Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SAMPLE 1
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
A UNIT ON MULTIPLICATION
GRADE 3
BY
ALEXANDER DAILEY
Table of Contents
Contextual Factors 3
Learning Goals 9
Assessment Plan 11
Works Cited 54
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 3
Contextual Factors
Keet Gooshi Heen Elementary is located in Sitka, Alaska. An isolated, coastal city with a
population of just under 9,000. The three major ethnic groups in Sitka are White, Alaska Native,
and Asian (Sitka, AK Demographics, 2017). According to information from a 2016 school
climate and connectedness report (American Institutes for Research, 2016), Keet Gooshi Heen’s
student population is made up of roughly 58% White, 22% AK Native, 7% Asian, 6% Pacific
Islander, 3% Latino, 3% American Indian, and 2% African American students. Just under 400
students, classrooms at Keet Gooshi Heen have a classroom-teacher to student ratio of about
1:20.
The socio-economic makeup of Sitka, while fairly diverse, tends to fall towards the
middle-upper class end of the spectrum. The median household income in Sitka is ~$70,000,
whereas the national median household income is closer to ~$51,000. Part of this is offset by the
increased cost of living that is tied to island living. About 4 in 10 students qualify for reduced or
Classroom Factors
In my host teacher’s classroom, students are organized into three large tables that sit
between 6 and 8 students each. These tables are partially used to encourage the development of
cooperative groups. Often, students at these tables are held accountable for each other’s work
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 4
ethic, cooperation, and adherence to classroom expectations. We believe that this fosters social
We have one permanent paraprofessional in our room, though the student she works with
requires intensive support and is often in-and-out of the classroom throughout the day. As a
result, the extra adult in the room is rarely available to provide support to other students in the
classroom.
In-school, we work on math anywhere from 1 to 1 ½ hours every day. Often these math
blocks are split into two sections by a 20-minute recess or a special. Sometimes this split is
inconvenient, as it always requires a little backtracking on the second half, but often this split
provides students with a much-needed break and the opportunity to engage more fully.
students work individually, in pairs, groups, and even as a whole-class. When possible, and if
necessary, there is a back table in the classroom where either my host or I can work with a small
While there are no desk cubbies, each student does have their own place to keep
unfinished work that can be easily retrieved. It is not uncommon for math work to be deposited
in these “unfinished bins” when it is time to move away from our math block. The expectation in
our classroom is that whenever a student is finished with the assignment at hand (whatever that
may be), they should next find and continue working on unfinished assignments. This allows us
to more freely create larger worksheets/workbooks that delve deeper into the target content while
As far as technology goes, our classroom is equipped with both a Smart Board and a
linked document camera. These are invaluable tools for providing guidance or instruction that
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 5
would be more difficult to cover using our basic white board. In lieu of a computer lab, we have
access to a class set of fully equipped laptops – though these are shared with other classrooms
and must be reserved. Typically, you can expect to have access to these laptops within a few
days’ notice, though you likely wouldn’t expect to have them for more than an hour or two at a
time.
Student Characteristics
There are 21 students in our 3rd grade classroom, 11 boys and 10 girls. Of these students
three receive special education services. Two students receive special education support in
reading and one student receives full support throughout the day and is always with a
paraprofessional. We have two students who are very far below grade level in math and about 8
students who are well below grade level in reading. While it is still early in the year, only about
Ethnic diversity in the classroom mirrors that of the school with the majority being white
and about one third of the students being AK Native. We also have one Latino student from out-
of-country and one African student who recently obtained U.S. citizenship.
Economic status in the classroom is diverse with several students on both ends of the
spectrum. Because this is only 3rd grade, our technological endeavors will be fairly limited in-
class, but it would not be equitable to run any sort of flipped classroom strategies that rely on
technology.
On the whole, I would say that this class is on par for the beginning of third grade, though
there are 4 students who clearly need additional support if they are expected to progress.
Understanding new math concepts is highly dependent on understanding previous and more
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 6
basic concepts. As such, without some sort of expedited and intensive support for these students,
they are in serious danger of falling further and further behind. We’re working right now to
secure special education services in math for at least two of these students.
possible and some items have become very clear in the process. The level of math knowledge in
this class is extremely diverse and the speed in which different students are able to work through
the same math problems is even more diverse. Because of these major skill-gaps, whole class
instruction tends to be the most difficult as keeping both ends of the classroom engaged and
learning is quite the juggle. Cooperative learning has proven to be moderately successful, though
As you would expect, through experimenting with different delivery strategies and
conducting a fun math survey, it appears that the class is split in terms of preferred learning
styles. Some students benefit more from visual explanations (pictures) while others seem to
benefit more from basic “number” representations. It seems that word-form or written math
problems are the least popular, which makes sense given the low reading level of this class.
