Who Are The "Natsarim" The "Christians" The "Catholics" The "Protestants" The "Sabbatarians" - Besorah (Good News) of Yahusha Ha'Mashiach, The Gift of Eternal Life

7/21/2018 Who Are The “Natsarim”; The “Christians”; The “Catholics”; The “Protestants”; The “Sabbatarians”?
rians”? | Besorah (Good News) of Yahusha H…
Besorah (Good News) of Yahusha Ha'Mashiach,

The Gift of Eternal Life
Advertisements
Eliminate
Cable TV Bill
This Device Allows
You To Watch
Virtually Anything For
Free
Report this ad
Who Are The “Natsarim”; The “Christians”; The “Catholics”;

The “Protestants”; The “Sabbatarians”?
Posted on December 27, 2013 by 777denny

https://777denny.wordpress.com/2013/12/27/who-are-the-natsarim-the-christians-the-catholics-the-protestants-the-sabbatarians/?wref=tp&wref=tp 1/23
7/21/2018 Who Are The “Natsarim”; The “Christians”; The “Catholics”; The “Protestants”; The “Sabbatarians”? | Besorah (Good News) of Yahusha H…
Who were the original followers of the Jewish Messiah? Was Christianity the original “sect” spoken
of in scripture concerning the followers of Messiah? Who were the original Protestants? Were most of
the early Christian “Church Fathers” antisemitic? Were the scripture translations afterwards tainted
by Gentile Christians who sought to usher in Pagan “holidays” and shun Jewish festivals,
persecuting Jews and all who didn’t follow their new teachings? Who are “Sabbatarians”? These
questions and more will be answered below so that the Truth can finally be told — after so many
years of continual falsehoods being told.
I am going to start out by giving you scripture that will enlighten us all to what the name of the
people who were the first followers of the Jewish Messiah, or “Mashiach” or “The Anointed One”
were called.
Acts 24:5 “For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among all the Jews
throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes.”
Acts 11:25-26: “Then Barnabah went to Tarsos to seek Sha’ul, and having found him, he brought him
to Antioch. And it came to be that for an entire year they came together in the assembly and taught
large numbers. And the taught ones were called ‘Natsarim’ first in Antioch.”
Act 24:5-6: “For having found this man a plague, who stirs up dissension among all the Yahuḏim
throughout the world and a ringleader of the sect of the Natsarim, who also tried to profane the Set-
Apart Place and whom we seized and wished to judge him according to our law.”
1 Peter 4:16: “But if one suffers being Natsarim, let him not be ashamed, but let him esteem Elohim in
this ma er.”
And did you notice that Paul was considered to be the ringleader of a sect called the Nazarenes
(Natsarim)? I will be bringing up Paul’s name later as I discuss the Sabbatarians, who mostly detest
— and even disavow — Paul’s testimony in scripture.
The original Hebrew for “Nazarene” is based on the root “natsar,” which means to watch. And this is
because the area around the burg Natsareth was named for it, hence the word “Gennetsaret” (vale of
Netsar) referred to the whole district. This root word used points to the fact that the town was
situated on high ground, which provided a panoramic view of the surroundings.
In fact, the “brow of the hill” which the townsfolk tried to throw the Messiah over gave the name to
the town itself. Natsareth (natsar, the root) hence means “watchtower,” and Natsarenes are by
extension “watchmen.”
The original followers of the Jewish Messiah were known as “Natsarim” (the plural of Natsari), as
you saw above the “sect of the Nazarenes” wri en in your translations at Acts 24:5.
The Natsarim were known to follow ‘The Way’ and were easily identified due to their use of the
Name. The Name of the Heavenly Elohim was banned and forbidden to be used by those practicing
Judaism. But the Natsarim used His Name regularly — as did Yahusha Messiah. They also did not
teach the traditions of Judaism, which was referred to as the traditions of men.
Revelation 12:17: And the dragon was enraged with the woman and he went to fight with the remnant
of her seed, those guarding the commands of Elohim and possessing the witness of
(h ps://777denny.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/yahusha-paleo.png) Messiah (The Natsarim).
Jerome (Sophronius Eusebius Hieronymus) acknowledged the existence of the Natsarim, and had
contact with one of them who validated the meaning of “He shall be called a Natsari” (from Mt.
2:23). The Natsari who spoke with Sophronius/Jerome was quoting from a text he referred to as the
apocryphon of YirmeYahu (Jeremiah):
The interesting thing about the quote from Jerome is that it a ests that Natsarim actually existed
during the 4th century:
“Recently I read in a certain Hebrew book

