Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Capitalizing on their internal capital and brand equity, this is the most opportune time for
these companies to revitalize their strengths, reform their structures and strategies and re-
launch themselves aggressively in the global markets.
The global markets emphasize value adds, innovation, flexibility, excellence and
customized products and services. The big question is whether the conglomerates should
diversify into strengthening their internal functions or take a focused approach to
establish and consolidate their markets. In the following paper, we attempt to discuss the
governing forces behind the decisions, an assessment of the decisions, and an orientation
for the future. Looking ahead, we discuss the strategies Indian companies must employ if
they decide to focus on core competencies.
Positioning for Emergent Market Companies
There are two main forces that govern the strategy adopted by organizations for
sustenance, survival and economic growth – one being those that push an organization to
expand its current localized markets, and the other being the Competitive Advantage they
hold in their market, that is, the degree to which its assets can be transferred to another
market:
(1) Defender – If globalization pressures are weak, and a company’s own assets are not
transferable internationally, the company needs to concentrate on defending its turf
against international exposure. For instance, Bajaj, Anchor, etc. The products could not
be transferred internationally.
(2) Extender – If globalization pressures are weak and a company’s assets are
transferable; the company can extend its success at home to a limited number of other
markets. E.g. Asian Paints, Infosys, etc Infosys extended its information technology
services and entered North America and Europe
(3) Dodger – If globalization pressures are strong, and its assets work only at home, then
it needs to concentrate on dodging its new rivals. Companies do so by a) selling off their
stakes to multinationals, b) concentrating on their competitive advantage solely,
c) complementing the multinationals’ offerings or adapt them to local tastes, and d)
moving to the other end of the value chain.
(4) Contender – If globalization pressures are strong and its assets are transferable, the
company may actually be able to compete head-on with the multinationals at the global
level, by shedding businesses, outsourcing components previously made in-house, and
investing in new products and processes.
In India, Market forces determine the state of the emerging economy. Each of the
elements of the Institutional Context has its own Ups and Downs . These elements
change with time and are affected by the presence of intermediaries. The Ups and Downs
have their impact on a company, based on its structure – whether it is a conglomerate or a
focused company.
Product Markets
• Patent Regime changed. Regulatory Bodies monitor product quality and fraud.
TRIPS: Conforming to WTO standards of Patents and Copyrights.
Capital Markets
• With the country's 15-year-old reforms process taking effect, India is poised to be
one of the fastest growing economies. Aided by a maturing domestic market and a
high GDP growth rate, India’s stock markets are booming like never before,
which now offers Venture Capitalists the best promises of returns from the
country to date. Consistent growth in the Indian IT market also contribute to a
continued climb in VC investments, which are now available in some cities and
from the Indian Diaspora
• Since the capital markets were open to foreign investors, financial intermediaries
became more sophisticated. Better Regulation, lending facilities and better
interest rates are a natural outcome of an open economy.
• The local banking system is well developed, with easy availability of equity and
stable debt and equity market.
• Accounting Standards - Financial reporting functions well
• Bankruptcy processes exist but are inefficient. Promoters find it difficult to sell
off or shut down “sick” companies.
• There is weak monitoring by bureaucrats
Labor Markets
• The trade union movement is active and volatile, and has strong political
affiliations, thereby creating challenging conditions in the Workers Market. E.g.
The recent incident in Honda, Gurgaon.
Government Regulation
Government holds a stake in virtually every decision external to a business for any
company. Indian law requires that companies get permission for entry and exit of
business, price modifications, import and export policies, etc.
The law establishes subjective criteria for many of these decisions, so Indian bureaucrats
have a great deal of discretion in how they apply the rules.
• With economic growth the primary objective, cash inflows are being welcomed -
managing large capital flows without excessive volatility; speedy decision-
making and timely corrective action in the face of instantaneous electronic fund
transfers across the globe
• Regulations have been eased, and policies are being revisited and reviewed.
• A dynamic press and vigilant NGOs keep a check on the system
Experience and connections ensure amicable relationships with the government. Intricate
relationships between businesses and government are a norm in Emerging countries like
India. For instance, Reliance launched local tariff plans, against the law, but managed to
garner support from the government, resulting in fine-tuning of the policy.
Contract Enforcement
• Regulatory Authorities have been setup for various markets in India, to regulate
the transactions, and to enforce contracts.
• With the economy opening up, more global players would enter the market.
Therefore, greater regulation is required, which is being monitored by
independent authorities. Enforcing contracts is critical in the Indian scenario,
since a strong law and order reflects the strength of the system, and in turn, the
economy.
• The enforcement of contracts is still not effective enough to entrust confidence in
the economy by the global players. As a result, companies are less likely to be
able to resolve disputes through judicial channels.
• Political goals take priority over economic efficiencies, resulting in lack of
confidence in the economy and stunted growth. Judicial system should be
independent of the Political system at the centre, and therefore, should demand
higher autonomy.
Conglomerates are leveraging their existing setups (internal funds, brand equity, trust and
relationships) into venturing and streamlining their processes. There is a transition
happening with a move towards focusing on core competencies and outsourcing all the
secondary domains. Focused approaches would reduce gross inefficiencies, accelerate the
decision making process and also enhance entrepreneurship. When the conglomerates
would become successful in establishing themselves as global players in their core areas,
they might hive off or sell off their peripheral areas of business.