Instructional Implications
Because of the high population of AK Natives here, mixed with Sitka’s isolation and
dependence on community, incorporating AK culture into my unit (even if in small ways) seems
a worthwhile goal. Not only will it allow me to engage and tap into the background knowledge
of many of my students, it will provide my students with knowledge/skills/ideas that will help
them to contribute and succeed as members of our community. This is related to another issue,
Because of the nature of our home, the way we have organized our classroom, and the
diverse skill sets of our students, developing cooperative and social skills are big goals for me
this year. I believe it will be in the best interest of my students to push cooperative learning hard.
I feel that if I can teach my students to work together, everyone will be much better off. It’s for
that reason that when possible, I’m going to try to develop lessons that involve groups as
Still, it’s clear that I’ll need to heavily differentiate my instruction as well as my
assessment pieces if I want to best serve this group of students. It’s looking like preparing
instruction/practice that varies in workload, depth, and delivery is going to be key for ensuring
the success of all. While this does slightly limit the level of cooperative learning I can provide in
terms of mixing different students, I think the two goals can be met together.
Whatever the format, it seems clear that I should try to stray away from word heavy
mathematics, at least in the beginning. While practice with word problems is extremely
important, and while I would like to promote reading skills from all angles, I think it best that I
allow students to get a grasp on the mathematics first instead of making things doubly difficult
for them. I don’t need my students fighting two battles at once – not when we’re learning
something as fundamentally important as multiplication. Word problems will have to come at the
I also need to try to combat technological inequity in this class before a real skill gap
develops. At this point, almost every student seems to be struggling to operate a computer, but
that won’t last long, at least not for those who have access to computers at home. I need to make
an effort to utilize the laptops when I can, even if only to practice concepts though online math
games.
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 8
On a similar note, due to a lack of what I’ll call home-support equity, I really can’t be
relying on after-school practice work to pull its potential this year. The students who are most at
risk of falling behind are the same students who lack academic support at home. I’m not going to
take away homework that will benefit those students who are doing it, but I need to remember
that flipped classroom strategies are simply not going to work with all the students in this class –
Learning Goals
Assessment Plan
Overview
Student understanding of
multiplication concepts
will be tracked with a
checklist. Items involving
a misconception or
challenge will be noted.
Formative assessment will largely take place through monitoring student work in class
and by reviewing their practice work with new multiplication concepts. In my unit, there are six
major steps in reaching two-digit multiplication understanding. [1-- addition; 2-- repeated
addition; 3-- arrays; 4-- single-digit multiplication; 5—breaking apart; 6-- two-digit
would be unwise to progress to a higher step without ensuring students are familiar with and
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 14
understand the previous steps. (You cannot learn repeated addition without first knowing
addition. Just like you cannot learn two-digit multiplication without first understanding single-
digit multiplication. The only exception might be arrays, but they are so frequent in real-world
mathematics and provide such a perfect visual aid to the concept of addition; I believe they
Each step will be met with its own guided lesson and practice opportunities. Some of
these opportunities may involve cooperative learning and some may involve individual learning.
More direct support will be provided to students who are demonstrating a lack of understanding
previous practice work. It is my estimate that each step will take anywhere between 2-3 days of
practice work.
Summative Assessment
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 17
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 18
Pre-assessment data
The following graphs contain student scores on the unit pre-test on learning goals 1 and
2. Blue items represent student scores for learning goal 1 and orange items represent student
scores for learning goal 2. The graph on the left contains individual student scores, while the
graph on the right contains a class average score. Scores of 80% or greater indicate a need for
alternative or advanced instruction. As you can see, no students qualified for alternative
instruction for either learning goal. Also, as a whole, the class scored much lower on learning
1, so this makes sense. Had learning goal 1 scores been closer to the target, I might have made
the decision to focus more instruction on learning goal 2. However, because learning goal 1 is
also low, and because learning goal 2 is dependent on learning goal 1, I believe it is more
Technology
I plan on using the Smartboard and attached document camera regularly during my
whole-class instruction. It allows the me to utilize manipulatives like place value blocks that
would otherwise be difficult to share. It also allows me to provide guidance with the actual
worksheets that I’ll be handing out to students. It is possible to incorporate technology into the
student-side of the lessons, but I only see this being reasonable for lesson 5 – where students are
asked to practice their multiplication facts. For this lesson, there is a plethora of multiplication
games that would challenge students to learn their multiplication facts – while also having fun.
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 21
TWS Unit
3.OA.3. –
Use multiplication and division numbers up to 100 to solve word problems in situations involving
equal groups, arrays, and measurement quantities (e.g., by using drawings and equations with a symbol
for the unknown number to represent the problem).
Students will be able to solve, create, and identify real-world word problems requiring the use of
multiplication involving 2-digit factors.
{O13} [L10] Interpret and solve {O12} [L9] Students will use the standard
multiplication word problems. algorithm to solve a series of multiplication
{O14} [L10] Write multiplication word problems where at least one factor as 2+
problems. digits.
{O13} [L10] Students will interpret and
solve a series of real-world multiplication
word problems.
{O14} [L10] Students will create, share,
and solve each other’s own real-world
multiplication word problems.
Introduction/Hook
After lesson 1, discuss the fact that multiplication is a key part of almost all mathematics and that
understanding how to multiply is essential for success in life.
