4 views

Uploaded by salim

optimization

- Bender’s Decomposition Method for a Large Two-stage Linear Programming Model
- DMGT504_1
- EXTENDED LINEAR MULTI-COMMODITY MULTICOST NETWORK AND MAXIMAL FLOW LIMITED COST PROBLEMS
- #1 Matematika Optimasi.pdf
- A Quantitative Approach to Profit Optimization and Constraints of Mixed Cropping Pattern in Bargarh District Of Western Orissa
- Lingo 11 Users Manual
- Linear Programming
- Summary of Article
- 03 Linear Programming
- 20.IJASRAPR201720
- Recorders Ejercicio
- 11 - Surrogate Constraints 1968
- -Ch9-LP.docx
- chap002tn- advanced operations management for competitive advantage
- Hydrothermal Scheduling Using Benders Decomposition- Accelerating Techniques
- ps3, ENGR 62, Stanford
- BA7206-Applied Operations Research.pdf
- Lpp1- Doc 2 Auto Saved)
- LPP.pptx
- Goal 15

You are on page 1of 11

João Xavier

Instituto Superior Técnico

September 2014

1. Target localization. You want to locate a target in Rn (n = 2 or 3). You have sensors at positions

ai ∈ Rn , i = 1, . . . , m. Each sensor provides a noisy measurement of its distance to the target:

sensor i gives you

di = x − ai + “noise”,

where x is the target’s location. Formulate the problem of estimating x from the available mea-

surements d1 , d2 , . . . , dm , as an optimization problem.

2. Optimal grades. You are enrolled in m courses for the semester. If you study a total of t ihours

for course i during the semester, your corresponding grade will be g i (t i ) = 20 1 − e−t i /di . The

constants di > 0 are given and represent the intrinsic difficulty of each course. You have T hours

available for studying during the semester. Formulate the problem of choosing t 1 , . . . , t m —the

study time that should be allocated to each course—as an optimization problem.

3. Linear receiver. A transmitter sends information symbols by modulating the amplitude of a carrier:

for each information symbol s ∈ R the transmitter emits the signal x(t) = sc(t), t = 1, . . . , T ,

where c(t) = cos(2π f0 t) is the carrier.

The receiver observes x(t) in additive noise plus an interference: y(t) = x(t) + n(t) + Ai(t),

t = 1, . . . , T , where y(t) is the signal measured at the receiver, n(t) denotes noise, and i(t) is the

interference signal with amplitude A. The receiver knows the carrier c(t) and the interference

i(t) but not the amplitude A nor the noise signal n(t) (of course, the receiver also ignores the

information symbol). The goal of the receiver is to estimate the information symbol s from the

available measurements y(1), . . . , y(T ).

We want to design a linear receiver, i.e., a receiver that estimates the information symbol via a

weighted combination of the measurements, b s = w1 y(1) + w2 y(2) + · · · + w T y(T ). Note that, for

a given choice of weights w1 , . . . , w T , there holds

! ! !

X T XT XT

s=s

b w t c(t) + w t n(t) + A w t i(t) .

t=1 t=1 t=1

1

4. Intruder detection. An intruder moves on the vertices of a given graph G = (V, E) where V =

{1, 2, . . . , N } is the node set and E is the edge set. There is a sensor at each node of the graph.

If the intruder is at node i, the sensor at that node detects him with probability αi and flags a

variable Zi = 1 (accordingly, the sensor fails misses the intruder with probability 1 − αi and sets

Zi = 0). If the intruder is not at node i, the sensor at node i may still report an (false) alarm, i.e.,

the sensor flags Zi = 1 with probability βi and sets Zi = 0 with probability 1 − βi . (Ideal sensors

correspond to αi = 1 and βi = 0.)

We have sensors’ measurements for T consecutive time instants: (Z(1), Z(2), . . . , Z(T )). The

vector Z(t) = (Z1 (t), Z2 (t), . . . , ZN (t)) represents the sensors’ readings at time t.

Formulate the problem of finding the most probable path of the intruder, given the measurements,

as an optimization problem. Use binary variables pn (t) ∈ {0, 1} to denote if the intruder is at node

n at time t (pn (t) = 1) or not (pn (t) = 0).

2 Convex functions

(b) f (x) = (|x| − 1)2

(c) f (x) = log (1 + e x )

(d) f (x) = x + where x + := max{x, 0}

(e) f (x) = 21 x +

2

.

