Professional Documents
Culture Documents
..3IoyRESOLUTIM TESTCHART
Is. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION I RESTRIC TIVE MARKINGS
R&D 5441-EN-01
6s. NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION I6b. OFFICE SYMBOL 7a. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION
Centre de Recherches de (if I/cabit)
1' Institut Superisur Insustri I Catholique USARDSGV-K
6c. ADDRESS (City, State, end ZIP Cod.) 7b. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Cd.)
Avenue de l'Hopital, 22 BOX 65
7000 Mn~fs, Belgium FPO NY 09510-1500
Ba. NAME OF FUNDING /SPONSORING ISb. OFFICE SYMBOL 9. PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
ORGANIZATION (f applicable)
O DJ4-6M08
ii~ ~ ~ ~ - il,"AJ4-8--08
b
S.ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Cod*) 10. SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERS
P0 Box 631 PROGRAM IPROJECT ITA IWR
1 UNIT
Vicksburg, HS 39180-0631 ELEMENT NO. 3NO. No. ACSSION NO.
61102A I.L161102R5 01
11. TITLE (Include Security 040mfication)
(U) Stress and Displacements in Two, Three and Four Layered Structures Submitted to Flexibi
12. PERSONAL AUTHOR(S)
Du HAINAUT
Accewin For
NTIS CRA41
DTIC TAB (
CONTRACT DAJA45-86-M-0483 Urnamionu-d 0
FINAL REPORTCoe
BELGIUM-
STRESSES AND DISPLACEMENTS
Introduction
This report deals with the mathematical aspects required for the establishment
of a computer program able to calculate all stresses and displacements in two,
three and four layered systems.
The materials of the different layers may be isotropic or cross-anisotropic.
The interface conditions cover all the cases from full friction to full slip included
partial friction.
The bottom or the last layer is aidered to be fixed (no vertical deflections).
The loads can either be flexible either rigid.
The report is based on :
- existing material : isotropic multilayer theory (BURMISTER, 1943)
and anisotropic multilayer theory (VAN CAUWELAERT, 1983).
- original research work : interface conditions (fixed bottom, partial friction) and
satisfactory convergency, thus complete accuracy, at the surface and in the first
layer of the system, rigid load boundary condition.
This report contains three parts :
Part I : a theoretical outline wherin the basic equations are given, the specific
boundary conditions discussed and the particular numeral problems related
to the accuracy at the surface and in the first layer, solved.
Part 2 : the general mathematical analysis of the chosen numerical solution and
a description of the programs and their utilization.
Part 3 : (appendices) the detailled mathematical and algebrical analysimes for the
different considered cnes : Itotropic or anisotropic, full slip or not, flexible
or rigid load.
The programs ere written in FORTRAN 77 and run on IBM PC or all other ompa-
twe eupment.
PART 1. THE IULTILAYER SOLUTION
J (-r).F(m)
S " 0 a) (Aiem z - Bie - m z + zCie m z - zDie') dm
- Cim(! - 2
Mi - mz)e MI + Di*(1 - 20 + Uz)e~ IZdm
i l
+ C i m(l + 2P t + MiOeS DtiS(l + 211 SOO~~ dul
2 2-ms
+ I [Aim +
e. - - Jo(r).F(u)[Cin .c
' - Dia.emI. 21.dm
J (r).F(M ) 2 m 2 -u
"o - r -. Aim
... + Aim e'+ Cim(l + us)e
*AIR
* -
-2-
0 I
+o ± ZoU ± e0-mo-ZId
radusCf.t(2nifrml area
lade circulara~
z: -- dpt
re
po ircutetif tessiomvrtclla
Tsy*est res
w- vertical dtelcto
- oItgson ramoeatieelae
-~ ~~~~ ~ - -- ------------------
-3-
masmi -£
* f0 J0 (mr).F(m)/m [A 1 s - Bi e - w. + Cie z - Die zi dm
This stress function differs fundamentally from the isotropic case such that
Oz = J: Jo(mr).F(m) [n (l + I 1 ) (Am2e m + Bm 2C )
z
0e-S
0 (z -s
a - f: Jo(r).F(m) [n 1 (l + U 1)
z
(A1 3 Lma + Bi 2 -uz )
e
2
hhi- 2 (G~i2s~mz + i2-.iz dm
+
nI -
-
13
)(C111 . 2aai
ei u + D 8 ame -81U )) dm
++fJI(mr)F(m)
' mr - ni( + Ud) At 2
z+ +
m e m
a 20 -mz
Ri m '
2 •ima 2-ie
+ Csim + Dsme 1 dm
+ 'tmLm 2 n2(l+u1)dm
re "
- J 1(m ).V( ) Ln*(l ) (Ai 2
e " - 2' m
. ..
m ..
.....
. ....
. •. ....
..
. ,wl ..
. .• . ..
-4-
IW a as J (mr).F(m)- Imz
i M)(Aim em -B m 2-mn)
fo m
2
ns (n ) S 8 imz
+ (i ±i ( Cs m2e - e )Jdm
2simz 2-simz
+ Cism e + Dsim e 1 dm
where
i -2
is the index of anisotropy.
• ni~- 2i
i i
The anisotropic relations are established by the assumption that G the shear
rz
+.
I + ni
Grzi Ei
iI
-5-
In the case of a uniform distributed load over a flexible area the kernel
is
where,
a- ---
Indeed the expression for the vertical stress is then at the surface.
- . TE
- BONDR CONDTION
- p for r < a
- p/2 for r - a
- o for r > a
at the surface
2a (a-r)
2 2-1/2
for r < a
-0 for r > a
P 2w a 2
P =~ 00 rdrd8 = irpa
0 z
E2( -Pa
for r < a
E i
with each layer a stress function 0 (Ai Bi C Di) with 4 unknown parameters
such that the total of unknown parameters is 4n. Two of the parameters depend
O - f(p) for r4 a
-7-
rz
At infinite depth the stresses and displacements must vanish and thus A and
n
C - o. As a result, there are 4 (n-i) parameters to be determined with 4
imposing the conditions that the layers maintain contact and that the vertical
bottom of each layer and at the top of the underlying layer are equal. The
tive adhesion at the interface between the layers. The two extremes of adhen-
sion are
u an Kui+
I
with
K e [O,inf]
Zero friction then becomes a separate case, for which another program has to
be written.
The boundary conditions discussed in the previous paragraph indicate that the
also consider the case of a multilayer system resting on a rigid body, such
that vertical displacements vanish at the contact face with the rigid body.
in multilayer layer theory, we can get w=o at the desired depth and determine
the corresponding values of the parameters A n,B n,C n,D . In the isotropic
case, the parameter Cn must then be put equal to zero, while the parameter A n
A n must be zero when s<1, or the parameter Cn must be zero when s>1 Using cri-
teria that a minimum influence on the surface deflection is desireable and the
fact that conditions u = o and T rz = o have less physical sense, we retain the
fit of this selection is that the condition w-o is the easiest to account for
mathematically.