that a Hebrew from the Natsarim sect brought to me,
the apocryphon of YirmeYahu, in which I found this text
wri en word for word.”
(Jerome; Commentary on Ma hew 2:23)
It seems that the “Hebrew” from the sect of the Natsarim is most likely pointing out
YirmeYahu (Jeremiah) 31:5.
The Catechetical School of Alexandria, Egypt and the “church fathers” who were trained and taught
there, developed what ultimately became “Christianity,” and later Roman “Universalism,”
Catholicism. What these early “church fathers” of Alexandria wrote about a certain “sect,”
the Natsarim, may be of interest to those who actually want to trace back to their roots of their beliefs.
Many of these early “Christians” were former sun-worshippers that adopted a belief in the Mashiach
(Messiah) of Yisrael, Yahusha. They worked predominantly with Greek texts, yet from
reading their Greek le ers, we can quickly discern that they despised the ”Natsarim.” One of these
Church Fathers’ indicated that these Natsarim possessed the writings of Ma ithYahu (Ma hew), and
stated that they were in Hebrew le ers, as they had been originally wri en. These facts clearly
contradict what most people today have been led to believe about the original followers of Yahusha.
And due to the “Church Fathers,” the Hebrew/Yisra’elite roots of the faith were suppressed, and only
the Greek roots were developed, wri en about and mostly followed.
Romans 11:16-22: ” Now if the first-fruit is set-apart, the lump is also. And if the root is set-apart, so
are the branches. And if some of the branches were broken off and you, being a WILD OLIVE TREE,
have been GRAFTED IN among them and came to share the root and fatness of the olive tree, do
NOT boast against the branches. And if you boast, remember: you do NOT bear the root, but the root
bears you! You shall say then, “The branches were broken off that I might be grafted in.” Good! By
unbelief they were broken off and you stand by belief. Do NOT be arrogant, but FEAR. For if Elohim
did NOT spare the natural branches, He might NOT spare you either. See then the kindness and the
SHARPNESS of Elohim: on those who fell sharpness, but toward you kindness, IF you continue in
His kindness, otherwise you also shall be cut off.”
Please understand that it seems that the two most uniform traits among all the “Church Fathers”
was their condemnation of the Natsarim, and their rabid anti-Semitism.
Origen of Alexandria taught at the Catechetical School of Alexandria and succeed Clement as Head of
the School.
Origen lived from 185 to 254 CE and was self-castrated and a vegetarian, like Clement.
Tertullian and Irenaeus were contemporaries of Orign, and were Classically Educated in Paganism,
and error was adopted.
Through modern seminaries (seed-plots) promote the teachings of the “Church Fathers”, Greek and
Egyptian men sought to eliminate the former Natsarim, and the Natsarim were spoken against by
those in authority back in the days of Shaul (Paul):
“And we think it right to hear from you what you think, for indeed, concerning this sect, we know
that it is spoken against everywhere.” (ACT 28:22).
Acts 11:28 “…And it came to be that for an entire year they came together in the assembly and taught
large numbers. And the taught ones were called ‘Natsarim’ first in Antioch.”
This sect, the NATSARIM, was suppressed by the early Church Fathers, and by the developing
hierarchy at the earliest formal school of Christianity — THE CATECHETICAL SCHOOL OF
ALEXANDRIA (FOUNDED CIRCA 190 CE)
The term by which the early followers of Yahusha of Natsarith were called is found at Acts 24:5,
misspelled “Nazarenes.”
IRENAEUS was a mid-2nd century “Church Father” who held that the bishops provided the only
safe-guard against false interpretation of Scripture, which laid the groundwork toward papal
primacy. Also, in his ba le against Gnosticism, and in the interest of unity, he maintained that
Doctrinal Authority had to be solely established by Episcopal “Councils.” “Episcopal” means
‘Governed by Bishops,’ and this laid a foundation for later Nicolaitanes and a hierarchical chain of
command, culminating in the fascism known as the Roman Catholic Church. Catholic means
“universal” in Latin, so Irenaeus’ vision for Unity of Doctrine did actually become a reality.
And for centuries after the resurrection of Yahusha, false teachers arose to draw away disciples after
themselves, just as Shaul (Paul) predicted would occur in Acts chapter 20.
Acts 20:27 “For I know this, that after MY DEPARTURE (emphasis is mine) savage wolves shall
come in among you, NOT SPARING THE FLOCK. Also from among yourselves men shall arise,
speaking DISTORTED TEACHINGS, to draw away the taught ones after them selves.”
And Yahuah tells us not to learn the ways of the Heathen, nor serve Him in their way. Dt. 12:30-32
The fourth century “Church Father,” Epiphanius, gave a detailed description of the Natsarim,
(SPEAKING AS A DRAGON):
“We shall now especially consider heretics who…call themselves Nazarenes; they are mainly Jews
and nothing else. They make use not only of the New Testament, but they also use in a way the
Old Testament of the Jews; for they do not forbid the books of the Law, the Prophets, and the
Writings… so that they are approved of by the Jews, from whom the Nazarenes do not differ in
anything, and they profess all the dogmas pertaining to the prescriptions of the Law and to the
customs of the Jews, except they believe in Messiah. They preach that there is but one God, and
His Son Yeshua the Messiah. But they are very learned in the Hebrew language; for they, like the
Jews, read the whole Law, then the Prophets…They differ from the Jews because they believe in
Messiah, and from the Christians in that they are to this day bound to the Jewish rites, such as
circumcision, the Sabbath, and other ceremonies. They have the Good news according to Ma hew
in its entirety in Hebrew. For it is clear that they still preserve this, in the Hebrew alphabet, as it
was originally wri en.”
Epiphanius is informing us that the Nazarenes were different from what he called the “Christians” and
“Jews,” and since he lived three hundred years after Yahusha Messiah arrived, the “Nazarenes” and
the “Christians” could ONLY be TWO SEPARATE GROUPS at that time!
And there is evidence that the Natsarim Sect continued to exist until at least the 13th century. The
Catholic writings of Bonacursus entitled ‘Against the Heretics’ refers to “Nazarenes,” who were also
called ‘Pasagini’. Bonacursus says, (SPEAKING AS A DRAGON):
“Let those who are not yet acquainted with them, please note how perverse their belief and doctrine
are. First, they teach that we should obey the Law of Moses according to the le er — the Sabbath,
and circumcision, and the legal precepts still being in force. Furthermore, to increase their error, they
condemn and reject all the Church Fathers, and the whole Roman Church.”
In his book “Judeo-Christianity,” Professor Simon disagreed with what Mr. Epiphanius had to say
regarding the “Nazarenes. In an effort to CORRECT HISTORY, the Catholic Professor wrote:
“They (meaning the Nazarenes) are characterized essentially by their tenacious a achment to Jewish
observances. If they became heretics in the eyes of the Mother Church, it is simply because they
remained fixed on outmoded positions.”
[However…] “They well represent (although Epiphanius is energetically refusing to admit it) the
very direct descendants of that primitive community, of which our author knows that is was
designated by the Jews, by the same name, of Nazarenes.” [French Catholic Professor and First
Century Assembly expert Marcel Simon, Judeo-christianisme, pp 47-48]
Himself a practicing Roman Catholic, Marcel Simon professed that is was indeed NOT the Catholic
Christians, but rather the “Nazarenes” who were the “very DIRECT DESCENDANTS of that primitive
community,” called the “Nazarenes.”
And by this he means that the “Nazarenes” — and NOT the Catholics — are the DIRECT, spiritual
DESCENDANTS of the Apostles of the New Covenant!!!
And the very first Believers in Yahusha were called ‘The Way‘ (comes from ( John 14:6/ Acts 9:2, 19: 9,
23, 22:4 and 24:22).
“Christianity,” in its modern form, it seems was likely started by Simon Magnus (Simon the
Magician), who is mentioned in Acts Chapter 8, and who a empted to purchase the power of Elohim,
and is actually buried under the altar of “St. Peter’s Cathedral” in Rome. ”Christianity” was later
made the Official State Religion of Rome by Constantine. In fact, the Vatican is the Great Whore
spoken of in scripture (h ps://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/mystery-babylon-the-great-whore-
of-revelation-is-revealed-the-vatican-is-in-rome-built-within-seven-hills-which-the-city-sits-upon/).
”Christianity” was certainly not started by “Saint Peter”, Paul, or Yahusha Messiah.
And did you know that there were “Christians” before the Natsarim were started by Yahusha?
Followers of Serapis (a Pagan sovereign) in 300 B.C. were known as “Kristianos.” The Greek term
Chrestoi means “good men,” which was applied to the followers of Sarapis for three centuries before
Yahusha Messiah arrived. (From Serapis dictionary entry: [There those who worship Serapis are, in
fact, Christians, and those who call themselves bishops of Christ are, in fact, devotees of Serapis.]) It
is a fact of language that the term “Christian” simply means cretin, idiot, stupid, mentally defective.
“For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among all the Yahudim
throughout the world and a ringleader of the sect (G139, hairesis) of the Nazarenes (G3480).” The
Greek word hairesis above gives us our word “heresy” translated “sect.” So we know the “sect”
being spoken of was not the Christians, because Christians developed later. The
word christianos was used twice in the Greek text as a device of scorn, since in the ancient world it
conveyed a much different sense than it does today. The use of the word christianos did not
“name” the sect, but it was a derisive, scornful label that meant they were like gullible, dumb
beasts, or “cretins”.
The word “christianos” (Latin, Christianus) was a term of scorn, traced back
through a related word which history never “revised”:
cre·tin (krēt’n) n.
1. A person afflicted with cretinism.
Slang: An idiot.
[French crétin, from French dialectal, deformed and mentally retarded person found in certain Alpine
valleys, from Vulgar Latin *christiānus, Christian, human being, poor fellow, from Latin Chrīstiānus,
Christian; see Christian.] Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language,
Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2009 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company.
The word “watchmen” is the Hebrew word NATSARIM, and means guardians, protectors, preservers,
and also means “branches”, as in “descendants”. Immediately, we see the connection with Yahusha’s
words about Him being the Root, and His students the “branches,” the off-spring of His teachings.
The name by which most Believers are called has no Greek roots; the Hebrew roots of our name are
profound.
And what about the term “God”? (h ps://777denny.wordpress.com/2014/03/04/origins-and-