R T : x = x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x T . The following functions f : R T → R compute characteristics of such

signals:

x 1 +···+x T

(a) Average: f (x) = T

1

PT x +···+x

2

(b) Variance: f (x) = T t=1 x t − 1 T T

(c) Energy: f (x) = x 12 + x 22 + · · · + x T2

(d) Peak: f (x) = max{|x 1 |, . . . , |x T |}

Æ P

T

(e) Root mean square (RMS): f (x) = T1 t=1 x 2t

¦ ©

(f) Largest increase: f (x) = max x 2 − x 1 + , x 3 − x 2 + , . . . , x T − x T −1 +

x

where A ∈ Rm×n and b ∈ Rm are given. Show that (1) is a convex optimization problem.

2

8. Signal denoising. We observe the signal y t = x t + n t for t = 1, . . . , T , where n t denotes noise and

x t is the signal of interest—known to be usually nondecreasing, i.e., x t ≥ x t−1 for almost all t. To

recover x = (x 1 , . . . , x T ) from the measurement y = ( y1 , . . . , y T ) we formulate the optimization

problem

2 T

X

minimize
y − x
+ ρ

x t−1 − x t + (2)

x

t=2

B(c, R) = {x : kx − ck ≤ R}.

2

If point x i is not covered by
we pay the quadratic penalty ωi kx i − ck − R where

the ball

ωi ≥ 0 is given; note that
x i − c
− R is the distance form x i to B(c, R). We are given the

radius R > 0 and we want to find the center c. The optimal placement of the ball corresponds to

solving

Xm
2

minimize ωi
x i − c
− R + . (3)

c

i=1

10. Logistic regression. Logistic regression is a popular approach to model the influence of several

explanatory variables X = (X 1 , . . . , X n ) on a binary outcome Y ∈ {0, 1}. For example, Y may

represent the absence of presence of a certain disease and the X i ’s might represent age, weight,

blood pressure, etc. In logistic regression, we assume the parametric model

!Y

1−Y T

X +r

1 es

Prob(Y |X , s, r) = T X +r T X +r

,

1 + es 1 + es

We are given independent observations (x k , yk ) ∈ Rn × {0, 1}, k = 1, . . . , K, where

x k = (X 1k , . . . , X nk ) ∈ Rn

contains the values of the explanatory variables in the kth example and yk ∈ {0, 1} is the corres-

ponding binary outcome. Computing the maximum likelihood estimates of the model parameters,

for the given dataset, corresponds to solving

K

X

maximize log P( yk |x k , s, r). (4)

s,r

k=1

3

3 Optimization with linear equality constraints

11. Maximum entropy. A random variable X taking values in the finite alphabet A = {a1 , a2 , . . . , an } ⊂

R is characterized by its probability mass function (pmf):

P(X = ai ) = pi , i = 1, . . . , n.

Pn

Note that pi ≥ 0 for all i and i=1 pi = 1. Assume a1 < a2 < · · · < an .

The entropy of X measures how “uncertain” the variable is:

n

1

X

H(X ) = pi log

i=1

pi

where 0 log(1/0) := 0. Note that the entropy is a function of the pmf p = (p1 , . . . , pn ).

Suppose that we do not know the pmf of X . We only know that the expected value of X is a given

µ ∈ (a1 , an ):

X n

pi ai = µ.

i=1

The goal of this exercise is to find the maximum entropy pmf with expected value µ; this corres-

ponds to solving the optimization problem

Pn

minimize − i=1 pi log(pi )

p>0

subject to a T p = µ

1 T p = 1,

where a = (a1 , . . . , an ).

e ai λ

pi (λ) = Pn ak λ

, i = 1, . . . , n,

k=1 e

where λ ∈ R solves

n

X

ai pi (λ) = µ. (5)

i=1

Pn

(b) Show that φ(λ) = i=1 ai pi (λ) is a strictly increasing function. Hint: show that

n

X 2

φ̇(λ) = pi (λ) ai − µ(λ) , (6)

i=1

Pn

where µ(λ) = i=1 ai pi (λ). (The right-hand side of (6) can be interpreted as the variance

of a random variable with pmf (p1 (λ), . . . , pn (λ)).

(c) Suggest a simple bisection method to find the solution of (5).

4

12. Bandwidth allocation. You have a bandwidth B > 0 to split among n clients. Each client has an

utility function that depends on the amount of bandwidth he gets:

Bi

Ui (Bi ) = αi log , for client i = 1, . . . , n.