At the beginning of lesson 2, ask students to give you an 8-digit number. Write a multiplication
problem on the board using this number multiplied by a single digit. Impress students by solving it
quickly through the standard algorithm. Explain that they’ll be able to do this too in a couple weeks
when we’re finished with our unit.
Present a multiplication word problem on the Smartboard and set to refer to on future
groups free to solve (8x6). lessons for those who
Circulate, observe, and provide guidance to teams who are stuck or might require this
who otherwise wouldn’t be able to solve. visual support.
Prompt groups who finish quickly to see if they can solve the problem Allow students to
using a different strategy. share their strategy(s)
When all groups have an answer (right or wrong), one at a time, have in writing instead of
them display their work using the Smartboard and present the strategy speaking.
they used (any groups who identified this as a multiplication problem
should go towards the end).
As they present, mimic the presenters’ strategies on the whiteboard
and help clarify what the group realized, what they did, and how their
strategy represented a correct interpretation of the problem.
Hopefully, you’ll have mix of different strategies. These might
include - loops & groups, arrays, repeated addition, addition trees,
multiplication, mental math using breaking apart, straight counting.
Once each group has presented, have a class discussion about how this
problem involved many groups of one number. Explain that these
types of problems are typically solved through multiplication and are
essentially just repeated addition.
Cover any of the above strategies that students did not come up with
and demonstrate how they could be used to solve this problem.
At this point, there should be a large number of different strategies
written on the white board. Leave them there. Reaffirm the idea that
essence behind each of these strategies is repeated addition.
Pose another 2 multiplication word problems and challenge students
to solve these on their own, and in ways different from the way their
group solved the first.
Have students turn in their work with these problems for review.
Rearrange these “piles” into neat rows of cubes. Ask whether or not
this is an effective way to represent 7 groups of 4.
Next, combine these rows into an array. Ask whether or not you still
have 7 groups of 4. Explain why you do and that this is called an
array.
Explain what an array is (a way of organizing groups of numbers) and
discuss why they might be useful for representing multiplication
problems. Remind students that multiplication is essentially repeated
addition and that an array is just a representation of this repeated
addition. Show that by counting the units in the array (individually or
by row/column), we can find the answer to the multiplication problem
represented by the array.
Discuss the shape of the array (rectangle). Ask students if an array
will ever take a different shape (no).
Experiment with different multiplication problems to test this theory.
Discuss why this is the case.
Hand out grid paper and have students construct arrays that
correspond to a series of multiplication problems. Have them use their
arrays to solve the multiplication problems.
Pair students up and hand out grid paper and a at least 25 place value
blocks. Write the numbers (9, 10, 12, 15, 20, 25) on the whiteboard.
Ask students to work together to come up with as many arrays as
possible for each of the 6 numbers without using the commutative
property. Students should use different colors for each number in
order to keep things organized.
Remind students that they are looking for patterns, and that if and
when they do find one, they should share it with the class.
Circulate, observe, and provide assistance to groups who may be stuck
or who are missing arrays. Encourage students to use the place value
blocks to pre-map their arrays.
Groups who finish early should be given additional numbers to map.
Once each group has completed at least 5 of the numbers, have a
whole class discussion about the patterns discovered. Students may
have noticed that each even number had an array involving a 2 as a
product. They also should have noticed that each number had an array
of 1xN. Help identify any patterns that were missed. Talk about how
these patterns are true of all multiplication problems.
Hopefully, students were constructing arrays with their place value
blocks and then splitting and combining their arrays to make new
ones. Model how this would have been an effective strategy.
Knowing what they know now, have students complete one last set of
arrays for the number 24. Collect these grid papers for review.
that we now know. Today we’ll start towards that goal of memorizing
the basic multiplication facts.
Hand out a multiplication fact worksheet and instruct students to
complete as many problems as they can using their memories,
patterns, drawing arrays, using repeated addition, etc. When they
complete the worksheet, they’re to use their multiplication charts to
check their answers. Any that they got wrong, they need to correct.
Circle and observe students. Look for fluency and the use of patterns
and memorization. If students are re-solving the same problems over
and over again, they should be reminded to look at their previous
solutions to promote that memorization connection.
Students who finish early should be given an additional worksheet to
practice on. Remind these students that it’s not about “finishing” the
worksheet, rather, it’s about getting better and better at multiplication.
Conclude the lesson by telling students that we’ll be practicing our
multiplication facts more and more regularly. It will become the go-to
activity when their work with a subsequent math activity is finished.
They will also be given opportunities to practice these facts at other
times in the day, not during regular math instruction.
7 rows of 3 tally marks, then circling 3 rows and 4 rows might help
some students visualize this more easily than with the block array.
Have students talk about how this idea of “breaking up” multiplication
problems might be useful for other multiplication problems.
Write the problem 17 x 6 on the board and ask students to solve it.
They’ll likely resort to repeated addition. Stop them and talk about
how breaking up the problem into two simple problems might make it
easier.
