Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract. The Tokyo subway sarin attack was the guidance in mass casualties, a n emergency staff call-
second documented incident of nerve gas poisoning in up system, and a n efficient emergency medical chart
Japan. The authors report how St. Luke’s Hospital system. Hospitals should establish a n information
dealt with this disaster from the viewpoint of disaster network during routine practice so that it can be
management. Recommendations derived from the ex- called upon at the time of a disaster. The long-term
perience include the following: Each hospital in Ja- effects of sarin should be monitored, with such inves-
pan should prepare an emergent decontamination tigation ideally organized and integrated by the Jap-
area and have available chemical-resistant suits and anese government. Key words: sarin; disaster medi-
masks. Ventilation in the ED and main treatment ar- cine; chemical warfare agents; emergency medical
eas should be well planned at the time a hospital is services; EMS; international medicine. ACADEMIC
designed. Hospital disaster planning must include EMERGENCY MEDICINE 1998; 5:618-624
HE TOKYO subway sarin attack was the sec- little description of the hospital resource deploy-
1 ond documented incident of sarin (methyl ment that occurred during the sarin attack disas-
phosphonofluoridic acid 1-methylethyl ester) nerve ter. In this article we address the St. Luke’s Hos-
gas poisoning in Japan, the first episode having pital disaster management response, problems
occurred in the city of Matsumoto in June 1994.’ encountered, and how the hospital addressed these
St. Luke’s International Hospital was a major re- problems. Companion articles focus oh the com-
ceiving hospital for the Tokyo subway sarin attack. munity emergency response4 and the national and
Although St. Luke’s Hospital had a disaster plan international responses6 to this disaster.
and disaster drills were carried out regularly, the
disaster plan was mainly aimed at responding t o
fires and earthquakes. After Japan experienced the BACKGROUND
great Hanshin earthquake in January 1995, every
hospital reconsidered its existing disaster plan.2At Prior to the sarin attack, Tokyo had disaster plan-
the time of the Tokyo subway sarin attack, St. ning, but it was mainly aimed at dealing with
Luke’s Hospital was in the process of revising its earthquakes, fires, and flood^.^ A chemical disaster
disaster planning. had never been considered, especially one involv-
We have published a preliminary report on the ing chemical warfare agents. Although the Mat-
Tokyo subway sarin a t t a ~ kThat
. ~ article contained sumoto sarin incident had increased the aware-
ness of chemical agent exposure, measures against
such agents in Tokyo, 200 km away, were poor. The
From the Department of Emergency Medicine (TO, NT, SI,
SH), St. Luke’s International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; and the Japanese Self Defense Forces had a wide knowl-
Department of Acute Medicine (KS, AF, AK),Kawasaki Medi- edge of chemical warfare agents, but few physi-
cal School Hospital, Kurashiki-city, Okayama, Japan. Current cians in Tokyo knew anything about such agents
affiliation: Department of Acute Medicine (TO), Kawasaki before the Matsumoto sarin incident.
Medical School Hospital, Kurashiki-city, Okayama, Japan.
Received: August 15, 1997; revision received: November 5,
On the morning of March 20, 1995, 15 stations
1997; accepted: November 27, 1997; updated: December 15, of the Tokyo subway system were filled with a nox-
1997. Presented at the 10th World Congress on Emergency and ious substance later identified as a diluted form of
Disaster Medicine, Mainz, Germany, September 1997. sarin gas. A total of 5 subway commuter cars were
Address for correspondence and reprints: Tetsu Okumura, MD, affected during the Monday morning rush hour.
