You are on page 1of 6

https://www.prismm.

net/2016/06/01/gpcr-capitalist-china-paoyuching/

The relevance of the GPCR in the light of China and Russia


becoming capitalist
By Prof. Pao-yu Ching

June 1, 2016 [a 50 años de la GRCP]

Dear comrades and friends:

On May 16, 1966, the Chinese Communist Party under the leadership of Chairman
Mao Zedong launched the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. We are gathering
here today to celebrate this historical event. Why are we celebrating the launching of
the Cultural Revolution half a century later? The reason is, of course, the Cultural
Revolution is as relevant today as it was in 1966.

First of all, if it had not been for the Cultural Revolution, Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping
would have been able to carry out their capitalist development a decade earlier. The
Cultural Revolution blocked the capitalist roaders from carrying out their plan, so it
provided ten additional years to develop socialism and demonstrate its superiority.
China’s socialist construction from 1956 to 1976, a period of merely 20 years, showed
us that socialism was not just an abstract concept, but a shining example of what could
be accomplished when the proletarian class was in charge.

Before the Cultural Revolution was launched in 1966, the Revisionists in China were
gathering strength to attack socialism on all fronts. They furiously attacked the Great
Leap Forward and the formation of the People’s Communes. After the Communes
were established in 1958, they employed many different strategies to sabotage China’s
collectivized agriculture including initiating schemes like the “Three-self” and “One
contract” campaign, designed to use profit motive to encourage peasants to leave the
Commune. In the industrial sector after public ownership was established in 1956, the
Revisionists worked relentlessly to dissolve the workers’ permanent employment
system in industrial enterprises and used various material incentives including the
piece wage rates to divide workers. They argued that the permanent employment
system prevented industrial enterprises from recruiting workers from the countryside to
keep wages low and profits high. The Revisionists also encouraged individual
enterprises to impose rigid work rules to increase work intensity in order to raise labor
productivity and profits.

In hindsight we can understand more clearly how the Revisionists strategized to


subvert socialist construction. The Peoples’ Republic of China won the revolution
against feudal landlords, foreign capitalists, and compradors by building a close
alliance between workers and peasants. The socialist construction could only succeed
by consolidating the worker-peasant alliance on a new material basis. The ownership
by the whole people in the industrial sector and the collective ownership of agriculture
provided the necessary conditions for this new material basis. However, the
Revisionists tried at every turn to prevent this alliance from being consolidated.

Before the Cultural Revolution, there were fierce struggles between the socialist line
and the capitalist line within the Communist Party – but most people in China were not
aware of it. After Liberation the attitude of workers and peasants toward the Communist
Party was generally one of overwhelming gratitude. They were grateful to the
Communist Party for leading them to their liberation from oppression, exploitation, and
suffering. The peasants were grateful for the significant improvements in their standard
of living, including better diet, healthcare, and education. Workers were grateful for the
rights and benefits they received including job security, decent housing, healthcare,
education, and a secure retirement. However, workers and peasants were not aware
that what seemed to be the endowment of the Party could be easily taken away, and
that they had to engage in struggle to protect them. Mao Zedong saw that the only way
for the revolutionary line to win was to expose the revisionists and to mobilize the
masses to struggle against them.

Prof. Pao-yu Ching reviews the history — the successes and setbacks — of China’s
Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution at the Amsterdam Forum on the GPCR’s 50th
anniversary, held 29 May 2016.
Three breakthroughs of the GPCR

The Cultural Revolution successfully exposed the Revisionists’ plan; the masses
learned how Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping attempted to carry out their Revisionist line
in all spheres of the society. However, it was not enough for the masses to understand
the struggles within the Party – they also had to learn how to engage in struggle to fight
against the Revisionists themselves. The Cultural Revolution mobilized the masses,
and Mao and those in the Party who supported the revolutionary line gave direction to
the struggle. When the Revisionists enticed workers and peasants with material bribes
to divide them, the campaigns in the Cultural Revolution broke through their capitalist
logic by putting politics in command. Mao understood that the transfer of the ownership
of means of production from private to public was not sufficient to transform society;
society had to be transformed on all fronts – economically, politically, socially,
ideologically and culturally. Launching the Cultural Revolution was an attempt to
transform the whole Chinese society, and as a result, it made several unprecedented
breakthroughs. Even though these breakthroughs were still in their budding stage when
the Cultural Revolution ended in 1976, their value is forever impactful because they
were proven to be essential in transforming a society during the socialist transition. I
would like to explain three of these breakthroughs.