definitions-of-words-holy-hallowed-sacred-sanctified-bible-grace-luck-lucifer-divine-divinity-deity-
theos-god-christ-jesus-church-lord-gospel/) The 1945 Encyclopedia Americana has this to say under to
topic “GOD”:
“GOD (god); Common Teutonic word for personal object of religious worship, formerly applicable to
super-human beings of heathen myth; on conversion of Teutonic races to Christianity, term was
applied to Supreme Being.”
We are to be the Hebrew word “qadosh,” meaning we are to be set-apart, not “holy.” And Brown,
Driver and Briggs (BDB) list the meaning of the word as “separation” or “withdrawal.”
And how do we become saved? Yahusha tells us below:
“And Yahusha came up and spoke to them, saying, ‘All authority has been given to Me in Heaven and
on Earth. Therefore, go and make Taught Ones of all the nations, immersing them in the Name of the
Father and of the Son and of the Set-apart Spirit, teaching them to guard all that I have
commanded you. And see, I am with you always, until the end of the age.’”
And we are spoken of here:
“And in her was found the blood of Prophets and Set-Apart Ones, and of all who were slain on
the Earth.” Rev 18:24
When we become saved, we enter a Covenant, which is a marriage between YHWH and Yisra’el, His
bride. Yisra’el is the only “denomination,” and the Natsarim are an elect group within Yisra’el, as they
are called by Yahusha as workers in His up-coming harvest of mankind to become Natsarim
(Believers in The Way of Yahusha ‘Mashiach’; Taught Ones of The Way of Yahusha ‘Messiah’;
Brethren of The Way of Yahusha ‘The Anointed One’ or ‘Redeemer’ or ‘Savoir — but NOT ‘Christ’).
We are Gentiles and Hebrews. We are all grafted into Yisra’el.
Natsarim, or followers of Yahusha, are those who “obey Yahuah’s Commandments and hold to the
testimony of Yahusha” (Rev 12:17).
Natsarim are watchmen (Natsarim, Acts 24:5, Jer. 31:6 meaning also branches), and consider all
Believers to be on the path to redemption through repentance, immersion in the Name of Yahusha,
and obedience to the Covenant of Yahusha, through the Set-Apart-Spirit of Elohim. We are to believe
in the Name of Yahusha Messiah and become immersed under water in His Name to receive
remission of sin and receive the Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim. Then we are to live as a new creature in
Yahusha Messiah to be set-apart from sin and to to good unto all men – and even our enemies as we
can — and especially to love the Brethren in Messiah Yahusha, as we try to love YHWH with all of
our heart, soul, mind and strength until out last breath.
And here is the Name of the Creator that was restored to the text in one of its original ancient Hebrew
forms:
Now let’s look at the “Reformation” or the beginning of the people who now call themselves
“Protestants.”
Martin Luther is credited by Christians as the leader of the Reformation Movement, so let’s only look
at only a SMALL (for lack of space) portion of his antisemitism writings.
Martin Luther – 1543: On The Jews and Their Lies
“What then shall we Christians do with this damned, rejected race of Jews? Since they live among us
and we know about their lying and blasphemy and cursing, we can not tolerate them if we do not
wish to share in their lies, curses, and blasphemy. In this way we cannot quench the inextinguishable
fire of divine rage nor convert the Jews. We must prayerfully and reverentially practice a merciful
severity. Perhaps we may save a few from the fire and flames [of hell]. We must not seek vengeance.
They are surely being punished a thousand times more than we might wish them. Let me give you
my honest advice.
“First, their synagogues should be set on fire, and whatever does not burn up should be covered or
spread over with dirt so that no one may ever be able to see a cinder or stone of it. And this ought to
be done for the honor of God and of Christianity in order that God may see that we are Christians,
and that we have not wi ingly tolerated or approved of such public lying, cursing, and blaspheming
of His Son and His Christians.
“Secondly, their homes should likewise be broken down and destroyed. For they perpetrate the same
things there that they do in their synagogues. For this reason they ought to be put under one roof or
in a stable, like gypsies, in order that they may realize that they are not masters in our land, as they
boast, but miserable captives, as they complain of incessantly before God with bi er wailing.
“Thirdly, they should be deprived of their prayer-books and Talmuds in which such idolatry, lies,
cursing, and blasphemy are taught.
“Fourthly, their rabbis must be forbidden under threat of death to teach any more…
“Fifthly, passport and traveling privileges should be absolutely forbidden to the Jews. For they have
no business in the rural districts since they are not nobles, nor officials, nor merchants, nor the like.
Let them stay at home…If you princes and nobles do not close the road legally to such exploiters,
then some troop ought to ride against them, for they will learn from this pamphlet what the Jews are
and how to handle them and that they ought not to be protected. You ought not, you cannot protect
them, unless in the eyes of God you want to share all their abomination…
“To sum up, dear princes and nobles who have Jews in your domains, if this advice of mine does not
suit you, then find a be er one so that you and we may all be free of this insufferable devilish burden
– the Jews…”
John Calvin, who believed in “predestination,” was also antisemitic. And “predestination” means
that if one is going to enter Hell or Heaven, they have already been preordained, and nothing can be
done about it.
John Calvin: A Response To Questions and Objections of a Certain Jew
“Their [the Jews] ro en and unbending stiffneckedness deserves that they be oppressed unendingly
and without measure or end and that they die in their misery without the pity of anyone.”
Excerpt from “Ad Quaelstiones et Objecta Juaei Cuiusdam Responsio,” by John Calvin; The Jew in
Christian Theology, Gerhard Falk, McFarland and Company, Inc., Jefferson, NC and London, 1931.
Here are some more antisemitic quotes from early “church fathers”
(h p://www.yashanet.com/library/fathers.htm):
Peter the Venerable — known as “the meekest of men, a model of Christian charity”:
“Yes, you Jews. I say, do I address you; you, who till this very day, deny the Son of God. How long,
poor wretches, will ye not believe the truth? Truly I doubt whether a Jew can be really human… I
lead out from its den a monstrous animal, and show it as a laughing stock in the amphitheater of the
world, in the sight of all the people. I bring thee forward, thou Jew, thou brute beast, in the sight of
all men.”
From “The Roots of Christian Anti-Semitism” by Malcolm Hay
Augustine (c. 354-430 A.D.), Confessions, 12.14
“How hateful to me are the enemies of your Scripture! How I wish that you would slay them (the
Jews) with your two-edged sword, so that there should be none to oppose your word! Gladly would I
have them die to themselves and live to you!”
John Chrysostom (344-407 A.D.) — One of the “greatest” of church fathers; A missionary preacher
famous for his sermons and addresses, also known as “The Golden Mouthed.”
“The synagogue is worse than a brothel…it is the den of scoundrels and the repair of wild beasts…
the temple of demons devoted to idolatrous cults…the refuge of brigands and dabauchees, and the
cavern of devils. It is a criminal assembly of Jews…a place of meeting for the assassins of Christ… a
house worse than a drinking shop…a den of thieves, a house of ill fame, a dwelling of iniquity, the
refuge of devils, a gulf and a abyss of perdition.”…”I would say the same things about their souls…
As for me, I hate the synagogue…I hate the Jews for the same reason.”
From “The Roots of Christian Anti-Semitism” by Malcolm Hay
Origen of Alexandria (185-254 A.D.) — A ecclesiastical writer and teacher who contributed to the
early formation of “Christian” doctrines.
“We may thus assert in u er confidence that the Jews will not return to their earlier situation, for they
have commi ed the most abominable of crimes, in forming this conspiracy against the Savior of the
human race…hence the city where Jesus suffered was necessarily destroyed, the Jewish nation was
driven from its country, and another people was called by God to the blessed election.”
Now let’s look at the Catholic Church, or be er known as the “Vatican,” and its history of
antisemitism, along with its persecutions and “Crusades” or “Inquisitions.”
The Inquisitions (h p://www.paralumun.com/inquisition.htm) (Roman, Medieval, and Spanish

