You are on page 1of 5

Effect of Bacterial Polysaccharide

Production on Formation Damage


R.E. Lappan and H.S. Fogler, SPE, U. of Michigan

Summary. In-situ growth of cellular material is known to cause formation damage. Bacterial reproduction and polysaccharide pro-
duction are the key factors that segregate bacterial formation damage from fines and particulate damage. Carefully controlled experi-
ments conducted on both high- and low-permeability ceramic cores showed that bacteria can plug the pore space and damage the cores.
However, further experimentation demonstrated that polysaccharide production is largely responsible for this damage. This conclusion
is based on a comparison of two experimental systems: core plugging from bacterial replication and polymeric production and plugging
of the porous medium caused solely by cell division with no polysaccharide production. In light of these results, the interpretation of
reservoir plugging resulting from the presence of bacteria requires further scrutiny.

Introduction
Bacterial growth and transport in reservoirs can greatly influence bly binds the cell to the surface, but the production of a secondary
EOR.I,2 Bacteria can enhance recovery by producing gases (C0 2 acidic polysaccharide that firmly attaches the cell. The primary poly-
and H 2) that increase the well's internal pressure and decrease the saccharide helps in the initial adhesion of the cell by mediating a
viscosity of the crude oil (below bubblepoint). 3 In addition, in-situ favorable contact between the cell and the surface. The secondary
cellular biosurfactant production has been shown to be a viable tech- polysaccharide, a more fibrous reticular (net-like/tangled) substance,
nique to enhance oil yields by decreasing the interfacial tension interconnects between and around adjacent bacteria or between bac-
between the oil and the water, thus allowing better crude emulsifi- teria and the surface to attach the cell irreversibly. Fowler et at.
cation. 3 ,4 These two phenomena are but a few of the possible bac- demonstrated this phenomenon by subjecting cells (attached to glass
terialhydrocarbon interactions that can influence oil recovery. These and stainless steel surfaces) to various shear stresses in a radial flow
phenomena have been given the collective name of microbial EOR chamber. 8 It was found that the shear stress required to suspend
(MEOR), a tertiary oil recovery technique. the sessile (attached) bacteria increases with the contact time given
The plugging of a water-swept zone by the injection and cultiva- to the cells for the adhesion.
tion of bacteria, in situ, has also been proposed 5 as an economi-
cal technique for flow diversion. This technique would be initiated Bacterial Injection and In-Situ Growth. Earlier microbial trans-
with the injection of bacteria, suspended in a nutrient-rich medi- port experiments used dead bacteria for core-injection studies. Typi.-
um, into the reservoir. Next, the well would be shut in to provide cally, common bacteria, such as Bacillus subtilis, were grown, killed
sufficient time for microbial growth, hence plugging the high- by sterilization, and then injected into a Berea sandstone core. 13
permeability thief zones. Then water injection would be resumed Results from the injection of dead bacteria into the sandstone core
and the plugged zone would divert the injection water into unswept indicated that bacteria would enter the porous medium and be trans-
zones. ported until they were sieved by a pore of smaller dimensions or
captured according to deep-bed filtration mechanisms. 14 Sieving
Rationale. Before any MEOR technique, such as in-situ surfac- is the dominant capture mechanism that occurs within the inlet sec-
tant and gas production or flow diversion, can be realized, a basic tion of the core during the initial stages of bacterial injection. Dur-