Looking ahead, the Institutional context is changing, with more confidence in the
economy and more cash inflow and financial funding of equity capital.
These conditions have accelerated the drive of Indian companies from dodger to
extender to contender (as explained in the model). The major Indian business houses are
now on the contender’s aggressive path utilizing their in-house capital and resources.
This shift may be more out of compulsion but the Indian businessmen have understood
the new emerging economic environment. An open Economy devoid of any trade barriers
with high forces of Globalization entails companies to take a focused approach.
Examples
• ONGC Videsh. It was created out of ONGC and now focuses only on oil
exploration and acquisition.
• IT Sector is refocusing on core competency.
• Jindal Stainless Ltd Jindal Stainless Ltd, a part of the $2 billion O P Jindal
group, has drawn up plans for an integrated stainless steel project in
Orissa’s Jajpur district. To be built in two phases, it will have a capacity of
1.2 million tonnes per annum.
Mergers & Acquisitions and Consolidation
This is the inorganic mode of the focused approach. Companies consolidate and grow
largest to gain larger and diverse markets shares and build a global brand. The profits and
economies of scale help them ward off tough competition.
Examples:
9 Birla firm control over Ultratech (L&T): in cement, textiles, and chemicals and in an
investment vehicle with stakes in asset management and insurance.
9 Chambal group: Its presence in fertilizers is spread across such companies as Zuari
Industries and Chambal Fertilizers. An integrated entity could provide benefits of synergy
and a higher valuation.
9 Tata Chemicals and Coromandel have emerged as integrated fertilizer companies with
portfolios comprising both urea and phosphates fertilizers.
9 IDBI and IDBI Bank
9 In textiles, Century has an integrated presence, with revenues of over Rs 1,000 crore,
strength in exports and a foray into branded garments under the `Cottons' banner
IT Industry
Pharma Sector Auto Industry
Issues: Low share in
Issues: TRIPS, Lax Issues: Foreign Players
world trade, Low to
Patent Policies, low Restructuring: New
Medium End activities,
R&D Product Segments
Lack of Products, More
Restructuring: (Tata Indica, M&M’s
focus on development
R&D, Invest in new Scorpio), Partnering
and maintenance than
molecules, Generics, for R&D, Tweaking
innovation, Lax Licensing
ANDA Approvals, existing Products. Core
Policies
Challenging Competency
Restructuring:
Innovator’s Patents Major Players: Honda,
Innovation, Low Cost to
Major Players: DRL, Tata Motors, Maruti,
Premium Product, High
Ranbaxy M&M.
end of Value Chain
Major Players: Infosys
, Wipro , TCS
Conclusion
As India moves from a delivery-driven economy to a market-driven economy, with
functional organizations giving way to Business Units, Cost-based decisions to Value-
based decisions, Global Focus needs to be reinforced, reiterating its commitment to
become a powerful nation in this knowledge century .Although the path would be full of
constraints and impediments, the wise Indian elephant would continue to lumber and
move ahead cautiously.
While the India businesses would focus on core areas and build world class products and
services, they should not forego control over their internal support functions, since
keeping the stakeholders confident of their solvency is equally critical.
Online Resources
http://www.weforum.org/pdf/SummitReports/ASIR04.pdf-Future Of The Asian Economy
http://www.asiaweek.com/asiaweek/magazine/2000/0114/forecast.wakeup.html-Asia’s Wake up Call
http://www.business-standard.com/special/bs1000/2003/bs12.htm- How Competitive is Industry?
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/businessline/2001/07/17/stories/14171806.htm- Ethical, What Business?
http://www.globalpolicy.org/globaliz/cultural/2003/0820custom.htm- India Companies are adding Western Flavour
http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/index.cfm?fa=viewArticle&id=1275&specialId=40- How R&D is changing India’s Pharma and
Auto Companies
http://www.indianembassy.org/special/cabinet/Primeminister/pm(fcci).htm- Prime Minister’s Address at FICCI
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/businessline/2001/10/31/stories/04312001.htm- Prodding People to Improve Productivity
http://www.indiainfoline.com/nevi/sopr.html-Software Products- marketing Challenges and Strategies
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/iw/2004/03/21/stories/2004032100540600.htm- Frontline Foreign Companies- Challenges
http://www.blonnet.com/iw/2005/05/01/stories/2005050100160600.htm- Restructuring in India Bigger Baskets More Goodies
http://www.jamaicans.com/articles/primecomments/strategiesforcompeting.shtml
http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Sloan-School-of-Management/15-220International-ManagementSpring2002/Syllabus/
http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/article_page.aspx?ar=1581&L2=16&L3=17&srid=17&gp=0
http://csa.iisc.ernet.in/bangit/global/power-points/nilekani.ppt
http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/12010/Dossani_Kenney.pdf
http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item.jhtml?id=1429&t=globalization
Authors:
1. Puru Gupta
#691, Sector 28
Noida – 201303
#9871924216
purugupta@gmail.com
2. Saurabh Mundhra
354 Nirman Apartments
Mayur Vihar Phase I
Delhi-110091
#9811994112
saurabh_mundhra@yahoo.com