You are on page 1of 43

FLUID MECHANICS

Dynamics of Viscous Fluid Flow in


Closed Pipe: Darcy-Weisbach equation for
flow in pipes. Major and minor losses in pipe
lines.

Dr. Mohsin Siddique


Assistant Professor

1
Steady Flow Through Pipes
 Laminar Flow:
flow in layers
Re<2000 (pipe flow)
 Turbulent Flow:
flow layers mixing with each
other
Re >4000 (pipe flow)

2
Steady Flow Through Pipes
 Reynold’s Number(R or Re): It is ratio of inertial forces (Fi) to
viscous forces (Fv) of flowing fluid
Velocity Volume Where ;
Fi
Mass. ρ . Velocity
Re = = Time = Time V is avg. velocity of flow in pipe
Fv Shear Stress. Area Shear Stress. Area ν is kinematic viscosity
ρ Q .V ρ AV .V ρ AV .V ρVL VL L is characteristic/representative
= = = = =
τ .A du V µ υ linear dimension of pipe. It is
µ .A µ .A
dy L diameter of pipe (circular conduits)
ρVD VD or hydraulic radius (non-circular
Re = = conduits).
µ ν
 For laminar flow: Re<=2000
Values of critical
 For transitional flow: 2000<Re<4000 Reynolds no.
 For Turbulent flow: Re>= 4000

Note: For non-circular section, we need to use hydraulic radius (Rh) instead
3 of diameter (D) for the linear dimension (L).
Steady Flow Through Pipes
 Hydraulic Radius (Rh) or Hydraulic Area A
Diameter: It is the ratio of area of flow Rh = =
wetted perimeter P
to wetted perimeter of a channel or pipe

For Circular Pipe For Rectangular pipe

D
B
Rh = =
(
A (π / 4 )D 2
=
D ) A BD
P πD 4 Rh = =
P B + 2D
D = 4 Rh

VD 4VRh By replacing D with Rh, Reynolds’ number formulae


Rh = =
ν ν can be used for non-circular sections as well.

4
Note: hydraulic Radius gives us indication for most economical section. More
the Rh more economical will be the section.
Head Loss in Pipes
 Total Head Loss=Major Losses+ Minor Losses

 Major Loss: Due to pipe friction

 Minor Loss: Due to pipe fittings, bents and valves etc

5
Head Loss in Pipes due to Friction
The head loss due to friction in a
given length of pipe is proportional
to mean velocity of flow (V) as long
as the flow in laminar. i.e.,
H f ∝V

But with increasing velocity, as the


flow become turbulent the head
loss also varies and become
proportion to Vn

H f ∝V n
Where n ranges from 1.75 to 2
Log-log plot for flow in uniform pipe
(n=2.0 for rough wall pipe; n=1.75 for
smooth wall pipe
6
Frictional Head Loss in Conduits of Constant
Cross-Section
 Consider stead flow in a conduit of uniform cross-section A. The pressure
at section 1 & 2 are P1 & P2 respectively. The distance between the section
is L. For equilibrium in stead flow,
∑ F = ma = 0
P= perimeter of conduit
τ o = Avg. shear stress
between pipe boundary
and liquid

 z 2 − z1 
  = sin α
 L 
Figure: Schematic diagram of conduit

P1 A − W sin α − τ o PL − P2 A = 0

z −z 
P1 A − P2 A − γAL 2 1  − τ o PL = 0
7  L 
Frictional Head Loss in Conduits of Constant
cross-section