understanding of how bacteria are transported through porous me- ing injection of the dead bacteria, blocking the larger pores takes
dia and how their retention affects the permeability of the media longer than blocking the smaller pores because the bacteria must
is needed. Bacterial transport through and retention by porous me- first agglomerate. 13 This plugging sequence produces the reverse-
dia differ from particle transport because cells increase in number S-shaped curve when the permeability ratio, k/ko (where ko = initial
and can produce polysaccharides, which affect their ability to ad- permeability of the core before cell injection), is plotted as a func-
here to surfaces. 6-9 tion of time (or PV's injected) on the abscissa (Fig. 1). In addi-
Bacterial adhesion experiments with inert nonporous surfaces tion, the injection of dead bacteria into Berea sandstone exhibited
demonstrated the importance of polysaccharide production.~-9 the development of an external filter cake at the injection face of
These studies, however, considered only the effect of polysaccha- the porous medium. IS
rides on cell adhesion to inert nonporous surfaces and did not con- The injection of live bacteria into core samples also produces the
sider the effects of in-situ growth. Consequently, there is a lack typical reverse-S-shaped permeability reduction curve. 16 Closer
of information on the effects of polysaccharides on cell transport examination of these injected core samples with a scanning elec-
and retention in porous media. This study, which is part of a series tron microscope (SEM) have shown that the pores were plugged
of experiments demonstrating bacterial cell transport and retention by bacteria coated with exocellular polysaccharide. Cores injected
in porous media, was conducted to determine the effects of poly- with dead cells, when examined by SEM techniques, did not dem-
saccharide production on reservoir plugging. onstrate this phenomenon. In addition to these observations, the
development of an external filter cake was noted during the injec-
tion of live cells. 16
Background
Once the bacteria enter the reservoir, they may grow in situ. This
Bacterial Adhesion. It has been proposed that bacterial adhesion growth is dependent on the availability of nutrients within the reser-
is a two-step process. 1O,1l The first step is the reversible adsorp- voir. In secondary oil recovery, where large volumes of water are
tion of bacteria to the surface. This initial contact of the cell with injected into the reservoir, accelerated indigenous bacterial growth
the surface is dependent on the colloidal, hydrodynamic, and iner- can be supported by the nutrients in the injection water, thus caus-
tial forces. 12 Once the cell is adsorbed on the surface, the second ing near-wellbore plugging. Bright-field microscopic examination
step begins with the polysaccharide production, leading to the ir- of test cores flooded with samples of reservoir injection water (water
reversible binding of the cell to the surface. Fletcher et at.7 ob- known to contain bacteria and growth nutrients) indicated that the
served the irreversible binding phenomenon in experiments on the pores at the injection face of the cores become plugged owing to
adhesion of marine bacteria to filters. They discovered that it is the capture, followed by the growth, of planktonic cells in the in-
not the cell's primary acidic polysaccharide coating that irreversi- jection water. 17 Accompanying the cells were large amounts of
cellular polysaccharide. For MEOR, nutrients are injected into the
Copyright 1992 Society of Petroleum Engineers formation, typically preceding bacterial cell injection, to induce in-
SPE Production Engineering, May 1992 167
0.10 1.0"",
( max. _erlllol..)