The deflection at the surface of a two layered system, without fixed bottom,
w 20-M_2)_
L fm0 0 1
Jo(mr).J (ma)
E 1a m
-9-
4 mh
I + 4Kmhe
- 2mh KLe -
+m
1-(L + K + 4km2h2)e-2mh
where
( 3- 4 11) - n(3- 4 t )
n(3-4pI) (3-412) Wn
E 2 (1 + P )
E(1 + P2)
which, to avoid convergency problems during the numerical computation (see art
w = -pa-2(l E- 12) 0o
Jo(mr).J (ma)
m d
1 0 dm
P2) a J0 (mr).JI(ma)
-pa 2(1 -
1 m
4K22 e-2mh
i(L + K + 4Kmh + 4Kmh)e - 2KLe-4mh dm
1 - (L + K + 4Km2h2)e-2mh + KLe-4mh
=W 1 + W2
The deflection with depth on the axis of the loaded area is computed (r - 0,
J (mr) - 1) with E, M 1,000, E2 - 10,1P - P2 - 0.5 , a - 10, h - 10, p - 1.
m w2 w
From this data, the deflection is correct for values of m-0.1 or smaller.
For the case of a rigid bottom at a depth H the value of the deflection at the
W L pa J 1ma)
( 1 -2m
- 2m
E m I + (1 + 2mH)e L
2l 2
2(- p) I L + K - 2KL
E 2 1 - K - KL
3 (ma)
1.5pa I ma
. E f. d
-
1.5pa.- Jo J1 (ma) 2(1 + mH)e H d
p + o m 1 + (I + 2mH).e -2mH d
- with H - 3a
m w2 w
- with H - 1,O00a
For the case of a rigid bottom at H - 3a, the deflection is correct for values
of m - 0.05 or smaller but for the case of a rigid bottom H - 1,000a, the
• .... .... -. .. aI
I
- 12 -
deflection is not correct for all the values m. In the latter case (H =
-0.01.
For comparison, the function is given below for various values of a for a
0.00 0.5 0
neglected. The error is significant for the deep rigid bottom condition. As
a result, the rigid bottom case must be handled carefully, while an average
the problem of accuracy can only be solved where the relations for stresses
attention to specific ters within the general expressions can help to improve
is a separate case that vill be addressed. The value of any stress or dis-
placement is obtained from one of the above wentioned relations. Let us con-
sider, for example, the vertical stress in the i-th layer of an isotropic
layer:
rigid bottom the parameters Al,Bi,Ci and Di must be determined for each value
- 1) unknowns.
Early solutions of this problem involved Inverting the matrix of the (4n
determinat of the denominator. Other program haij tried to avoid the inver-
sion problem by using a trial. The procedure involves selecting values for I
and a
and solving the system of (An - 1) equations. The solutin is
evaluated on how well the surface conditions are met. A second pair of values
4
- 14-
for In and Dn is selected and a new solution obtained procedure. Since the
+t) J (r.J(a) - 2
w" pa--f o Am 2 c -- BIfmeI
1945)
2(1-u2) Jo(mr).Jl(ma)
W " - zI .o a "
FeH
Ft (2F-1-2mH) - (l-F)e - 2 lH
- d
[Fe2 + (2F-1)2uH - (l+2u2H 2 ) + ( 1-F)e -2m t
where
not singificant when computing stresses, because the product of the Bessel
a a
m.o
/A
- 15-
can be stopped when the terms of the series become small enough so as not to
The parameters C and Di. from which the values of all the other parame-
(Fe H - (F-mH)e- I
DI Fe2.1 + (2F-I).2H - (1+2m 2H 2 ) + (1-F)e -2
mt
the circular loaded area. At an H/a value of 5, a memory overflow will occur
as e
for values of a above 10 as a result of such exponential terms such
2.1/a
and e However, this problem can be overcome by dividing both numerator
.
26H
and denominator by a
most computers have a routine that sets variables subjected to underflow equal
to zero. If such a routine does not exist, it can be build into the program.
4r
- 16 -
and in a completely safe way (i.e. the numerators both tend to zero, while the
This can be obtained automatically for the two layer system by writing the
their numerators.
-o for r > a
o S
- 17-
a-~ for
r < a
J (ua)
S om r ) du which is a special case
.Jl( m a)
For r - o, one has f - dm - I
o Jo(xr)-.J
a
1 (ma)
For r - a, one has :o o da - 2/w
Jo(mr).JI (ua) 2
For r < a, one has fo dm F (1/2, - 1/2; 1; L)
a
- (a) (b)
F(a, b; c; z) E n! (c)n z
o n
(a)~n- a (a+l) (a+2) ... (a+n-1)
(a) W 1
o
J (mr).J
0 1 (ma) 2 a
For r>a F (1/2, 1/2; 2; 1) =d-
0 2r2
r
In the case of a rigid load the analytical integrals are:
- o for r > a
f: JI(ar)in(iM) d - - [a-(a 2 -r2 )]1/2 for r < a
r
- for r >a
r
J1m)
i (a 1 2 /21
i(ar ) .do -Lr
[a-(a 2_r2)1/2 for r <a
"-a for r >a
r
ted to a force P.