(h p://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/Inquisition.html)) were perpetrated upon the
Peoples of Europe (h p://www.zionism-israel.com/dic/Inquisition.htm), with an estimated 3 million
murdered and about 300,000 burned at the stake in Spain alone.
A Catholic historian commenting on the Spanish Inquisition wrote:
“When Napoleon conquered Spain in 1808, a Polish officer in his army, Colonel Lemanouski,
reported that the Dominicans [in charge of the Inquisition] blockaded themselves in their
monastery…the inquisitors denied the existence of any torture chambers. The soldiers searched the
monastery and discovered them under the floors. The chambers were full of prisoners, all naked,
many insane. The French troops, used to cruelty and blood
(h p://www.torturamuseum.com/instruments.html), could not stomach the sight. They emptied the
torture-chambers, laid gunpowder to the monastery and blew the place up.”
And Church historian Bishop William Shaw Kerr writes:
“The most ghastly abomination of all was the system of torture. The accounts of its cold-blooded
operations make one shudder at the capacity of human beings for cruelty. And it was decreed and
regulated by the popes who claim to represent Christ on earth…
“Careful notes were taken not only of all that was confessed by the victim, but of his shrieks,
cries, lamentations, broken interjections and appeals for mercy. The most moving things in the
literature of the Inquisition are not the accounts of their sufferings left by the victims but the
sober memoranda kept by the officers of the tribunals…there is no intention to shock us.”
Also, Emelio Martinez writes in a book published in 1909: “To these three million
victims [documented by Llorente] should be added the thousands upon thousands of Jews and Moors
deported from their homeland…In just one year, 1481, and just in Seville, the Holy Office [of the
Inquisition] burned 2000 persons; the bones and effigies of another 2000…and another 16,000 were
condemned to varying sentences.”
Even Peter de Rosa acknowledges that the RCC “was responsible for persecuting Jews, for the
Inquisition, for slaughtering heretics by the thousand, for reintroducing torture into Europe as part of
the judicial process.”
In 1096, Pope Urban II was the impetus of the first crusade to retake Jerusalem from the Muslims,
with one of the Crudaders’ first acts upon taking Jerusalem “for Holy Mother Church” was to put the
Jews into a synagogue and set it on fire.
Here is a book entitled: “The Popes Against Jews: The Vatican’s Role in the Rise of Modern Anti-
semitism (h p://www.davidker er.com/books/popes-against-jews)“
Here is a list of compiled quotes from Popes of the Roman Catholic Church wherein they taught:
That the Jews are cursed for murdering Jesus (h p://www.romancatholicism.org/popes-

jews.htm#_The_Jews_are)
That the Jews are cursed to be traitors like Judas (h p://www.romancatholicism.org/popes-

jews.htm#_That_the_Jews)
That the Jews are cursed to be unscrupulous money grubbers, like Judas
(h p://www.romancatholicism.org/popes-jews.htm#_That_the_Jews_1)
That the Jews are cursed to be outcasts like Cain, segregated from the rest of the society within which
they live (h p://www.romancatholicism.org/popes-jews.htm#_The_Jews_are_1)
That the Jews are cursed to be distinguished from everyone else by an identifying mark, like Cain
(h p://www.romancatholicism.org/popes-jews.htm#_That_the_Jews_2)
That the Jews are cursed to be outcasts, periodically ejected from the nations amongst whom they
live, like Cain (h p://www.romancatholicism.org/popes-jews.htm#_That_the_Jews_3)
That the Jews are cursed to be slaves like Esau (h p://www.romancatholicism.org/popes-

jews.htm#_That_the_Jews_4)
Here is a list of instances (h p://www.romancatholicism.org/popes-jews.htm#list) where Christians

expelled the Jews in line with the teachings and exhortations of the Catholic Church.
And how about this: ‘THIS anthology which brings together texts from the main Catholic theorists of
Germany, from Gorres to Vogelsang, MAKES US BELIEVE THAT NATIONAL-SOCIALISM
[NAZISM] WAS BORN OUT OF CATHOLIC IDEAS (h p://www.jesus-is-
lord.com/vatican_jesuits_hitler.htm)‘.(113)
Here we have the Vatican conducting beatification of Pope Pius IX, a deeply ingrained antisemitic
within the Catholic Church (h p://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2000/09/pope-s19.html), who reigned
from 1846 to 1878, and was beatified by Pope John-Paul II on September 3 in a ceremony a ended by
thousands of pilgrims in St Peter’s Square in 2000.
In fact, the Vatican is the “Great Whore (h ps://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/mystery-

babylon-the-great-whore-of-revelation-is-revealed-the-vatican-is-in-rome-built-within-seven-hills-
which-the-city-sits-upon/)” spoken of in scripture
(h p://www.remnantofgod.org/whoreo abylon.htm).
Here are the “Religious Luciferian Symbols (h p://whale.to/c/churches_ill.html#Inverted_cross)” the