c
.2
0.08
I
I, \ Low
U 0.08
~ r \ "'rmaablllly
eore
I!
, ..
High
I \ .........bUIly
~ "" 0.04 eore
0.02 ...
0.00
10 20
-------
30 40 50 60
Pore size (J.lm)
o
Time or pore volume
Fig. 2-Pore-slze distribution for low- and high-permeability
cores (distributions based on log-normal and normal proba-
Fig. 1-Reverse-S-shaped permeability reduction curve ob- bility cumulative curve fits of mercury poroslmetry data, re-
served during live and dead bacterial InJection. spectively).

situ cell growth and bioproduct production. Cellular growth means physical characteristics of Leuconostoc mesenteroides. In short, one
increased biomass production and thus reduced reservoir injectivi- may consider these bacteria to be self-replicating, polymer-
ty. Hence, the development of an injection strategy that allows cel- producing colloidal particles, typically I I'm in size.
lular growth within a formation and minimizes formation damage
may make MEOR processes technically feasible. Media Selection. The core-plugging experiments started with the
The use of bacteria for the plugging of water-swept zones by in- injection of the model bacteria into a well-characterized porous
situ growth has one foreseeable drawback, namely the problem of medium. Consolidated porous ceramic cores were selected as an
cell growth in the near-wellbore region. It is desired that the bac- ideal medium for this study because they exclude such artifacts as
teria grow exclusively in the water-swept zone and not in the near- fines migration, have a uniform surface chemistry composition, and
wellbore region. One proposed technique is the limitation of the have a specific and uniform pore-size distribution. Table 2 lists
cell's ability to produce polysaccharides. IS Cells can be manipu- the chemical and physical characteristics of the ceramic cores.
lated so that their ability to produce polysaccharide could be in- Uniformity in chemical composition, and hence surface chemis-
duced or hampered by controlling the type and amount of nutrient try, is important in the initial phase of the experiment. Deep-bed
feed supplied to them. Hence, a potential cell injection procedure filtration theory predicts that the capture of submicron particles (0.1
for treating a water-swept zone would be to inject the bacteria un- to 1 I'm) is primarily the result of the colloidal forces that exist
der restricted polysaccharide-producing conditions and then to in- between a particle (the bacterial cell) and the surface of the porous
troduce a feed that would induce cellular polysaccharide production media; 20 Hence, for the sake of comparison between polymer-
in the high-permeability zone. Although the idea of controlling bac- producing and non-polymer-producing experiments, the injection
terial growth in situ holds promise, previous experiments did not and eventual capture of the bacteria must be consistent between core
differentiate between the plugging of the core samples by polysac- samples for proper interpretation of results.
charide production or by cell growth. Hence, there is a need to A specific pore-size distribution was selected as an important
determine the relative effects of both cellular growth and polysac- criterion because such effects as bacteria straining on the initial in-
charide production on reservoir plugging. jection of bacteria should be minimal. Bacteria straining is a unique
retention phenomenon, and its occurrence would make it difficult
Methodology to interpret the results from experiments designed to demonstrate
To determine whether cellular polysaccharide production or cell polysaccharide plugging. Also, the initial bacteria injection must
production is the dominant plugging mechanism, a series of ex- not cause serious damage to the medium. Therefore, the porous
periments using a model bacteria for injection and in-situ growth medium must have a mean pore diameter that is greater than the
in a well-characterized porous medium was conducted. size of the bacteria. For this study, ceramic cores with two pore-
size distributions were selected. Fig. 2 presents the results obtained
Bacterial Selection. For this study, the genus Leuconostoc mesen- from mercury porosimetry determination of the pore-size distribu-
teroides was selected as the model bacteria because it has the unique
ability to produce dextran, a water-insoluble polysaccharide, when TABLE 2-PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
it is fed sucrose. When this bacterium is limited to a glucose/fructose OF THE CERAMIC CORE
feed, however, no dextran is produced, so cellular polysaccharide
production can be controlled. This controlled production enables Percentage
the formulation of experiments that demonstrate the effects of in- Mineral (wt%)
situ polysaccharide production on the permeability of porous me- AI 2 0 3 50
dia by conducting parallel plugging experiments where polymer pro- Si0 2 37
duction is promoted or repressed. Table 1 lists some of the relevant CaO 7.7
MgO 3.8
TI0 2, Fe203' K 20. Na20 <1% each
TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF THE PHYSIOLOGICAL
CHARACTERISTICS OF -LEUCONOSTOC MESENTEROIDES 19 High Low
Permeability Permeability
Mesophilic Porosity 0.555 0.536
Cocci 0.5 to 1.2 I'm in size Permeability. darcies 14.7 0.098
Aerotolerant Mean pore size, I'm 33.2* 3.27**
Anaerobic Standard deviation 12.1 0.94
Agglomerate Group(s) of 1, 2. or 4
Dextran production When fed sucrose 'Based on normal distribution.
No dextran production When fed fructose or glucose "Based on log·normal distribution.