2
With P - pia
lim pa f M Jo(mr) J (
ma) dm jf J(mr) dm
a0o
In this case
-mz
pa f Jo(mr) Jl (ma) e dm
S f2w
a p dp dO
2w [o [o (p2Z2)1/2
One of the two integrals can be solved analytically. The required integrals
are:
/2
pa f J(mr) J(ma) e dm - f 2z(a2_x2 ) 2
dx
0a 0 1 2w -a (z2+X2+r2_2xr) (z2+r +a2 _2xr)1/2
2
a ~~2 2 1/2 d
pa fpa JJ10o(mr)) J (ma)) aze'~ -%ma
J2w ue -
fa (4Z 2z(a 2_x 2 d 1/2
J-a (z 2 +x 2+r 2_2xr) (z2 +r2+a 2_2xr)1/2
/ 2 dx
+ kfa 2z2 (a2-x2 )
2w-a (z +r 2+a -2xr) 3/2
paIJo(mr) J (ma) - m ~ a a )
n (r2-2xr+a2+z 2.1/2 + (a2-x)
2 21/2
paf 0 e d 2w f -a
aIn (rdx
m 2T - 2 2 1/2
(r -2xr+a +z2 22Z1/2
(a -x )
pa J(mr)
I J I(ma) a2 fW____ sizd
e dmp sin8d
0 mr 11 o (z2 +w2)2/2
2 2 2
with w - a +r -2arcos e
2
Jl(mr) J1 (ma)
Pa e- dm p - f 2Ir I2 in 2sOde
r W 0(z 2 +W2 )3 /2 s
In the case of a rigid loaa we expand either the Bessel function, J (mr)
0
or JI(mr), either the sine function, sin (ma), depending on the relative
Go (-l)n r 2n r (n+3/2) a2
if r <a 2a E 2 2)n + l F n+l, -n; 3/2; 22
o r(1/2) n! (a +z a +z
f J (mr) sin(ma) m e- mz
dm=
00
JI(mr) sin(ma) em z
n1a 2n+3 r2
if rif> ra2az
aaa +_ rz n+ F---,-nl; 2;
r r(r2+z2/2 1 2 22 3
r +z
(r +z 2)
J (mr) sin(ma) e - dm =
. .- a 1
-22-
( *. r 2n+3 r2
if r(>na1
2n+3 F 2 r-n;
r2+z 2
2
(r 2+z
2n r (n+3/2) a2
if r (a 2 E r z(n2+z2)n+2 F n+2, -n; 3/2; a22
o n! r(1/2) (a a
S 2n+1
na 2n1r.z (2n+3) (ni+1) r
rn+
if r > a z 2n+ F 2 n+5, -n; 2;
2n+5
(r +z )
The case to be solved for first is full or partial friction at the inter-
- At the surface a - p
T 0
rz
W, =w
wi = wi+1
u i = )iui
A4 or C = 0 if rigid bottom
A4 = C4 = 0 if 4 - th layer is semi-infinite
is difficult to solve analytically in the same way that BURMISTER did for a
two and three layered system. Using the same approach results in mathematical
negative exponents only and a denominator containing a constant term and nega-
tive exponents. During the integration procedure, when the variable tends to
infinity, the numerator will then tend to zero and the denominator to a con-
stant value. In the analysis the exponents must appear in close form. The
sive form. Sequential steps in the mathematical analysis for a rigid bottom
are as follows.
First Step
Second Step
MI (A1 B1 IC D)T i
f
(I )T
- At the surface
where MI is a 2 x 4 matrix
T
- At the first interface MI(ABC 1M2(A
= 2 B2 C2 D )
where M is a 4 x 4
and M6 is a 4 x 2 matrix.
Third Step
MI (A B1 C1 D1)T = (1 o)T
T -1T
(A1 B1 C D1 ) = M I .M2 (A 2 B 2 C 2 D 2 )
C D )T
(A2 B2 C2 D2)T= 31 .M4 (A3 B3 3 3
(A B C D3 )T M11 M (B D ) T
A3 B3 C3 3 5*6 4 4
and finally
The
rodct .1-I .2,M3 -I 144..M5-I .M6 is a 2 x 2 matrix, so that we can write
- 25 -
21 2 4\
a2 2
Ba 22 2 1 *a
a11 - 2.12
D -a 2 1
D4 = ali a 2 2 -a a12
the matrices are split in such a way that the exponents can be factored out of
x -x
M2 = e .M2 1 +e 2
M3 4(1-12 ) [ e-Y.H31 + e Y.M3 ]
H3 4(l-Ij3 ) 31 32
M 4 e .M41+ e-YM42
______ -Z z
-1
5 - -t-- 13 e . 51 + e .M52
M6 [ e .M6 1 + eZ.M6 2
where x = mh1
y = m(h 1 + h 2 )
z - m(h I + h2 + h3
u - m(h I + h 2 + h 3 + 2h4 )
The terms of all the matrices are in closed form and can be introduced as
- Am .
input values for the numerical procedure. The term ot the resulting products
columns or rows of each matrix contain only zeros. In the final product
values of all the unknown parameters except for the parameters B and D 1 at
term in both the numerator and the denominator followed by negative exponents
where K is a constant term and f (A ) and f2(C are functions of the parame-
ters A and C I which converge normally. Splitting the above relation into two
o1 M pa fa J 0 (mr).J(ma). K dm
arises too. Therefore, utilizing the surface conditions, the expressions for
stresses and displacements are split into two parts. The first part, known as
2.1.2 Full Slip at the First Two Interfaces and Full Friction at the Third
Interfaces
the case of full slip for the four layer system are:
Trzi+ 0 (3)
W, wi + (4)
W, w i+
ui i+
u 1
4
A4 or C4 o for a rigid bottom
- 28 -
First step
Second Step
matrix form
T -I T
(A3 B3 C 3 D3 ) a H5 M6 (B4 D4 )
Third Step
UI
)T
M(C D
(AI B 1 )T - I
Using conditions (1) and (2) at the first interface replace AI and BI by their
5 , C 2 , D2 -
T T
(C I D 1 ) a MI (A 2 B2 C 2 D2 )
Using condition (4) at the first interface, replace A,, Bi b C I and D I by their
)T . 2 (C2 D2 T
(A2
Using condition (1) and (2) at the second interface, replace A and '2 by
T T
H4 (A3 B3 C 3 D3 ) = (K o)
Finally,
T
M4 .M5 .M6 (B4 D4 ) - (K o)T
The same procedure is also utilized to express all the unknown parameters as
functions of B4 and D4 .
At this point a supplementary difficulty for the full slip case, regard-
ing the expression of the vertical deflection must be considered. The verti-
l+j1 J (mr).JI(ma)
w - pa 0 m ft(AiBICiDi) dm
For m -
-30-
J 0 (ar).J (ma) a
• 2
E-o
and
lim f (AB C D 0
Eno
which result in the above expression for the vertical deflection being unde-
fined. However, at the rigid bottom w-0 for all values of the integrating
Of course this is not any more true in the case of the last layer being a
a a a -a a -1 B + D (I - 2P I1
z 2 z3 z4 - 5 5 5 5
T Trz 4
rz I rz 2 rz 3 -rz 5 -0 -B 5+ 2p5 D5 -U
WI a w 2 a w3 " 4 " 5
- 31 -
- - ..--..- .2(1 s
h
I (ab) if
[ + 4f + 2f + ... + 4f +
f
3 o 1 2 2n-1 2n
segments of length h.
such as:
a - pa f J 0 (mr)*JI(ma) f(m) dm
where the interval of integration goes until infinity. The numerical computa-
tion is Interrupted when the value of the function f (mz) (in fact the values
of all the parameter A Bi CID I) becomes smaller than the imposed convergency
level (i.e. fI(m,z) < ). The rate of change of the function, fi(mz), is sig-
nificant for small values of the integrating parameters m and less significant
ment of m (i.e., h) for higher values for a. Using this technique, the above
I [o,-] - hIf
h l- ° + 4f I + 2f 3 + f4] for a 4 L1
h2
+ + +
+ " i4 4f 2f6 4f for L, < 4 L
h
+ + + +
3- if 8 4f9 2f1 0 + 4fll f1 for L2 < m
becomes:
I [o,-] - 4f + 2f 2 + 4f 3 + 2fI + h4
2h 2h
+ L' [4f 5 + 2f6 + 4f7 + 2f8 j + Lf
4
" h[ 4 f + 2f + 4f + 2f 12
i
I [Li, Li+1] [4fl+ 2f1+ 2 ... 4f+2n-+ 2fi+2n ]
The length of the integration segment can be modified further with a value of
Sfi+2n
The initial length h of the integration segment is chosen by the user and
appropriate subroutine.
