Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Ratee: ALAN S. DAGOC Name of Rater: ROLLY L. ALAPAG

Position: SST-I Position: Head Teacher III
Review Period : June 2017- March 2018 Date of Review: Midyear : October 2017 Year End : March 2018
Division: SURIGAO DEL NORTE

TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Key PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

RATIN SCOR
Weigh RESULTS
Final Result TIME G E
t per QUALITY EFFICIENCY Q E T
Outputs Areas OBJECTIVES LINE KRA
(MFOs) (KRAs) TIMELINESS

1.Teaching 1.1Prepare daily JUNE 10% All daily lesson plans/logs had the Utilized daily lesson logs with Submitted and checked 2 days
-Learning lesson plans and daily 2017 5 following:Objective,Subject complete I’Ms in every before the delivery of the lesson
Process logs of activities to matter,teaching strategy,learning subject ares
30% including appropriate, MARCH tasks and assignment
adequate and updated 2018 Lacking 1 prescribed part of the No IM’s (1) subject area Submitted and checked 1 day
instructional materials 4 lesson plan before the delivery of the lesson 4 4 3.67 0.37
within the rating period Lacking 2 prescribed part of the No IM’s (2) subject area Submitted and checked the
3 lesson plan delivery of the lesson 3

2 Lacking 3 prescribed part of the No IM’s (3) subject area Submitted and checked 1 day
lesson plan after the delivery of the lesson

1 No lesson plan prepared No IM’s used Submitted and checked 2 days

or more after the delivery of the
lesson
1.2 Facilitate and deliver June 10% Employed innovative teaching Employed innovative Facilitated innovative teaching
the learning 2017 to 5 strategy with 3 activities,appropriate teaching strategy using ICT strategy once every quarter
competencies using March and complete instructional materials
inovative teaching 2018 4 Employed innovative teaching Employed innovative Facilitated innovative teaching
strategies as reflected in strategy with suitable teaching strategy using strategy once every semester 4 3.33 0.33
the daily lesson plan/log activities,appropriate and complete localized and indigenized
instructional materials IM’s
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Key PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

RATIN SCOR
Weigh RESULTS
Final Result TIME G E
t per QUALITY EFFICIENCY Q E T
Outputs Areas OBJECTIVES LINE KRA
(MFOs) (KRAs) TIMELINESS

3 Employed innovative teaching Employed innovative Facilitated innovative teaching

strategy with 2 activities,with teaching strategy IM’s strategy 2 times within the
complete instructional materials purchased from personal school year 3 3
funds

2 Employed innovative teaching Employed innovative Facilitated innovative teaching

strategy with 2 activities,but teaching strategy IM’s strategy once in a school year
incomplete instructional materials purchased from School
MOOE
1 No innovative teaching strategy Traditional teaching No innovative teaching
employed employed
1.3 Employ discipline of June 10% 100% of the classroom rules and Classroom rules and Student discipline is observed
students including 2017 to guidelines adhere to child protection guidelines are daily in the classroom
classroom March 5 policy implemented,posted in the 5 5
rules,guidelines and 2018 4.67 0.47
classroom and oriented to
individual and group the students
tasks within the rating 4 90% of the classroom rules and Classroom rules and Student discipline is observed 3
period guidelines adhere to child protection guidelines are times a week in the classroom
policy implemented,posted in the 4
classroom
3 80% of the classroom rules and Classroom rules and Student discipline is observed
guidelines adhere to child protection guidelines are implemented once a week in the classroom
policy in the classroom
2 70% of the classroom rules and Classroom rules and
guidelines adhere to child protection guidelines are posted in the
policy classroom
1 60% of the classroom rules and No defined classroom rules
guidelines adhere to child protection and guidelines
policy
2. Students 2.1 Monitor, Evaluate June 10% Complete, accurate and updated Students progress report
Outcome and maintain complete, 2017 to 5 school records presented to parents during Submitted 10 days after every 5
(30%) accurate and updated HRPTA meeting quarterly grading period