The first breakthrough was major changes in industrial organization. As early as 1958,
workers and cadres in the Anshan Iron and Steel Factory took the initiative to innovate
new ways of involving workers in decision making in running the factory. By March
1960 Mao Zedong had seen that the changes they made in industrial organization were
profound and fundamental, and named their initiatives the Angang Constitution, which
included five principles: (1) Put politics in command, (2) Strengthen Party leadership,
(3) Launch vigorous mass movements, (4) Systematically promote the participation of
cadres in production labor and of workers in management and (5) Reform
unreasonable disciplinary rules; ensure close cooperation among workers, cadres, and
technicians; and energetically promote technological innovations. Mao urged all
factories to put the Angang Constitution principles into practice, but his call did not
receive an enthusiastic response until the Cultural Revolution, when workers struggled
to change their factories by instituting the Angang Constitution as part of their overall
struggle to change society. Changes in the factories inspired by the Angang
Constitution blocked the Revisionists’ efforts to turn workers into replaceable wage
labor. This new industrial organization was a remarkable breakthrough, a necessary
change to establish the new relations of production during socialist transition.

Another significant breakthrough during the Cultural Revolution was Mao’s education
reform. This reform fundamentally changed the rules of selecting who could receive
higher education. During China’s 3000 years under feudalism, education was reserved
for the privileged few. These elites, whose education was supported by the surpluses
produced by the working people then used their education to rule the working people.
Actually this has always been true in all societies divided by class. Education reform
during the Cultural Revolution turned this system upside down for the first time in
Chinese history and in the history of the world. The education reform during the
Cultural Revolution instituted a new system of selecting workers, peasants and
revolutionary soldiers for higher education by their co-workers. The State paid for their
education and living expenses and a monthly stipend while they were in school. Upon
graduation they went back to work in the same factory or collective. The Reform also
revolutionized the content of college courses and with much more emphasis on
practice. Students learned science and technology as well as Marxism, Leninism and
Mao Zedong Thought in order to change the material world and to transform
themselves with the goal of serving the people. From this new education system
sprouted a new generation of integrated working class intellectuals ready to take
leadership in running the Worker State. The new education system that emerged from
the Cultural Revolution demonstrated concretely how the next generation of proletarian
leadership could be trained and cultivated to continue the revolution.

Another breakthrough was the practice of the broadest and most comprehensive
democracy. Democracy was something completely alien in China because of its long
history of feudalism. The ordinary people had to pledge their absolute loyalty and
obedience toward the emperor and to all his officials. During the Revolutionary War,
democracy was practiced to a limited extent in the revolutionary bases; people were
encouraged to speak their mind and made suggestions and posed criticisms to the
revolutionary leaders. Cadres also engaged in the practice of criticism and self-
criticism. The revolution succeeded because peasants and workers trusted the
Communist Party and recognized that Party leaders were qualitatively different from
past rulers. After Liberation all major changes in China were made by first mobilizing
the masses: from the mass movement to end the feudal land tenure, to the Anti-graft
and Anti-rightist Movements, to the campaign to eliminate pests and diseases, and to
the Great Leap Forward, launched to establish the Peoples Communes and
industrialize China’s countryside. Then in 1966 the launch of the Cultural Revolution
brought mass movement to an even higher level when people freely practiced what
was called the “Big Four Freedoms ”: the freedom to a Big Voice, Big Openness, Big
Debates, and the freedom to put up Big Character Posters. These freedoms expanded
democracy to the broadest scope. The practice of democracy was another
breakthrough of the Cultural Revolution. Broad democracy was supported and
encouraged, because the Communist Party trusted the masses and believed change
was only possible with their participation. The masses returned their trust to the
Communist Party and together they fought to build a new society.

We are celebrating the Cultural Revolution today because it gave socialism the chance
to develop ten additional years. We are also celebrating the Cultural Revolution,
because of the major breakthroughs I just talked about. Through understanding these
major breakthroughs we learn not only that class struggle continues during the socialist
transition, but they also give us the concrete content of class struggle in all the spheres
of the society necessary to move society forward. They provide us with answers about
how workers can begin managing their factories so that they eventually can be in
charge of the State; how to train new generations of educated proletariat; and how
broad democracy can be practiced during the socialist transition. Although these
changes were only carried out for one short decade, they became fundamental and
deep-rooted in Chinese society. The counterrevolutionaries today regard the Cultural
Revolution as their enemy number one by viciously attacking and distorting it. They can
hate it as much as they want but they cannot erase the impact of the Cultural
Revolution from the Chinese society.

