Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2. Olayinka D. Otuyemi, Joe H. Noar - A comparison of crown size dimensions of the permanent
teeth in a Nigerian and a British population, European Journal of Orthodontics, 1996, 18(6),
623-628.
4. Araujo E, Souki M. - Bolton anterior tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion
groups, Angle Orthodontist, 2003, 73(3), 307-313.
7. MF Guagliardo - Tooth crown size differences between age groups: A possible new indicator
of stress in skeletal samples, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1982, 58(4), 383-389.
8. LF Andrews - The six keys to normal occlusion, AJO-DO, 1972, 62(3), 296-309
10. HJ Keene - Mesiodistal crown diameters of permanent teeth in male American Negroes,
International Journal of Orthodontics and Dentistry for Children, 1979, 76(1), 95-99
11. Turner PN, Richardson A - Matters relating to tooth sizes in Kenyan and British subjects,
African Dental Journal : Official Publication of the Federation of African Dental Associations =
Journal Dentaire Africain. 1989, 3(2), 17-23
12. SE Bishara, JR Jakobsen, EM Abdallah et al - .Comparisons of mesiodistal and bnccolingnal
crown dimensions of the permanent teeth in three populations from Egypt, Mexico, and the
United States, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., 1989, 96(5), 416-422
13. S Malkoç, F Ayhan, B Metin et al - Maxillary and mandibular mesiodistal tooth sizes among
different malocclusions in a sample of the Turkish population, European Journal of Orthodontics,
2001, Volume 33, Issue 5, 592-596.
15. Ashraf I.Shaweesh - Mesiodistal and faciolingual diameters of the permanent teeth in a
Jordanian population, Archives of oral biology, 2017, 73, 253-258.
16. Al-Khatib AR, Rajion ZA, Masudi SM et al - Tooth size and dental arch dimensions: a
stereophotogrammetric study in Southeast Asian Malays, Orthod Craniofac Res., 2011, 14, 243-
253.
17. D Patel, F Mehta, N Patel et al - Evaluation of arch width among Class I normal occlusion,
Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2, and Class III malocclusion in Indian population,
Contemp Clin Dent., 2015, 6(1), 202-209.
18. M Poosti, T Jalali – Tooth size and arch dimension in uncrowded versus crowded class I
malocclusions, The Journal of contemporary dental practice, 2007, 8(3), 45-52.
19. JM Doris, BW Bernard, MM Kuftinec - A biometric study of tooth size and dental crowding,
American Journal of Orthodontics, 1981, 79(3), 326-336.
20. RP Howe, JA McNamara Jr, KA O’Connor - A biometric study of tooth size and dental
crowding, American Journal of orthodontics & dentofacial orthopedics, 1983, 83(5), 363-373.
21. CP Wermerson - Comparison of tooth widths, arch widths, arch
lengths in early mixed and permanent class I normal dentitions to class I and II crowded
dentitions, Thesis, University of Iowa, Iowa Research Online, 2016, 34-34
22. DF Naidu - T. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner:
a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,
2013,144, 304-310.
1.Partea generală.....................................................................................................................3
2.Partea specială......................................................................................................................6
2.1. Materiale și metode........................................................................................................7
2.1.1.Materiale.....................................................................................................................7
2.1.2.Metoda de măsurare....................................................................................................10
2.1.2.1.Măsurarea lungimii arcadei.....................................................................................10
2.1.2.2.Măsurarea lățimii dinților........................................................................................14
2.1.2.3.Măsurarea lățimii arcadelor dentare.........................................................................19
2.1.2.4.Calcularea a micșorării sau măririi de spațiu...........................................................19
2.2.Rezultate...........................................................................................................................20
2.3. Raportul static.................................................................................................................35.
2.3.1. Rezultate statice..........................................................................................................35
2.4. Concluzie..........................................................................................................................37
Bibliografie...............................................................................................................................38
Anexa 1. Lista abrevierilor.......................................................................................................39
Anexa 2. Lista figurilor............................................................................................................40
Anexa 3. Lista tabelelor...........................................................................................................41
Figura 2.1.2.3.4.
Figura 2.1.2.3.3
Figura 2.1.2.3.2
Figura 2.1.2.3.1
Figura 2.1.2.1.5
Figura 2.1.2.1.4
Figura 2.1.2.1.3
Figura 2.1.2.1.2
Figura 2.1.2.1.1
Figura 2.1.1.3
Figura 2.1.1.2
Figura 2.1.1.1