Display a grid on the Smartboard and create the array for 17 x 6. Next,
draw a line through long side of the array between 10 and 7. Explain
how you’ve just taken a large array and created two smaller arrays
without losing any numbers. Have students tell you what
multiplication problems correspond to the two arrays (10x6 and 7x6).
These are two problems that the students certainly know how to solve.
Have them solve, combine, and then come up with an answer for the
original array of 17x6.
Discuss why you split the array at 10 and 7 (1’s and 10’s place). Right
now, you’ll just have to tell them that splitting by the number-place is
the best way. Also, this is how it’s done in the standard algorithm. Yes
– the standard algorithm has us break up our factors just like this.
Guide the class through a few more practice rounds involving single
by 2-digit factors, prompting them to tell you where to split the array.
Introduce and explain the breaking apart worksheet. Instruct students
to complete it.
Circulate, observe, and provide support where necessary.
Students who finish early should work on their multiplication facts.
Finish the lesson with another demonstration of the standard
algorithm, this time, pointing out where this “breaking apart” takes
place.
Title of Lesson: [L8] Expanded Algorithm for Multiplication
Materials for lesson: Whiteboard, Expanded algorithm worksheet, grid paper, scratch paper
Objectives and Essential Questions for lesson: {O4 and 11} EQ - If multiplication has to do with
groups of a set number, does it matter how we order those groups?
Content areas covered in lesson (from standards): 3.OA.1.
Embed Assessments in Lesson activities
Lesson 8) Allow students to use
Review breaking apart with an array of a 1-digit by 2-digit headphones during
multiplication problem on the Smartboard. individual work time.
Have a student use the Smartboard to guide the class through another Provide a step by
example (make sure that the array is “broken” at the number-places). step guide for the
This time, write the problem on the white board in standard vertical expanded algorithm
form, and follow along by going through the expanded algorithm as for students who
the student takes each step with the array. might benefit.
Explain that what you are doing is the exact same thing as what the
student is doing – and it’s called the expanded algorithm.
Emphasize the place value in your demonstration. Students may
become confused about when to treat a partial product as a 1, 10, or
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 31
100. Always refer to each digit by its number-place (e.g. in 5 x 34, the
3 is said as 3 tens).
Remind students about the commutative property and instruct them to
always place the larger number on top when using a multiplication
algorithm.
Students will also be used to single by single-digit problems, where
there is only 1 product. They may need reminding that in the
expanded algorithm, you get partial products that need to be added
together to get the final product – just like when they broke apart the
arrays.
Introduce the expanded algorithm worksheet and go through the first
2-3 problems with the class. When it appears that students understand,
have them continue on their own. If the class appears to be stumbling,
provide simpler 1x2-digit problems on the board and have them work
in pairs using scratch paper to solve. Walk through each problem after
ample time has been given for groups to solve.
Circulate, observe, and provide support where necessary.
Students who finish early should practice using the expanded
algorithm with their own single by multi-digit problems.
When finished, demonstrate the standard algorithm and explain that
the only difference between it and the expanded version is the partial
products. The standard algorithm uses carrying to eliminate this step –
though they are functionally the same. Encourage students! They’re
almost there!
Students who finish early should continue practicing with the standard
algorithm using their own multiplication problems and scrap paper.
Collect worksheets for review.
Write a 1-digit by 8-digit multiplication problem on the board. Have
the class solve it by guiding you through the standard algorithm.
Talk about the fact that rarely do we ever encounter isolated number
problems in the real world. Have students brainstorm some real-world
scenarios that might require multiplication.
Title of Lesson: [L10] Real-world Multiplication
Materials for lesson: Smartboard, whiteboard, scrap paper, word problem worksheet
Objectives and Essential Questions for lesson: {O13 and 14} EQ - What do real-world
multiplication problems look like?
Content areas covered in lesson (from standards): 3.OA.1. & 3.OA.3.
Embed Assessments in Lesson activities
Lesson 10) Allow students to use
Have a class discussion about what multiplication problems actually headphones during
look like in the real world. Explain that in real life, numbers are individual work time.
always attached to something real. Allow students to
Organize students into groups of 3 and assign each group a number dictate their word-
from 3-9. Have students brainstorm all of the possible things they can problems to you if
think of that come in groups of their number (e.g. 4 legs on dog, 5 necessary.
points on a star, 5 pennies in a nickel, 6 sides on dice, etc.).
Pick a number that no other group received and do the same on the
whiteboard.
Next, pick one of your topics and write a multiplication word-problem
involving that number on the whiteboard (There were 23 octopus in
Sitka Sound. Each has 8 legs. How many octopus legs are there in
Sitka Sound?).
Remind students that multiplication has to do with groups of a set
number. In this case, your groups were octopus and the set number
was 8 – 1 for each leg of an octopus. Also, point out that a word
problem requires solving and therefore should have a question
attached. Students should be careful when crafting their questions. A
multiplication problem looks for the total number of items. Not the
total number of groups or items per group.
Explain that when interpreting a math word problem, students have to
determine whether or not it has to do with equal groups before they
can determine whether or not it could be solved through
multiplication. They should look for groups and items per group. If it
doesn’t have groups, or an equal number of items per group, and if the
solution doesn’t have to do with the total number of items, then it isn’t
a multiplication problem.