168 SPE Production Engineering, May 1992


TABLE 3-GROWTH MEDIUM
to p ........ glUgH
Water, mL 900 and data Icqutaltlon
Tryptone, 9 20
Yeast extract, 9 5
NaCI, 9 4
Sodium acetate, 9 1.5
Ascorbic acid, 9 0.5
Trace elements Ca, Mn, Fe, Mg
Carbohydrate solution·
Distilled water, mL 100
Sucrose, 9 15.0
Or a combination of
fructose, 9 7.9
and glucose, 9 7.9
Yeast extract (and tryptone)are
supplied to the cells as the sources of amino acids,
purines, pyrimidines. and vitamins, which are needed by the cells for growth
because Leuconostoc cells cannot synthesize these compoun~s for themselves.
Fig. 3-Hassler™ cell used for bacterial transport experi-
'The carbohydrate solution is mixed with the other ingredients after autoclaving. ments.

tion, while Table 2 presents the calculated means and standard devi- minimal effects on the response rate of the pressure transducers.
ations. Note that both cores have a mean pore size that is larger Initially, the apparatus was sterilized by ethanol (200 proof) rins-
than the size of a Leuconostoc mesenteroides cell. For the high- ing or autoclaving.
permeability core, it is desirable for the bacteria to be distributed
evenly throughout the core. The low-permeability core was select- Results
ed to emulate a tYPical reservoir permeability that would allow cell Figs. 4 and 5 show the results of the plugging of the porous media
transport 21 rather than having an even distribution of bacteria
for both high- and low-permeability core samples. The permeabil-
axially.
ity reduction calculated from the data is plotted as a function of
time. The results from the high-permeability core experiments have
Experimental Procedures. The plugging experiments consisted of
been replicated on three separate occasions. As Fig. 4 illustrates,
two phases: the initial injection of bacteria into the porous medium
the injection of the bacteria (inoculum) into the high-permeability
followed by the injection of a nutrient feed into the medium to pro-
cores did not affect the damage or plug the porous media. The lower-
mote cell and (depending on the type of saccharide added) poly-
permeability coreS, however, did show a two-thirds reduction in
mer production. These experiments were conducted on both the
permeability when the inoculum was injected. Fig. 5 shows the
high- and low-permeability cores.
The inoculum cells were grown in a glucose/fructose feed solu- reduction in permeability of the low-permeability cores at the start
tion as a batch culture for an 18- to 24-hour period and reached of the feeding when k/k o '"" 0.3 to 0.4.
a cell density of about 10 9 cells/mL, as measured by plate counts. Figs. 4 and 5 also illustrate the effects of injecting the cores with
Table 3 lists the constituents supplied in the glucose/fructose medi- the feed solutions. The permeabilities of the sucrose-fed cores were
um. This culture, cell and spent-medium solution, was then inject- reduced more drastically than those of cores fed glucose/fructose.
ed into the core samples (2.54 em diameter by 5 cm in length) at These results show that polysaccharide production causes increased
a constant flow rate of 5 mLimin, which translates to an injection core plugging, if cell growth rates for sucrose-fed cells are of the
superficial velocity of 0.987 cm/min. After the inoculation of the same magnitude as the rates when the cells are supplied glu-
core, a glucose/fructose feed was injected into the core at a rate cose/fructose feed. A kinetic study proved this to be true. That is,
of 0.1 mLimin (1.18 cm/h). The pressure drop across the core was the doubling times for the bacteria under the different feeds are
then monitored for the remainder of the experiment. This experi- approximately equal. Virtually equal growth rates were expected
ment was then repeated, except sucrose feed was used instead of because the nutrient feeds were stoichiometrically equal; i.e., for
the glucose/fructose feed (see Table 3). every mole of sucrose in the polysaccharide-promoting feed, there
Fig. 3 shows the apparatus used in this study. This equipment is a mole of glucose and a mole of fructose in the non-polymer-
includes the self-contained piston container, nutrient prefIlter, and promoting feed. (Note that sucrose is a disaccharide composed of
pressure transducer fIlters. These pressure transducer fIlters main- two monosaccharides, glucose and fructose, joined by a glycosid-
tain the system in an aseptic condition and were found to have ic bond.)

0.1

0 0.1 • Glucose-Fructose 0
~

~ • Sucrose 0.01
i2
0.01
0.001

••
0.001 Glucose-Fructose
Sucrose
0.0001 0.0001
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Time (hr) Time (hr)

Fig. 4-Permeablllty reduction caused by dextran synthesis Fig. 5-Permeablllty reduction caused by dextran synthesis
In high-permeability (14.7-darcy) core. in low-permeability (98-md) core.