βu

The constants αi > 0, βi > 0 are given.

(a) Find the bandwidth allocation that maximizes the overall utility, i.e., solve the optimization

problem Pn

maximize i=1 Ui (Bi )

B1 ,...,Bn >0

(7)

subject to B1 + · · · + Bn = B

γ

(b) Re-solve (7) but with the utility functions Ui (Bi ) = − Bi + δi where γi > 0, δi > 0 are given

i

constants.

x 12 x n2

¨ «

E = (x 1 , . . . , x n ) : 2 + · · · + 2 = 1 ,

R1 Rn

where R i > 0 are given for i = 1, . . . , n. We want to project the point a = (a1 , . . . , an ) onto E , i.e.,

we want to solve Pn 2

minimize 21 i=1 x i − ai (8)

x 1 ,...,x n

x 12 x n2

subject to R21

+ ··· + R2n

= 1.

Assume that ai > 0 for i = 1, . . . , n.

(a) Argue that the solution must satisfy x i > 0 for i = 1, . . . , n. Thus, problem (8) is equivalent

to Pn 2

minimize 12 i=1 x i − ai (9)

x 1 ,...,x n >0

x 12 x n2

subject to R21

+ ··· + R2n

= 1.

(b) Find an efficient algorithm for solving (9). Hint: note that the constraints in (9) are not

linear. Explore the change of variables yi := x i2 .

the probability simplex: each point x = (x 1 , . . . , x n ) in ∆ can be interpreted as the probability

mass function of a random variable over an alphabet with n symbols (x i is the probability of the

random variable taking on the ith symbol).

Consider the problem of projecting a point a = (a1 , . . . , an ) ∈ R onto the probability simplex,

minimize 1

2

kx − ak2

x

subject to x ≥0

1 T x = 1.

5

(a) Show that the first-order necessary optimality conditions can be written as

x i − ai = λ + µi , i = 1, . . . , n

x1 + · · · + x n = 1

x i ≥ 0, i = 1, . . . , n

µi ≥ 0, i = 1, . . . , n

x i µi = 0, i = 1, . . . n,

(b) Let c ∈ R be given. Show that the solution of the system

a−b=c

a≥0

b≥0

ab = 0

(c) Use part (b) to find an efficient algorithm that solves the system in (a).

Pn

Pi

maximize i=1 log 1+ Ni

P1 ,...,Pn

subject to Pi ≥ 0, i = 1, . . . , n

P1 + · · · + Pn = P0 .

This problem arises in communication theory. The goal is to assign powers to n transmitters in

order to maximize the communication rate of n parallel additive white gaussian noise channels.

The constant P0 > 0 is the total power budget and Ni > 0 represents the power of the observation

noise in the ith channel.

(a) Show that the first-order necessary optimality conditions can be written as

1

− P +N = λ + µi , i = 1, . . . , n

i i

P + ··· + P = P

1 n 0

Pi ≥ 0, i = 1, . . . , n

µi ≥ 0, i = 1, . . . , n

Pi µi = 0, i = 1, . . . n,

(b) Show that if (P1 , . . . , Pn , λ, µ1 , . . . , µn ) solves the system in (a) then λ < 0.

(c) Show that the system in (a) is equivalent to

−λPi − Ni µi = λNi + 1, i = 1, . . . , n

P1 + · · · + Pn = P0

Pi ≥ 0, i = 1, . . . , n

µi ≥ 0, i = 1, . . . , n

Pi µi = 0, i = 1, . . . n.

6

(d) Change variables as η := − λ1 (this is well defined since λ < 0) and show that the system in

part (c) is equivalent to

Pi − ηNi µi = η − Ni , i = 1, . . . , n

P1 + · · · + Pn = P0

Pi ≥ 0, i = 1, . . . , n

µi ≥ 0, i = 1, . . . , n

Pi µi = 0, i = 1, . . . n.

(e) Change variables as νi := ηNi µi and show that the system in part (d) is equivalent to

Pi − νi = η − Ni , i = 1, . . . , n

P1 + · · · + Pn = P0

Pi ≥ 0, i = 1, . . . , n

νi ≥ 0, i = 1, . . . , n

Pi νi = 0, i = 1, . . . n.

(f) Find an efficient algorithm to solve the system in part (e). Can you see why the optimal

power assignments resemble water filling?