Prompt groups to do the same as you and pick one topic to write a
multiplication problem about. Encourage them to make their groups a
2-digit number.
Once students have finished, have them present their questions to the
class using the Smartboard. Students should use the standard
algorithm to solve each other groups’ problems. Students should be
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 33
instructed to raise their hands when they think they know the answer.
Inform students that word problems require words in the answer. For
the octopus problem, the answer is not simply 184, it is 184 octopus
legs. Stress this point.
Once each group has shared, instruct students to complete the
multiplication word problem worksheet. Students will interpret,
identify, and create their own word problems individually. When
they’ve done that, they need to find two students in the class to solve
their problems using the standard algorithm.
Circle, observe, and provide support where necessary.
Collect work for review.
Closure for Unit: Multiplication Meeting
Materials for Closure: Whiteboard, Enduring Understandings Questions
Objectives and Essential Questions for closure:
How is addition connected to multiplication?
Does multiplication have patterns?
How are arrays helpful for understanding multiplication?
What is the best way to get better at multiplying?
If multiplication has to do with groups of a set number, does it matter how we order those groups?
What is the quickest way to multiply large numbers?
What do real-world multiplication problems look like?
Content areas covered in Closure (from standards): 3.OA.1. & 3.OA.3.
Embed Assessments in Closure activities
Closure: Write student
Write the essential questions on the whiteboard. Have students group up answers to the EQ’s
and moderate a whole class discussion about multiplication and the on the whiteboard for
recently completed unit (if possible, split the class into two groups to students who require
maximize participation potential). This will mostly look like a review visual support.
discussion, but should be guided by the EQ’s on the board. Prompt Allow students to
students to explain their thinking and to give examples. dictate their answers
to the handout
questions to you if
Finish by handing out two questions that students are to try and answer on
necessary.
their own. “What is multiplication?” “What does real-world multiplication
look like?” Look for evidence that students have met the enduring
understandings.
End by stating that their work with multiplication is just starting – this is
only the beginning. As time goes on, they’ll get better and faster at
multiplying, and will eventually be able to do any sized multiplication
problem. Encourage them to look out for situations that require real-world
multiplication.
understand in order to do any kind of math beyond the simplest problems. In order to be successful in
our society, you need to understand and be capable of doing multiplication.
Because multiplication is a complex concept with lots of depth, this unit focuses on understanding the
basics of multiplication instead of attempting to master the actual operation. Like all math,
multiplication requires a certain level of memorization. While this unit didn’t attempt to secure that
memorization, it does set the groundwork for the memorization to begin.
It is often difficult to embed cultural connections into mathematics, especially when the focus is on the
abstract concepts as opposed to the real-world application of those concepts. For that reason, this unit
was only able to make real-world connections in a limited way. That said, mathematics is built on
utilizing prerequisite knowledge and this unit was designed to take full advantage of the style in which
previous mathematical concepts were delivered to and understood by students in this classroom. This
has given these students a better chance at developing a real understanding of the target concepts, as
opposed to if this were a multiplication unit pulled from an outside source. In turn, that gives these
students a better chance at success in our society.
STAGE 1 – Objectives
What students should know… What students should be able to do….
Multiplication is equivalent to repeated Solve a multiplication problem using several
addition. different methods.
Multiplication can be represented in many Solve single digit by single digit
convenient ways, including through multiplication problems.
groups/loops and arrays.
Pose another 2 multiplication word problems and challenge students to solve these
on their own, and in ways different from the way their group solved the first.
Have students turn in their work with these problems for review.
Closure:
Finish by discussing how multiplication has to do with a number of groups that have the same number of items.
In essence, multiplication problems require a series of repeated addition. We can represent this repeated addition
in many ways.
Lesson 2
Candidate Name: Alex Dailey Host Teacher Name: Mrs. Peterson
School: Keet Gooshi Heen Grade Level: 3 # of Students: 21
Date & Time of Lesson: ~ Length of Lesson: ~1hr
Topic of Lesson: Building a Multiplication Chart Content Area: Mathematics
Materials: Multiplication grid handout, Smartboard
STAGE 1 – Objectives
What students should know… What students should be able to do….
Multiplication is equivalent to repeated Interpret a multiplication chart.
addition.
There are many patterns in multiplication (1 x
N = N), (0 x N = 0), (An even factor
multiplied by another number will result in an
even product) (Commutative property of
multiplication)
Students who finish early should find a partner and quiz each other on their
ability to skip count 10 times for any digit without looking at their grid.
When everyone is finished, have a whole class discussion about some of the
patterns they found and why they exist. Help point out any patterns not seen.
Have students label the columns and rows (outside of the grid) with the numbers
0-10. Demonstrate this process.
Explain that what students have created is called a multiplication fact chart and
can actually be used for multiplication. Remind students that multiplication is
repeated addition and show them how the chart is read and why it makes sense.
Test the chart with a variety of multiplication problems to show that it really
works.
