Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Academic Sciences
ISSN- 0975-1491
Vol 7, Issue 6, 2015
Short Communication
1 2
Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences,
Universitas Halu Oleo, Kampus Hijau Bumi Tridharma Anduonohu, Kendari, 93232, South East Sulawesi, Indonesia
Email: rahayuken08@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
IndonesiaObjectiv: This research is aimed to determine antibacterial activity of some solvents of raw propolis extracts of Trigona sp from Sulawesi,
Method
and compare it with antibacterial activities of ethanolic and aqueous extracts.
Staphylococcus aureus.
Results
and
S
phylo coccus aureus
assay
extracts
and
E er chia coli
S. au reus
: The oily extract of propolis showed a potent antibacterial activity compared to the ethanol extracts against
E. coli
also
Inhibition zone of Virgin Coconut Oil (VCO) propolis extract and Olive oil extract on
Conclusion
: The propolis extracts obtained with Virgin Coconut Oil (VCO) and olive oil as solvent have higher antibacterial activity than the
Key wo rds
Tr igona sp.
ethanolic extracts. So the VCO and Olive Oil can be used to extract raw propolis.
: Antibacterial activity, Olive Oil Extracts of Propolis, VCO Extracts of Propolis,
Trigona sp
Propolis is a mixture of beeswax and resin which are collected by
honey bee (
Bee uses propolis not only as a building material for their hive but
Trigona
, propolis is also
used to construct storage pots for pollen and honey. Propolis is a soft
chloroform [17].
Another natural products that also as the top using treatment for a
period time are the olive oil and the Virgin Coconut Oil (VCO). The
study, we used several kinds of oil (virgin coconut oil/VCO), olive oil,
propolis on
bacteria
and
(T igo
sp)
for resinous substance
collected
by honey bees
generic name
meaning
derived from Greek as“pro” meaning “in defense of” and “polis”
from Merck Co, Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA), Lurie Bertani (LB),
for sealing holes in their honey combs and protecting their entrance
Raw propolis used for extraction was from Landono district, South
Trigona
Konawe, South East Sulawesi in 2013. The raw propolis was taken
[12], and by the seasonal collection [13, 14]. Propolis that rich of
Staphylococcus aureus.
and
Obaida
[20] with modifications [18]. Granulated
propolis was
Pujirahayu (20 ml) were seeded by pour plate with 100 l of the spore
extracted with different solvents, these are water, ethanol, VCO, olive oil and suspension. Then 5 µl of the ethanolic and propolis oil extract were
propylene glycol (same concentrations) at 40 °C in shaker (Stuart GFL 1086) .
Thus, 25 g of propolis (finely grounded in a mixer) was extracted with 250 ml
added in well (4 mm), with final volume of 100 µl for each well,
solvents (water, ethanol 70%, VCO, Olive oil and propylene glycol) at 40 °C into
shaker in dark room for seven days. After that, the suspension was filtered (with
Whatman filter paper No. 41), the residue was extracted again. Then for seven completed witho
days the suspension was filtered every day. The yield of maceration was further the respectively solvent, then the plates were
dried in rotary evaporator (Laborota 4002) at 30 °C-40 °C. Then the dry extracts
were weighed to gain the final extract. All the samples then were analyzed in
triplicate. incubated at 37
C for 24 h and the inhibition zone was measured
Escherichia
co li, Salmon lla thypi,
three holes measured in one Petri dish. The assays were made in
and each solvent plate were used as negative control [8, 17].
significant.
by utilizing agar
Bacter
The results of the study of the inhibitory effect of propolis extracts
Propolis Extracts
and
extract
are ia
PG
VCO
shown in table 1. These results indicate that the type of solvent
Olive
significantly affects on the inhibition Et-OH
zone. Propolis Aqua
Ampicil
E. coli
Prop
Propo
Oil-
Propol
with des
line
S.
ureus
olis
lis
Propo
is
Prop
lis
and
E. coli
c
b
and were
b
significantly
different compared
c
showed
no inhibitory effect on the
three bacteria
that
were
observed. However, five of the propolis extract did not show any inhibitory effect
against S. typhi.
02
c
12
b
.32c
31a
surprisingly indicated by the OEP and VEP, which have lower
aureus
levels of flavonoids than PEP and EEP. This is an indication that
1.08
0.90
there were other components that influence their effectiveness in
1.10
inhibiting the growth of bacteria. Supposedly, components contain in
.93
the solvent Olive Oil and VCO adds the effectiveness of propolis
21
extract toward its ability to inhibit any bacterial growth.