Capitalism restored but Left holds on to Maoist legacy

After Mao Zedong died in 1976, Deng Xiaoping seized political power. In the four
decades since then Deng and his followers dissolved the public ownership of the
means of production and reversed all the changes made during the Cultural
Revolution, drastically changed Chinese society. In 1985 they first moved to dissolve
the People’s Communes and divide up collectively owned land. Agricultural
infrastructure, such as irrigation and drainage systems built during the Commune
years, gradually fell apart due to lack of maintenance. Land improvement projects,
health and education and other social welfare programs disappeared one by one.

Then the Reformers turned to dissolve public ownership of China’s industrial


enterprises. From the mid-1980s to the end of 1990s workers in those enterprises
fought courageously against selling industrial assets to those who had political
connections. Finally in 2000 the regime gave up on reforming most of those factories
built during the socialist period by closing most of them down and laying off 36 million
workers. (China Statistical Abstract, 2001, 39) Those workers who had made
tremendous contributions building socialist China were literally thrown out onto the
streets with barely enough income to survive and without any medical insurance. When
I visited the workers districts in a major Northeast city, I saw stores, kindergartens,
barbershops, and bathhouses all closed down. Former State factory workers lined the
streets and trying to sell their labor to do odd jobs.
Deng’s Reform had two main components: capitalist reform in China and linking China
to the world capitalist system. As the new regime dissolved the public ownership of the
means of production, it moved to open up China’s economy to foreign capital. It used
low taxes, low wages, generous subsidies, and lax labor and environmental laws to
attract foreign capital. Foreign capital investing in China has had two goals: the first is
to occupy the Chinese market and the second is to take advantage of China’s cheap
labor, cheap resources, and the freedom to pollute. American, European and Japanese
multinationals first formed joint ventures with Chinese companies but eventually 70% of
them became 100% foreign owned. Most of the Fortune 500 companies set up shop in
China. According to one report, of the 28 Chinese industries that are open to foreign
investment, 21 have fallen under foreign control. This means that foreign capital
controls the five largest firms in those industries (Economic News, June 4, 2005).
Among the foreign-controlled industries include pharmaceutical, automobile, soft drink,
beer, bicycle, elevator, cement, glass, rubber and tire, agricultural machinery,
agricultural processing, retail, and delivery service. In the process, many of formerly
well-known Chinese brands have disappeared from the market.

Another major way to take advantage of China’s cheap labor has been for the
multinationals to hugely expand processing production in China. Capitalists from
Taiwan and Hong Kong set up processing firms first in Shenzhen and other Southern
coastal cities; later they moved into China’s interior. These firms do processing work for
the multinationals and the range of products has expanded from clothing, shoes, toys,
furniture, and numerous household items to electronics, such as computers, printers,
iPhones and tablets. China’s Capitalist “Opening Up Reform” came at almost exactly
the same time as global monopoly capital’s new strategy of imperialist globalization to
restructure the world economy. Global monopoly capital expanded its domination over
production and distribution by forcibly opening all national borders. International trade
and financial organizations, such as GATT (later the WTO), the IMF and the World
Bank helped to rewrite and enforce new trading and investment laws. These changes
enabled global corporations to use a complex integrated strategy that involves splitting
the production process into specific activities or functions by dispersing them to the
lowest cost locations. Governments in host countries compete with one another to
make their countries more attractive to these giant global corporations. They keep
wages low and working conditions poor. In addition to subsidies and tax incentives,
they upgrade their infrastructure and allow these corporations the freedom to pollute
their environment. Above all they use oppressive and brutal means to suppress
workers from organizing. All governmental policies in this new phase of imperialism are
justified on the basis of increasing a country’s global competitiveness.

This new strategy of imperialist globalization has been able to shift excess capacity and
labor-intensive, high-energy consuming and most polluting production from advanced
capitalist countries to developing countries. China has been the number one country on
the receiving end. Since joining the WTO, China’s GDP and exports have taken off
both reaching double-digit growth. By 2009 China’s exports of manufacturing goods
reached 16% of the world total, and in 2011 China became the largest manufacturer in
the world. China’s new regime has indeed successfully integrated China into the world
capitalist system.