Department of Acute Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School Hos-
pital, 577 Matsushima, Kurashiki-city, Okayama 701-01, Ja- According t o a traffic white paper, the capacity of
pan. Fax: 81-86-463-3998; e-mail: xj2t-okmraasahi-net.or.jp subway trains between 8:OO AM and 8:40 AM
*Part 3 follows in this issue of Academic Emergency Medicine. reaches more than 200%. With such congestion,
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE June 1998, Volume 5, Number 6 619
passengers cannot read opened newspapers, only TABLE1. Patient Arrival during the Week aRer Exposure
magazines. The attack occurred at approximately Number of Number of
7 5 5 A.M. The terrorists carried diluted sarin solu- Date Outpatients* Admitted Patients
tion in plastic bags into the subway trains and si-
March 20 (Mon.) 640 111
multaneously stuck the sharpened tip of an um- March 21 (Tue., holiday) 116 31
brella into these bags. There were 12 fatalities, March 22 (Wed.) 319 10
and 5,500 more persons were sickened. March 23 (Thu.) 204 5
St. Luke’s International Hospital, a private 520- March 24 (Fri.) 90 3
bed facility, received the largest number of victims. March 25 (Sat.) 40 2
March 26 (Sun.) 1 2
The hospital saw 640 patients on the day of the
attack and, in total, 1,410patients in the week fol- *The number of outpatients includes only new case numbers
lowing the attack. Table 1 shows the patient vol- (initial encounters); the number of admitted patients includes
old cases.
ume on a daily basis for the first week. The hos-
pital is located within 3 km of the affected subway
stations. Figure 1 shows the location of St. Luke’sstation. Preparations were begun for burn and car-
Hospital in relationship to the affected stations. bon monoxide poisoning victims. At 8:28 A M , the
first patient complaining of eye pain and visual
ANALYSIS OF PROBLEMS darkness arrived at the ED on foot from the sub-
way station. The first ambulance arrived at 8:43
Hospital Capacity. When the first emergency AM. In the first hour, about 500 patients (including
call from the Tokyo metropolitan ambulance con- 3 patients in cardiopulmonary arrest upon arrival)
trol center of the Tokyo Metropolitan Fire Depart- were rushed to the ED.
ment came into our ED at 8:16AM, it was reported The president and vice president of St. Luke’s
that there had been a gas explosion at a subway Hospital visited the ED, saw the chaotic state it
TABLE2. Secondary Exposure Symptoms in the Hospital these entrances. We divided victims into 3 catego-
Workers (n = 472) ries: mild, ambulatory victims who presented with
Eye symptoms 66 (14.0%) only eye symptoms; moderate, nonambulatory vic-
Headache 52 (11.0%) tims who presented with other systemic signs and
Throat pain 39 (8.3%) symptoms; and severe, victims placed on mechan-
Dyspnea 25 (5.3%)
Nausea 14 (3.0%)
ical ventilation. We closely observed 528 mildly
Dizziness 12 (2.5%) symptomatic patients with an IV line for several
Nose pain 9 (1.9%) hours in the outpatient department and then sent
them home. There were 107 moderately sympto-
matic patients admitted to wards. There were 4
was in, and knew the situation was extraordinary. severely symptomatic patients admitted to our in-
They initiated a disaster-oriented system and de- tensive care unit (ICU). One severe patient was
clared a disaster situation when it was suspected nonreactive t o CPR and died in the ED. Overall,
that hundreds of victims would soon be arriving at triage was relatively simple and favorably done.
the hospital. At that time all routine operations Fortunately, the effects of sarin on the majority of
and outpatient examinations were canceled. A con- victims were mild, and those severely affected ap-
trol center was set up in our ED. St. Luke’s Hos- peared at the early stage of this disaster.
pital has 36 residents, 129 staff doctors, 477
nurses, 68 clerks, and an average of 30 volunteers Decontamination. After it became suspected
a day. Off-duty staff members were called in, and that nerve gas was the cause, we decontaminated
the staff and students of St. Luke’s College of the admitted patients by having them change
Nursing were mobilized. clothes and shower. However, we were unable t o
St. Luke’s has approximately 2,000 outpatients decontaminate most mildly affected patients. This
daily, and the day of the attack was no exception. was in part because it took time to determine the
St. Luke’s Hospital has 3 entrances, and victims, cause of the victims’ illness and in part because we
their families, their coworkers, television crews, did not have enough space for changing clothes
and curious onlookers could enter from any of and showering. No room has been set aside for de-
these doors. Therefore, the inner part of the hos- contamination in our hospital. Victims’ clothes
pital was in a chaotic state. We could not block free were packed in plastic bags, sealed up, and kept in
access because we had no definite plan for the the ward.
guidance of mass casualties. When examinations
were canceled, sufficient and repeated explana- Secondary Exposure of the Hospital S t m . The
tions were given and we called for the understand- hospital staff wore gloves and masks, but only
ing of those at the hospital at the time. Printed those ordinarily used during operations and not for
information was distributed to the victims in an the setting of chemical contamination. We had no
effort t o reduce their anxiety level. chemical-resistant clothing.
