection.
O2 + e → O2-
1 2-
O + e → O2-
2
Solution of 100 mmol dm-3 of potassium ferricyanide was prepared in 0.1 mol dm-3
potassium nitrate stock solution. Similarly, a solution of 4 mmol dm-3K3[Fe (CN)6] was
prepared in 0.1 mol dm-3Na2SO4. From the prepared K3[Fe(CN)6] solution which was diluted
by KNO3, series of solutions was prepared in to 100 mL volumetric flasks and making up to
the mark by adding KNO3.
The cell was filled with the respective solutions and the electrodes were fixed in such a way
that their tips were immersed. Before fixing the electrodes, they were washed with
deionized water. The glassy carbon was first polished using alumina on a micro cloth pad
and then rinsed with deionized water.
The parameters were set and the CVs were obtained for each of the solution of the series.
A study of the effect of scan rate CV measurements was done by varying the scan rate for
the 4 mM solution of K3[Fe(CN)6] In KNO3. Next a study of the effect of the supporting
electrolyte on CV measurements was done by recording the voltammogram of the 4
mmoldm-3 K3[Fe (CN)6] prepared in 0.1 moldm-3 Na2SO4.
Results:
Cyclic voltammograms for concentration series of K3[Fe(CN)6] with KNO3 as a supportive
electrolyte.
Cyclic voltammograms for different scan rates of 4 mM of Fe3+
Calculation :
Preparation of solutions.
10.11g of KNO3 was dissolved in a 1 L volumetric flask and top up with deionized water.
3.29 g of K3[Fe(CN)6] was dissolved in a 100 ml volumetric flask and top up with
prepared KNO3 solution.
= 1.42 g
1.42 g of Na2SO4 was dissolved in a 100 ml volumetric flask and top up with deionized
water.
= 0.13 g
0.13 g of K3[Fe(CN)6] was dissolved in a 100 ml volumetric flask and top up with
prepared Na2SO4 solution.
2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0 and 10.0 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] solution series were prepared by taking 2.0, 4.0,
6.0, 8.0 and 10.0 mL of K3[Fe(CN)6] and top up the 100 mL volumetric flask by KNO3.
Epc = 0.1700 V
Epa = 0.2546 V
Epa +Epc
E0 = 2
0.2546 V +0.1700 V
= 2
= 0.2123V
0.059
∆E = Epa - Epc = = 0.2546V −0.1700V = 0.0846V
n
0.059
0.0846 V = n
n =0.7
Calculation of ipc and ipa for the various scan rates
20
0 Ʋ1/2
ipc /ipa
-40
-60
y = -145.88x - 7.03
R² = 0.9678
-80
Determination of unknown concentration
ipc vs [Fe(CN)6]-3
50
40
30
ipc/µA
20 y = 4.5384x + 0.4644
R² = 0.9856
10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
[Fe(CN)6]-3/moldm-3
ipa vs [Fe(CN)6]-3
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
-10
-20
-30
ipa/µA
y = -6.036x - 2.8397
-40 R² = 0.9914
-50
-60
-70
[Fe(CN)6]-3/moldm-3
5. There is no current flow through working electrode and reference electrode. So there
won’t be an IR drop. Using the auxiliary electrode enable to measure the current.
Discussion :
In electrochemical experiments, the reactions of interest occur at the surface of the working
electrode. Therefore we are interested in controlling the potential drop across the interface
between the surface of the working electrode and the solution.
In this experiment first we should deoxygenate the cell before doing the experiment. But if
the reduction potential of the compound is away from the oxygen reduction no need of
deoxygenate the cell.