z −z  Remember !! For pipe flow


P1 A − P2 A − γAL 2 1  − τ o PL = 0
 L 
Dividing the equation by γA
P1 v12 P2 v22
+ z1 + = + z2 + + hL
γ 2g γ 2g
P1 P2 τ o PL
− − ( z 2 − z1 ) − =0
γ γ γA For stead flow in pipe of
uniform diameter v1=v2
 P1   P2  τ o PL
 z1 +  −  z 2 +  = = hL = h f
 γ   γ  γ A
 P1  P 
 + z1  −  2 + z 2  = hL
Therefore, head loss due to friction hf can γ  γ 
be written as
τ o PL τ o L A
hf = = Q Rh =
γA γRh P
This is general equation and can be applied to any shape conduit having
either Laminar or turbulent flow.
8
Determining Shear Stress
 For smooth-walled pipes/conduits, the average shear stress at the
wall is
τ o = f (Rh , µ , ρ ,V , )
 Using Rayleigh's Theorem of dimensional analysis, the above relation
can be written as;
(
τ o = k Rh a .µ b .ρ c .V n )
 Rewriting above equation in terms of dimension (FLT), we get
F
 a  FT  b  FT 2   L  n 
c τ o = force / area =
F L2
= K  (L )  2   4    
L2
  L   L   T   Rh = length = L

V = L /T
(
FL−2 = K (L ) FTL−2
a
( ) (FT
b 2 −4 c
L ) (L / T ) )
n
ρ = M / L3 = (F / a ) / L3 = FT 2 / L4
µ = N .s / m 2 = FTL− 2
9
Determining Shear Stress
= K ((L ) (FTL )(
−2 b
FT L (L / T ) 2 −4 c
) )
−2 a n
FL
 According to dimensional homogeneity, the dimension must be equal on
either side of the equation, i.e.,
F : 1 = b + c → (i ) Solving three equations, we get
L : − 2 = a − 2b − 4c + n → (ii )
a = n − 2; b = 2 − n; c = n − 1
T : 0 = b + 2c − n → (iii )
 Substituting values back in above equation
n−2
 R Vρ 
( ) (
τ o = k Rh a .µ b .ρ c .V n = k Rh n − 2 .µ 2− n .ρ n −1.V n ) = k  h  ρV 2
 µ 
τ o = k (Re )n − 2 ρV 2

k (Re )
n−2
 Setting = Cf / 2 we get

V2
τo = Cf ρ Where, Cf is coefficient of friction
2
10
Determining Shear Stress
 Now substituting the equation of avg. shear stress in equation of head loss,
C f ρV 2 L C fV 2L
hf = =
2γRh 2 gRh τ o = C f ρV 2 / 2
τoL
 For circular pipe flows, Rh=D/4 hf =
γRh
4C f V 2 L L V2 L V2
hf = = 4C f = f
2g 4D D 2g D 2g

 Where, f is a friction factor. i.e., f = 4C f = f (Re )

 The above equation is known as pipe friction equation and as Darcy-


Weisbach equation.
 It is used for calculation of pipe-friction head loss for circular pipes
flowing full (laminar or turbulent)
11
Friction Factor for Laminar and
Turbulent Flows in Circular Pipes
 Smooth and Rough Pipe
 Mathematically; e < δv
Smooth pipe
 Smooth Pipe
e > δv
e < δv Rough pipe
Turbulent flow near boundary
 Rough Pipe
e > 14δ v
e = Roughness height
 Transitional mode δ v = Thickness of viscous sub-layer

δ v ≤ e ≤ 14δ v 14.14ν 14.14 D


δv = =
V f Re f

12
Friction Factor for Laminar and Turbulent Flows in
Circular Pipes
64
 For laminar flow Re < 2000 f =
Re

 For turbulent flow Re > 4000


Von-karman Eq. for fully rough flow
From Nikuradse experiments 1 3.7
for smooth = 2 log
1 Re f f e/ D
= 2 log
f 2.51 pipe flow
Colebrook Eq. for turbulent flow in all pipes
Colebrook Eq. for smooth pipe flow
1 Re
= 1.8 log e/ D 
1 2.51
f 6.9 = −2 log + 
f  3.7 Re f 
 
