Professional Documents
Culture Documents
David Crohn
University of California, Riverside
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
SALTS
Salts are a huge concern in semi-arid and arid soils
Salts accumulate from irrigation water
Salts concentrate due to evapotranspiration (ET)
Not a concern where
precipitation significantly
exceeds evapotranspiration
SALTS
Mostly Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+ and Cl-
Decrease yields by upsetting osmotic balance in the roots zone
If sodium dominates, soil structure is lost so that water and air cannot penetrate
Not a concern where
precipitation significantly
exceeds evapotranspiration
SALT MEASUREMENT
Salts in water improve it ability to transmit electricity
Salinity is measured indirectly
Water is added and extracted from soils
Its electrical conductivity is then measured
< 4 dS/m is desirable, but it depends on the plant
How much water is added affects results
EC2
EC5
ECe
SALTS AND COMPOST
Growers in California and similar environments worry about salts in compost.
Compost numbers are often high
4 – 6 dS/m for greenwaste compost
Manure, biosolids composts MUCH higher (10, 15, higher)
BUT nutrients are salts!!!
And much of the salinity measured is
due to these nutrients
Also some compost salts are
organic and will decompose
Compost salts are diluted in soils
THE QUESTION
Tomato 3.5 5
Blueberry 3 5
3 SOILS
Organic
Soil ECe Matter
Textures Sand (%) Clay (%) (dS/m) pH (%)
Sandy
Loam 60 12 1.0 7.9 0.75
Silt Loam 26 17 2.2 7.1 0.69
Clay
Loam 21 38 4.1 8.2 0.92
9 COMMERCIAL COMPOST BLENDS
Treatment Constituents
T1 steer manure and wood fines
T2 steer manure and wood fines
T3 wood fines, biosolids, and digested steer
manure.
T4 chicken manure and wood fines.
T5 steer manure and wood fines
T6 wood fines, biosolids, and digested steer
manure.
T7 wood fines and digested steer manure.
T8 rice hulls, biosolids, wood fines, chicken manure.
T9 ground wood fines, peat moss, worm castings, fir
bark
COMPOST PROPERTIES
0
Control T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9
Treatments
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT COMPOSTS ON DRY
MATTER YIELD OF TOMATO AT TWO
SALINITY LEVELS
12
ECe = 3.5 dS/m
ECe = 5.0 dS/m
10
Shoot Dry Weight (g)
0
Control T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9
Treatments
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT COMPOSTS ON DRY
MATTER YIELD OF BLUEBERRY AT TWO
SALINITY LEVELS
10
ECe = 3.0 dS/m
ECe = 5.0 dS/m
8
Shoot Dry Weight (g)
0
Control T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9
Treatments
COMPOST NUTRIENTS, SALTS, AND
AGINDEX
T1 124.4 17.6 31.7 803.9 13.1 12.3 136.8 216.5 525.8 1.6
T2 76.3 30.9 6.8 650.4 11.5 8.5 134.5 172.6 141.9 2.9
T3 459.2 7.7 3.4 283.1 86.7 34.5 725.0 124.6 208.5 2.4
T4 166.2 20.2 35.6 533.7 17.6 5.8 146.7 120.2 105.5 4.0
T5 137.7 2.7 2.8 668.4 34.5 25.9 213.5 186.9 84.8 3.6
T6 355.6 2.8 2.5 95.3 39.2 17.1 189.5 42.8 133.4 2.7
T7 247.1 7.7 1.9 131.7 49.4 20.1 199.4 48.5 281.6 1.3
T8 183.2 3.4 0.4 97.7 163.5 28.8 248.7 29.6 116.9 2.1
T9 61.7 11.3 1.5 303.9 44.1 11.4 133.2 111.8 82.7 2.3
Soil 6.0 15.4 65.3 40.3 107.9 71.2 106.3 16.4 67.8 -
OBSERVATIONS:
In all cases we saw reduced growth as soil-compost mix ECe values increased from 10
to 25% salt damage levels (p<0.0001)
In all cases compost use improved growth above the fertilized controls (p<0.0001)
Could not predict growth 10 to 25% damage level differences from measured
compost nutrients or salts using regression
AgIndex was significant (p<0.05) suggesting that this ratio is meaningful
𝑁 + 𝑃2 𝑂5 + 𝐾2 𝑂
𝐴𝑔𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑥 =
𝑁𝑎+ + 𝐶𝑙 −
PREDICTING THE ECE OF COMPOST AMENDED
SOILS
Soil salinity is measured using ECe
Compost salinity is measured using EC5
These are NOT comparable because the amount of water in saturated paste varies
from soil to soil
EC5 > Ece
Also adding compost changes the amount of water in the saturated paste of the soil
compost mix
Have developed a method, based on published regression data, to predict this.
PREDICTING THE ECE OF COMPOST AMENDED
SOILS
Estimation of Initial
Compost-Soil Mixture Salinity levels
Compost Properties Soil Properties
Compost Application Rate (tons/acre): 8 Soil Texture Class:
Compost Salinity (EC 5, dS/m): 5.6 Soil Salinity (EC e, dS/m): 2
Compost Moisture Content (% wet wt.): 35% Soil Incorporation Depth (inches): 6
Compost Organic Matter (% dry wt.): 50% Soil Organic Matter (% dry wt.): 1.0%
Control
Cumulative Na+ Leached (meq)
50 soil
Gypsum
50% rate
40
BSC:
biosolids compost
30 BSCG:
biosolids compost
Control + gypsum
20 Gypsum
GWC:
BC
BCG greenwaste compost
10
BSC GWCG:
BSCG
greenwaste compost
GWC
GWCG + gypsum
0 BC:
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 biochar
BCG:
Cumulative Time (min)
biochar + gypsum
Salinity: Ece improved everywhere
30
Initial Post Leaching
a a
a a a
25 a a a U: unsterilized
S: sterilized
Soil ECe (dS m-1)
20
SC:
soil alone (control)
15 WBC:
woodchip biochar
BSC:
10 biosolids compost
GWC :
a a
5 b b b b greenwaste compost
b b
0
USC UWBC UBSC UGWC SC SWBC SBSC SGWC
Texture: Wet aggregate stability was greatest
in the (unsterilized) composts.
60
Initial c c c
After Incubation c
Post leaching
50
Wet Aggregate Stability (%)
b b U: unsterilized
b
b S: sterilized
40 a a SC:
a a a a soil alone (control)
a a a a a a a a a
a
30 WBC:
woodchip biochar
BSC:
20 biosolids compost
GWC :
greenwaste compost
10
0
USC UWBC UBSC UGWC SC SWBC SBSC SGWC
CEC: Most improved in the composts.
34 Initial
Post Leaching
32 U: unsterilized
b b b S: sterilized
CEC (meq/100g)
30 b SC:
soil alone (control)
28 WBC:
woodchip biochar
a BSC:
26 a a a
a a a a biosolids compost
a a a a
24 GWC :
greenwaste compost
22
20
USC UWBC UBSC UGWC SC SWBC SBSC SGWC
A FURTHER BENEFIT OF COMPOST: LIFE
50
U: unsterilized
S: sterilized
40
SC:
soil alone (control)
30 WBC:
woodchip biochar
USC
SC BSC:
20 UBC biosolids compost
SBC GWC :
UBSC
10 greenwaste compost
SBSC
UGWC
SGWC
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700