Major Key
Final Result
Outputs Areas OBJECTIVES
(MFOs) (KRAs)
learner’s academic
learning progress
evidenced by complete
school records in 2 week
or 10 days after every
periodical examinations
in a rating period
2.2 Conduct 30 minute
remediation/enrichment
activities daily in a rating
period to improve
learners performance
with complete logs of
evidences
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Weigh
TIME
t per QUALITY EFFICIENCY
LINE KRA
TIMELINESS
March 4 Complete, accurate and updated Students progress report
2018 school records presented to parents during
HRPTA meeting quarterly
3 Complete, accurate and updated Students progress report
school records presented to parents during
HRPTA meeting quarterly
2 Incomplete, accurate and updated Students progress report
school records presented to parents during
HRPTA meeting quarterly
1 Incomplete, accurate and updated Students progress report
school records presented to parents during
HRPTA meeting quarterly
June 10% Complete logs of evidences 100% learning improvement
2017 to 5 of the total identified number
March of learners who need
2018 remediation
4 Complete logs of evidences 85% learning improvement
of the total identified number
of learners who need
remediation
3 Complete logs of evidences 80% learning improvement
of the total identified number
of learners who need
remediation
2 Incomplete logs of evidences 75% learning improvement
of the total identified number
of learners who need
remediation
1 Incomplete logs of evidences 75% learning improvement
of the total identified number
of learners who need
remediation
TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL
RATIN SCOR
RESULTS
G E
Q E T
Submitted 12 days after
periodical examination
4 4 4.33 0.433
Submitted 14 days after
periodical examination
Submitted 16 days after
periodical examination
Submitted 18 days after
periodical examination
Conduct daily 30 minute
remediation/enrichment activities
Conduct daily 30 minute
remediation/enrichment activities
4
Conduct 30 minute
remediation/enrichment activities
thrice a week 3
Conduct 30 minute
remediation/enrichment activities
twice a week 2 3 0.3
Conduct 30 minute
remediation/enrichment activities
once a week
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Key PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

RATIN SCOR
Weigh RESULTS
Final Result TIME G E
t per QUALITY EFFICIENCY Q E T
Outputs Areas OBJECTIVES LINE KRA
(MFOs) (KRAs) TIMELINESS

2.3 Attain 40% of the
total enrolment in grade
7 achieved 80% quarterly
proficiency level in all
subjects in a rating
period as reflected in
grading sheets,report
card,137 and SF 5
40% and above of the
Complete records of evidences learners attained 80%
10% 5 proficiency level in all subject
areas
4 Complete records of evidences 35% and above of the
learners attained 80%
proficiency level in all subject
areas
Complete records of evidences 30% and above of the
3 learners attained 80%
proficiency level in all subject
areas
Complete records of evidences 25% and above of the
2 learners attained 80%
proficiency level in all subject
areas
1 Complete records of evidences 20% and above of the
learners attained 80%
proficiency level in all subject
areas
Submission of the required
records 10 days after the
conduct of the periodical 5 5 5 5 0.5
examinations
Submission of the required
records 11 days after the
conduct of the periodical
examinations
Submission of the required
records 12 days after the
conduct of the periodical
examinations
Submission of the required
records 14 days after the
conduct of the periodical
examinations
Submission of the required
records 15 days after the
conduct of the periodical
examinations

3.Commun 3.1 Conduct home June 4% 4 or more parents were visited Parent and student commit
ity visitation at least 3 2017 to 5 regarding the performance of their for a change,documented Visited 1 month before the end
Involveme parents of those March son/daughter of the grading period 5 5
nt (10%) problematic students 2018
every grading period 4 3 or more parents were visited Parent and student commit
regarding the performance of their for a change but did not Visited 3 weeks before the end
4
son/daughter signed of the grading period
2 parents were visited regarding the Parent and student did not
3 performance of their son/daughter commit but signed the Visited 2 weeks before the end
4.67 0.47
commitment of the grading period
2 parents were visited regarding Parent and student did not
2 the performance of their commit and did not signed Visited 1 week before the end of
son/daughter the commitment the grading period
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Key PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

RATIN SCOR
Weigh RESULTS
Final Result TIME G E
t per QUALITY EFFICIENCY Q E T
Outputs Areas OBJECTIVES LINE KRA
(MFOs) (KRAs) TIMELINESS