SPE Production Engineering, May 1992 169


1.0
500 Glucose-Fructose Sucrose • Sucrose
Feed Feed .. Glucose-Fructose
400 0.9
:i _t:
!3OO - - Inlet Pre.....
_ .. ,30m
-0
c5i 0.8

.~200
! 100
.... Pre..... 3.8 om QI-=
>t:
i~
- t : 0.7
Ql
~
Et:O
O
0
0.6

0 20 40 60 60 100 120 140


0.5
Time (hr) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
0
Dimensionless Length
Fig. 6-lnlet and Interstitial pressure results during glu-
cose/fructose feeding followed by sucrose feeding (at a flow Fig. 7-Axlal cell concentration (relative to the Inlet cell con-
rate of 0.1 mUmln). centration of the polysaccharide-plugged core).

It may also be debated that the cells injected into the high- plugging results, it is now known that the use of any MEOR tech-
permeability cores and then fed glucose/fructose did not plug the nique in a low-permeability reservoir will always exhibit forma-
porous media because they were washed out of the core. An addi- tion damage because of the combined effect of cell growth and
tional experiment was then conducted to demonstrate that the cells polymer production. Hence, the development of an MEOR tech-
were present in the cores and could cause damage when provided nique for a low-permeability reservoir must promote the produc-
a sucrose feed. This core-plugging experiment was conducted with tion of biogases and biosurfactant, which are the desired bacterial
a high-permeability (5-darcy) core injected with an inoculum and products, and retard the generation of large quantities of cells and
then fed a glucose/fructose solution under the same conditions stated polysaccharides. For high-permeability reservoirs, the restrictions
above. Then after 56 hours, the feed was switched from a glu- are a little more lenient. Cells would be allowed to replicate dur-
cose/fructose feed to a sucrose solution, thus producing the results ing synthesis of the biogases and biosurfactant, but again polysac-
given in Fig. 6. In this plot the inlet, 1.3-cm, and 3.8-cm axial charide production would have to be eliminated or minimized to
pressures (distances measured from inlet) are shown as a function prevent damage to the reservoirs.
of time instead of the overall permeability reduction of the core. In addition, the staining results also have dramatic consequences
The resulting pressure increases provided by the graph clearly dem- regarding the application of any MEOR process. The adaptation
onstrate that cells are retained by the porous media and that they of an MEOR process, which would require the maintenance of cells
can plug the media when provided sucrose. In addition, Fig. 6 il- at the oil/water interface to maximize oil recovery, would have to
lustrates an increase in the 13-cm pressure tap reading after 110 control or eliminate the cell's ability to produce polysaccharides
hours of feeding (54 hours of sucrose injection). This increase in because the biopolymer radically hinders the cell's transportabili-
pressure means that the cells are not just plugging the inlet face of the ty. Whether this control can be accomplished by preventing the
core but are penetrating well within the core and causing damage. generation of polysaccharides or the degradation of polysaccharide
After completion of these experiments, the cores were halved depends on the bacterial strain selected for MEOR.
axially and dyed with crystal violet. Crystal violet is a stain that These core plugging results can also be used to further our under-
specifically dyes gram-positive bacteria. The intensity of the color standing of formation damage caused by biomass production (cell
produced from the staining is proportional to the cell concentra- and polysaccharide production). As Geesey et al. 17 stated, flood-
tion in the local region. Hence, this staining procedure gives the ing water will typically contain nutrients that can support both cell
concentration gradient of the bacteria throughout the length of the growth and polysaccharide production by cells either suspended in
core. Fig. 7 shows the relative axial cell concentration measured
the injection water or indigenous to the reservoir. Hence, the re-
by crystal violet stain for the high-permeability core. The relative
sults of plugging experiments suggest that nutrients leading to poly-
cell concentration is based on the concentration of cells (or intensi-
saccharide production should be eliminated or limited as a minimal
ty of violet color) divided by the concentration of cells at the inlet
control of formation damage. In addition, for low-permeability
of the sucrose-fed core. As depicted in Fig. 7, the cells in the glu-
reservoirs, stringent water quality control would be needed to pre-
cose/fructose-fed cores are relatively evenly distributed through-
vent both polysaccharide production and cell growth.
out the core compared with the sucrose-fed core, which exhibited
a large cell concentration gradient. A third core was also injected
Conclusions
with cells but was not supplied a feed. The core was cut and stained
to determine the cell deposition pattern within the high-permeability The results of the cell-growth experiments show that cellular poly-
cores. The staining of this unfed core demonstrated a linearly dis- saccharide production is a significant factor in formation damage
tributed low concentration of cells through the core, indicating a by bacteria. Such damage was pronounced for the high-permeability
lack of cell-transport hindrance by the high-permeability porous cores, where damage to the cores occurred only as a result of poly-
medium. The results obtained from these three core stainings sug- saccharide production. In contrast, the low-permeability cores dem-
gest that the polysaccharide-producing cells grew at the injection onstrated damage from both polysaccharide and cell production.
face, where nutrient availability is high, and were retained there. Nonetheless, for the low-permeability cores, the permeability reduc-
The non-polysaccharide-producing cells were not retained as easi- tion with polysaccharide production was more than 10 times great-
ly by the porous medium' and thus were able to be transported within er than that without polysaccharide production. The results from
the core, reducing the magnitude of the gradient. the core staining also suggest that the transport of cells through
The staining of the low-permeability cores did not show such a porous media is highly dependent on the cell's ability to produce
drastic cell gradient. This may be explained by the fact that mech- polysaccharides.
anisms other than cell retention caused by polysaccharide produc-
tion are significant in this core. Acknowledgment
We gratefully acknowledge the Industrial AffIliates Program at the
Discussion U. of Michigan for providing financial support for this work. The
The core-plugging results have significant ramifications regarding Industrial Affiliates Program consists of Chevron Oil Field Research
the implementation of any MEOR processes. From these core- Co.; Conoco Inc., Halliburton Services, Japan Nat!. Oil Corp.,

