Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Genre Analysis:
Enid Martinez
RWS 1302
Dr. Vierra
GENRE ANALYSIS 2
Genre Analysis
The effects of water in urban settings can be recorded in great scientific detail and basic
management systems and landscaping impacts on flood risks. The two genres selected for this
analysis are a monograph Rivers and Landscape by Geoff Petts (1985) and a YouTube video
What Has EPWU Done Lately to Make El Paso More Storm Ready? by El Paso Water (2012).
Petts argues that accepted techniques used to understand rivers plus recent advancements in the
study of hydraulic change in nature can explain the dynamic, long term effects of river systems
(p. ix). The non-scholarly digital source claims that El Paso Water Utilities is making changes to
make the city storm-ready with a master plan drafted by the people of the El Paso community
(0:10). The expectations of genres differ by separating academic information from common
knowledge depending on the delivery of content and the target audience, making the monograph
Audience
The target audiences for the monograph and the video are different but few individuals of
each audience group could potentially share an interest of both genres. According to Petts
(1985), the monograph is targeted towards “students of physical geography and environmental
science” (p. ix). The purpose of the textbook is to educate students on fluvial landscapes (p. 1),
catchment hydrology (p. 20), solute dynamics (p. 55), sediment transport (p. 95), channel
morphology (p. 140), fluvial stratigraphy and palaeohydrology (p. 175), and lake sediments and
drainage basin history (p. 214). It can be assumed that the audience is well versed in the
academic language of environmental science and other scientific disciplines by the lack of
glossary and lack of graph reading aids. According to El Paso Water (2012), the video’s
GENRE ANALYSIS 3
audience is El Paso Water Utilities (EPWU) customers (2:17). The video specifically refers to
neighborhoods around Fair Banks and Transmountain in the Northeast (0:45), Central El Paso
(0:30, 1:57), Lee Trevino on the East side (1:05), and Sun Valley Drive (1:20). The video
mentions engineers, a master plan, and claims the EPWU has “reduced El Paso’s flood risk by
50%” (0:23), which could interest the audience of the monograph if they were also citizens of the
El Paso area and provoke further inspection of the projects mentioned in the video. The target
audience for the video encompasses all customers in the El Paso area in 2012 and according to
an article by WaterWorld in 2012, EPWU had “over 200,000…customers” and “El Paso, Texas
has more than 700,000 residents”. The percentage of El Paso residents that could also be
specifically studying rivers and landscape is probably too low to be significant, but of those few
students of earth sciences pertaining to hydraulics in the region a majority of them would have
been invested in staying up to date on the city’s efforts to decrease the overall flood risk. Out of
all the scholars in the world pursuing a greater understanding of rivers, the percentage of those
Structure
The structure of the monograph is completely different than the structure of the YouTube
video, but with minor similarities. The book’s physical limitations are of 243 pages and it is
organized in basic book format of front matter, body, and back matter, divided into seven
lectures detailed on the content’s page. Furthermore, the preface summarizes how each chapter
ties into the next one. Every chapter includes an additional reading source list for the topic of that
lecture. The final sections include a thorough bibliography in APA format (p. 245) and an index
(p. 269) for ease of use. The video is a digital source only and it has a duration of 2:54 minutes.
The video uploaded to YouTube is easy to scroll through to view the content freely but as it is a
GENRE ANALYSIS 4
news broadcast it is not labeled or organized in a way visible to the viewer. The purpose of the
information portrayed in the video is to inform and perhaps bring comfort to its audience that the
The book is written in an expository style while the video is recorded in a descriptive
style. Petts (1985) claims the purpose of the monograph is to provide students with a solid
foundation to understand river systems (p. ix). The language is formal and appropriate for the
intended audience. The scientific jargon used is highly specialized, but italics are used to
highlight key terms and define them throughout the textbook, for example “catchment ecosystem,
which consists of a river, or lake…” (p. 8). A conversion table is provided (p. iix) to provide easy
access to frequently used units and conversion factors related to the data provided in the text.
Heavy use of graphical data provides visual representation of the topics being taught which
meets the expectations of students pursuing a deeper understanding of the subject. The video has
an informal tone as it directly addresses the audience with “you” (2:16) and the speaker includes
himself as a member of the audience “…making sure we’re storm ready” (0:18). The unseen
speaker of the video uses simple language to describe the changes that have taken place in the El
Paso but also describes dimensions of major projects and briefly uses some terminology that the
average citizen might not know (1:36) but this does not affect the overall comprehension of the
news update.
Rhetorical Issues
The genres under analysis use opposite tactics to support their claims. The monograph
provides reputable sources and overwhelming data to educate the audience on fluvial systems.