3.2 Conduct HRPTA
meeting regularly with
documentation
3.3 Participate in at least
3 programs/activities
sponsored by LGU or
NGO
1 parent was visited regarding the Parent and student did not
1 performance of their son/daughter respond Visited 2 days before the end of
the grading period
June 85% parents’ attendance; HRPTA meeting is evaluated Held once in a quarter
2016 to 3% 5 documented to be outstanding 5 5 5 5 0.15
March 4 60% parents’ attendance; HRPTA meeting with 1 Held once in a quarter
2017 documented complaint
3 50% parents’ attendance; HRPTA meeting with 2 Held once in a quarter
documented complaints
2 35% parents’ attendance; HRPTA meeting with 3 Held once in a quarter
documented complaints
1 25% parents’ attendance; HRPTA meeting with 4
documented complaints Held once in a quarter
June Involved in at least 3 committees of
2016 to 3% 5 the identified programs/activities Joined with full enthusiasm Come ahead of time
March 5 5
sponsored by LGU and NGO with
2017 evidence
Involved in at least 1 committees
4 of the identified programs/activities Joined with full enthusiasm Come on time
sponsored by LGU and NGO with 4 4.67
0.14
evidence
3 Attended 2 in the identified Joined with hesitation
programs/activities sponsored by Come in 15 minutes late
LGU and NGO with evidence
2 Attended 1 in the identified Joined with 1 complaint
programs/activities sponsored by Come in 30 minutes late
LGU and NGO with evidence

1 Never attended programs/activity No willingness to join Did not come

sponsored by LGU and NGO
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Key PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

RATIN SCOR
Weigh RESULTS
Final Result TIME G E
t per QUALITY EFFICIENCY Q E T
Outputs Areas OBJECTIVES LINE KRA
(MFOs) (KRAs) TIMELINESS

4.Profess 4.1 Conducted and June 5% Monitored and evaluated based on Full implementatiion of Submitted 1 action research by
ional implemented action 2017 to the standard criteria research finding in school March 2017
Growth research related to March 5
and school or classroom 2018
developm concerns/problems
ent (20%)
4 Monitored and evaluated but Most of the finding were Submitted 1 actiion research by
lacking 1 criterion implemented April 2017
Monitored and evaluated but Partial implementation of the Submitted 1 action research by
3 lacking 2 criteria researh findings May 2017
Monitored and evaluated but Select research findings Submitted 1 action research by
2 lacking criteria were implemented June 2017
1 Monitored and evaluated with no No evidence of No submission at all
evidence implementation 1 1 1 1 0.05
4.2 Participated June Attended conferences in the Presented complete MOVs Joined at least 4 professional
professional 2017 to 8% national level conferences within the school
conferences and other March 5 year
related activities for self 2018
growth and
advancement
Attended conferences in the Presented 3 MOVs Joined at least 4 professional
4 regionall level conferences within the school
4 4
year
3 Attended conferences in the Presented 2 MOVs Joined at least 3 professional
divisionl level conferences within the school
3 3.67 0.29
year
2 Attended conferences in the district Presented 1 MOVs Joined at least 2 professional
level conferences within the school
year
1 Attendance to 1 seminar in school No MOV Joined at least 1 professional
level conferences within the school
year
4.3 Received Received awards in any Awards received presented Received at least 5 awards
awards/certificate of 7% 5 memorandized contests in the with complete MOVs within a year
recognition,commendati
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Major Key PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

RATIN SCOR
Weigh RESULTS
Final Result TIME G E
t per QUALITY EFFICIENCY Q E T
Outputs Areas OBJECTIVES LINE KRA
(MFOs) (KRAs) TIMELINESS

on,and appreciation in regional level

the school,district and
division

Received awards in any Awards received presented Received at least 4 awards

4 memorandized contests in the with 1 lacking MOVs within a year
4 4
division level
Received awards in any Awards received presented Received at least 3 awards
3 memorandized contests in the with 2 lacking MOVs within a year
3 3.67 0.26
districtl level
Received awards in any Awards received presented Received at least 2 awards
2 memorandized contests in the with 3 lacking MOVs within a year
school level
Received awards in any contest No evidence presented Received at least 1 awards
1 within a year
Plus Certificate of Commendation(see
Factor 10% attached) 5 0.5
Over all
4.263
Rating

ALAN S. DAGOC ROLLY L. ALAPAG ANTONINO C. EBU ÑA

Ratee Rater Approving Authority

Prepared by :

ALAN S. DAGOC
SST-1