Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dische’s carbazole reaction (1) has been the principal method for
uranic acid determination since 1947. The method as originally described
is limited in applicability by low color intensity of certain uranic acids,
such as n-mannuronic. Among modifications developed to increase sensi-
tivity of the reaction, the most significant are those which use borate
(24). Others have been based on the differential temperature response
of certain uranic acids (5-7).
In this laboratory, the discovery that n-mannuronic acid is a major
constituent of the extracellular polysaccharide from Arthrobacter viscosus
NRRL B-1973 (8, 9) necessitated finding an accurate method for
n-mannuronic acid determination. We adapted the borate-modified car-
bazole method of Bitter and Muir (4) to the analysis of heteropolysac-
charides (lo), and discovered that the color intensity of n-mannuronic
acid increased tenfold over that obtained by the Dische method. In this
initial work we also developed a technique for calculating the relative
proportions of two uranic acids in a synthetic mixture, using data from
carbazole analyses both with and without borate. However, application
of this method to alginates containing known amounts of n-mannuronic
and n-guluronic acids gave unsatisfactory results, apparently because of
interference from traces of n-glucuronic acid. The same difficu1t.y was ex-
perienced by Haug and Larsen (11) using Dische’s carbazole method.
Because the reactivity of n-glucuronic acid is considerably higher than
that of either n-mannuronic or n-guluronic acid both with and without
borate, very small amounts of n-glucuronic acid could affectthese cal-
culations greatly. However, it appeared likely that conditions-could be
found for reducing the reactivity of n-glucuronic acid relative to that of
n-mannuronic acid, since the reactivity of n-glucuronic acid varies much
more with temperature than that of other uranic acids (5). We therefore
‘This is a laboratory of the Northern Utilization Research and Development
Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture.
470
MODIFICATION OF CABBAZOLE ANALYSIS 471
have made a systematic study of the combined effects of borate and re-
duced temperature on the stability, sensitivity and specificity of the car-
baeole reaction. Reported here are the standardized procedure established
for a 55” borate-carbazole analysis and comparative data obtained by
this method and other accepted procedures on selected mono-, o&o-, and
polpsaccharides containing uranic acids.
Reagents
(1) Concentrated H&SO,, sp. gr. 1.84: ACS reagent grade.
(2) Stock borate solution: 24.74 gm H,BO, dissolved in 45 ml 4 M
KOH; solution diluted to 100 ml with distilled water to give a stable
stock solut.ion 4 M in BOa3-.
(3) H,SO,-borate reagent: 25 ml stock borate soIution made to 1 liter
with ACS grade HeSO,. Final solution 0.1 M in H,BO,.
(4) Carbazole reagent: 0.1% solution prepared by dissolving carbazole,
recrystallized from benzene, in absolute ethanol purified by the method
of Stark (12).
Test Materials
All test and standard solutions were freshly prepared before use. Po-
tassium n-glucuronate dihydrate, a-n-galacturonic acid monohydrate,
n-glucose, n-galactose, and n-mannose were high-grade commercia1 sam-
ples. n-Guluronic acid was a gift from Dr. Arne Haug. All other materials,
prepared in this laboratory, were in the form of potassium salts. These
include the a- and P-methylpyranosides and furanosides of n-mannuronic
acid, the extracellular polysaccharide from Arthrobacter viscosus NRRL
B-1973 and the aldobiuronic and aldotriuronic acids isolated from this
polymer, namely 4-0-/?-n-mannopyranosyluronic acid- (l-4)-n-glucose-
and 4-O-P-n-mannopyranosyluronic acid- (l-4) -O-/?-n-glucopyranosyl-
(l-4) -n-galactose (8, 9). All calculations of concentration were based
on the molecular weight of the acid form, rather than the potassium salt
form, so,that alI absorbance values would be comparable. Samples were
of known moisture content; all calculations were on a dry-weight basis.
Standardizatibn’tif Probedtire for 55” Borate Antilysis
Since our primary interest was in developing a method that had high
sensitivity for n-mannuronic acid and low sensitivity for n-glucuronic
acid, experimentation was limited to these two materials during standard-
ization of procedure. Because Radhakrishnamurthy and Berenson (5)
showed exceptionally low color yield for n-glucuronic acid when samples
472 KNUTSON AND JEANEs
RESULTS
total heating time was kept constant, but if the proportion of the heating
done before and after carbazole addition was varied, considerable vari-
ation in absorbance occurred. As shown in Figure 1, absorbance is highest
if all heating is done after addition of carbazole, even when samples are
kept at room temperature for 3 hr, although the differences are not so
great after this length of time. Thus the procedure of heating only after
addition of carbazole was adopted as standard for all subsequent tests.
Time at
Room Temp.
I I I I
0’ 10 20 30 40
Heating Time After Carbazole Addition, min
Heatrng
mm
0.2 -
I I I L
0 I 2 3 4
Time at Room Temperature. hr
U2
u
,$
/
---,--
2"
_/
----
/
*.--
-i---------
40 60J
FIG. 4. Standard curves for modifications of the carbazole analysis: (A) n-galac-
turonic acid; (B) n-mannuronic acid; (C) L-guluronic acid; and (D) n-glucuronic acid.
476
-.
55".