S. thypi
bacterial strains, inhibit viral enzymes, avoid free radicals, etc [23].
to S. thypi.
E. co li
and
highest, but VEP and OEP are more effective compared to EEP and
PEP on so that they can be affected by monolaurin. Gram-negative bacteria
effect on monolaurin can easily penetrate through the membrane, and its
S. ur
us
The main compounds of VCO are monolaurin and lauric acid, that
researchers
lipopolysa ccharide
).
bacteria (
membrane is
Some
composed of lipids, polysaccharides
negative bacteria [2, 29]. However, it has been reported that EEP
was effective on Gram-negative bacteria in higher concentrations Other researchers from Spain reported that propolis extract in
Saccharomyces
S. au reus
cerevisae
) and
moderately
active
and
Streptococcus pyogenes
E.
[30]. This study also showed that EEP had inhibitory effect both on
coli
against
S. aureus,
S. aureus
, but
inhibiting
extract of propolis .
S. au reus.
S.
aureus
EOP
inhibition
zone
against
in
vi vo
in v itro
significantly
different when
compared with the EPG, EVP and EEP. Diameter of inhibition of EOP
was22.4 mm, while the VEP by 12 mm, EEP 11.9 and PEP of 10.8
S. au reus
also known as oleocanthal [36, 37]. Our result showed that propolis
was
Olive oil is composed of oleat acid, palmitat acid, sterol acids, simple
the highest.
the olive oil [33-35]. The most bactericidal polyphenols of olive oil
propolis which had antioxidant activity [39] and concluded that such
aureus,
Strepto coccus
mutans,
nd da
albicans
Salmonella en teri ca
and
samples.
were very active against Gram-positive bacteri and yeasts
(
accharomyces
cerevisae
)
E. co li
and
moderately
active
against
pyogen es. Th ey also found si gnificant act iv ity a ga inst
, whereas
VCO extracts of propolis had similar inhibition zone with Ethanol
was
However, the oily extract was more potent on inhibiting the bacteria
the other extracts. In the antibacterial test, our data also showed that
greater
S.
au eus
et al.
et al.
Very sim ilar results for the antibacteri al activ ity of propol is on
[17]. Our
aureus
when compared to ethanol and propylene glycol extracts.
S.
S. a
us
al.
inhibitory effect on
results
not only
against
Clostridium perfringens
E. coli
of
et
the
potential
harmful
bacteria
intestinalmicrobiota (
bifidum
and
and
), but also it
Bi fidobact rium
monocytogenes,
Staphylococcus aureus,
The advantage of use the solvents VCO and Olive Oil is, they are both
propolis without having to be remove it. VCO and Olive Oil can
solvent
to
extract propolis. These
Listeria results
antimicrobial
Salmonella en teritidis
pathogens
effects of propolis vary for
tested
(
different
solvent
et al.
and
et al.
E.demonstrates
antibacterial activity on
when extracted
et al.
Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, Vol 7, Issue 6, 419-422
S. aureus
S. thypi
by VCO, Olive Oil, P ropylene glycol and ethanol. However, all the
Propolis
aureus
coli
S.
. Propolis extracted in Olive oil has
E. co li
S. thypi
DeclaredCONFLICTNoneOF INTERESTS
REFERENCES
, wh il e propolis extrac ted in
1.
VCO has the most intensive antibacterial activity on Ghisalberti EL. Propolis A review. Bee World 1979;60:59-84.
.
2.
is Yaghoubi SMJ, Ghorbani GR, Soleimanian ZS, Satari R.
3.
we can use them directly without having to remove it. In addition, composition. DARU 2007;15(1):45-8.
E.
Popova M, Silici S, Kaftanoglu O, Bankova V. Antibacterial
oli
4.
chemical composition.etPhytomed.
2005;12:221-8.
these oil can enhance the inhibitory effect of propolis against gram-
propolis and Olive oil extracts of propolis and its antimicrobial activities. J Ethnopharmacol
ACK NOWLEDGME NTS
5.
2001;74:105-12.
activity of propolis of : An
and
and
12.
- 2012;3(3):256
61.
of karnataka,
characterization.
7.
India. Prime J Microb Res 2012;2(2):80-5.
of its constituens and medicinal properties: a
13.
review Int J Adv Eng Tech 2010;1(3):50-3.