Blacius Eq. for smooth pipe flow
3000 ≤ Re ≤ 105
1/ 7
Halaand Eq. For turbulent flow in all pipes
0.316 u  y
f = 0.25 =  
u max   e / D 1.11 6.9 
Re  ro  1
= −1.8 log   + 
 
Seventh-root law f  3 .7  Re 

13
Friction Factor for Laminar and Turbulent Flows
in Circular Pipes
 The Moody chart or Moody diagram is a graph in non-
dimensional form that relates the Darcy-Weisbach friction factor, Reynolds
number and relative roughness for fully developed flow in a circular pipe.
 The Moody chart is universally valid for all steady, fully developed,
incompressible pipe flows.

14
Friction Factor for Laminar and Turbulent Flows
in Circular Pipes
 For laminar flow For non-laminar flow
1 e/ D 2.51 
64 = −2 log +  Colebrook eq.
f = f  3.7 Re f 
Re  

15
Friction Factor for Laminar and
Turbulent Flows in Circular Pipes
 The friction factor can be determined by its Reynolds number (Re) and the
Relative roughness (e/D) of the Pipe.( where: e = absolute roughness and D
= diameter of pipe)

16
17
Problem Types
 Type 1: Determine f and hf,
 Type 2: Determine Q
 Type 3: Determine D

18
Problem
 Find friction factor for the following pipe
 e=0.002 ft
 D=1ft
 Kinematic Viscosity, ν=14.1x10-6ft2/s
 Velocity of flow, V=0.141ft/s

 Solution:
 e/D=0.002/1=0.002
 R=VD/ ν =1x0.141/(14.1x10-6)=10000
1  e/ D 2.51 
= −2 log + 
f  3.7 Re f 
 
 From Moody’s Diagram; f=0.034
f = __________ _

19
Problem-Type 1

 Pipe dia= 3 inch & L=100m


 Re=50,000 ʋ=1.059x10-5ft2/s

 (a): Laminar flow:


 f=64/Re=64/50,000=0.00128

VD V (3 / 12)
Re = ⇒ 50000 = −5
⇒ V = 2.12 ft / s
ν 1.059 × 10

fLV 2 0.00128(100)(2.12 2 )
H Lf = = = 0.0357 ft
2 gD 2(32.2)(3 / 12)

20
Problem-Type 1

 Pipe dia= 3 inch & L=100m


 Re=50,000 ʋ=1.059x10-5ft2/s

 (b): Turbulent flow in smooth pipe: i.e.: e=0

1  e/ D 2.51   
= −2 log +  = −2 log 0 + 2.51 
f  3.7 Re f   3.7 50000 f 
   
f = 0.0209

fLV 2 0.0209(100)( 2.12 2 )


H Lf = = = 0.582 ft
2 gD 2(32.2)(3 / 12)

21
Problem-Type 1

 Pipe dia= 3 inch & L=100m


 Re=50,000 ʋ=1.059x10-5ft2/s

 (c): Turbulent flow in rough pipe: i.e.: e/D=0.05

1  e/ D 2.51   
= −2 log +  = −2 log 0.05 + 2.51 
f  3.7 Re f   3.7 50000 f 
   
f = 0.0720

fLV 2 0.0720(100)( 2.12 2 )


H Lf = = = 2.01 ft
2 gD 2(32.2)(3 / 12)

22
Problem-Type 1

hL=?

L = 1000m; D = 0.25m; e = 0.0005m


Q = 0.051m 3 / s; ν = 1.306 × 10 −6 m 2 / s

( )
R = VD /ν = (1.039 × 0.25) / 1.306 ×10 −6 = 2 ×105
e / D = 0.0005 / 0.25 = 0.002
QV = Q / A = 1.039m / s
From Moody's Diagram
f = 0.0245
fLV 2
hL = = 5.39m
2 gD
23
Problem-Type 2

hL = fLV 2 / 2 gD

24
Problem-Type 2
 For laminar flow For non-laminar flow
1 e/ D 2.51 
64 = −2 log +  Colebrook eq.
f = f  3.7 Re f 
Re  

25
Problem-Type 3

26
Problem

1  e/ D 2.51 
= −2 log + 
f  3.7 Re f 
 
flV 2
hLf =
2 gD

27
Problem

28
Problem

29
MINOR LOSSES
 Each type of loss can be quantified using a loss coefficient (K).
Losses are proportional to velocity of flow and geometry of device.