AMn m m m il u mm~m m m m m
- 33 -
- Input of the data (by display or file) for loads and pavement struc-
ture
0.
of m.
of m.
tation of the analytical part of the solution for the surface and
- stresses o a o r
x y z xy xz yz
displacements u v w
- principal stresses a 1 2 a3
principal strains e I2 e3
linear strains c e e
x y z
The number of circular loads, with different radii and contact pressures,
The program is written in FORTRAN 77 and runs on IBM PC's equipped with a
REFERENCES
4p
-IN24
All
APPENDIX I
SYMBOLS
We write
A-,l +) Ci ____
L. .4
y = h, i- l A.
'..M 14 + 12 + 143 +. 4
A,- b, -iQ,.Z, ,
1A., A C- C(z-4 1 v.
t-.~7 D ('+&-t~
AI bt- eCz -ArL -,C),-' l.-x-<)T~
F',,, I,.=
(A,a,-, D, )" = ,
,". C _D2)"
,L2y-x)
A 1.3
4A-
F wI-A'v -'F-
... -I I - -- ]D
A4(4-),
+ 0-
+-
0 0 2
A1.4
1-2 4- 4-
-Ib rL11a 0
+ .., t, -* , , vy
4- A -VL Ti
A +o-Z
I - 11 - -P2 bi
A 1.5
"IL) L R
L t., + + L,' +- 4]3. ,
A
A Ml ) + i CZ
, +(A L Itl D
' -2) A
M A b C, , T),2).
A 1.6
A 2. R1 i - (4~*)PL .(4)RL
Vz k% 9 - A 2.1 .. -
A411-. A 1P2 Z jk a . p4 2, k. +4~ 'RAL
2. 2 2. P4.
- F?' 2. F2 *Fi
The values of the parameters A, and C1 are deduced from the matrix
equation
A(4h
V 2 2"
+ P 2.2.) (Azi .f~l)
A ,,x
7 2
V
The values of the parameters B1 and D1 are deduced from the surface
conditions
i ,-- 2)A, + (.--A.,) A, + A-.,c, (--24-
U. 4(~ ~ A. ?-
A F z -X
V
-A A a + 'P.i -x
A 1.8
,2- At 7b - Cz L-*z-) aY + D -,
(-2*..).--
%V: A6 -- : (lA
C2 -~v:. 9L r )-,(.-A7
C)--O
2. Resolution of the system of 10 boundary equations.
We write the conditions at the second interface in matrix form
-A , _ _ -
,A 1.9
-I A S4-
A(- tL)
o - I,,. ,. . +_2Fo, .o
) 4
,a,. .,)x, -,.t2_4 - ,..
b -y)
(Al - -4
I )
I + +A
M + N,1 DT
0 "
0
M3AZ.(
IO
0
)0 0
0 4- .
0 k+t) 0 IC
U.A (.1 L Sel k2 t
| <',...
I,... i, bJ|I', l'v
.
0 to
A 1.10
WA A + 2)k3.
A_____ Y) ,,,,..
-'=At;l~~I
_ +{ t~ p+- (1) IS.
,,k 4)3~~~) ~
2F.Fu-Z.. ~h~ ,.
A QA
A - ,.) L 1
-'.*F+ ' ( ') L
M + ?1, 1A, D4')
c,;.
4- ,, I M4-k AI
- UMIAA')
f
.4T-Lky42
4-46 1
..
.. . ......
...
....
..
., h.. ...-
.. . . .....
. ....
.... * ....
....
..~.
A 1.11
(A l - Cu T_ ti M0 b D
I +
TwA 2.
o 1 0
CV + M,
- -,
A 1.12
A 4 4
4 b +
0 a 0 12 1
o 4- o 4- fo o
-
Pl V,- o0 04-
F'. ,_x F3
F.zA TA + x P5
Fbl~ IF
Ael, , r, A 1:
FAA 2 -,13r
A ,= - . I'
A, C.+ (),A)
.. . A t_
... . • .. . ..
A 1.13
4(4+0)
-A 2 -* ILIC
Z.'2+R -AL
.4 D2~
All,- ,
A., t. ,l T -_ j
, 1z4
~~%
-')-*4 r- 4 ,
-~ ~- - X
M1Fk. F, F2 ~
,F~ I F, z
$: (-- k)Az
V
-. .* F '2-. -_
11.V
F2-' - P -Z . FF-2- - FF' F4
A 1.16
A --- - it 13
4 (-i-)
A A 7.2 +. T- r2.,__
A 1.17
A~AM
A 1. 18
0 0 0
ow + 0 0 0
IIY 4-~
i -2.
1 0 0
0 1 0
'Li i
NIS 2 L I~ LcL
A 1.19
- Lt.
LA, j4 b-w A
4.. Lw -Pa24.3,
A)=-
A 1.20
j, La
.,ie write the boundary conditions at the second interface in matrix form
- A t- . FI)2
I I2,
y0
-Y 0
o - _
0 ~Wk,-2h. 3
o_ 0A 4'
lib-
MA* 4
A .;,tM2 3AI& S,
/ 1.21
0 0a'ih 10 ) 0
100
1.) 0'0
0 +~
IC
- 00
4 (A-.
Lr.
-
AA yc,
K 1-(A-21-1) (-A2+^t
) l~
e:"' b , .- ,
II
0F F, . 0 P4
1
FF F F.2 T- FF 2 .41
* --- , A
A 1.23
FF~t-AF~ -* '3
'F' = 1- - kA-*h) Fb
Fpr 2 a=rb i -
32
l'2,1
( u-P k?),.Its
'fr )
e-* On. P it ( L%.') +- it LAL 0- '
(k)) l - -,P
. kt p )Z22-v) * (Q1- P2- +~ 14 ') +- OMLX 4L4. 1
kuI Ili + 1 Ph
C2(AR4)
A~ It 02..
A 1.24
k 2 o0 24 II 22
1o4 L- kL24.
k L 4, 1-1<4 A-L41
kcLAL2 * 4 kAJ4.
-LL2. LA,.
I- e
~tFL~~ +
LotIt kL . 0%%1k j1
~ ~ i.
A 1.25
-2.