A study of secondary exposure of the hospital
Medical Charting. At first, medical charts were staff was carried out by means of a questionnaire.6
filled out in the ordinary manner, but when >500 The study items were sex, profession, symptoms,
victims rushed into the hospital, we simply wrote and the main place of work. Basically, members of
down each victim’s name, address, complaints, the staff worked at one place. We sent the ques-
place of work, physical findings, and treatment, re- tionnaire to 1,063persons, of whom 472 (44%) re-
spectively, on a continuous sheet. Afterwards, plied. Of these 472 persons working in our hospi-
these continuous sheets were put between the tal, 110 persons (23%) complained of acute
leaves of each patient’s ordinary medical chart. poisoning symptoms. All 110 persons with symp-
As a result, the medical records of some of the toms were female. Table 2 shows the symptoms,
mildly affected patients got scattered and lost dur- and Table 3 shows the secondary exposure per-
ing this chaotic period. On the day of the attack centages of various medical staff positions and var-
we made a special summary sheet for admitted pa- ious sites of care provision.
tients. This had a standardized format, and doctors In St. Luke’s International Hospital there is a
filled in the patient’s state of exposure (where, chapel, in which 0,, aspiration, and compressed air
when, and how he or she was exposed), signs, outlets were installed. Many victims were man-
symptoms, treatment, and outcome in accordance aged in this area. Although this area is a useful
with check boxes. emergency care site, ventilation is poor. As a re-
sult, 46% of the medical staff working in this area
miage. At St. Luke’s Hospital, triage was done complained of acute poisoning symptoms. No in-
mainly in the ED. As mentioned above, our hos- creased ventilation was provided anywhere in the
pital has 3 entrances, and triage was done at all hospital during the first day. Fortunately, injury to
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE June 1998, Volume 5,Number 6 621
the hospital staff due to secondary sarin gas ex- TABLE3. Secondary Exposure Rates by Hospital
posure was mild. Nobody needed medical treat- Occupational Category and Site of Care Delivery
ment, although 1 nurse was admitted complaining Occupational category
of nausea, eye pain, headache, and dyspnea after Nurse assistants 39.3% (1lf28)
working in the chapel all day long. This nurse re- Nurses 26.5% (45/170)
covered in a few days. Volunteers 25.5% (14/55)
Doctors 21.8% (1W55)
Clerks 18.2% (12/66)
Antidote Storage. Initially we stored 100 am-
pules of 2-pyridine aldoxime methiodide (2-PAM) Site of care
(1 ampule contains 500 mg of 2-PAM) and 1,030 Chapel 45.8% (38183)
ICU 38.7% (12/31)
ampules of atropine sulfate (1ampule contains 0.5 Outpatient department 32.4% (34/105)
mg of atropine sulfate). While this supply permit- Ward 17.7% (14/79)
ted initial treatment of the moderate to severely ill ED 16.7% (8148)
patients, our pharmaceutical department made an
additional order to wholesale dealers at an early
stage of the disaster. According to newspapers,
9,000 ampules of 2-PAM were transported from 1 ever, their database did not include nerve agents
manufacturer to Tokyo by air. We used 700 am- at that point. The police finally identified the ma-
pules of 2-PAM and 2,800 ampules of atropine sul- terial as sarin by 11:OO AM based on mass spec-
fate. We used 1,000mg of 2-PAM initially. For the trum analysis using gas chromatograph-mass
victims whose symptoms continued, we used 500 spectrometer analysis, demonstrating that the
mghr of 2-PAM until the symptoms disappeared. agent was consistent with the spectrum of sarin as
documented in a database of the National Institute
Medical IMormation l’kansmission. We sus- of Standard and Technology (USA).