Revisit the patterns identified earlier and explain that these are patterns found in
multiplication.
Lead a speed game where you put multiplication problems on the board and
have students use their charts to find the answer as quickly as possible and raise
their hands. Once everyone has raised their hands, have the class call out the
answer. See how fast you can get.
Closure:
Discuss how the class is faster as solving basic multiplication facts now than at the beginning of the lesson.
Explain that they will get faster and more accurate the more practice they have. Remind them that these facts are
at the heart of almost all future math they will encounter and that mastering these will result in them being much
more successful at math.
Lesson 10
Candidate Name: Alex Dailey Host Teacher Name: Mrs. Peterson
School: Keet Gooshi Heen Grade Level: 3 # of Students: 21
Date & Time of Lesson: ~ Length of Lesson: ~1hr +
Topic of Lesson: Real world multiplication Content Area: Mathematics
Materials: Smartboard, whiteboard, scrap paper, word problem worksheet
3.OA.3. –
Use multiplication and division numbers up to 100 to solve word problems in situations involving equal groups,
arrays, and measurement quantities (e.g., by using drawings and equations with a symbol for the unknown
number to represent the problem).
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 40
Students will be able to solve, create, and identify real-world word problems requiring the use of
multiplication involving 2-digit factors.
STAGE 1 – Objectives
What students should know… What students should be able to do….
Real multiplication involves more than Interpret and solve multiplication word
numbers and algorithms – it includes context problems.
that must be interpreted. Write multiplication word problems.
Students will create, share, and solve each other’s own real-world multiplication word problems.
Next, pick one of your topics and write a multiplication word-problem involving to you if
that number on the whiteboard (There were 23 octopus in Sitka Sound. Each has 8 necessary.
legs. How many octopus legs are there in Sitka Sound?).
Remind students that multiplication has to do with groups of a set number. In this
case, your groups were octopus and the set number was 8 – 1 for each leg of an
octopus. Also, point out that a word problem requires solving and therefore
should have a question attached. Students should be careful when crafting their
questions. A multiplication problem looks for the total number of items. Not the
total number of groups or items per group.
Explain that when interpreting a math word problem, students have to determine
whether or not it has to do with equal groups before they can determine whether
or not it could be solved through multiplication. They should look for groups and
items per group. If it doesn’t have groups, or an equal number of items per group,
and if the solution doesn’t have to do with the total number of items, then it isn’t a
multiplication problem.
Prompt groups to do the same as you and pick one topic to write a multiplication
problem about. Encourage them to make their groups a 2-digit number.
Once students have finished, have them present their questions to the class using
the Smartboard. Students should use the standard algorithm to solve each other
groups’ problems. Students should be instructed to raise their hands when they
think they know the answer. Inform students that word problems require words in
the answer. For the octopus problem, the answer is not simply 184, it is 184
octopus legs. Stress this point.
Once each group has shared, instruct students to complete the multiplication word
problem worksheet. Students will interpret, identify, and create their own word
problems individually. When they’ve done that, they need to find two students in
the class to solve their problems using the standard algorithm.
Circle, observe, and provide support where necessary.
Collect work for review.
Closure:
Congratulate students. Not only do they know how to multiply, they know how to do real-world multiplication!
Have a conversation about the importance of this skill and how it’s required in nearly all walks of life and just
about every single profession.
In lesson 7, I had students use arrays to practice breaking apart multiplication problems
involving a 2-digit factor. The purpose of using arrays was so students could visualize how we
were turning 1 “difficult” multiplication problem into 2 “less difficult” multiplication problems.
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 42
Because I wanted this lesson to lead into the expanded algorithm for multiplication, I had
The way the lesson was set up, I modeled, then provided guided practice in splitting a set
of arrays by place value. In the guided practice portion of the lesson, I had students working as a
class and to help me do the problems. When asked to split the multiplication array (13x8) for me,
student BaTw, correctly determined that the 13 needed to be split into 10 and 3, but attempted to
split the side of the array with only 8 units. Looking around the classroom, I noticed that several
other students had made this same error. I realized that I needed to do some review for
understanding arrays.
In the previous unit about addition and subtraction, we had used pictures to represent
part/part/whole relationships. I hadn’t thought about it until now, but on an array, when breaking
apart one side, you’re left with something that looks remarkably similar to the pictures we used
pictures and highlighted the similarity of these pictures to our arrays when we’re breaking them
apart. I explained that before “breaking”, the side of the array is the whole. Post “breaking”,
we’re left with two parts that, when combined, create the whole. This helped students make the
connection between the “breaking” of the 2-digit factor with the correct side of the array that
needed to be split.
