Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BRSM
Systems:QMS ISO 9001 (2008)‐FSMS ISO 22000 (2005)
Assessment Report/Checklist
Form 009
CLIENT‐ORGANIZATION (NAME):
Aras Taban Co
PHYSICAL LOCATION(s):
Amol Ind. Zone, Amol, Iran
Stage II Audit Date(s):
26 & 27 May 2016
Stage I Audit Date(s):
3,4 May 2016
NAICS (or NACE) CODE
10.91‐D1
EXCLUSIONS: 7‐3/7‐5‐2/7‐5‐4(for ISO 9001:2008)
Assessment objectives: Verifying the company’s scope and
documentation for the requested regulators and
ISO 22000:2005 & ISO 9001:2008 requirements
to protect consumers and communities
ASSESSMENT TEAM INFORMATION
Assessment Team Leader, ATL Vahid Salahi
Assessor 2 Nahid Zandi
Note: Adjusting the language within this form to the type of activity and nature of the organization is acceptable.
REFERENCE, AS
This Clause
APPLICABLE1
Has been
Reference Clause Observations Verified,
please Tick
mark √
We pursuit to assure that client‐organization adheres to the protection of communities and consumers. This is to
1 follow the intent to the substitution of the word “identify” to the word “determine” as part of the importance to the
processes being capable of achieving desired outputs (including consumer’s well‐being).
2 Scope of activities Production of Di calcium phosphate (DCP)
Codex:
ISIRI 2513
Legal status
Industrial and Mines regulations:
3 Other: Iran FDA
Obligatory applicable standard which Iran FDA Regulations
organization has to follow ISIRI 2513
This Clause
APPLICABLE1
Has been
9001 22000 Observations Verified,
AS
CLAUSES CLAUSES Reference Clause please Tick
mark √
FORM‐009_V4_QMS MDD Issued: July 9, 2003 Revised: March 2013 Page 2 of 10
REFERENCE, AS
This Clause
APPLICABLE1
Has been
Reference Clause Observations Verified,
please Tick
mark √
FORM‐009_V4_QMS MDD Issued: July 9, 2003 Revised: March 2013 Page 3 of 10
REFERENCE, AS
This Clause
APPLICABLE1
Has been
Reference Clause Observations Verified,
please Tick
mark √
Company plans for production with stock inventory and at least there should
be three MT in stock.
FORM‐009_V4_QMS MDD Issued: July 9, 2003 Revised: March 2013 Page 4 of 10
REFERENCE, AS
This Clause
APPLICABLE1
Has been
Reference Clause Observations Verified,
please Tick
mark √
FORM‐009_V4_QMS MDD Issued: July 9, 2003 Revised: March 2013 Page 5 of 10
REFERENCE, AS
This Clause
APPLICABLE1
Has been
Reference Clause Observations Verified,
please Tick
mark √
withdrawals Non-conforming products and all semi products are labeled according to
identification procedure
Production of 500 kg has start on 94/02/20.(09 April 2016) Bach No of
this is DC-A1-950220. According to procedure this semi product is
traceable.
For final product with Bach No DC-A1-950220 ,the Traceability were
checked. For example for this batch test control of Preparation of
Hydrochloric Acid (3 + 1) was observed.
They have plan in event of withdraw, until now there was not need to
withdraw products
PH meter and scale precision 0001/0 g of Laboratory calibration
certification were checked.
Hydrometer -where in manufacturing saloon- has been identified with
Control of monitoring and code 834 and calibration certificate CDR-92834 has been observed.
7.6 8.3 A
measuring devices
Calibration list of measuring device has been observed.
Measurement, analysis
8 and improvement
Validation, verification and
8.1 8
improvement of the food A
8.2 safety management
system
Internal audit planning for this year observed. Interval for internal audit are
once a year. The internal audit has held on 94.12.02 .(March 2015)
checklist of internal audit were observed. Evidences have recorded
8.4.1 completely.
8.2.2 Internal audit A
one nonconformity For ISO 9001 nonconformities Such as Correctives
action was not Considered, refer to 8.5.1 9001
Monitoring possibility
System
failure possibility
Severity of failer
Deployment to reduce
Resonance effect
RPN
Action
FORM‐009_V4_QMS MDD Issued: July 9, 2003 Revised: March 2013 Page 6 of 10
REFERENCE, AS
This Clause
APPLICABLE1
Has been
Reference Clause Observations Verified,
please Tick
mark √
Part 3
Monitoring Action
Verification
Validation method Acceptance criteria retention Responsible Documentation
method
External Analysis In accordance COA 3 month Mr Jalal Test report
Monitoring and According to the data analysis procedure monitoring processes were
measurement of processes observed. Organization collect, identify and analyze appropriate data to
8.2.3 Evaluation of individual demonstrate efficiency.
N/A verification results If score of customer satisfaction below than 75 or every item be zero A
8.4 corrective action must be done. Score of customer satisfaction for was 80.
Analysis of data
Acceptable Deviation of production is 2%,the result is 1.6%
final inspection form from the national standard (ISIRI 2513) has been
done on 11 Jan 2016,
Characters ---
Chloride ≤ 0.02%
Monitoring and Sulphates ---
measurement of product Iron ---
8.2.4 8.4.2 System for the monitoring of Arsenic ≤ 0.003% A
critical control points Pb 0.011%≤
Hg 0.00002%≤
Cd 0.005%≤
Flouride 0.3%≤
Assay Not less than 54% of P2O5
FORM‐009_V4_QMS MDD Issued: July 9, 2003 Revised: March 2013 Page 7 of 10
REFERENCE, AS
This Clause
APPLICABLE1
Has been
Reference Clause Observations Verified,
please Tick
mark √
Form FR.41.02/02 A
Physical chemical Microbiological
FORM‐009_V4_QMS MDD Issued: July 9, 2003 Revised: March 2013 Page 8 of 10
REFERENCE, AS
This Clause
APPLICABLE1
Has been
Reference Clause Observations Verified,
please Tick
mark √
FORM‐009_V4_QMS MDD Issued: July 9, 2003 Revised: March 2013 Page 9 of 10
REFERENCE, AS
This Clause
APPLICABLE1
Has been
Reference Clause Observations Verified,
please Tick
mark √
By exception, we indicate the specific Strengths and weakness of the organization in light of the management system, as we perceive and seen through
processes in reference to requirements of the criteria being ascribed as these apply and relate to the assessment plan and planning of the assessment.
This aspect relates to Accreditation Body as it does to the protection of consumers in the client-organization’s role within their respective supply – chain.
Disclaimers: (1) herein, we reiterate that any suggestion or opinion that the assessment team expresses does not construe to be a contractual
requirement. (2) The degree of certainty in conclusions increases by the competence of the assessment team as well as the attestation within the
assessment protocol, values, mission and vision under which we operate for the protection of consumers, still remains a certain level of uncertainty.
Strength Weakness
Marketing and sales Distance between lab and manufacturing site
Laboratory Equipment ‐
Traceability ‐
action Request Type I Form-008 – as we indicate and that each of the RA addresses the basic four (4) questions
as seen in Form-008:N/A
action Request Type II Form-008 – as we indicate and that each of the AR addresses the basic four (4) questions
as seen in Form-008:
END of REPORT
FORM‐009_V4_QMS MDD Issued: July 9, 2003 Revised: March 2013 Page 10 of 10