RESEARCH DESIGN

and
STATISTICAL TOOL
 RESEARCH DESIGN
The design of the study should include
information on the:
➢ Type of study
➢ The research population or the sampling
frame
➢ The expected duration of the study
Nine Types of Experimental Research:
1. Single-group design
2. Two-group design
3. Two-pair group design
4. Three-group design
5. Parallel-group design
6. Counterbalanced or Latin square design
7. Complete randomized design (CRD)
8. Randomized complete block design (RCBD)
9. Correlational design
1. Single-Group Design

One treatment with two or more levels.

Univariate analysis because there is only one

variable but two or more levels.
 One treatment with two or more levels.
Univariate analysis because there is only one
variable but two or more levels.
Effect on the Yield of Koi Cultured in Aquaria When
Different Levels of Shrimp Meal Are Used as
Supplemental Feed
Effect on the Yield of Koi Cultured in Aquaria When
Different Levels of Shrimp Meal Are Used as
Supplemental Feed

One-factor ANOVA or F-test one factor

- significant difference
2. Two-Group Design

Two comparable groups employed as control

and experimental groups or two groups that
are both experimental groups.

Bivariate analysis because it has two variables.

Two comparable groups employed as control and
experimental groups or two groups that are both
experimental groups.
Bivariate analysis because it has two variables.

Acceptability of Pork Siopao and Milkfish Bones Siopao

Acceptability of Pork Siopao and Milkfish Bones Siopao

Mean – determine the acceptability of the

products
t-test – significant difference
3. Two-Pair Group Design

Extension of the two-group design, one pair of

experimental group.
 Extension of the two-group design, one pair of
experimental group.
General Acceptability of Ube Ice Cream and Mango Ice
Cream (Control Group) and Seaweed Ice Cream and
Squash Ice Cream (Experimental Group)
General Acceptability of Ube Ice Cream and Mango Ice
Cream (Control Group) and Seaweed Ice Cream and
Squash Ice Cream (Experimental Group)

Mean – determine the acceptability of the products

Two-factor ANOVA or F-test two factor – significant
difference
4. Three-Group Design

Three groups of independent variables.

 Three groups of independent variables.

Effectiveness of Teaching Physics using Discovery

Approach, Unstructured Approach, Laboratory Method
to Grade 12 Students
 Effectiveness of Teaching Physics using Discovery
Approach, Unstructured Approach, Laboratory Method
to Grade 12 Students

Mean – determine the mean score of students per method.

Two-factor ANOVA or F-test two factor – significant
difference
5. Parallel-Group Design

Consists of three or more groups wherein one

group is the control group with two or more
experimental groups.
Consists of three or more groups wherein one group is the
control group with two or more experimental groups.

Effect of Planting Palay Using Inorganic Fertilizer, Night

Soil, and Chicken Dung as Organic Fertilizers
Effect of Planting Palay Using Inorganic Fertilizer, Night
Soil, and Chicken Dung as Organic Fertilizers

Mean – determine the mean weight of palay.

Two-factor ANOVA or F-test two factor – significant
difference
6. Counterbalanced or
Latin Square Design or
Rotation Design

Two or more treatments taken by the subjects

during the experiment.
Two or more treatments taken by the subjects during
the experiment.
Effectiveness of Teaching Chemistry Using Three Methods of
Teaching Under Three Instructors to Three Groups of
BS Chemistry Students
 Effectiveness of Teaching Chemistry Using Three
Methods of Teaching Under Three Instructors to Three
Groups of BS Chemistry Students

Mean – determine the mean score of students per method

and per instructor.
Two-factor ANOVA or F-test two factor – significant difference
7. Complete Randomized
Design (CRD)
No control in this design but the subjects will
undergo randomization procedure.
No control in this design but the subjects will undergo
randomization procedure.

Yield of Culturing Catfish (C. batrachus) Using Shrimp Meal

as Supplemental Feed in the Fishpond
Yield of Culturing Catfish (C. batrachus) Using Shrimp
Meal as Supplemental Feed in the Fishpond

Mean – determine the mean weight of catfish.

Two-factor ANOVA or F-test two factor – significant difference
8. Randomized Complete
Block Design (RCBD)
There is control in this design but the subjects
undergo randomization process.
There is control in this design but the subjects undergo
randomization process.

Effect of Culturing Prawn in Fishpond Using Fish Meal, Bread

Meal, Shrimp Meal, and Fish Silage as Supplemental Feeds
Effect of Culturing Prawn in Fishpond Using Fish Meal,
Bread Meal, Shrimp Meal, and Fish Silage as
Supplemental Feeds

Mean – determine the mean weight of prawn.

Two-factor ANOVA or F-test two factor – significant difference
9. Correlation Design

Use to determine the relationship between two

dependent variables, X, and Y, on how they
are manipulated by the independent variable.
Use to determine the relationship between two dependent
variables, X, and Y, on how they are manipulated by the
independent variable.
Relationship Between the Weight (X) and Length (Y) of Mud
Crab (S. serrata) Cultured in the Fishpond Using Bread Meal
as Supplemental Feed
Relationship Between the Weight (X) and Length (Y) of
Mud Crab (S. serrata) Cultured in the Fishpond Using
Bread Meal as Supplemental Feed

Pearson Product-Moment Coefficient Correlation

– determine the relationship between the weight (X) and
length (Y) of mud crab
 Statistical Tools

➢ Mean
➢ t-test
➢ One-factor ANOVA or F-test one factor
➢ Two-factor ANOVA or F-test two factor
➢ Pearson Product-Moment Coefficient
Correlation
EXCEL – DATA – DATA ANALYSIS
 DATA ANALYSIS

1. Open Excel
2. Click File
3. Click Options
4. Click the Add-Ins category
5. In the Add-Ins box, Click the Analysis
ToolPak, Click Go
6. Check Analysis ToolPak
7. Click OK
Weight Increment of Kappaphycus Cultured in Guimaras
Bay Using the Lantay Method and the Hanging Method

VARIABLE 1 – LANTAY METHOD

VARIABLE 2 – HANGING METHOD
Weight Increment of Kappaphycus Cultured in Guimaras
Bay Using the Lantay Method and the Hanging Method

Two-Group Design
Mean and t-test
EXCEL
MEAN 8.38 > 6.30
VARIABLE 1 IS ACCEPTABLE THAN VARIABLE 2
t-test 1.690219 ˂ 3.499483
Null hypothesis (Ho) is accepted
P-value 0.1348317 > 0.05
Null hypothesis (Ho) is accepted
Effectiveness of Teaching English to K-12 Students Using
Method 1, Method 2, Method 3, and Method 4
MEAN 83.30 > 83.10 > 83.00 > 82.85
Method 3 > Method 2 > Method 1 > Method 4
 COLUMNS or METHODS

F-value 1.444642 < 4.145066

P-value 0.239342 > 0.05
Null hypothesis (Ho) is accepted
 ROWS or SUBJECTS

F-value 182.9546 > 2.2406

THANK YOU