V2
Hm = K
2g

 Where, Hm is minor loss and K is minor loss coefficient. The value of


K is typically provided for various types/devices

 NOTE: If L > 1000D minor losses become significantly less


than that of major losses and hence can be neglected.

30
Minor Losses
 These can be categorized as
 1. Head loss due to contraction in pipe
 1.1 Sudden Contraction
 1.2 Gradual Contraction

 2. Entrance loss
 3. Head loss due to enlargement of pipe
 3.1 Sudden Enlargement
 3.2 Gradual Enlargement
 4. Exit loss
 5. Head loss due to pipe fittings
 6. Head loss due to bends and elbows

31
Minor Losses
 Head loss due to contraction of pipe (Sudden contraction)
 A sudden contraction (Figure) in pipe usually causes a marked drop
in pressure in the pipe because of both the increase in velocity and
the loss of energy of turbulence.
Head loss due to sudden contraction is

2
V
H m = Kc 2
2g

Where, kc is sudden contraction


coefficient and it value depends
up ratio of D2/D1 and velocity
(V2) in smaller pipe

32
Minor Losses
 Head loss due to enlargement of pipe (Gradual Contraction)
 Head loss from pipe contraction may be greatly reduced by
introducing a gradual pipe transition known as a confusor as shown
Figure.
Head loss due to gradual
contraction is
2
V2
H m = Kc '
2g

Where, kc’ is gradual contraction


coefficient and it value depends
up ratio of D2/D1 and velocity
(V2) in smaller pipe

33
Minor Losses
 Entrance loss
 The general equation for an entrance head loss is also expressed in
terms of velocity head of the pipe: 2
V
H m = Ke
2g
 The approximate values for the entrance loss coefficient (Ke)
for different entrance conditions are given below

34
Minor Losses
 head loss due to enlargement of pipe (Sudden Enlargement)
 The behavior of the energy grade line and the hydraulic grade line in
the vicinity of a sudden pipe expansion is shown in Figure

The magnitude of the head


loss may be expressed as

Hm =
(
V1 − V2 )
2

2g

35
Minor Losses
 head loss due to enlargement of pipe (Gradual Enlargement)
 The head loss resulting from pipe expansions may be greatly
reduced by introducing a gradual pipe transition known as a diffusor

The magnitude of the head


loss may be expressed as

H m = Ke
(V1 − V2 )
2

2g

The values of Ke’ vary with the diffuser angle (α).

36
Minor Losses
 Exit Loss
 A submerged pipe discharging into a large reservoir (Figure ) is a
special case of head loss from expansion.

Exit (discharge) head loss is


expressed as

H m = Kd
(V )
2

2g

where the exit (discharge) loss


coefficient Kd=1.0.
37
Minor Losses
 Head loss due to fittings valves
 Fittings are installed in pipelines to control flow. As with other losses in
pipes, the head loss through fittings may also be expressed in terms of
velocity head in the pipe: 2
V
Hm = K f
2g

38
Minor Losses
 Head loss due to bends
 The head loss produced at a bend was found to be dependent of the
ratio the radius of curvature of the bend (R) to the diameter of the
pipe (D). The loss of head due to a bend may be expressed in terms
of the velocity head as

V2
H m = Kb
2g
 For smooth pipe bend of 900, the values of Kb for various values of
R/D are listed in following table.

39
Minor Losses

40
Numerical Problems

41
Numerical Problems

42
Thank you
 Questions….

 Feel free to contact:

43

You might also like