2
+
"l 4
4. 2.2. . 'r
.PAa o
&'L=
D - .. A
4..)A.... PL +
TT2 - k"
(L.- =. I P k.=.,
A 1.26
i. WL.v
c-- ~r-2kL
- T-kL.1. .c-11
1 c 12. PI
+ rr1<i..-, --
-2. -FLz,. F Ljz.
+.XL,
+ iV4
(LL2 L-tL,)(T-,?.'+-6 T4
is a constant.
A fb -Si
=- -LL [ 2.1t,) )
1b,, .7- - L DA ' ,
'4(.4-A9
"- B 7-" C +PA2DA
A 1.27
-~ ~ L2
P, +j(9 ) e~ ~ C~~' Lz.)P
(1-e +4 2.)D
DW- 2-42%9(
)CTx..R;~C)
29 - 4, (Ae 4
AC4+-L
The program calculates the stresses and the displacements using following
relations:
77 ) -
V-0j
),Z e- -w
AtI Pj W-A 90e-
~..
.I ~.... Ef .. JA "..-
'.--.e-
A. 1. 29
Lk= LA-r. (j o
Y Y = A.(. YV~ 0
Load
CL
<
A. 1. 30
- )rra
-. (w P)(
(r>-) +2
T,~ A, trcA
~~c~i-) 0A mC
r) " OLw)4(, ck2uIjjie
Ck.(A -
A. 1. 31
wi th ~2~*
~cL)
-r r
W4- 2) IW
wi th A(:~
-c" U
- - it
A. 1. 32
.A ~ A T, Cm r)O
wi th0
troL
+2,(A -hw,)A.T C
0 j.
with
p..
T- O Cl t (voir)
ON 7
Iwol)e
j,(A -
A. I1. 34
3m V) W1-
C a
) A
, __ ,
__2L 104
ir
0
with
A&, A.
1
4 1
06 A. 1. 35
wi th
'4r
~,L~).~)'o~e..: I: o
r 0 ~ (rIT
14 7 ,
T,
-w Iih_____L~
wi th
4±k L4 Iwo-W;I
A. 1. 36
E, o
The relations for the stresses and displacements are given in paragraph 4.1.
m
The terms Aim emz, Bim2 emz , Ci m
and Cime z are to be replaced
14 L (-%%
----- op
APPENDIX 2
SYMBOLS
We write
L , (,_t,_-)
(
L
r , + tL - ,- • , (A-,+..) .- :
A .J A,
- z e,t)C I, 4- L ,-2 -x
ktFIAt&
- .,11-%,c01 (-A
(-c -
,.4r).,-,),
I-
-1
,(-
X, - D
&v
.,)'x).a 7x
C-
2A;, 4. C , CA4)..) - ),
I b, e, -- D, ( . ,)
•)e - C, g A + A 1._
A 2.3
where
I-])-, AL-"
1 4 C,-z(..-Z.++
-U3 -, )i.' .
and, taken in account the bottom conditions,
x ( xA3
L - )I
L2x+ -
3
A'l LLA+-.A)i
[) ^-j .- *).
X -
and with
FL: F, ( - L , DLe
(.4- f.)
B;1A -I.vwr ) I
-~-)ht
t+ ( 2 Lt
*IJ )Jkj~2+~ EL:
ft--
A 2.4
where
-Ax
A+ A Z ,
L -,- Z ' I- - (4+ ) [,
- z
p ,. --.
VI I 2.L42xi" -A j- ~ -
2--f
A 4L 2 tLA2] + (4-A Ix a) CO
b% A- .. )k")tx4 4.
-. L .. ~I x
A 2.5
A ,Y-
S- 2 .). -,
Irv A2% - Y ty 4D22 '
ZA,- .+ C,(-,.A.) -,
* -i 3), C--
We replace A, and Bt
1 by their values in function of CI and D, and
solve the system
-- 4 3x
2 (~.201)e-, -9 -
and with
LA 2JL[i1 Ax ZA
U-cx] -2.(.44+X) 4x~
- - 4 -
2(A - 2, )%7 x P
where
7, -A+2x%-) ZT
~ 2(-'x~t
,
F,. V,
A 2.7
2% - L 4- C2 (A1~ t ~ b2A- -
We add and substract the first two conditions at the second interface
where
) &~~~~~
LASjI 2. (-1~~
-2.~ - C) ~ I L ~( . ~ v 2 ) 3 V~
IA. 31'1
-V - . - Y .1 x
and with
c_.k
D2ACy k.1)
A 2.8
function of B3 and D3
We replace C2 and D2 by their values in
3,3
[A, -x
(2y- 2.
+.;k"s)
I -,(.+,,€-
t ,!LD+" 4-1- .+It
(z-y)
2~ ~ 4 ' . (I2)~
+-Ff
-(2 A *4_ ,
2) .~-,
~ L
A 2.9
We have
V2
so that
so that
We have
- _ 14 Aa-)
so that
A24'g 2..y)
-
LC3.~
c~~e.I, xP). +- - cji+.e0 4-
We have
~~~~- 3
AZVi+2 (.,,+ A,)2)t -
7,
A2x) -x ,,,'x
VI
A 2.10
so that
- it
2A,?. - t. + SA )).-.- . t
A 2.11
ty:
Abt' .tl - C i-xt'4 7)
A,4c C, A(2-A
IA ,
QA-o
A2. 12
AAC'= -
b Aej- 34A (2-A4Y, *-) m4
We write the conditions at the third interface in matrixform
We invert M5
where
-' A
- A-
T A
4 -I 71-2 -161
Cb Ill-
~ ILMel++L
,-s -£1)- 231 ,,
M-CI - 41,+
1.6 2 - e ,
L L(,Z--)- ~~-h~+-
A2. 13
(!-
~2 I 0 0 ) I6
(;I- )
S0
.-
Y}.., L, (L,-L.,) ( I)
" = A
2A,-i4 4+ C, - -) -2),
-2b A - C, - 1. AA),
Adding and substracting then the first two conditions at the first
interface, we obtain
where
-- w
COiZ IjA- +
~
:1 -)(A. C-- 4 )~4 F C"L +. 2 D7 e
and with ,= F
A2 %2 .~-c ~-2A-C ) 2
where
where
c J,L( 2-
= LAS]L2y- R,_) "t'-4 (I/,1
+4 Rd -vtI (A 1e4 -
1 *j 2-.
jA)JL(.ii2 2V ~y2' *( 4 ),U (.42 1t
j- + (A+',) P'(-L)
2A~t
and with
2.6
C, Dc.7j e'+ E
(%IL ,fl (
L- 9 Ali)
where
V) -. ( 'f
U -L
2.('/
2 2. e,- 2.N '4 -t A' )
W7!