Vatican uses.
Here is the history of the sign of the cross (h p://www.ccg.org/english/s/p039.html) and it’s idolatrous
usage by the Vatican (h p://www.piney.com/His56.html).
(h ps://777denny.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/cross-pagan-egyptian-osiris.jpg)
Note that the Isra’elites carried along their idols from Egypt, with the women wearing earrings and
other jewelry — which was almost always an image of the “sovereign” or “sovereignness.” These
women had spent 400 years worshiping Osiris (h p://www.piney.com/MuEgypt.html), which
was pictured as a tiny or large golden calf.
Apis was the beast-sovereign of ancient Egypt, and was also known as Mnevis and Onuphis. This
Apis / Mnevis / Onuphis (Apis) was regarded as the avatar or Incarnation of the god Osiris, whose
soul, it was said, had transmigrated into the body of a bull.
(h ps://777denny.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/bacchus-babylonian-messiah-head-band-covering-a-
person.jpg)
When one considers that the Buddhist, like the Babylonian cross, was the recognized emblem of
Tammuz (Eze 8:14), who was known as the mistletoe branch, or “All-heal,” then one can understand
just how the sacred Initial should be represented as covered with leaves,with Rome adopting and
calling it the
“Medicine which preserves the healthful, heals the sick, and does what mere human power alone
could never do.”
To identify Tammuz with the sun it was joined sometimes to the circle of the sun as in figure on left;
sometimes it was inserted in the circle, as in figure on right.
This Pagan symbol seems first to have crept into the Christian Church in Egypt, with a statement of
Tertullian showing that Christianity had completely adopted that Pagan symbol. The first form of
that which is called the Christian Cross and found on Christian monuments in Egypt, is the
unequivocal Pagan Tau, or Egyptian “Sign of life. “Statement of Sir G. Wilkinson:
“A still more curious fact may be mentioned respecting this hieroglyphical character [the Tau], that
the early Christians of Egypt adopted it in lieu of the cross, which was afterwards substituted for it,
prefixing it to inscriptions in the same manner as the cross in later times. For, though Dr. Young had
some scruples in believing the statement of Sir A. Edmonstone, that it holds that position in the
sepulchres of the great Oasis, I can a est that such is the case, and that numerous inscriptions, headed
by the Tau, are preserved to the present day on early Christian monuments.”
See image of Bacchus below and take note of the sign of the cross and the instruments of Apollo
(Apollyon, Abaddon)
(h ps://777denny.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/bacchus-with-cross-instruments-of-apollo-apollyon-
abaddon.gif)
And not only that, but there is hardly a Pagan tribe where the cross has not been found! The cross was
worshiped by the Pagan Celts: “It is a fact,” says Maurice,
“not less remarkable than well-a ested, that the Druids in their groves were accustomed to select
the most stately and beautiful tree as an emblem of the Deity they adored, and having cut the
side branches, they affixed two of the largest of them to the highest part of the trunk, in such a
manner that those branches extended on each side like the arms of a man, and, together with the
body, presented the appearance of a HUGE CROSS, and on the bark, in several places, was also
inscribed the le er Thau.” It was worshipped in Mexico for ages before the Roman
Catholic missionaries set foot there, large stone crosses being erected, probably to the “god of
rain.”
Thus, the cross, just like today in Christianity, was widely worshiped, and/or regarded as a sacred
emblem,
and was the unequivocal symbol of Bacchus, the Babylonian Messiah. He is represented with a head-
band covered with crosses in the above figure.
“From a Biblical perspective the Greek word stauros denotes an ‘upright stake’…– not a cross —
agreeing with the Aramaic [Peshi a text-The Messiah] was put on an upright stake, not ‘cross-
ified.’”(Andrew Gabriel Roth, Aramaic English New Testament, app., p. 916, 76).
“The Greek word stauros means staff, stake , pole, or beam, corresponding to the Hebrew word nas
(h p://www.yaim.org/web/literature/other-topics/163-didyahshuadieonacross.html), which the
serpent Nehushtan was lifted up with in the desert (John 3:14, Numbers 2:19; 2 Kings 18:4).” (Lew
White, Fossilized Customs, 8th ed., p.114).
And check some of these quotes (h p://www.remnantofgod.org/whoreo abylon.htm) out:
In his book, Cardinal Newman admits that; the “temples, incense, oil lamps, votive offerings, holy
water, Holidays, and seasons of devotion, processions, blessings of the fields, sacerdotal vestments,
the tonsure (of priests, munks and nuns), images, and statues… are all of PAGAN ORIGIN.” — The
Development of the Christian Religion Cardinal Newman p.359
And the penetration of the religion of Babylon became so general and also so well known that Rome
was called the “New Babylon.”– -Faith of our fathers 1917 ed. Cardinal Gibbons, p. 106
“Confiding then in the power of Christianity to resist the infection of evil, and to transmute the
instruments and appendages of demon worship to an evangelical use… the rulers of the church from
early times were prepared should occasion arise, to adopt, or imitate, or sanction the existing rites and
customs of the populace.” — Development of Christian Doctrine, Cardinal Newman. p. 372
Cardinal Newman lists many examples of things of “pagan origin” which the papacy brought into
the church “in order to recommend the new religion to the heathen: “in order to recommend the
new religion to the heathen:” “The use of temples, and these dedicated to particular saints, and
ornamented on occasions with branches of trees; incense, lamps, and candles; holy water; asylums
[hermitages, monasteries and convents]; [pagan] holy-days, processions, sacerdotal vestments, the
tonsure, the ring in marriage, turning to the East, images, . . . and the Kyrie Eleison.” — Cardinal J.
H. Newman, An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine, 1920 edition, p.373 [Roman
Catholic].
“The [Catholic] Church took the pagan philosophy and made it the buckler of faith against the
heathen. She took the pagan Roman Pantheon, temple of all the gods, and made it sacred to all the
martyrs; so it stands to this day. She took the pagan Sunday and made it the Christian Sunday. She
took the pagan Easter and made it the feast we celebrate during this season . . . The Sun was a
foremost god with heathendom . . . The sun has worshipers at this hour in Persia and other lands . . .
Hence the Church would seem to say, ‘Keep that old pagan name [Sunday]. It shall remain
consecrated, sanctified.’ And thus the pagan Sunday, dedicated to Balder, became the Christian
Sunday, sacred to Jesus” — William L. Gildea, “Paschale Gaudium,” in The Catholic World, 58,
March, 1894, p. 809 [A Roman Catholic weekly].
“in order to recommend the new religion to the heathen:” “The use of temples, and these dedicated to
particular saints, and ornamented on occasions with branches of trees; incense, lamps, and candles;
holy water; asylums [hermitages, monasteries and convents]; [pagan] holy-days, processions,
sacerdotal vestments, the tonsure, the ring in marriage, turning to the East, images, . . . and the Kyrie
Eleison.” — J. H. Newman, An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine, 1920 edition, p.373
[Roman Catholic].
“The mighty Catholic Church was li le more then the Roman Empire baptized.”– A. C, Flick, The
Rise of the Mediaeval Church, 1909 edition, p. 148. “From ancient Babylon came the cult of the virgin
mother-goddess, who was worshiped as the highest of gods–see S. H. Langdon, Semitic Mythology,
1931 edition. This worship was taken over as Mary-worship by Rome. Heathen sun-worship on
Sunday was likewise adopted by the Roman apostasy.”
“In order to a ach to Christianity great a raction in the eyes of the nobility, the priests adopted the
outer garments and adornments which were used in pagan cults.” — Life of Constantine, Eusabius,
cited in Altai-Nimalaya, p. 94
“The Church did everything it could to stamp out such ‘pagan’ rites, but had to capitualet and allow
the rites to continue with only the name of the local diety changed to some Christian saint’s
name.” — Religious Tradition and Myth. Dr. Edwin Goodenough, Professor of Religion, Harvard
University. p. 56, 57
“From the foregoing, which treats merely of the more important solar festivals, it is clear that these
products of paganism are as much in force at present … as they ever were, and that Christianity
countenances, and in many cases has actually adopted and practiced, pagan rites whose heathen
significance is merely lost sight of because a ention is not called tot the source whence these rites
have sprung. So heavy was this infiltration that Sir Samuel Dill exclaims: “Christianity is only a sect
of the Mithraists.” — Roman Society from Nero to Marcus Aurelius, p. VII
“We know that Mithraism was a state religion of Rome at the time that the Christian church was
established there. Evidently tenants of Mithraism such as Sunday worship and eating the wafer in
the mass were adopted into Christianity at that time” — Jim Arrabito “666 & the Mark”
Stanley’s History, page 40: “The popes filled the place of the vacant emperors at Rome,
inheriting their power, their prestige, and their titles from PAGANISM.”
“In short, sun worship, symbolically speaking, lies at the very heart of the great festivals which the
Christian Church celebrates today, and these relics of heathen religion have, through the medium of
their sacred rites, curiously enough blended with practices and beliefs u erly antagonistic to the
spirit which prompted them.” — Sun Lore of All Ages, Olco , p. 248
“Yet the cross itself is the oldest of phallic emblems, and the lozenge-shaped windows of cathedrals
are proof that the yonic symbols have survived the destructions of the pagan Mysteries. The very
structure of the church itself is permeated with (sexual symbolism) phallicism. Remove from the
Christian Church all emblems of Priapic origin and nothing is left…” — The secret teaching of all
ages by Manley P. Hall
“When the zealots of the primitave Christian Church sought to Christianize paganism, the pagan
initiates retorted with a powerful effort to paganize Christianity. The Christians failed but the pagans
succeeded. With the decline of paganism the initiated pagan hierophants transferred their base of
operations to the new vehicle of primitive Christianity, adopting the symbols of the new cult to
conceal those eternal verities which are ever the priceless possession of the wise.” — The secret
teachings of all ages, Manley P. Hall p. CLXXXV
Don’t you remember the warning from 2 Timothy about a time that would come when people would
not seek sound teachings?
2 Timothy 4:3 “For their shall be a time when they shall not bear sound teaching, but according to
their own desires, they shall heap up for themselves teachers tickling the ear, and they shall indeed
turn their ears away from the truth and be turned aside to myths…”
Now we turn to the “Sabbatarians.”
Sabbatarians are those that call themselves “Natsarim,” and who observe Jewish holidays, but trust
in the Torah for their salvation, and also keeping a watered-down version of Sabbath Day “rest,”
rather than the trusting in the finished work of Yahusha at Calvary.
They have an almost universal disdain of Paul, who was commissioned to the Gentiles by none other
than Yahusha the Messiah, to preach the Truth to. Remember, it was Paul who rebuked Peter for
trusting in the Torah and it’s circumcision and other requirements, rather than in Messiah, and said
that those who did this were “fallen” from grace.
Let’s see where they err…
Galatians 2:3 “And I went up by revelation and laid before them that Besorah which I proclaim
among the Gentiles…But as for the false brothers, sneakingly brought in, who sneaked in to spy out
our freedom which we have in Messiah