Pn

minimize

x 1 ,...,x n i=1 f i (x i ) (10)

subject to x1 + x2 + · · · + x n = B

x i ≥ 0, i = 1, . . . , n.

We can interpret x i as the amount of a resource (e.g., time or money) we allocate to a task i, and

− f i (x i ) as the reward we receive back. The available budget is B > 0. The goal is to spread our

budget across the tasks in order to maximize the reward.

(a) Assume that each function f i : R → R is differentiable. Write the first-order necessary con-

ditions for problem (10) in terms of the variables (x 1 , . . . , x n ) and the lagrange multipliers

λ and µ1 , . . . , µn (associated with the equality and inequality constraints, respectively).

(b) Let (x 1? , x 2? , . . . , x n? ) be a solution of (10). Use part (a) to show that there exists a η such that

f˙i x i? = η , if x i? > 0

¨

(11)

f˙i x i? ≥ η , if x i? = 0.

(c) Suppose η and (x 1? , . . . , x n? ) satisfy (11). Choose λ and µ1 , . . . , µn such that all the conditions

in part (a) are fulfilled—except for the constraint x 1 + · · · + x n = B.

(d) Assume that f¨i > 0 for i = 1, . . . , n. This means that all f i ’s are convex with strictly increasing

derivative. Suggest a method for solving the system in part (a). Hint: try to design a

bisection method that finds a suitable η.

(e) Apply your approach from part (d) to problem 2: make your method as explicit as possible.

7

5 Optimization with nonlinear constraints

minimize −x − y (12)

x, y

subject to y ≤3

y ≥ x 2 − 1.

(a) Sketch the feasible region and some level curves of the objective function.

(b) Use the KKT theorem to locate all solution candidates.

(c) Give the solution of the problem. Hint: argue through Weierstrass’s theorem (which says

that a continuous function on a compact set attains its infimum).

x, y

subject to 1 ≤ (x − 4)2 + y 2 ≤ 9

y ≥ 0.

(a) Sketch the feasible region and some level curves of the objective function. Guess the solution

(x ? , y ? ).

(b) Write the KKT system associated with problem (13).

(c) Show that your guess (x ? , y ? ) satisfies the KKT system.

minimize − y2 (14)

x, y

subject to x2 + y2 ≤ 4

xy ≥0

x + y ≥ −1.

(a) Sketch the feasible region and some level curves of the objective function. Guess two local

minimizers (x 1? , y1? ) and (x 2? , y2? ).

(b) Write the KKT system associated with problem (14).

(c) Show that your two guesses (x 1? , y1? ) and (x 2? , y2? ) satisfy the KKT system.

H(s, r) = {x ∈ Rn : s T x = r}

We want to project a point p ∈ Rn onto a given hyperplane H(s, r), i.e., we want to solve

2

minimize 21 x − p

(15)

x

subject to s x = r.

T

8

(a) Show that the solution of (15) is

r − sT p

x? = p + s.

ksk2

(b) Conclude that the distance from the point p to the hyperplane H(s, r), defined as

¦
©

d p, H(s, r) = inf
x − p
: x ∈ H(s, r) ,

is given by

|r − s T p|

d p, H(s, r) = .

ksk

21. Fitting a plane. We want to fit a plane to a cloud of points in R3 . We parameterize the plane as

H(s, r) = {x ∈ R3 : s T x = r}

We fit the plane by minimizing the sum of the square distances from each x k to the plane:

PK 2

minimize 12 k=1 d x k , H(s, r) (16)

s,r

subject to ksk2 = 1.

(b) Use the KKT system to show that the optimal plane passes through the center of mass

K

1X

x := xk.

K k=1

¨

Rs = λs

ksk = 1

K

1X T

R := xk − x xk − x

K k=1

(d) Conclude that the optimal plane is given by (s? , r ? ) where s? an eigenvector associated with

the minimum eigenvalue of R and r ? = (s? ) T x.

minimize sT x (17)

x

T −1

subject to (x − c) A (x − c) ≤ 1.

9

The data s 6= 0, c and A 0 is given. Problem (17) consists in minimizing a linear function over

an ellipsoid with center c. Use the KKT theorem to show that the solution is

As

x? = c + p .

s T As

23. Minimum volume box enclosing an ellipsoid. A box in Rn is a set of the form

B(l, u) = {x ∈ Rn : l ≤ x ≤ u}.

Find the smallest box that contain a given ellipsoid E = {x : (x − c) T A−1 (x − c) ≤ 1}.

