Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Adolfo, Lisandro
Baltazar, Risha Kay Vocis
Pascasio, Ma. Veah Luisa
I. INTRODUCTION
II. ARGUMENTS
A.
Fourth, is that the said accused does not appear to be the most
guilty. The law only requires that the defendant whose exclusion is
requested does not appear to be the guiltiest, not necessarily that he
is the least guilty;
Lastly, that the said accused has not at any time been convicted
of any offense involving moral turpitude. Moral turpitude is defined
as anything done contrary to justice, honesty, principle or good
morals. In this requirement prior conviction is necessary, so if the
witness being discharged was merely accused of a crime involving
moral turpitude or has been acquitted of the same, he is still eligible
for discharge. The discharge of an accused operates as acquittal and
shall be a bar to future prosecution for the same offense, unless the
accused fails or refuses to testify against his co-accused in accordance
with his sworn statement constituting the basis for his discharge. It is
true that an accused cannot be made a hostile witness for the
prosecution, for to do so would compel him to be a witness against
himself. However, he may testify against co-defendant where he has
agreed to do so with full knowledge of his right and the
consequences of his acts. It is not necessary that the court discharges
him as a state witness.
B.
Apart from the acquittal, the other benefits that the witness under
the program may receive are:
The state may also offer the witness a place in the witness
protection program, giving them a new identity, so they need not fear
retaliation from their former accomplices. With such support from
the Government, conviction of offender in a seemingly hopeless case
Page | 5
C.
In Chua v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 103397, August 28, 1996, the
court stated that countless crimes would go unpunished as insolent
and contumacious criminals oft-times defy the law with impunity if
the rules on criminal procedure were so construed or applied as to
Page | 6
One cannot deny the importance of the aid that state witnesses
offer in the prosecution of criminal cases. When there is no direct
evidence available for the proper prosecution of the criminal offense,
the accused may be acquitted and unpunished and the State then,
irretrievably prejudiced.
D.