Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INDUSTRIES
Abbreviations:
NIL
CONTENTS
1. PURPOSE 4
2. SCOPE 4
3. REFERENCES 4
4. DEFINITIONS 4
5. METHODOLOGY 4
1.0 PURPOSE
2.0 SCOPE
3.0 REFERENCES
Notification of the Government of India (Part II-Section 3, Subsection (ii) vide No.
S.O. 10 (E) dated 8th January, 1999
4.0 DEFINITIONS
Nil
5.0 METHODOLOGY
Waste substances which are either generated in the process indicated in column-2
of Schedule-1 and consists of wholly or partly of the waste substances referred to
in coumn-3 of the same schedule or which consists wholly or partly of substances
indicated in Schedule –2, unless the concentration of the substances is less than
the limit indicated in the same schedule of the notification of the Government of
India (Part II-Section 3, Subsection (ii) vide No. S.O. 10 (E) dated 8th January, 1999
are categorized as hazardous wastes.
Waste quantity and composition are subject to fluctuation depending upon the
process of operation. Waste disposal facility must be provided to cope with peak
waste output. Historical records, if any, will provide valuable information.
Extensive interaction with facility operators shall also be planned to get authentic
information on quantity and type of waste. In addition theoretical approach will also
be utilized based on the knowledge of process operation.
Understanding the physical and chemical properties of a waste and sampling and
analysis procedures is the cornerstone upon which the subsequent strategies
depend on Knowledge of the physical and chemical properties of the waste is
crucial in identifying waste reduction opportunities.
It is necessary in gauging what risks a waste may pose to surface water, ground
water, and air. It drives the selection of a liner or the choice of land application
methods. It is needed to determine which constituents to test for if conducting
ground-water monitoring. Knowledge of waste generation processes, analytical
testing, or some combination of the two to estimate waste constituent
concentrations will be utilized. No matter, which approach is used in characterizing
a waste, the important goal is to maximize the knowledge available to make the
important decisions.
The intent of leaching and extraction tests is to estimate the release of waste
constituents into ground water. The importance of estimating potential constituent
concentrations that may leach to ground water is underscored by the fact that the
ground water software model, Industrial Waste Management Evaluation Model,
(IWEM), generally used in waste management studies, determines expected
leachate concentrations to develop recommended liner system designs. If the total
concentration of all the constituents in a waste has been estimated using process
or industry knowledge, estimates of the maximum possible concentration of these
constituents in leachate can be made using the dilution ratio of the leachate test to
be performed.
One of the more critical elements in proper waste characterization is the plan for
sampling and analyzing the waste. The sampling plan will be a written document,
specifically prepared for this project, that describes the objectives and details of the
individual tasks of a sampling effort and how they will be performed. This plan will
be carefully thought out, well in advance of sampling. The more detailed the
sampling plan, the less opportunity for error or misunderstanding during sampling,
analysis, and data treatment.
Some of these factors are discussed below. Additional information on data quality
objectives and quality assurance and quality control are found in several sources
such as Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods –
SW-846, Guidance for the Data Quality Objectives Process (EPA600-R-96-055),
Guidance on Quality Assurance Project Plans (EPA600-R-98-018), and Guidance
for the Data Quality Assessment: Practical Methods for Data Analysis (EPA600-R-
96-084).
The first step in any analytical testing process is to obtain a sample that is
representative of the physical and chemical composition of a waste. The term
“representative sample” is commonly used to denote a sample that has the
properties and composition of the population from which it was collected and in the
same proportions as found in the population. This can be misleading unless dealing
with a homogenous waste from which one sample can represent the whole
population. Because most industrial wastes are not homogeneous, many different
factors will be considered in obtaining samples that are collectively representative of
a waste. Examples of factors that will be considered include:
The type of sampling plan developed will vary depending on the sampling location.
This involves establishing an imaginary three-dimensional grid or sampling points in
the waste and then using random-number tables or random-number generators to
select points for sampling. Hollow-stem augers combined with split-spoon samplers
are frequently appropriate for sampling landfills.
The overview of the analytical approach for waste characterization depends on the
specific type of industry. The procedures or supporting documentation related to
following major areas have to be reviewed for drawing up the plan.
• Waste Characteristics
• Proximate Analysis
• Survey Analysis
• Directed Analysis
• Ignitability
• Corrosivity
• Reactivity
• Toxicity (Extraction Procedure Test)
The results of the TCLP will also be of main interest, in view of the fact that the
details help in deciding upon liner material for the landfill.
The objective of the Proximate Analysis will be to define the physical form of the
waste and arrive at an approximate mass balance. The analysis will be mainly
carried out for the following parameters:
The results of directed analysis furnish the overall description of sample with
estimated quantities of major components. The following major parameters shall
be analyzed:
• Total Organic Content
• Specific major organic components
The respective Quality Assurance and Quality Control measures, including the
sample preservation techniques etc., as outlined in the protocols will be strictly
adhered to.
When selecting the most appropriating analytical procedures, at least the physical
state of the sample using process and generator knowledge, the constituents to be
analyzed, detection limits, and the specified holding times of the analytical methods
will be considered. It may not be cost-effective or useful to conduct a test with
detection limits at or greater than the constituent concentrations in a waste. There
are several general categories of phases in which samples can be categorised:
solids, aqueous, sludges, multiphase samples, ground water, and oil and organic
liquid. A suitable procedure will be selected that is designed for the specific sample
type.
After assessing the state of the waste, assessment of the environment in which the
waste is placed will be carried out. For example, an acidic environment may require
a different test than a non-acidic environment. If the waste management u nit is
receiving only monofill, then the characteristics of the waste will determine most of
the unit’s conditions. Conversely, if wastes are being co-disposed wastes must be
considered, including the constituents that may be leached by the subject waste.
A brief summary of the TCLP test is provided below. The complete procedures for
all of these tests are also provided in SW-846 or in the Annual Book of ASTM
Standards Volume or in 11.04.