6 Linear programs

24. Fitting a line. We want to fit a line to given data {(x k , yk ) : k = 1, . . . , K} ⊂ R2 . The line is

parameterized as y = s x + r and we penalize residuals via their absolute values:

PK

minimize

s,r k=1 | yk − (s x k + r)|. (18)

(b) Suppose now that each (x k , yk ) is known only up to an additive bound ρk ≥ 0. That is, the

(unknown) true kth data point lies in the box {(x, y) : |x − x k | ≤ ρk , | y − yk | ≤ ρk }.

To cope with this uncertainty, we formulate a robust variation of (18) as

K

X

minimize max{| y − (s x + r)| : |x − x k | ≤ ρk , | y − yk | ≤ ρk } . (19)

s,r

|k=1 {z }

f (s,r)

Note that (18) corresponds to the special case ρk ≡ 0. In (19) we fit a line that minimizes

the sum of the worst-case residuals. Formulate (19) as a LP. Hint: it may be useful to show

that max{|a + z b| : |z| ≤ ρ} = |a| + ρ|b| for any a, b ∈ R.

B∞ (c, R) = {x ∈ Rn : kx − ck∞ ≤ R}

¦
©

p, B∞ (c, R) = inf
y − p
1 : y ∈ B∞ (c, R) .

is defined as d1

We want to place a box (with fixed radius R) near given points pk ∈ Rn , k = 1, . . . , K, by solving

PK

k=1 d1 pk , B∞ (c, R) .

minimize (20)

c

10

26. Rankings. We have a collection of n items to rank. A ranking corresponds to the assignment of a

label x i ∈ R to each item i = 1, . . . , n. Thus, the x i ’s measure the status of the items (the top item

is the one with the highest of the x i ’s). We refer to a vector x = (x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x n ) as a ranking.

We want to build a ranking on the basis of a given set of K opinions that compare two items at

a time. If the kth opinion says “item i is better than j” we encode it as a vector ak ∈ Rn with a

1 in position i and a −1 in position j; the remaining entries are zero. A ranking x is compatible

with the kth opinion if akT x ≥ ε where ε > 0 is some (fixed) positive constant. Note that some

opinions may be contradictory.

We want to find a ranking that agrees the most with the K opinions. We formulate the problem

PK

minimize k=1 w k ε − a T

k

x +

(21)

x

1 T

subject to n

1 x = 0,

where the constant w k ≥ 0 is the weight we place on opinion k (its credibility). The constraint

says that the average label should be zero; this constraint is introduced to normalize the labels,

as it is easily seen that the cost function in (21) is insensitive to an additive constant in x.

Formulate (21) as a LP.

11

- Bender’s Decomposition Method for a Large Two-stage Linear Programming ModelUploaded byBoonsap Witchayangkoon
- DMGT504_1Uploaded byLiving Legend
- EXTENDED LINEAR MULTI-COMMODITY MULTICOST NETWORK AND MAXIMAL FLOW LIMITED COST PROBLEMSUploaded byAIRCC - IJCNC
- #1 Matematika Optimasi.pdfUploaded byDheandra Nur Aisyah
- A Quantitative Approach to Profit Optimization and Constraints of Mixed Cropping Pattern in Bargarh District Of Western OrissaUploaded byDhavalaSanthoshKumar
- Lingo 11 Users ManualUploaded byMathi3u
- Linear ProgrammingUploaded byAira Cannille Lalic
- Summary of ArticleUploaded byLavina Nair
- 03 Linear ProgrammingUploaded byFaisal Anggarda
- 20.IJASRAPR201720Uploaded byTJPRC Publications
- Recorders EjercicioUploaded bybru
- 11 - Surrogate Constraints 1968Uploaded byasistensi pak
- -Ch9-LP.docxUploaded byالف تات
- chap002tn- advanced operations management for competitive advantageUploaded byHenna.B
- Hydrothermal Scheduling Using Benders Decomposition- Accelerating TechniquesUploaded bykaren dejo
- ps3, ENGR 62, StanfordUploaded bysuudsfiin
- BA7206-Applied Operations Research.pdfUploaded byManikandan Suriyanarayanan
- Lpp1- Doc 2 Auto Saved)Uploaded bySonia Verma
- LPP.pptxUploaded byharshaTahalani
- Goal 15Uploaded byrindangsukmanita
- Linear Programming Techniques to Optimize Bank of Baroda's Loan PortfolioUploaded byEditor IJTSRD
- 1.07 Linear ProgrammingUploaded byrachel
- Step by Step Optimization SUploaded byNopparut
- 06 Bust Proceedings optimizationUploaded byKarthik Karunanidhi
- 2-78-1424077448-3. management - OPTIMIZING CEMENT DISTRIBUTION IN THE NIGERIAN CEMENT MANUFACTURING- Dr Nwekpa K C (1).pdfUploaded byParr
- Linear ProgrammingUploaded byDr Rajesh Timane
- 9A01708 Water Resources System Planning and ManagementUploaded bysivabharathamurthy
- 2 Linear Programming ProblemUploaded bymeeejohn
- Huang 2016Uploaded byErlangga Bayu Setyawan
- Online File W4.2Uploaded byCarrm@