In lesson 8, I had students practicing work with the expanded algorithm for
multiplication. At this point, students were only working with problems that involved a 1-digit
factor by a 2-digit factor. Prior to this point, students had really only practiced 1-digit by 1-digit
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 43
multiplication, which requires no “addition” step. While modeling, I demonstrated and explained
to students that with a 2-digit factor, they would be calculating 2 separate products that would
need to be combined to get the true product (students had explored this concept before with
multiplication problems on the board and had them solve on scratch paper. Student LySu, and
several others, were consistently getting the problems wrong. The reason – they were stopping
after calculating the first product, despite my instruction and explanation that multiplication
problems with 2-digits would result in multiple products that needed to be added together. After
pointing this out and providing whole-class reminders had failed, I decided to have students
write the multiplication problems in a different way. Before, all I had written on the board was
the two factors and the product line. This time, I added empty boxes (1 for each of the 2 partial
products), and a second product line under those. I instructed students to do the same before
attempting to solve. These extra features provided students with a clear reminder that “there is
another step in this problem”. After using the new, more structured, version of the expanded
algorithm, LySu and the rest of the class were able to successfully compute the multiplication
problems and I was able to release the class for independent practice.
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 44
Potential
Pre- Post- Gain
Assessment Assessment Score,
Raw Score, Raw Score, Pre- Post- Actual Top Learning
Students, Top Top Assessment Assessment Gain Possible Gain
N= Possible = Possible = Percentage Percentage Score = Score
15 11 11 100%
1-HaCo 6 9 55% 82% 27% 45% 60%
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 45
The above table includes the pre and post test scores for the assessment designed to
measure learning goals 1 and 2. Because the learning goals are related, about half of the
The following graph shows student progress from pre to post test for learning goal 1.
Blue items represent pre-tests and orange represent post-tests. Scores are separated by student (1-
15).
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 46
Objective 1
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Series1 Series2
With only 1 student who did not improve, and a class-wide average gain score of 35%,
the graph clearly demonstrates that students made significant progress towards achieving
learning goal 1. However, with only 5 out of 15 students scoring at 80% or greater on their post-
test, I would conclude that more practice with multiplication is needed – which is exactly what
we have planned.
The following graph shows student progress from pre to post test for learning goal 2.
Blue items represent pre-tests and orange represent post-tests. Scores are separated by student (1-
15).
Objective 2
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Series1 Series2
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 47
Again, only 1 student did not improve from pre to post test. 9 students scored twice as
high on the post-test as they did on the pre-test. This suggests that a significant amount of
learning took place during this unit in regards to learning goal 2. Only 4 students scored 80% or
above on questions pertaining to learning goal 2. It stands to reason that more practice is needed
Subgroup Analysis
The following graph shows AK Native students’ and Non-Native students’ pre and post
test scores for measures of learning goal 1. I chose to analyze these two groups because of the
demographics in our school system and the NAEP’s 2015 findings on achievement gaps between
white students and American Indian/Alaska Native students (Achievement Gaps, 2015). I wanted
to check whether or not there was a pre-existing gap in my own classroom, and if so, how that
The first group represents the 11 non-Native students and the second group represents 4
AK Native students. The blue items represent pre-test scores and the orange items represent post-
test scores.
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 48
Objective 1
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1 2
Series1 Series2
The data set is perhaps too small and too narrow to make a determination about whether
or not an achievement gap does exist in my classroom, but the data clearly shows that ethnicity
in terms of non-Native vs AK Native did not play a role in student learning. The average scores
of both groups more than doubled from pre to post-test and both groups scored similarly on both
the pre and post-test. (Something to note – there are 21 students in the classroom and only 15
students’ data represented on these graphs. This is due to students missing the pre or post-tests
due to being absent from school. Out of the 7 students who identify as AK Native in this
classroom, 3 of them were not represented in this data because of those absences.)
Two students, CaMo and CoMc, demonstrated different levels of performance on the pre
and post-test. CaMo scored a 1 on the pre-test and a 6 on the post-test. CoMc scored a 6 on the
pre-test and a 10 on the post-test. Both students improved markedly, but I was expecting CaMo
to score higher on both the pre-test and post-test. Both have typically shown to be high achievers
in math, I wanted to examine their work more closely to see why their scores were so different.
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 49
CaMo moved to Sitka this year and came equipped with a lot of prerequisite math
knowledge. Entering third grade, he already knew a fair deal of multiplication facts by memory –
CaMo seemed to latch onto the idea of repeated addition very quickly. The problem was,
he wasn’t willing to let it go, as you can see in this worksheet where students were supposed to
be practicing using the expanded algorithm and not repeated addition (he gave himself those
stars).
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 50
when we worked on factor finding using arrays. Here, you can see a misunderstanding of arrays
CaMo’s
practice
work with
arrays and
factor-
finding
This
is an example of CoMc’s work on factor finding with grid paper and his expanded algorithm
practice. Notice the difference in work and how it shows an actual understanding of the learning
Out of the two learning goals I had set out to achieve through this unit, the students in my
classroom were slightly more successful when it came to learning goal 1. The simplest
explanation for this is that we spent far more time learning about and practicing the concepts
related to goal 1 as compared to goal 2. It just so happens that practicing goal 2 was dependent
on having some mastery over goal 1 – as is often the case in a heavily scaffolded content area
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 53
like mathematics. Another possible explanation is that the math concepts related to goal 1 are
simpler than those related to goal 2, and were therefore easier for students to learn. Goal 1
mostly requires an understanding of operations and a little memorization, while goal 2 requires
these same understandings in addition to being able to decipher and create real-world context
surrounding the data used in these operations. Along with being simpler to learn, goal 1 lends
and practicing the operation, can be taught with words, algorithms, and an endless slew of
manipulatives. This class does much better with algorithms and manipulatives, and so learning
While students performed similarly on both learning goals, their average scores for
learning goal 2 measures were slightly lower. As I mentioned, more than half of this class is
reading below grade level with at least 8 students reading significantly below grade level.
