Professional Documents
Culture Documents
R2
11 beam
L
EXISTING PILE CAPACITY ANALYSIS
I.D.O.T. BBS FOUNDATIONA AND GEOTECHNICAL UNIT Modified on 09/22/16
EXISTING PLANS PILE DESIGN CAPACITY ====================== 17 TONS (enter zero if unknown)
DRIVING RECORDS FINAL PILE BEARING ========================30 TONS (enter zero if unknown)
HAMMER TYPE SHOWN ON RECORDS =================
PILE TYPE DRIVEN =======================================
PILE LENGTH > 60 FT ======================================
MAIN MODE OF SUPPORT TO THE PILE ====================
Pile Effect on
Precast Concrete or Timber Pile Metal Shell orSteel H-Pile
Pe Hammer
(0% Capacity Increase) (4% Capacity Increase) 4%
Efficiency
Pile Length
Driven or Estimated Length < 60 ft. Estimated Plan Pile Length > 60 ft. Driving Records Driven Length > 60 ft.
Pl Formula
(0% Capacity Increase) (2% Capacity Increase) (4% Capacity Increase) 2%
Conservatism
Borings Indicate No Records End Bearing in Soil Friction in Granular Friction in Cohesive End Bearing in End Bearing in Limestone
Sm Main mode of Available (0% or Shale (4% Soils (8% Capacity Soils (16% Capacity Sandstone (16% or Dolomite (20% 4%
Support Capacity Increase) Capacity Increase) Increase) Increase) Capacity Increase) Capacity Increase)
Cumlative
Allowable Resistance Available (RA) = Exist. Cap. (1+Cs + Cb + He + Pe + Pl + Sm ) Increase
& Setup
RA = 30 ( 1 + 0+ 0.06 + 0+ 0.04 + 0.02 + 0.04 ) = 16%
RA = 30 (1.16)