- 511 NotesUploaded bysalim
- MA30087/50087: Optimisation methods of operational researchUploaded byMarcelo Ziulkoski
- 08520064Uploaded bysalim
- IOIPNotesOct2014Uploaded bysalim
- NLSC Lecture Notes 2016 Sufficient Conditions ChapterUploaded bysalim
- tenta13A_2Uploaded bysalim
- sol2Uploaded bysalim
- intro_optUploaded byУзахир УЗИ Армани
- intro_optUploaded byУзахир УЗИ Армани
- adap 1Uploaded bysalim
- Tentalosning TMA947 070312 2Uploaded bysalim
- t3Uploaded bysalim
- t 1Uploaded bysalim
- t 2Uploaded bysalim
- TP2_4Uploaded bysalim
- cv-14-lecture-18_3Uploaded bysalim
- lecture_notes_series_optimisation_constrained.pdfUploaded bysalim
- Dβsgn(σ (t)) (1)Uploaded bysalim
- EEE482-FA09-ISSMUploaded bysalim
- 07 Homework6 SolUploaded bysalim
- tentoct11Uploaded bysalim
- Course Outlines 012Uploaded bysalim
- SEEM3470_tuto_02Uploaded bysalim
- intro_optUploaded byУзахир УЗИ Армани
- intro_optUploaded byУзахир УЗИ Армани
- intro_optUploaded byУзахир УЗИ Армани
- Lewis 1996Uploaded bysalim
- m11_lec1Uploaded bysalim
- hu2008Uploaded bysalim

- Complete Catalytic Catalog 106Uploaded byTomas Leon Julia
- Apollo 14 Rock SamplesUploaded byBob Andrepont
- GATE Paper Mechanical Engineering 2003Uploaded byMechmagics
- Final Exam CEng 6209 TE Final Exam [2006]Uploaded byAshebir Asrat
- 37982104.pdfUploaded byTaniaGhina
- Microbiology Basic and AppliedUploaded byStephen Moore
- 165 Kostadin Cukor Jurkovic CIM2017Uploaded byKenan Muhamedagic
- CO2Uploaded byBashar Al Zoobaidi
- API 602Uploaded bysathesh_mech
- Business Research Methods AssignmentUploaded byAsim Mirza
- Newsvendor.pptUploaded bysumeetgkd
- Special Purpose Motors and Control DevicesUploaded byDominick Bas
- Transmission Lines and Network CablesUploaded bydebabratalogon
- Acoustic Microfluidics FinalUploaded bySam Wilton
- Controlled Release OxycodoneUploaded byCarleta Stan
- PDT UNIT9 (Students)Uploaded byfariq
- Or BreakoutUploaded byRushaank Shukla
- 5th unitUploaded byRaviteja4586
- 3.7.1 Guide to CD-FilmUploaded byKiran Baboolaul
- aut02Uploaded byfahri_amirullah
- AerostructuresUploaded byQasim Al Mansoor
- English+Manual+of+Welding+Practise+boardUploaded byoscar tebar
- National Governors Association (NGA) and The Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) Joint Release of Common Core Public Feedback SummaryUploaded byGatortrapper
- X2372_HXF_HXF2_SellSheet_0 (1)Uploaded byGerman Restrepo
- Principles TdUploaded byEnrique Flores
- Over Clocking GuideUploaded byEdward Velasquez
- Vlsi Implementation of Adaptive Kalman Filter ForUploaded byInternational Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology
- fUploaded byomarzame
- From Suns to Life - A Chronological Approach to the History of Life on EarthUploaded byarul
- Total Productive Maintenance WorksheetUploaded bybhavesh_balas