Professional Documents
Culture Documents
th
FOUNDATION
®
year
of continuous
service to CLINICIANS’ GUIDE TO DENTAL PRODUCTS & TECHNIQUES
dentistry
CRA
January 2006
STATUS UPPER ANTERIOR VENEERS— STATE OF THE ART (PART 1)
REPORT
Volume 30 Veneering of teeth has grown enormously in the last 20 years. Most clinicians agree veneers can be
Issue 1 the most beautiful & natural looking dental restorations, & their use will continue to grow. Report
below addresses veneer material options; tooth preparations; tissue management concepts; making
impressions; provisional restorations; & CRA conclusions. Future reports will address cements,
IN THIS ISSUE: finishing & occlusal equilibration, & special considerations for natural looking lower anterior veneers.
• UPPER ANTERIOR
VENEERS—
STATE OF THE
1. VENEER MATERIAL OPTIONS
ART (PART 1) Table below lists current veneer material options, their use as reported by respondents to CRA’s ’05 Product
Use Survey, & characteristics of each option.
Pages 1–3
Material Reported use Characteristics
• TETRIC Ceramic
EVOCERAM Pressed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71.2% . . . . . . . . . . . Monochromatic, but easy to modify shade using surface stains; relatively easy
Universal to make
composite resin Fired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61.5% . . . . . . . . . . . Offers best control of color
Milled (CAD-CAM). . . . . . . . 0.4% . . . . . . . . . . . Monochromatic, but 3 translucency blocks available & shade can be modified
Page 4
using surface stains; can be accomplished in 1 office visit
Resin
• CANKER COVER Direct† . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62.0% . . . . . . . . . . . Characterization by resin layers, accomplished in 1 office visit, may not be as
Covers & aids durable as ceramic
healing Lab fabricated . . . . . . . . . . . 7.5% . . . . . . . . . . . Characterization by resin layers, easy for lab techs to make, good control of
Page 4 color, may not be as durable as ceramic
Milled (CAD-CAM). . . . . . . . 0.4% . . . . . . . . . . . Monochromatic, but can modify shade with surface stains; can be
accomplished in 1 office visit
• AQUASIL ULTRA † Resin brands reported most used were: EsthetX, 17.2%; Renamel, 10.0%; Filtek Supreme, 9.0%; TPH3, 9.0%; & Herculite, 7.3%. Many other brands
DIGIT were reported used by less than 4% of respondents.
Unit-dose
dispensing Summary: Many veneer material options are available today. Ceramic (pressed & fired) & direct resin are
Page 4 reported most used. CAD-CAM ceramic & resin, & direct resin are the only options for single office visit veneers.
• TELE-TALK
Training manual 2. TOOTH PREPARATIONS
Page 4 No one tooth preparation serves all cases. Many patients have malaligned or rotated teeth, caries,
crowding, restorations, intrinsic stains, &/or white spots. Patients’ desires & expectations need to be
discussed & understood. All alternatives should be explained to satisfy informed consent. Most clinicians
agree preparations should be as conservative as possible. For some cases, tooth bleaching & minimal
orthodontics may achieve patient’s desires without placing veneers.
A. No prep or very shallow preparation (0.0–0.3mm)
Example case of no prep veneers (Lumineers, using Cerinate porcelain by Den-Mat):
®
Indications Advantages Disadvantages
Since 1976 • Pre-treatment tooth color is • High esthetic potential • Potential for over contouring
CRA FOUNDATION® acceptable, teeth are in lingual • Little to no potential for post-op • Thin veneer may not block cement or
3707 N. Canyon Road #6 version, small or spaced teeth, sensitivity & debonding tooth color, affecting final color
Provo, Utah 84604 malformed teeth, or very thin • Preserves tooth structure
801-226-2121 veneers over relatively normal • No anesthesia required
tooth anatomy • Provisionals usually not
www.cr ane ws.or g
required
CRA Foundation® Newsletter Page 2 January 2006
Summary: Teeth can be prepared for veneers ranging from no prep or removal of tooth structure, to deeply into dentin.
Most dentists in CRA 2005 survey report use of moderate depth preparations into enamel only.
Photos below show the range of tooth reduction possible for veneers depending on situations described above.
4. MAKING IMPRESSIONS
Accurate impressions reduce finishing time at seating & improve quality of veneers. 80% of respondents to CRA’s ’05 Product
Use Survey reported use of VPS impression materials (most used were Aquasil at 13.6%, Imprint at 6.4%, & Splash at 6.0%).
Polyether impression material was reported used by 17% of respondents.
A. 1–3 Teeth— Double arch impressions that transfer centric occlusion relationship are easy &
predictable. Use VPS or polyether impression material & adequate impression trays (two well
proven example trays are the Anterior Triple Tray by Premier Dental & Quad Tray by Clinicians Choice).
B. 3+ Teeth— Rigidity & accuracy are critical. Properly adapted stock trays or light-cured custom
trays (Triad by Dentsply) used with VPS or polyether impression materials work well.
5. PROVISIONAL RESTORATIONS
Veneer provisionals are placed to reduce interim tooth sensitivity & for esthetics. Patient should be warned they are fragile.
Bis-acryl resins are most used (i.e. Integrity by Dentsply Caulk, Luxatemp by Zenith Dental, Protemp 3 Garant by 3M ESPE, & others).
Microfill or nanofill composite resins can also be used (i.e. Durafill by Heraeus Kulzer, Filtek Supreme by 3M ESPE, Renamel Microfill
by Cosmedent, & others). Final restorations should be placed as soon as possible.
6. CRA CONCLUSIONS
Veneers, direct & indirect, comprise a major portion of dentistry today. This report has described a state-of-the-art
technique from preparation to temporization along with materials found useful by CRA Evaluators. Dentists should
provide complete patient education about the veneer concept, including alternatives, veneer advantages & disadvantages,
risks, & costs & document informed consent about veneer therapy before starting treatment. Treatment choice should
be the most conservative method consistent with patient needs & desires.
CRA Foundation® Newsletter Page 4 January 2006
CRA
CONFIRMED NOTEWORTHY
USEFUL
Products evaluated by CRA & reported in the CRA Newsletter have been selected on the basis of merit from hundreds of products under evaluation. CRA conducts research at 3 levels: (1) Multiple-user field
evaluations, (2) Controlled long-term clinical research, & (3) Basic science laboratory research. Over 400 clinical field evaluators are located throughout the world & 40 full-time employees work at the institute.
All professional staff volunteer their time. A product must meet at least one of the following standards to be reported in this publication: (1) Innovative & new on the market; (2) Less expensive, but meets the use
standards; (3) Unrecognized, valuable classic; or (4) Superior to others in its broad classification. Your results may differ from CRA Evaluators or other researchers on any product because of differences in
preferences, techniques, batches of products, & environments. CRA FOUNDATION® (CRA) is a tax-exempt, nonprofit education & research organization which uses a unique volunteer structure to produce
objective, factual data. All proceeds are used to support the work of the CRA FOUNDATION®. ©2006 This Newsletter or portions thereof may not be duplicated without permission of CRA. Annual English
subscription $65 in U.S. & $65 (U.S. Funds) in other languages &/or countries, or $7 per issue.