(h ps://777denny.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/yahusha-paleo.png)in order to enslave us, to these we
did not yield in subjection, not even for an hour, so that the truth of the Besorah remains with you.
But from those who were esteemed to be whatever — what they were, it makes no difference to me,
Elohim shows no partiality — for those who were esteemed contributed naught to me. But on the
contrary, when they saw that the Besorah to the uncircumcised had been entrusted to me, even as
Kepha [or “Peter” as we know him today] to the circumcised — for He who worked in Kepha to
make him an emissary to the circumcised also worked in me for the gentiles. So, when Ya’aqob,
Kepha and Yohanan, who seemed to be supporters, came to know the favour that had been given to
me, they gave me and Barnabah the right had of fellowship, in order that we go to the gentiles and
they to the circumcised…11. And when Kepha had come to Antioch, I withstood him to his face,
because he was at fault. For before some came from Ya’aqob, he was eating with the gentiles, but
when they came, he began to withdraw and separate himself, in fear of those of the circumcision.
And the rest of the Yahudim joined him in hypocrisy, so that even Barnabah was led away by their
hypocrisy. But when I saw that they are not walking straight according t the truth of the Besorah, I
said to Kepha before them all, “If you, being a Yehudite, live as a gentile and not as the Yahudim,
why do you compel gentiles to live as Yahudim? We, Yahudim by nature and not of the gentiles,
sinners, knowing that a man is not declared right by works of Torah, but through belief in
(h ps://777denny.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/yahusha-paleo.png)Messiah, even we have believed in
Messiah (h ps://777denny.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/yahusha-paleo.png), in order to be

declared right by belief in Messiah and not by works of Torah, because by works of Torah no flesh
shall be declared right. Chapter 3:2 “This only I wish to learn from you: Did you receive the Spirit by
works of Torah, or by the hearing of belief? Are you so senseless? Having begun in the Spirit, do you
now end in the flesh?…5. Is He, then, who is supplying the Spirit to you and working miracles among
you, doing it by works of Torah, or by hearing of belief?”
As we can see above, no flesh shall be saved obeying the Torah, which the Sabbatarians don’t
even fully obey, anyway, their hypocrisy evident to everyone who knows the truth of scripture. And
besides this, many Sabbatarians who call themselves “Natsarim,” only believe that the Son is the
Father and the two are the same, which clearly the scriptures do not teach in the new or old
covenants. Imagine the Son having an imaginary conversation with himself as the Father? This is
nonsensical to me.
Thanks for listening, 777denny
Advertisements
Fort Wayne, IN Residents

Are 'Rattled' By New Website
Report this ad
Fort Wayne, IN Residents

Are 'Rattled' By New Website
Report this ad
Filed under: Christianity, Elohim, Natsarim, religion, Sabbatarianism, Set-apart One of Yisra'el, Yah,
Yahuah, Yahusha Ha'Mashiach, YHWH, Yisrael |
« Do Christians Tell Lies? Take This Test To See If You Are Spreading Falsehoods On Accident — Or
On Purpose! 2013 in review — Yahusha Ha’Mashiach, The Gift of Eternal Life »
16 Responses
Why is Christianity Beholden to Babylonian Holidays of Christmas and Easter (Mythology)?