A2. 17
form
We write the system in matrix
A2-I, (At)~
Y
T TT
or
'f I~j~)
.M2.6
S D,)
A.2Y 4
P62I
t,27
= 0
We notice that M 41 .M526 1
M41.M5262 = 0
M42.M=5161 0
M42 .'M
5 16 2 = 0
A2. 18
We cal1
M4 1. 5 16 1 =N 1
M4 1 .M5 1 6 2 = N2
M42.M5261= N3
M42.M5262= N4
and write
1)
t v- .(I
)L•
-Y)(_ . ,
We write
e IV , I- t, e.
We olv
sy st
%Ah 2 6 Dem -
U 4 (%. +bt2
.22 t-7ee
V3
where
1- .
, ,, C X - () 2.1,
+ -
+
l"-',
The term b11 .b2 2 - b12 .b2 1 contains linear functions of the variables
and has to be develloped in close form
0 L .l
1~
-x ,
LLL ) + L, 2 +y.
Y -
and finaily
b- 4 I I
:-4-3! '07 TRZI:E::AND,_DI: LAC-EMENT- IN TWOrTrM 4M)FU
DE
LAY EIED' TnUCTUnE - UBMI -U' CENTRE DE RECHERCH-TS
L WNT :JPEP.IEUP INDUTRI EL -AIN5LIQU
F UA!4 -.AWELAERT ET AL. 3~ -EP 87 F 29/11 ML
4- )L)
d4 4L5ts1 &)(1-) - -. 1
IuI 1".2
-OL' RESOLUTq4IO
TEST CHART-
*P2. 20
The values of the parameters A3, B3, C3 and D are obtained from the
relation
rT CA-b b. Cb = A'y1 5
+ NIF2GLA-P+ IF.. T
The matrices M5261 and M 262 contain nothing but zeros in their
first and third rows, so that we can write
(A, C, -- +
TA A
The matrices M5161 and M5162 contain nothing but zeros in their
second and fourth rows, so that we can write
0 T
-'i
P2. 21
We have
SO
so that 7
LAf3LAt(A+ )3)
L J~
where
so that
s C2 (.A+tha2xt
so that
A
2x-
4 (A-A
At
A2. 22
We have that
A
C 2. X L[ (2 +-t I) 7 -)Vw
where
24 C (AL1
so that
so that
3~ A- A, 4(A-4A
A - 2 A, -A
M -2( ,,, ." , (CI ,,) ).-
,,)4t-"
A2. 23
The relations for the stresses and displacements are completely the same
as those developped in appendix 1, by replacing the parameters Ai , Di
by their adequate values.
-' ~~ ~ ~ w ~ 4- 4I 3;Lwir)
"j J;rL)~
(Vgo -2~4. 24r
A--
C (4~)
h ))2.4)'b ak. IA,,- s -A
4 (2 (-4)-)-D,(-A-3
so that, for m = 0,
A,- - C, D. -°
and thus
LA,~
,4 -
---
A 3.14
APPENDIX 3
SYMBOLS
We write
• -i ME
A ,
E52.
kw-l
2
y+
Z = W, ( 14 , 4 % +*
i% A,Zx+ b, + C, D, 1
x -- 4 SAC
> .', ' ._ ,
6- A. +)1,) .
%V-A, (- + S L,.+)-&
,)L,C'j 3-( -st-Da
.
t <. A240
,, ~. . ~ .. ~ . ~. ... - -~ _ C, ,4.= ..
A 3.3
b, M, - b%) Diw,
)
-- i
----
2,
2.~(-w) 4 i)-x 4+
(~-h
!+
I = C- a.-F
9 r, -: Y-)
. A4. , L I..
(I. -X J
A 3.4
mV.H
ti laX iteX
i R),l
2s5", ( -*,
- -----
b aj4.2 , 2L30
2A,(4- ,
1"e
S II -L
, ' I
A
A 2 .1 -
+ - R4 2
-A
A 3.5
+. A I L -D2
212
f,X . 1 A, I") M (-
w, 2- IA22 +,2J F
I ;,%,x
2.,,
L', V s
(A- S. 2Lh.A 7.
2 - 142 A
A 3.6
The values of the parameters A1 and C, are deduced from the matrix
equations
2 ,(A- ,)
The values of the parameters B1 and D, are deduced from the surface
conditions
('- ) - ,
A 3.7
(At 5L CL V) r MV'.MA Cb DO
A 3.8
).,
.T{i-) l+l, zv .- -,
(2-Y)
-
'1,.I 4e.
-(z-v) ~j(. k +
f-~LV
-v
-a' t ~{~#, .l'-tL
A4+5 -Y -
,I)-t < , . - -
MAi
02.1
4 '. t. .. , ...... ..
bMl) 431lz-y
A 3.9
2h (4-h.)
A
-ty-y-x
O. 1424tXe
. . J U.i.,
RAI V
-%------ An -
A 3.10
-Ra 2ZtpRAD3C
21. 4~A I,)2-b
(4he
L" RgL a 4-0,Rj
t.C bbD3
(A,~~t T
+. Oa
bus All 6? +I
at U,41
41 RAIoftRAI Ou
R*
y
L 4,
RA.(L
A 3.11
. C. A D AllT
" ,^A
VV
Ovi., bb 4. A2LL P
and solve the system
A2L
Aft.At& - Z.,i
7L
V2 MO.N- k. 0L
A 3.12
I A• . - - .). Ot L IL . I•
+ j- Al)C
(2?
We write
LU I ,BL - OJ J 2a,-')
Z
. A, &L.....
. . . .. - Q
A 3.13
-1-
11OI u.
1 Pw.. A - A I . 2.'bI l R - - PA-L As)
)PAL'k
IPNbb (v t; J
UT &
A 3. 14
{ 4, LAI AMi
. A 9
ilA, -4 '1
ul% L 1Ali~ b - Rva'R3,
* ~ 4PE~f~e3
vim
4L 4L
\7 e- ve x 4L~___ __________________
A 3.15
We write then 4; 4 -
e
IL~ 4. Rq c to~~ +
-L 3
Rz-, r , 0.,1
I Abe.~h)(.'L
OS- IL1w4V-i~
-I7-)
si tAIX
2J,~~A q ,-
2:4(4-hlot)
-4 -31,X
,. 1 t,?,
- Rlb',2,b - 2LA ,12A +'
V, -v-A
- I. 2 € DI9-
+,Lz4
+ e+
t
-2A
J2 (%A--A
4. R,z b. + 1 + A
'~'m
_--
-, - 2At t - . 4-.) c,tJ,1t
A 3. 18
We a
S(- +V,' A A o4
AI-,
4',b,4 [i+ )
i tlil 'b,
. .al
. . (A 6AAL D4 ,Z2:* .
A3. 19
A b-b CbDa.)T
Lj$ ' G(b 4 )T
We invert M5
A b %111
C D2 MS
Jr,,.[.
