Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Opponent report
Author of thesis: Noor Mohammad
Roll:1503011
Atik Shahriar Pranto
Roll:1503010
Roll:1503091
Q1. To what extent does the article title reflect the content of the report?
1. Excellent 2. Good 3. Neutral 4. Poor 5.Very Poor
Evidence:_________________________________________________________________
Evidence:_________________________________________________________________
Evidence:_________________________________________________________________
Q4. Is the methodology presented in the manuscript and any analysis provided both accurate
and properly conducted?
1. Excellent 2. Good 3. Neutral 4. Poor 5.Very Poor
Evidence : The analysis of each complexity i.e. time and space complexity for each algorithm
should be given(page:3 section:3).
Q5. Does it significantly build on (the author’s) previous work?
1. Excellent 2. Good 3. Neutral 4. Poor 5.Very Poor
Evidence:_________________________________________________________________
Q6. Do you find the author’s conclusions credible?
Evidence:_________________________________________________________________
Evidence:_________________________________________________________________
Q9. Do you feel that the significance and potential impact of a paper is high or low?
1. Excellent 2. Good 3. Neutral 4. Poor 5.Very Poor
Evidence:_________________________________________________________________
Q10. Are all relevant accompanying data, citations, or references given by the author?
1. Excellent 2. Good 3. Neutral 4. Poor 5.Very Poor
Evidence:_________________________________________________________________
Q11. Is the submission in Standard English to aid the understanding of the reader?
Evidence: The authors use the data from various sources,but not explain how it works and used
data are very common(page:4 section:4).
*Evidence should be given if corresponding decision is poor or very poor. Provide at least one example along
with page number and section number to clarify.