Flavonoid analysis and antimicrobial activity of commercially Kalogeropoulos N, Konteles SJ, Troullidou E, Mourtzinos I,
8.
available propolis products. Acta Pharm 2005;55:423-30.
Karathanos VT. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant activity and
14.
activity of propolis extracts on 12 different bacteria in condition cyprus. Food Chem 2009;116:452–61.
9.
of 3 various pH values. Arch Biol Sci 2010;62(4):915-34.
10.
beeet
Nikolova A. Extraction of biologically active compounds from
propolis(propolis).
. Food Chem Toxicol 1998;36(4):347-63.
propolis and concentration of Extract by nanofiltration. J
Santos FA, Bastos EM, Uzeda M, Cavahlo MA, Farias LM, Moreira ES, 15.
Membr Sci 2010;348:124–30.
11.
against oral anaerobic bacteria. J Ethnopharmacol 2002;80:1-7.
Barros MP, Souza JP, Bastos JK, Andrarde S. Effect of Brazilian
green propolis on experimental gastric ulcers in rats. J Bandur G,
421
Pujirahayu
17.
Silva KR, Francielle TM, Kelly AD, Shierly DK, Herta SDS.
compared with other propolis extract. Revista Ciences Eatase Proceeding of The 7 . Asian apicultural association conference
18. 20.
Naturis 2010;12(2):327-38. and 10
24.
th flavonoids. Pharmacol Ther 2002;96:67et.
-202.
Nikolova-
Popova
28.
M, Bankova biologicallyV,Butovska Loung
D, Petkov V, . Indo J Chem 2009;9(1):99-106.
FS,
Silalahi J, Suryanto D. Antibacterial activity of
Validated methods for the
Es cherichia
quantification
of
act iv e constituents
of
coli
25.
poplar
26. and
2005;38(2):77-83.
RA, Dan Chigbu OA. Lauric acid content
UgboguCndidaOC,Onyeagbaalbicans against
27.
and
of monolaurin
as antibac ter ial ag ent
a gainst
et al.
Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, Vol 7, Issue 6, 419-422 Keceli T, Robinson RK. Antimicrobial activity of phenolic extracts from virgin
Lu LC, Chen YW, Chou CC. Antibacterial and DPPH free radical-scavenging olive oil. Milchwissenschaft 2002;57:436-40.
activities of the ethanol extract of propolis collected in Taiwan. J Food Drug Anal Brenes M, Garcíća A, de los Santos B, Medina E, Romero C, de Castro A,
2003;11:277-82. Romero F. Olive glutaraldehyde-like compounds against plant
pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Food Chem 2011;125:1262-6.
Beauchamp GK, Keast RS, Morel D, Lin J, Pika J, Han Q, Phytochemistry:
Sforcin JM, Fernandes JA, Lopes CAM, Bankova V, Funari SRC. Seasonal effect on t al
Brazilian propolis antibacterial activity. J Ethnopharmacol 2000;73:243-9. Ibuprofen-like activity in extra -virgin olive oil . Nat 2005;437:45-6.
Ghazghazi H, Chedia A, Safa H, Wissem M. Antibacterial, Antifungal and Medina E, de Castro A, Romero C, Brenes M. Comparison of the
antioxidant activities of Tunisian concentration of phenolic compounds in olive oils and other plant oils:
correlation with antimicrobial activity. J Agric Food Chem 2006;54:4954-
Olea europaea 61.
ssp oleaster fruit pulps and its essenstial fatty acids. IntJ Pharm Pharm Bonhevíć JS, Gutieć rrez AL. The antimicrobial effects of propolis collected
Sci 2015;7(1):52-5. in different regions in the basque country (Northern Spain). W J Microb
Biotechnol 2012;28:1351-8.
Paudel S, Thakur M. Lamichhane JR. Antimicrobial activity of wild olive crude
in vitro Bosio K, Avanzini C, d’Avolio A, Ozino O, Savoia D.
extracts . Int J Pharm Sci Res 2011;2(3):110-3. In vitro
Della Greca M, Monaco P, Pinto G, Pollio A, Previtera L, Temussi F. Phytotoxicity activity of propolis against . Lett Appl Microbiol 2000;31:174-7.
of low-molecular-weight phenols from olive mill waste waters. Bull Environ Streptococcus pyogenes
Contam Toxicol 2001;67:352-9.
422