The video relies almost exclusively on visual and auxiliary aids to persuade its audience of the
GENRE ANALYSIS 5
importance in the changes being made to El Paso’s drain systems by coaxing the viewer’s
Ethos are evident in the monograph but only alluded to in the video. The title page of the
book states that Petts was from the Department of Geography of Loughborough University of
Technology, and his co-author Ian Foster was from the Department of Geography of Coventry
(Lanchester) Polytechnicat the time of publication. Both highly credible sources for the textbook,
their previous works are listed in the bibliography (p. 251, 261). The acknowledgements mention
Coventry, as well as a note of gratitude from the publishers “for permission to include copyright
material” in the form of figures of graphs (p. vii), making it clear that the information is already
in circulation and accepted in their academic field. The book was published by Edward Arnold
Publishers, and the scholarly nature of the textbook means it had to go through a peer review
before being published. The video provides no clear credible sources, aside from being posted by
the El Paso Water channel. The video does not include any interviews or engineering company
names or mention any specific expert involved in the city’s master plan. There are clear shots of
the intersections mentioned, like Lee Trevino and James Watt (1:09) and a highway sign of I-10
which confirms that it is an accurate representation of city locations. The before and after shots
of city projects, including a “key pipeline running from central El Paso to the Rio Grande” (1:52)
are very convincing that there is steady and effective progress throughout the city’s drain
systems. The lack of obvious proof of ethos from the video does not decrease its credibility due
to the view of the city projects and the effects on actual streets.
The monograph does not appeal to pathos, yet the video is primarily supported using
visual and auditory prompts to persuade the target audience. The monograph is a clinical source
GENRE ANALYSIS 6
as it does not need to appeal to the reader’s emotions to inform using specialized data. The video
uses subtle tactics to engage the viewer’s emotions by using background music and visuals of the
El Paso flood of 2006 (0:16). There are also dramatic shots of completed projects under heavy
rain (1:26), and recordings of rapid water currents on streets at locations of new drains (0:46)
that emphasize the effectiveness of the developments. The background music is understated and
doesn’t distract from the speaker, and there are thunder sounds played in conjunction of a “storm
ready” lightning-animated sign at interval times to reinforce the severity of the topic and keep
Both genres make use of logos via different methods. The monograph makes heavy use
of a variety of graphs to support its claim, often taking up an entire page. Figure 2.2 (p. 22)
shows six separate line charts to compare runoff variability of different rivers around the world
that is explained in further detail on pages 21 and 23. Chapter 3 relies on tables and figures
depicting river water chemistry to make up half of the pages in the chapter and contains chemical
equations to further support the research presented (p. 55-94). All tables and figures are cited in
the reference section by author and year, confirming the validity of the data. The video uses a
different tactic and verbally describes the dimensions of the northeast channel #2 project (1:20)
while showing the remodeled drains in action. The video claims 12.4 million dollars (1:30) were
used towards the new upgrades but does not provide further information to confirm this figure.
The video shows a brief frame of a man in a suit presenting a map of the city with blurred
information (0:09), as well as what appears to be a board meeting with administrators viewing
thick binders (0:13), presumably the master plan mentioned, but gives no names for the
individuals shown or who they work for and can only be assumed that they are members of the
GENRE ANALYSIS 7
EPWU company. The video alone does not provide concrete evidence that its data is accurate,
but a skeptic could search the utility company’s epwu.org website for more information.
Conclusion
The two genres previously compared are explicitly different and only relate in the general
scope of the topic. The monograph provides reliable informative data while the video only
briefly covers major current events. The book’s intended audience is extremely specific and
highly academic, while the video targets a region-specific audience regardless of education level.
The expectations created by the book’s physical limitations demand long, dedicated hours to the
subject and access to an academic library (although the book is available to buy on internet
markets, its dated publication would make it unlikely to be commonly sought after). In
comparison, the video only requires less than three minutes to view and can be viewed on many
technological platforms such as a phone, television, or computer. The vast difference in content
is emphasized by the presentation of information; the monograph requires advanced jargon and
mathematical skills to process whereas the video only requires a basic understanding of the
English language and the senses of sight and hearing. Overall both genres are effective at
communicating efficiently with their target audience and supporting their claims with the
GENRE ANALYSIS 8
Bibliography
What has EPWU done lately to make El Paso more storm ready? El Paso, W. (Director). (2012,
Petts, G. E., & Foster, I. (1985). Rivers and landscape. Baltimore, Maryland: Edward Arnold.
search.ebscohost.com.lib.utep.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat04704a&AN=nug.b1346610&site=e
ds-live&scope=site
WaterWorld. (2012). El Paso water utilities streamlines customer field service with mobile
water-streamlines-customer-field-service.html