pected that the cause of the victims’ illness was In addition to the above information sources, we
some form of organophosphate agent exposure. We sought references in our own library, where MED-
were puzzled as to why it had happened in the sub- LINE and EMBASE are available. We also con-
way. The situation resembled the Matsumoto sarin tacted the Japan Poison Information Center via
incident of June 1994. telephone and facsimile regarding treatment. After
On the day of the Tokyo subway sarin attack, as much information as possible was collected, the
medical information came mainly from 3 sources. chief resident developed emergency guidelines for
Table 4 shows the time course, information, and treatment. The staff of the ED repeatedly circu-
information sources. Information came first from lated to the wards t o standardize the treatment.
the president of Shinshu University Hospital, who
had experience with treatment of the Matsumoto Follow-ups. In March 1996,we sent a question-
sarin incident victims, via telephone and facsimile. naire to the 606 victims who came to our hospital
Simultaneously, it came from a doctor sent from on the day of the attack. Table 5 shows the results
the Ground Self Defense Forces Hospital. Sponta- of this q~estionnaire.~ Of the 606 victims, 303 re-
neously, an interhospital network arose and func- plied. Of these, 46% still had some symptoms. Re-
tioned effectively. Low serum cholinesterase val- garding physical symptoms, 19% of the victims
ues, the signs and symptoms of the patients, the still complained of eye problems, 12% of easy fati-
information from the doctors who had managed gability, and 9% of headache. As for psychological
the Matsumoto sarin incident, and advice from the symptoms, 13% complained of fear of subways and
Ground Self Defense Forces Hospital led to a di- 12% indicated fears concerning their escape from
agnosis of nerve gas agent poisoning. The third the attack. A medical checkup was carried out 1
source of information was television news. It took year after the attack on 133 victims who wanted
3 hours for the police to announce officially that such a checkup.
the material was sarin, but the police did not in-
form us directly.
About 2 hours after the initial chemical expo- DISCUSSION
sure, misinformation indicating that the material
causing the victims’ illness was acetonitrile was The hospital response to this attack was particu-
provided by the Tokyo Metropolitan Fire Depart- larly concerned with management of mass chemi-
ment, but there were no findings of acetonitrile cal casualties. We were able to initiate the
poisoning (i.e., no methemoglobinemia) among the disaster-oriented system at an early phase of this
victims, so we ignored it. The Tokyo Metropolitan attack, so that our energies could be concentrated
Fire Department has hazmat teams, who based on this disaster. The canceling of all routine oper-
their diagnosis on an infrared gas analyzer; how- ations and outpatient examinations is an espe-
622 SARIN ATTACK Okumura et al. TOKYO SUBWAY SARIN ATTACK, PART 2
cially serious decision for a hospital to make. The nurse assistants and nurses had a high incidence
cooperation and understanding of patients who of secondary exposure, presumably because they
were not victims made the success of this system were in more direct contact with victims. Regard-
possible. Also, fortunately, the Tokyo subway sarin ing location, the chapel showed the highest inci-
attack occurred just after the workday began. As a dence of secondary exposure. It is suspected that
result of these circumstances, we were able to this was due to poor ventilation. The high inci-
manage this disaster relief without serious prob- dence of secondary exposure in the ICU was
lems. We are pleased with the effectiveness of our thought to be due to the fact that this was where
teamwork. the most severely ill patients were cared for. Un-
However, some problems were exposed. Prob- expectedly, the incidence of secondary exposure in
lems related t o the hospital response can be di- the ED was relatively low. We suspect that this
vided into 3 categories: 1) hardware problems finding was due to better ventilation in the ED.
(structural problems of the hospital, including lack Since many victims came in succession, the en-
of decontamination facilities); 2) software problems trance of the ED was wide open. Confirming the
(problems of disaster planning and its manage- condition of areas of patient management is im-
ment); and 3) transmission problems (communi- portant, and ventilation should be well planned at
cation difficulties). the time a hospital is designed.