Learning goal 2 has everything to do with solving real-world problems and one of the only
reliable ways of providing practice problems and assessments for real-world problems is to use
word problems. There may be some simple audio-based technology that would allow me to
reproduce the delivery structure of word problems without requiring students to read, but as low
as these students may be in reading, they are even lower in audial learning skills. We figured out
very early in the school year that about half of the class are not audial learners. As far as I can
see, this really only leaves one option – lab-style, discovery based math lessons. Yes, this would
be less time efficient and make it more difficult to assess learning, but it would provide an
avenue for teaching real-world math that would match these students learning styles. The
problem is that this class hasn’t had enough practice with discovery based learning – they just
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 54
aren’t prepared for it. I have tried many times to set up discovery based lessons (including during
this unit) with this classroom and have only been successful after several trials of the same style
of lesson with the same goals/expectations. With this unit, I simply didn’t have the luxury of
spending 3 or 4 lessons getting students “used to” the kind of lesson required for them to
discover a single math concept. I believe that at this point in the year, it would have been
possible to run these discovery lessons with success, though that would have also required a lot
of pre-loading and preparing students by teaching in this way from the beginning of the year.
Scenarios like this, mixed with my belief in the power of discovery learning, have led me to
in learning goal 1 were easier than those measuring learning goal 2. I am afraid that this might be
true and is at least partly to blame for the discrepancy in scores. Apart from learning goal 1 being
inherently easier than learning goal 2, I also attached slightly more difficult problems to the
questions measuring learning goal 2. This was an oversight and provides a lesson to myself as far
as helping me understand what to “look out for” when designing my next assessment piece.
Professional Development
As a teacher, one thing I’d like to improve upon, is being more proactive in learning my
students’ skillsets and learning styles. This year, I figured that this would simply be a natural
process of me learning about my students. I thought that I would find out through experience
how my students learned and then adjust my teaching style to match. What I realized through
this unit, is that sometimes, students aren’t prepared to learn in the style that suits them. And in
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 55
these cases, it is possible that they need a good deal of time to practice learning in that style
before they can have an effective learning experience. For me, and this unit, it was the lack of
reading ability and the tendency to not do well with audial instruction that led to a slower-paced,
discovery learning as an alternative to word problems. Unfortunately, the students were not
adequately prepared to learn in this way without a lot of practice (which was not an option). Had
I been more proactive in the beginning of the year, I might have seen this coming and made the
necessary arrangements to provide that practice – possibly resulting in a more successful unit,
while setting the stage to provide student-matched instruction for the remainder of the year.
The second teaching habit that I feel I could improve is in how I communicate
expectations to my students. I’ve realized, with the help of this unit, that I sometimes I send
mixed messages to students, as far as what is expected of them during a lesson. I have a teaching
style that tends to encourage calling out, and often there are lessons where calling out is not
helpful. In these lessons, I instruct students to not call out, but because of my teaching habits, I
unconsciously let the first few slide. This, of course, leads to more students calling out and then I
have to stop the class and repeat student expectations. This is no doubt confusing for students
and leads to a less effective lesson. I try to be very conscious of the language I use when
teaching, but I’ve realized I also need to be more conscious of the style in which I’m teaching.
Perhaps I need to include an additional category of notes to myself on my lesson plans. One that
pertains to student expectations and what that means for the style in which I teach that particular
lesson. I was also given a suggestion by a fellow teacher and mentor, that when I want a whole-
class answer, or when I am open to call-outs, I should have a signal – and this signal should be
pre-taught and ongoing. For instance, when I am looking for students to call out, I might end my
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 56
question with “Anyone?” Or when I am looking for a whole-class call out I might say,
“Everyone!” With enough practice, for both the students and myself, I could see this working
very well.
Works Cited
Achievement Gaps. (2015, September 22). Retrieved December 12, 2017, from
https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/studies/gaps/
Keet Gooshi Heen Elementary. (2017). Graphiq. Retrieved December 12, 2017 from
https://public-schools.startclass.com/l/1844/Keet-Gooshi-Heen-
Elementary#Key%20Facts&s=4qN59B
TEACHER WORK
SAMPLE 57
Sitka, AK Demographics. (2017). AreaVibes Inc. Retrieved December 12, 2017, from
http://www.areavibes.com/sitka-ak/demographics/
Spier, E. (2016, June). American Institutes for Research. 2016 Alaska School Climate and
Connectedness Survey. Detailed Report: Sitka School District. Retrieved December 12,
2017.