170 SPE Production Engineering, May 1992


Marathon Oil Co., Mobil R&D Corp., Phillips Petroleum Co., Tex-
Authors
aco Inc., and Unocal Corp. In addition, author Lappan thanks his
colleagues at the U. of Michigan for their support. Raymond E. Lap-
pan Is a PhD-
References degree candidate
1. Carlson, V., Bennett, E.O., and Rowe, J.A.: "Microbial Flora in a at the U. of Michi-
Number of Oilfield Water-Injection Systems," SPEl (June 1961) 71- gan In Ann Arbor.
80; Trans., AIME, 222. He holds BS and
2. Kalish, P.J. et al.: "The Effect of Bacteria on Sandstone Penneabil- MS degrees In
ity," SPEl (July 1964) 805-14; Trans., AIME, 231. chemical engineer-
3. Grola, M.M. and Russell, H.H.: "Isolation and Screening of Anaero- Ing from the U. of
bic Clostridia for Characteristics Useful in Enhanced Oil Recovery," Windsor, Canada.
Contract No. DOE/BC/108ll-I, U.S. DOE (Oct. 1985). H. Scott Fogler,
4. Bryant, R.S. and Burchfield, T.E.: "Evaluation of Microbial Systems Lappan FoglerVennema Profes-
in Porous Media for EOR," SPERE (May 1988) 489-95. sor of Chemical En-
5. Costerton, J.W., Cusack, F., and MacLeod, F.A.: "Microbial Proc- gineering at the U. of Michigan, has research Interests In flow
ess for Selectively Plugging a Subterranean Fonnation," U.S. Patent
and reaction In porous media, colloid stability, waste-water
No. 4,800,959 (Jan. 31, 1989).
treatment, and dissolution kinetics In microelectronics fabri-
6. Sutherland, I.W.: Microbial Adhesion to Surfaces, R.C.W. Berkeley
cation. In 1980, Fogler was the first reCipient of the newly
Instituted award for Outstanding Research from the U. of
et al. (eds.), Ellis Horwood Ltd., West Sussex, England (1980) 329-38.
Michigan College of Engineering. He also received In 1980
7. Fletcher, M. etal.: Microbial Adhesion to Surfaces, R.C.W. Berkeley
the Chemical Engineer of the Year Award from the Detroit Sec-
et al. (eds.), Ellis Horwood Ltd., West Sussex, England (1980) 67-78.
tion of the American Inst. of Chemical Engineers. Fogler has
8. Fowler, H.W. and McKay, A.J.: Microbial Adhesion to Surfaces,
been a consultant for Chevron 011 Field Research Co. for 25
R.C.W. Berkeley etal. (eds.), Ellis Horwood Ltd., West Sussex, Eng-
years.
land (1980) 143-62.
9. Allison, D.G. and Sutherland, I.W.: "The Role of Exopolysaccharides
in Adhesion of Freshwater Bacteria," J. Gen. Micro. (May 1987) 133, 18. Jack, T.R., Thompson, B.G., and DiBiasio, E.: "The Potential for