') { '}
e-.2.Y"{'
101F) Y) S.e,(
Y)
(4 + Q
_$, YI
If s4 > 1
- (- ,j 4-
4 -. -,--,-
t)AVA 24l
C A,5)L1 jA A
A3. 20
We write
?J4 . - "'I(/ )" ¢Cci )
so that
%ILIA4 -v) fA
MA 12 -V)
A2.X
+~4 t,(i)MA(ill)-
M SP 5~3 (y-v)
I~ Y)
%2)
- ~ ~ ~ A A) )~A,-o
11A6 14f M(h). ' ('i) B3
+ e
2:7 4~2
A3. 22
so that
-S!t
)l- J - l -s.
A A
2: M4A(2iQii2CS)I7ry;CC + MML,J*04).DJ2
I2, (.A-V' )
so that
3. Resolution of the system of boundar COnditions
A3.24
We write the conditions at the surface in matrtxform
-4 , (A C. 'D)
so that
MRa.-IAI
I . M L2.L4
bit.
lb,.z
2
l11.
:- el- '
t.i.C21 . C42- C21
+'(Cm,.Owt- b, b l~o~)
i2bo
OL4
I. .Jk.12 1n I.I
2 ICtvm 4-A I
i
ilo A4. ~ AL
e-
-jige
AA_~*
______9
A3. 26
a.-~~~ . ~.,aA
t)R
-C -X 2L'-x x i
-~~~ 2JA*]
-A IL J2 47
' 2 3, -1 -l y
4 i'iv.C ~ j (t)Ri.
1
~ 2 tS A3,~
2.-R2 0 ZAs" , ~
A3. 27
- ZJ(L
%%2 OLI
c2~-i4L
4 2-s,Ls
ItZ, -21
(.
L lolt- (A.:i3R2AL - 2:1.RAS4
Q~~ 2,
. A~1 -ICv) 3, 1( A25A
b .l L (say--y') ~h A,,,,c
A3. 28
f Ja
bv w4. 6.2.
:aty-x)
:~ U~~A. IA)?
qP 4
)~
+ 4A VbO ) 4- tAI..9-1
.
Lis -
q.2.
9*1) 9- 0-
V1 J'. & 3 VS1 9,2
IN - 9m-?. ?3
L PiR
9 -
Al 1 imi.fn2 - A.P]
P3. 29
'ti, A - 4, ia .
2$ %U 63
it
~jiAA- 21 .02 I-
1a .&~ 4 -i 1 .E3b}
4 6)2.4Y443-
O.AkA -
-
P3. 30
bui b,~2 ~
bit.VIZ "~) Sm (Z-Y)
-7 bA ~~~J
LIA (2-Y) Y)'
Le(v,,yv)r .~2
~W
- -2 U2
A4.
Avb-i, t
4, Aw. i 2B J2y
4 ''-
We write
C9-22-I.-,=Q-. *0." L C *
A3. 31
We write
2v
--
t,
M~
.%%-
14rx%
-P.2
~~2.i~~~J01 ~P t
--
(0 *9.?J,-
+~~)2~1Y 1
~~ ~ ' %..7i~
b)%
pit~ ~ ~
I,. Ou. P. + 4t j
14 th12
* 3A.4Q
At -. Pit
We have th atC
(A- 14 (A
TZ
JA
pl~2,. c-.
/3. 32
V, (w) tI-11)
t-P,.
-• ,,. C. • I M21- l •
t.
4L e, 4 7 L .-
Oh~~ kl
~~ 2~2 22. 2-A2
-Y) '
(3',Y " 1-01 -X) 1,/ 0 .1 32.
62_ 4 4.2, x1
C . • • - "
e j -YJ)tY )
AV X CY
.(W'
2 ) Kj -. i) z )-
:..,,, C..- v,",( ' ; C'z
p - e
2N-Y
The values of the parameters are obtained from the matrix equation in § 2.1.
r4
A)-y S4
A. _ IL ,, , + T .Dz
A?4- )4 Pi )
B-~4
I31(7.,f 'PA. D
'I).3
= - -
tA h)C-I)AM ),
A3. 34
?I22.DA
?2
Ik'A +
4t. t 1 -)"
1et).Liyi)~~~sk-OoX~
'
- ~~
'A - ?72
+ ~ ~Y4~2V
,i)
-s-y-2517)Y
921 1 L?21
t
2.2 5i
4pA'~tI.P
T
L'A-Y)
A3. 35
- Pn. q4,- 4
~
s--L(-I ~ (A v ~ , )
. 1 . I
A3. 36
2(.--Y).
2 -bz ) f AY) '1
)
- 4, 'Y pit
.(- Y Y CNXY
PA wl 11
P
, Low-- ' 0,12.- P22 +03
P,,
I 0-b)- pi
A, + '1 C e
AA2.
c ----..-- )- 9 , I, D A
Ct A (-IL A11
B32.- A4'22 A
C----_'.
2a
CA C 2.,6, - C 2.
P3. 38
[S2LI4 t - QL~~
2 V2
1b/1
413 )&-A~~?2yh
. -. I V
Ly-') '6
b 2 2~4A-.1)
.. 2 -21.y T3.yK .st
-~ 0b2. 1 . b 2
4[.- -2sL1'V' Lb - 2
e7 0'-2442
C 2 2. b41 - C 2 1. -
-1-W') I , -A
2r
t =~~~3r
- ( a 2U)%L
-4ilL V -.01,, -"
+)z X2 c Pa
A - - SLPc .2
2% L, in--A
I, (Aivt
The values of the parameters B1 and D are obtained from the boundary
conditions at the surface
-
L
, Xt 2 , W ' ' '
A.A4e7"
A4. 14
2. Expression of the boundary conditionsin matrixfoft.
SYMBOLS
We write
Aivri(A t h A
[' - ,,C I,9-H,..-•.. )*;.,
)
E__ k .L L
y W%'4~ L
Arz*
,w 4 t , + +
A, "-4- b, + - r,3),
Boundary conditions at the interface (z = H1 ):
DC
ttin L
A,- A ,
A -J
A 4.3
We add and substract the first two conditions at the first interface
+ CA+S,) C, + (A-S,)
2~~~Z. ,JTv~ A2]
2 , + ,E + + Z - LA.)"
2-
L Aaj1 + x 3 j +)
A- 2.]<-'
)i - SIX
),LA2 J L t,(2.. C" - (+A
+ - A+,. A 4 -
72A . 12j£x]
A 4.4
c, -
C,,-,) C,-) 'it-sow = F, i ( ,Z-1
and with
P2.