Follow the Mammon, Follow the Great Whore, and Become Li le Spiritual Whores?: “Come Out
From Among Them And Be Ye Separate, Says YHWH” | Gospel of Yahus, on January 5, 2014 at
1:02 AM said:
[…] Who Are The “N… on ‘Mystery Babylon,’… […]
Reply

7:45 PM said:
[…] Why is Christianity… on Who Are The “Natsarim… […]
Reply

7:48 PM said:
Reply

7:54 PM said:
Reply
Testimonies of Hell From Atheists, Agnostics, Rebels and Backsliders. Why YOU Will Survive
Death, Even Though You Leave Your Body! | Besorah (Good News) of Yahusha Ha'Mashiach, The
Gift of Eternal Life, on February 22, 2014 at 4:18 AM said:
[…] Who Are The “Natsarim”; The “Christians”; The “Catholics”; The &… […]
Reply
Have You Been Baptized in the Name of “Jesus” to Wash Your Sins Away? If So, You Have Been
Baptized into the GREEK Name Transliterated From “Iesous,” Which in Hebrew Means “Horse”!
YAHusha is the Messiah | Besorah (Good, on February 22, 2014 at 4:39 AM said:
[…] Testimonies of Hell… on Who Are The “Natsarim… […]
Reply
Larry, on April 1, 2014 at 6:40 PM said:

Yes, have just read most of your writings, and consider ourselves to be
a later day Natsarim, of many years ago, just now thrilled with being
connected to the “first” follwers of the NATSARIST.
We really appreciate your work, and as we and our family have come
out of “Christianity” some 25 years ago. We identify with all the socalled
Fathers of the Church says about the Natsarim, having been keeping
them (not perfect mind you). Seventh Day Sabbath, SetApart Days,etc.
I led our family out of the Catholic Church some 45 years ago, so we
do really appreciate what you have compiled.
However! ! You are not alone it seems. We just stumbled onto your site
“after” watching some of Lew White’s Documentaries Videos. We were
appalled to read “word for word” in his videos, what you have wri en
above, in much the same order and sequence. So, it appears, someone
is copying whom and I do not know whom is doing the copying.
We became aquainted with Lew White through his book “Fossilized-

Customs.”
Anyway maybe you can shed some light on the above, would be very
much appreciated.
Again, thanks for your very helpful articles.
Larry Garman, Sr.
Reply
777denny, on April 2, 2014 at 10:35 AM said:

I have used some of Lew White’s work that I hope I put into quotes. I am NOT a Sabbatarian, if
you mean a follower of “not perfect” selected obedience to some of the Abrahamic Law
pertaining to the keeping of the Sabbath Day. Out of Christianity and into the keeping of Sabbath
Days for salvation, instead of faith through the Set-Apart Spirit of Elohim as we work out our
salvation with fear and trembling according to YHWH’s esteem and plans for our lives? Anyway,
I cannot get a Christian to set himself free from his delusion of following the Trinity of Nimrod,
Tammuz, and Semiramis, nor can I separate a Sabbatarian from his “not perfect” Torah
observances that reduces his faith to dependence on the Law of Moses, which Yahusha fulfilled
after He was esteemed to the Right Hand of YHWH…
Reply

Thanks for your reply, and no didn’t see your giving Mr.White credits, but we haven’t seen all
of your articles. As for the Sabbath, we love
keeping it, as HE did, and all the early followers were “accused” of it
by the church “fathers”, etc.
Of course the main reason is, He says “IF”you love me, keep MY
commandments.” whom He said would not change a jot, or ti le, till
heaven and earth pass.”
Then of course the final word on the commandments come from John
in Revelations, called the saints, who “keep” the commandments, and
“Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have the
right to tree of life, and may enter in to the gates into the city.”Rev22:14
Above sounds like kinda important, if words mean anything. Of course

they are not for “Salvation”, that only comes though the shed blood of
the Redeemer,Yahusha, our MessiYah.
Most of all they are not MOSES’ laws, he got them from the one who
wrote them with His finger, and calls the MY laws, MY sabbaths,You
shall keep, on and on.
Really the only reason we arrived at your site was just looking for some
more info on the Natsarim, read you column above and WOW!, I have
read this info “before” and word for word. Innocent enough? didn’t know
who was being copied, now we know.
Finally, as for Natsarim, first followers, why should we not try to “do”
what they did?” weren’t they “doing” it right? weren’t they martyred for
doing the 7th day Sabbath?, Were called Judahizers? Laws of Moses?
and any other derogatory term the unbelievers could conjer up?
Ok, so, some do the Sabbath, You do not, why not leave it that and not
resort to name calling and negitivity? am sure when the King comes he
will correct any and all errors.
Peace, and well wishes to you and yours.
L.G.
Reply
Larry, on April 5, 2014 at 1:34 AM said:

Notice a li le more explanation on our “not perfect” comment required.
First of all, we were shocked to find a fellow Natsarim preaching against

the Sabbath, or keeping the Torah and Commandments. We have been
for 25 years or so. We realize we are not perfect in anything and don’t
worry about it. Most of all we don’t place our Salvation on anything but
the shed blood of our Saviour Yahusha and His Name.
Hope this helps you understand our intententions of the not perfect
comment. But know it all happened for a reason, so will see how it all
plays out.
Thanks again,
L.G.
Reply
777denny, on April 5, 2014 at 9:02 AM said:
I do plan on writing another article explaining why Believers in Yahusha Messiah are NOT
beholden to keep the Jewish Sabbath (I deleted it because it had too many “other
sovereigns” or “other mighty ones” in it. Although one can “observe” the Sabbath toward
YHWH as long as we do not believe that by observing it we are “obeying” the
commandments of YHWH. I do know what the commandments of Yahusha are, and not
one of them refers to observing the Jewish Sabbath AFTER He sent His Set-Apart Spirit,
which fulfilled the Scriptures that refer to the fact that we have entered the “rest” of
working for Yahusha, Whose burden is light, and resting from our sins, and instead,
learning to become slaves of right-living. We will observe the Sabbath in the age to come
voluntarily — just like we can do now. Also, many Natsarim despise Paul, the emissary to
the Gentiles directly sent by Yahusha — with some even hating him and accusing him of
starting the false sect of religion known as “Christianity.” Did you not read my article
entitled, “1 Yohanan (1 John) Father Elohim’s Commandments Are to Believe in Yahusha
and to Love Believers in Yahusha Ha’Mashiach (Messiah)!”? This Scripture clearly states
what the commandments of Yahusha are. Please re-read them again. There is not one place
in all Scripture after Yahusha sent His Set-Apart Spirit that calls for Believers in Yahusha to
observe seventh day Sabbath Days… h ps://777denny.wordpress.com/2014/02/1-yohanan-
1-john-father-elohims-commandments-are-to-believe-in-yahusha-and-to-love-believers-in-
yahusha-ha-mashiach-messiah/
Reply