1319-27. Use of Microbes in the Production of Heavy Oil," Proc., 1982 Inti.
10. Marshall, K.C., Stout, R., and Mitchell, R.: "Mechanism of the Ini- Conference on Microbial Enhancement of Oil Recovery, Afton, OH,
tial Events in the Sorption of Marine Bacteria to Surfaces," J. Gen. May 16-21.
Micro. (Nov. 1971) 68, 337. 19. Buchanan, R.E. and Gibbons, N.E.: Bergey's Manual of Determina-
11. Fletcher, M. and Floodgate, G.D.: "An Electron-Microscopic Demon- tive Bacteriology, eighth edition, The William & Wilkins Co., Balti-
stration of an Acid Polysaccharide Involved in the Adhesion of a Ma- more, MD (1984) 490-513.
rine Bacterium to Solid Surface," J. Gen. Micro. (Feb. 1973) 74, 20. Herzig, J.P., Leclerc, D.M., and Le Goff, P.: "Flow of Suspensions
325-34. Through Porous Media-Application to Deep Filtration," Ind. & Eng.
12. Norde, W. and Lyklema, J.: "Protein Adsorption and Bacterial Adhe- Chern. (1970) 62, 8-35.
sion to Solid Surfaces: A Colloid-Chemical Approach," Col. & Sci. 21. Jenneman, G.E., McInerney, M.J., and Knapp, R.M.: "Microbial
(1989) 38, 1-13. Penetration Through Nutrient-Saturated Berea Sandstone," Applied &
13. Hart, R.T., Fekete, T., and Flock, D.L.: "The Plugging Effect of Bac- Env. Microbiology (Aug. 1985) 383-91.
teria in Sandstone Systems," The Cdn. Mining & Metallurgical Bulle-
SI Metric Conversion Factors
tin (July 1960) 495-501.
14. Tien, C., and Payatakes, A.C.: "Advances in Deep Bed Filtration" in. X 2.54* E+OO cm
AIChE J. (Sept. 1979) 737-59. psi x 6.894757 E+OO kPa
15. Kalish, P.J. et al.: "The Effect of Bacteria on Sandstone Penneabil- darcy X 9.869233 E-Ol J.'m2
ity," JPT (July 1964) 805-14; Trans., AlME, 231. Ibm x 4.535924 E-Ol kg
16. Shaw, J.C. et al. "Bacterial Fouling in a Model Core System," Ap-
plied & Env. Microbiology (March 1985) 49, 693-701. 'Conversion factor is exact. SPEPE
17. Geesey, G.G., Mittleman, M.W., and Lieu, V.T.: "Evaluation of Slime- Original SPE manuscript received for review Feb. 22. 1990. Revised manuscript received
Dec. 18. 1991. Paper accepted for publication Jan. 28. 1992. Paper (SPE 19418) first
Producing Bacteria in Oil Field Core Flood Experiments, " Applied & ~~~~~~ted at the 1990 SPE Formation Damage Control Symposium held in Lafayette. Feb.
Env. Microbiology (Feb. 1987) 278-83.

SPE Production Engineering, May 1992 171

You might also like