The most critical problem in the first category If sufficient field decontamination is not done,
was the structural deficit of the hospital buildings. some contaminated victims may reach hospitals by
Secondary exposure seemed t o have been due to their own means. Ideally, each hospital should
poor ventilation and the lack of a decontamination have its own decontamination facility, but such re-
area. Analysis of the results of the survey of sec- modeling is expensive. As an alternative, a decon-
ondary exposure of the hospital staff indicates that tamination area outside the ED entrance could be
pita1 should prepare an emergent decontamination in the first sarin gas terrorism. Am J Emerg Med. 1997; 15:
527-8.
area and have available chemical-resistant suits 2. Yamamoto Y. Emergent proposal for disaster medicine. The
and masks. Ventilation in the ED and main treat- Yomiuri Shinbun (Osaka edition). February 23, 1995,p 12.
ment areas should be well planned at the time a 3. Okumura T, Takasu N, Ishimatsu S, e t al. Report on 640
victims of the Tokyo subway sarin attack. Ann Emerg Med.
hospital is designed. Hospital disaster planning 1996;28:129-35.
must include guidance of mass casualties, an 4. Okumura T, Suzuki K, Fukuda A, et al. The Tokyo subway
emergency staff call-up system, and an efficient sarin attack disaster management, Part 1: Community emer-
gency response. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5613-7.
emergency medical chart system. Fortunately on 5. Okumura T, Suzuki K, Fukuda A, et al. The Tokyo subway
this occasion, the interhospital information net- sarin attack disaster management, Part 3: National and in-
work that arose spontaneously was effective, Hos- ternational responses. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5:618-24.
6. Sanoyama T, Monden M, Ohbu S, et al. The investigation
pitals should establish such an information net- of secondary exposure at St.Luke's International Hospital. Ni-
work during routine practice so that it can be hon-Iji-Shinpo. 1995;3727:17-9.
called upon at the time of a disaster. The long-term 7. Ishimatsu S,Tanaka K, Okumura T, et al. Results of the
follow-up study of the Tokyo subway sarin attack victims (1
effects of sarin exposure should be monitored, with year after the attack) [abstract]. Nihon-Kyukyuigakkai-Zassi.
such investigation ideally organized and inte- 1996;7567.
8. Cox RD. Decontamination and management of hazardous
grated by the Japanese government. materials exposure victims i n the emergency department: Ann
Emerg Med. 1994;23:761-70.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the invaluable assistance 9. Marrs TC, Maynard RL. Neurotoxicity of chemical warfare
and support of the physicians, nurses, clerks, secretaries, and agents. In: Handbook of Clinical Neurology, ed. 64.Amster-
dam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1994,pp 223-38.
volunteers of St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo. They 10. Jamal GA. Long term neurotoxic effects of chemical war-
also thank Ilan Tur-Kaspa, MD, Chairman of the Advisory fare organophosphate compounds (sarin). Adverse Drug React
Committee of the Israel Ministry of Health on Hospital Prep- Toxic01 Rev. 1995;14:83-4.
aration for Mass Casualty Toxicological Events, for sugges- 11. Yokoyama K, Araki S, Okumura T, et al. A preliminary
tions, and Paul E. Pepe, MD, Jerris R. Hedges, MD, MS, and study on delayed vestibulocerebellar dysfunction in the Tokyo
Mohamud Daya. MD, for critical review of the manuscript. The subway sarin poisoning in relation to gender difference: fre-
authors dedicate this work to all the victims of the Tokyo sub- quency analysis postural sway. J Occup Environ Med. 1998;
way sarin attack and Matsumoto sarin incident in the name 40(1):17-21.
12. Yokoyama K, Araki S, Okumura T, et al. Chronic neuro-
of St. Luke. behavioral effects of the Tokyo subway sarin poisoning in re-
lation to posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch Environ Health.
1998 (in press).
References 13. Murata K, Arika S, Okumura T, et al. Asymptomatic se-
quelae to acute sarin poisoning in the central and autonomic
1. Okudera H, Morita H, Iwashita T, et al. Unexpected nerve nervous system 6 months after the Tokyo subway attack. J
gas exposure in the city of Matsumoto: report of rescue activity Neurol. 1997;244:601-6.