However, if we look beneath the surface, we discover that in the past four decades
especially since the 1990s, China as a country (its land, natural resources, and
environment) and the Chinese people have paid a horrendous price for this so called
development. During the decades of the Reform both foreign and domestic capital
have ruthlessly exploited the Chinese people, thoroughly depleted China’s resources
and savagely damaged China’s environment. Chinese workers have become wage
laborers. The 200 million workers selling their labor in multinational processing
factories all came from China’s countryside. They work from 12 to 14 hours a day and
often only get one day off every two weeks. The pace of work is oppressive: large
numbers of workers suffer from exhaustion and work-related diseases and injuries and
some have committed suicide. On the agricultural side, China has only 9% of the
world’s arable land but feeds 22% of the world’s population. During the socialist period
China was self-sufficient in food but now is increasingly dependent on food imports.
The strategy of using exports to spur short-term growth has meant taking more and
more land from agriculture for industrial use. Local governments have used brutal force
to remove people from their land and their homes. Moreover, China has a very limited
fresh water supply: on a per capita basis China’s access to fresh water is merely 25%
of the world’s average. Industrial water use has deprived people of adequate water
supply. Currently, 400 out of 600 major cities in China do not have adequate water for
their residents. China is depleting its underground water so rapidly that it is causing the
desertification to advance at the rate of 2,000 square kilometers a year. [Note 1:
According to Ji Yongfu, the director of Gansu’s Desert Control Research Institute,
overuse of groundwater and overgrazing has caused the desert to advance at a rate of
about 2,000 square kilometers a year (Bloomberg.com, February 22, 2006).
Desertification has been the main cause of sand storms in China’s northern cities,
which have spread all the way to Korea, Taiwan, and Japan.]
On top of rapid depletion of China’s limited resources, China’s environment has been
damaged to the point of almost no return; 80% of China’s rivers are severely polluted.
In many major Chinese cities where the air is so heavily polluted, particles smaller than
2.5 microns (PM2.5), the most toxic smog, reached 40 times the maximum level
allowed by the World Health Organization. The effects of these and other conditions
have resulted premature death of cancer and other diseases. [Note 2: China: The Dark
of Growth, The Epoch Times, June 27 – July 3, 2013, A7] A large part of China’s
resource depletion and pollution can be traced back to its manufacturing for exports,
because in 2011 Chinese people only consumed 35% of the GDP. [Note 3: APCO
Worldwide, http://www.apcoworldwide.com/content/PDFs/npc_briefing_2011.pdf]

I think it accurate to say that China saved capitalism by providing global capital a
golden opportunity to expand and occupy ”new territory”. Moreover, China’s financial
support to the United States has helped the largest empire in the world sustain its
global hegemony. But while China saved capitalism, capitalism has destroyed China.

The Left in China was defeated 40 years ago when counterrevolutionaries seized
political power and began their Capitalist Reform. However, the Left has not faded
away. On the contrary, forces on the Left have revived and have been fighting furiously
and relentlessly against the Right, who now hold political and economic power. As the
contradictions in Chinese society intensify, forces on the Left are further strengthened.
They have fought those in power in every way possible – by engaging in ideological,
economic, and political struggles. They have published books and articles; held public
forums on critical issues; engaged in struggles against environmental pollution and
against Genetically Modified foods; formed study groups to discuss Marx, Lenin and
Mao; organized students to learn from workers and to investigate and publicize working
conditions in factories; conducted mass rallies where they delivered speeches and
sang revolutionary songs; and tested all conceivable means to organize workers. Now
with the most serious economic crisis impending, and with rising numbers and
increasing scale of labor and environmental protests, the Left is ready to battle. These
current experiences are a testimony to the enduring legacy of Mao, his teachings, and
the Cultural Revolution.

The Chinese revolution and its socialist construction transformed China from a poor
underdeveloped country exploited by imperialist powers to become an independent
country free from foreign domination and exploitation. During socialism working people
in China commanded the highest respect ever in the history of humankind, and they
exerted their utmost efforts to build a new society for future generations. It was a
country full of hope, pride, and aspiration. The Cultural Revolution’s major
breakthroughs clarified and articulated the fundamental differences between socialist
development and capitalist development and showed us the concrete path to
continuing class struggle during the socialist transition. We can say with confidence,
“Socialism has not failed”. The counterrevolutionaries seized power from the
proletariat. We just have to take the power back and WE WILL.###

You might also like