Greetings once again, A question? are you a believing Natsarim, or
not? The historical evidence is overwhelming that the first followers of
the Natsarist, were most definitely Sabbath Keepers. As asked above,
being followers of the Apostles and long after being put to death for
being “Judahizers”, and Sabbath keepers, and law.
YOU say they were WRONG? they didn’t know what they were doing?
The Universal Church was at war with these true believers, untill they
wiped them out. And you say the “the Memorial to His Creation” has
been done away?
It is this idea that has Evolution Exploding in the world today. For it too
“refutes” His Creation Day, replaced, destroyed, beli led, to SUNday,
as prophesied by Daniel, accomplished by Constantine 1, and the
Unversal Church and her daughters ever since.
FULFULLED: this is a word that needs some comment. According to

you it means, something like “done away”. You say Yahusha fulfilled
the Commandments, or such? Can’t go back up to check, but is this
close to your message? Did he do away with “all” of them? or just the
Sabbath day? What day(s) do you keep, if any? In order for that to be
valid, all the above scriptures would have to be thrown out, too many
to note here again.
Fulfilled in our view, and what the context says is, He did them “fully”or
perfectly. Didn’t he keep Sabbaths, eat Kosher food? keep Holy Days?
Are we not to “walk as He walked”, “Follow Me”, on and on.
Yes, His sacrifice accomplished more than our meger minds can ever
comprehend. Nailed the sacrificial laws to the stake, split the veil in the
Temple, opened the WAY to Himself to all, shed forth His Set Apart
Ruach, to be our helper, comforter, truth leader, sanctifier, on and on.
Thank again, have a good day.
L.G.
Reply
james, on April 13, 2015 at 3:47 PM said:

fulfill means to teach more fully
Reply
Zniale Zniale, on March 6, 2015 at 3:59 AM said:

I totally agree with you L.G., I call myself a Puratim,(sorry for the mis~ spelling) I keep the
Sabbath, I keep the 10 Commandments, As YHWH said BE PERFECT as I AM PERFECT,
We are to strive to be perfect, Am I perfect LOLL hardly, but Im not going to stop striving
to live as Yahusha has taught us to live, pu ing others before ourselves and loving even
our enemies, Yahusha as you said told us Himself that He did not come to do away with
His Abba’s laws but to fullfill them, What He did away with were the Levitical laws, He
was the LAST Sacrifice. Amen!! All Praise and Glory to Him who was and IS and is
Coming again soooo soon! Blessings and Thank you Mr.777Denny, for the though history
on the RCC which i knew most of, The only thing that keeps me out of the Adventist
Church is the teachings of Mrs.White, (nothing wrong with Mrs.White), It reminds me od
the Mormons Joseph Smith. and Islams Mohamadd., Nothing new under the sun.
Reply
Jacqueline Schneller, on April 22, 2015 at 2:46 AM said:

the word perfect is really COMPLETE.. and you can be complete .And you see you
have tasted the word of righteousness when you have tasted the torah and found out it
is clean and healthy and brings blessings in your life and body
Reply
John Richardson, on July 8, 2014 at 7:35 AM said:

I would like to hear more on the Natasarim and how they differ from the Christian of today; how
Yeshuah differed from todays christian as well as Jews, not Zionist nor neo-con sympathizers. Would
you please provide clarity . Thank you Larry.
Reply
WP Designer.

Who Are The "Natsarim" The "Christians" The "Catholics" The "Protestants" The "Sabbatarians" - Besorah (Good News) of Yahusha Ha'Mashiach, The Gift of Eternal Life

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Who Are The "Natsarim" The "Christians" The "Catholics" The "Protestants" The "Sabbatarians" - Besorah (Good News) of Yahusha Ha'Mashiach, The Gift of Eternal Life

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

7/21/2018 Who Are The “Natsarim”; The “Christians”; The “Catholics”; The “Protestants”; The “Sabbatarians”?

rians”? | Besorah (Good News) of Yahusha H…

Besorah (Good News) of Yahusha Ha'Mashiach,

Who Are The “Natsarim”; The “Christians”; The “Catholics”;

Posted on December 27, 2013 by 777denny

“Recently I read in a certain Hebrew book

1. A person aﬄicted with cretinism.

And what about the term “God”? (h ps://777denny.wordpress.com/2014/03/04/origins-and-

And how do we become saved? Yahusha tells us below:

And we are spoken of here:

Martin Luther – 1543: On The Jews and Their Lies

John Calvin: A Response To Questions and Objections of a Certain Jew

From “The Roots of Christian Anti-Semitism” by Malcolm Hay

Augustine (c. 354-430 A.D.), Confessions, 12.14

From “The Roots of Christian Anti-Semitism” by Malcolm Hay

The Inquisitions (h p://www.paralumun.com/inquisition.htm) (Roman, Medieval, and Spanish

A Catholic historian commenting on the Spanish Inquisition wrote:

And Church historian Bishop William Shaw Kerr writes:

That the Jews are cursed for murdering Jesus (h p://www.romancatholicism.org/popes-

That the Jews are cursed to be traitors like Judas (h p://www.romancatholicism.org/popes-

That the Jews are cursed to be slaves like Esau (h p://www.romancatholicism.org/popes-

Here is a list of instances (h p://www.romancatholicism.org/popes-jews.htm#list) where Christians

In fact, the Vatican is the “Great Whore (h ps://777denny.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/mystery-

Here are the “Religious Luciferian Symbols (h p://whale.to/c/churches_ill.html#Inverted_cross)” the

And check some of these quotes (h p://www.remnantofgod.org/whoreo abylon.htm) out:

Now we turn to the “Sabbatarians.”

Let’s see where they err…

our freedom which we have in Messiah

Messiah (h ps://777denny.ﬁles.wordpress.com/2013/12/yahusha-paleo.png), in order to be

Thanks for listening, 777denny

Fort Wayne, IN Residents

Fort Wayne, IN Residents

Why is Christianity Beholden to Babylonian Holidays of Christmas and Easter (Mythology)?

Why is Christianity Beholden to Babylonian Holidays of Christmas and Easter (Mythology)?

Why is Christianity Beholden to Babylonian Holidays of Christmas and Easter (Mythology)?

Why is Christianity Beholden to Babylonian Holidays of Christmas and Easter (Mythology)?

Larry, on April 1, 2014 at 6:40 PM said:

We became aquainted with Lew White through his book “Fossilized-

Again, thanks for your very helpful articles.

Larry Garman, Sr.

777denny, on April 2, 2014 at 10:35 AM said:

Larry, on April 4, 2014 at 9:38 PM said:

Above sounds like kinda important, if words mean anything. Of course

Peace, and well wishes to you and yours.

Larry, on April 5, 2014 at 1:34 AM said:

First of all, we were shocked to ﬁnd a fellow Natsarim preaching against

777denny, on April 5, 2014 at 9:02 AM said:

Larry, on April 5, 2014 at 6:34 PM said:

FULFULLED: this is a word that needs some comment. According to

Thank again, have a good day.

james, on April 13, 2015 at 3:47 PM said:

Zniale Zniale, on March 6, 2015 at 3:59 AM said:

Jacqueline Schneller, on April 22, 2015 at 2:46 AM said:

John Richardson, on July 8, 2014 at 7:35 AM said:

You might also like