- F2 ~ 1 .A I
I2 ' -
with
T1 V,
1+ ti),
A 4.5
(I,-)
S
+Y
J
D2. 2
R . L - St J
-2.* -X 2
-t- F-
.v,
,
()" )(A
A 4.6
. - ,X
Ch - S £^)L2 ,.
+ - (A:)
4.' IV,
~, - - ~.F2,
, * , ,'- +S. IL3
2,,
2.~
C CS"
A W ... , 2.) - • 4 .. C
A 4.7
Y: Cr)A - .)
+ 2"
.+-- D..z
Ca.)..)Cz N+ Ca - .)v))
W= -i lo A 2.f&b) Z (Z)
)4$KO5N D(1"),
A<4 l% X )
We add and substract the first two conditions at the first interface
.2A + [-ic ) I, '"= LA I)
- Jr-,
A 4.8
where
[Al] A,'_r 4- + 4)
..2x 4Js(
4 j2JS-,-Q e - -4-J)e j V ,
N7 - (')+.'.) I Z +C , 4. (A ).4 .
4
and with
.3,
(h,-,)
3
it- ' ' C2 -
_' _- 'Dal
r
,je 2.x- '1
IA23J. ', + 1k j
A 4.9
(-1)
/
-- ]
94- (A+.-~) A 2
_3
C.' "
and by adding and substracting
Cu [)Ab-L2Trt,
) :,( t)_ - - +(4,3 ;24'-")
A L4
and with
~i
A 4.11
with
Q-
-i)
J' 1+
4- 4- (-))3 f) 4J 03 D
Together with the t rz-condition
26-,
gb)- L-
, _ +
,__ -______ ,___-______-___,L_-
-2-y (5-y)-Y
e -L
AM 3
A 4.12
-,
e. -
V 3 O
Tfr t p, C an ae g.
The relations for the parameters A1, B1, C 1 and D are given in § 1.3
1
A 4.13
Atj:+b bi e 4. D,
TI A-b bjAx
t - 1,., r. Do 'J
-VV Lx.-vCC3, - 4+
ink 4- t A.)4-
L,- .).4)..) AA,-
,--.-' 1,AI-..,) i,. (4a{w,,F.),
t~ ,,t,. D
s(.-
LV.
1( ~ 1 44. 1) tA
4.r.)
W0
if CA 10)C
;4 (V. tg4)
1"
A4. 14
____.___J2-7
-- QL--_
A
_~t(2
(A 3 ~) (7 -
. -s~(Arvq
b+i-b'- ( "
(-Y 3
If s4 > 1
If s 4 < 1
5A (Vm)' ")
A4. 15
2J,, 4-I$)
'?j4 A L)1CCi4)
Tm
so that
A.) op Io12
2
S?21 e,(Z)) P2( 1f)B4
•D,
D5PAI 4P
A4. 16
2A -. -+~ AAAC
a LA 2]
ThFo nt exhsiaperd
iiv exp.o
1. - , _- = . .... .
_ •. . Am2 -
A4. 17
3 (VI, T-0
s -
C, -,e = FC2 6,
2 ?,
t A2] A+- .
A, t- _x)- 4 3: - =o
- _( t._ 3).'t.
- R Cd' ) - ( 4 ) -
b,9.
F - ---
A4. 18
- [Ao]
* 21 .
4~C. 2 + 4+J2))) ,2+- EA[A]
We replace A2 and B2 by their values obtained from the first interface
conditions
CC A-,.) - (A C-
4V D2 -Xi)z
Tj~i
L y -)e +
-L,
iv
4. Rpost n d 4- e-
The positive exponent e(y-x) has disappeared.
-2-.A
- -
(A h) V
A4. 19
:tCiii-,) C1 - Si (.-')
) Y )- (-) )
CT - b # - l<l
s ' ? -' - 1
Cz-1)iT
LA2,]LCA4T e 3)
fL
+) (
A A %+
*4
-- Y
(A+$3 ? 4- 05)1P42
((A+ e-
A4. 21
The positive exponents e(z'y), eS3 (z'y) and e(z-y)'e53 (z 'y ) have
disappeared.
(
) -121-Y)
2z -Y).
-i
A3 ~ ~ PIL D3 -
'2's(A.~
. , ,_.i,, ,927. , ) P) - P,
0% -Y)
The positive exponent e(z-y) has disappeared. Although the presence
of the constant s3 (P22P41 - P21P42) the numerator converges to zero
because of the factor Q2.
4%- Pl P,5,L- !i P~
P52 PV 3
A4. 23
21,
-- ~~-Y -
'P,42'~?Z.r3) -
(A
The values of C2 and D2 are obtained from the relations established in § 2.4.
L2.. ILJ
' Y + - 3]
+ACa
C, Casl -Y) 4. 31}
D2 1 ) 3,-2 +s
-- 'R-3)-- .. . . .L
b-|
A4. 24
The values of the parameters A1 and C1 are obtained from the relations
established in § 2.3.
The relations for the stresses and the displacements are completely
the same as those developped in appendix 3, by replacing the parameters
Ai , Di by their adequate values.
AIL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
APPENDIX 5
I
EXPLANATORY NOTICE
ISIC FOUR-LAYERED (FLvy) USAE Page 1
Configuration:
I
In the next presentation <ENTER means action of key ---
Insert the EXECUTABLE disk into drive B.
Load DOS, if necessary, then type DIR B: and PATH A:\
FLB> FLxy <ENTER>
I - a - .
181C FOUR-LAYERED (FLxy) USAE Page 3
Compilation:
Linkage:
Note
|t f
1SC FOUR-LAYERED (FLxy) USAE Page 4
Screen of CHOICE 1:
Screen of CHOICE 2:
.Screen of CHOICE 3:
System data.
I. 400000.0 0. 16 20.0
1. 0000
2. 100000.0 0.25 20.0
1. 0000
3. 10000.0 0.50 30.0
1. 0000
4. 1000.0 0.50 9000.0
Screen of CHOICE 4:
Screen of CHOICE 5:
X.= y=
0. O0 0. 000
17.175 1 . 0)
Screen of CHOICE 6:
Screen of CHOICE 7:
Next screen:
choice of scale
allowed choices
---- thickness of lrst layer
thickness of 2 first layers
-- thickness of 3 first layers
4 - thickness of 4 layers
5 - load radius
suggested solution : 5
your choice
m 0. 10
be even more patient...
ISIC FOUR-LAYERED (FLxy) USAE Page 8
f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ISIC FOUR-LAYERED (FLxy) USAE Page 9
Mechanical data
4 1-000 . 0 1C) C? C
i.
1 (:(.((..0.0 0.50 3().(_:
I~~~~~~reSt ~~ a ~s -a
traffic data
tA
ISIC FOUR-LAYERED iFLxy) USAE Page 10
Utilized symbols:
The normal stresses are taken positive when they produce compression
and negative when they produce tension.