_______--
--air---
no 08lale
..----
IO
MODIFICATION OF CABBAZOLE ANALYSIS 477
DISCUSSION
Although there have been numerous publications on carbaeole method-
ology, comparatively little is known about the chemistry of the reactions
involved. 5-Formylfuroic acid has been identified as the chromogen re-
sponsible for the carbazole reaction color (13), and it has been shown to
be the preferential product formed from -uranic acids in concentrated
MODIFICATION OF CARBAZOLE ANALYSIS 479
sulfuric acid (14). It is not known why the formation of this chromogen
should vary so much from one uranic acid to another, or why such factors
as addition of borate or variation of heating temperature should cause
large and specific changes in amount of reaction. The second reaction in-
volved in the analysis, the formation of the chromophore from carbazole
and 5-formylfuroic acid, has been described only empirically. Gauthiei
and Kenyon (6) have reported that the sensitivity of Dische’s original
method can be increased if samples are heated after carbazole addition,
and Galambos (7) reported that 95% of the color lost upon standing at
room temperature can be restored by further heating at 190”. Possibly the
increased absorbance observed with most of the acids studied by our
method resulted from both reactions proceeding simultaneously. Carhazolc
present in the reaction mixture might react immediately with nascent
5-formylfuroic acid and thus reduce immediate degradation of the chro-
mogen and permit a greater proportion of the chromogen t.o form
chromophore.
TABLE 3
Ratios of Reactivity of Uranic Acids under Various Reaction Conditions
to Reactivity of D-Ghxuronic Acid at 100” without Borate 15 w
Uranic acid
Reaction conditions D-Gluouronic wGalacturonic r+Mannuronic L-Guluronin
Our results demonstrate the flexibility of the basic reactions and the
high sensitivity and specificity that can be obtained. Shown in Table 3
is the relation of the absorbance of all four acids studied under all four
reaction conditions to the absorptivity of n-glucuronic acid under the
standard Dische condition. Under any reaction condition, the reaction of
each acid is quite specific. A similar comparison is shown in Table 4, ex-
cept that the absorptivity of each acid under each condition is compared
to its own absorptivity at 100” without borate. This comparison reveals
not only the specificity of each condition for each acid but the much
greater specificity of the absorbance pattern of each acid when all con-
ditions are considered together. Such data are useful in identifying un-
known uranic acids or in determining whether a compound or mixture
rontains more than one uranic acid. This technique has been especially
valuable in this laboratory for confirming identification of the uranic acid
in a heteropolysaccharide.
480 KNUTSON AND JEANJCS
TABLE 4
Ratios of Reactivity of Hexuronic Acids under Three Reaction Conditions Compared
with Standard Carbazole Procedure at 100” without Borate
Reactivity ratio
Borate
No borate,
55” 100” 55”
SUMMARY
The carbazole analysis when run at 55” in the presence of borate gives
increased sensitivity for n-galacturonic, n-mannuronic, and L-guluronic
acids, while greatly decreasing that of n-glucuronic acid. Comparison of
values from these reaction conditions with values from other modifications
of the carbazole analysis reveals a high degree of specificity of the re-
action for each acid under any defined set of conditions. This specificity
is of value for identification of unknown uranic acids. The new modifi-
cation is especially useful for determination of n-mannuronic acid in
heteropolysaccharides.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We wish to thank Dr. Ame Haug of the Institute of Seaweed Research, Trondheim,
Norway, for his gift of L-guluronic acid and Dr. J. H. Sloneker of thie laboratory for
samples of the methylglycoeides of n-mannuronic acid and for the aldobiuronic and
aldotriuronic acids from the extracellular polysaccharide from Arthrobacter viscose
NRRL B-1973.
REFERXNCES
1. DI~CHE, Z., J. B&d. Chem. 191,189(1947).
2. GREQCJRY, J. D., Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 89, 167 (1960).
3. BITTER, T., AND EWINS, R., Biochem. J. 81,43P (1961).
4. BITIXR, T., AND Mom, H. M., Anal. Biochem. 4,330 (1962).
5. RADHAERIGHNAMURTHY, B., AND BEBENSON, G. S., And. Chem. 35, 1316 (1963).
6. GAUTHIER, P. B., AND KENYON, A. J., Biochim. Biophy. Acta 130, 551 (1966).
7. GALAMBOS, J. T., Anal. B&hem. 19, 119 (1967).
8. JEANES, A., KNUTSON, C. A., PITTSLEY, J. E., AND WATSON, P. R., J. Appl. Polymer
Sci. 9, 627 (1965).
9. SLONEKER, J. H., ORENTAS, D. G., KNUTSON, C. A., WATSON, P. R., AND JEANES,
A., Can. J. Chem., in press.
10. KNUTSON, C. A., AND JEANES, A., Abstracts of Papers, 148th Meeting, American
Chemical Society (1964), p. 16D.
11. RAna, A., AND LARSEN, B., Acta Chem. Scud. IS,1908 (1962).
12. STARK, S. M., JR., Anal. Chem. 22, 1158 (1950).
13. BOWNESS, J. M., Biochem. J. 70, 107 (1958).
14. ANDERSON, D. M. W., AND GARBUTP, S., J. Chem. Sot. 3294 (1963).
15. KNUTSON, C. A., AND JEANES, A., Anal. Biochem. 24,482 (1X%3).