Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plaintiff, )
vs. ) Division
) K.S.A.Chapter 60
ERIC MUATHE, )
Defendant, )
COMES NOW, the Defendant, Eric M. Muathe, as himself and Pro-Se who files this
1. Defendant incorporates, and references, the Defendant's June 14th, 2018 Motion to
2. Even after Defendant filed the previous Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Pleadings
attorney's for Plaintiff went ahead, and yet again, filed two pleadings on June 21st,
2018 in the subject matter case without sending the pleadings, or notifying
Page 1 of6
Defendant in any shape, or form, that new pleadings had been filed. See the attached
3. Defendant found out that there had been new pleadings filed when Defendant went
4. It is important to note that this is not the first time that pleadings have not been sent
to Defendant by attorneys from the same Lathrop Gage LLP law firm. Attorney
Matthew Hubbard similarly had not been mailing hard copy pleadings to Defendant
as per his certificate of services. Attorney Matthew Hubbard does not dispute
this fact. The difference being that attorney Matthew Hubbard had sent Defendant a
copy of his court fillings via email but neglected to send Defendant hard copies as
per his certificate of service. See the attached, Nov 16th, 2016, email communication.
5. Here no service of filed pleadings of any kind have been sent to Defendant since
6. Defendant recently filed attorney complaints, dated June 18th, 2018, against
Plaintiffs attorneys [ehan K. Moore, and Michael J. Abrams. The complaints were
centered on the attorneys filing pleadings in the case, and not sending Defendant
7. It should be noted that since the Defendant's June 18th, 2018 attorney complaints,
pending federal court case using priority mail. See the attached copy of the envelope
and pleading.
Page 2 of6
8. Until attorney's for Plaintiff stopped serving Defendant pleadings they had filed in
this case the record will reflect that Defendant had never missed any deadlines, or
failed to respond to any pleading in a timely manner, or failed to appear for any
example see the attached priority mail envelope, post marked June 1st, 2018, which
was sent from the Lathrop Gage LLP law firm as regards a motion to dismiss that the
law firm had filed in the above referenced federal case. This motion to dismiss (with
10. The attorney's for Plaintiff should readily be able to prove that they sent Plaintiff
any pleading via priority mail since January 25th, 2018. Of course, this will not be
possible since no mail has been sent to Plaintiff since January 25th, 2018 as has been
11. Plaintiffs attorney should easily be able to produce evidence that the summary
judgment pleadings they filed on May 30th, 2018 and May 31st, 2018 were sent to
plaintiff, assuming priority mail was utilized for voluminous mail. Of course, this will
not be possible since no mail has been sent to Plaintiff since January 25th, 2018 as
12. Defendant has yet to see any pleadings Plaintiffs attorneys failed since January
25th, 2018.
Page 3 of6
13. Kansas Rule of Professional Conduct 3.3 Advocate: Candor Toward the Tribunal
states: "a) A lawyer shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of fact or law to
a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made
14. Defendant alleges and believes that any statement by Plaintiffs attorney alleging
that they have sent Defendant any pleading since January 25th, 2018 is a bad faith
bold faced lie, and a false statement of fact - knowingly and willfully meant to
15. It is apparent that severe sanctions are needed here due to the continued failure to
serve defendant even after Defendant filed the June 18th, 2018 attorney ethics
complaints and the June 14th, 2018 motion to strike and motion for sanctions. This
is an abuse of the process and is calculated willful, bad faith, practice aimed at
winning the case without affording the opposing party an opportunity to respond.
Plaintiff requests oral arguments pursuant in part to Supreme Court Rule 133( c)(l).
Supreme Court Rule 133(c)(1) (2017 Kan. S. Ct. R. 198) provides: "A party may
party."
Page 40f6
WHEREFORE, Defendant Prays for an order striking ALL of Plaintiffs filings since
January 25th, 2018, and bar Plaintiff from refilling said pleadings, or for any other
Respectfully submitted,
By: bne- N..uJ~
Eric M. Muathe
1410 Bitner Terrace, Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762
(913) 980-7286 < muathedotcom@gmail.com >
Page 5 of6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on July 17th, 2018 the foregoing was mailed via PRIORITY mail - with
tracking - to the following address:
I certify that on July 17th, 2018 the foregoing was mailed via first class mail to the
following address:
JEHAN K. MOORE,
C/O LATHROP GAGE LLP,
2345 GRAND BLVD., STE. 2200
KANSAS CITY, MO 64108-2618
Eric M. Muathe
1410 Bitner Terrace, Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762
(913) 980-7286
muathedotcom@gmail.com
Page 6of6
7/8/2018 Office of Judicial Administration - Kansas District Court Records Search
Case Number: 86
Defendants
Party 1
IDefendant Number: 1
Description
Defense Attorney
Party 2
IDefendant Number: 2
Last Name (or Business Name): Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Tnc
First Name: Middle: Suffix:
Description
I--sex_: I_Rac_e: _
IL...T-_Ic...;ig::.l_'t_: '?_e...;.g::.h_t_: ••••
Party 3
IDefendant Number: 3
Description
https:/Iwww.kansas.gov/countyCourts/search/records?execution=e1 54 1/20
7/8/2018 Office of Judicial Administration - Kansas District Court Records Search
Action 152
Action 153
Action 154
Action 155
Action 156
Action 157
https:/Iwww.kansas.gov/countyCourts/search/records?execution=e1 s4 20/20
I
! D
i
i
[p)
r-----·-- --us POST AGE
0612912018
From 64108
0 !bs 1 ozs
ili l}(~~,.
ji~~~
II i(~tti·:.~~~?:
Pitney Bowes
II
~~l~~~k~h:
I
ill 1
111'1'" '~~~~'f't'l"~f~W~~~~'~~
I;,! :
.tf.i,r,~~~~~~~,
!I.!
022VVOOO,125203 !
I 7.on~; 1 ComPlsPrice : j'
~ . ~74206ti·1
i ERIC f\.1UATHE II
I IIIII'I! IIIIISIPI~
. III! Ildlll
IIIIIIII1
TIIIA C11'jG #
ilil. 1 Ililll
I
I
l . J
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
AT KANSAS CITY
ERIC M. MUATHE, )
)
Plaintiff, )
v. )
Case No. 2: 18-CV-02064-CM-JPO
)
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., )
)
Defendants. )
)
ORDER
Having considered Defendants' unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File their
Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, and finding
that Plaintiff has agreed to the requested extension of time and good cause has been shown for
Defendants are granted a 7-day extension of time, through and including July 19, 2018, within
which to file Defendants' Reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended
Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JUDGE
Case 2:18-cv-02064-CM-TJJ Document 16 Filed 06/29/18 Page 2 of 2
filed in good faith. Accordingly, good cause exists for the requested extension of time.
WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that the Court enter an order granting
Defendants a 7-day extension of time, until July 16,2018, within which to file Defendants'
Reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. A proposed Order
Respectfully submitted,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically
with the Court on June 29, 2018, and sent via U.S. Mail to the following:
2
Case 2:18-cv-02064-CM-TJJ Document 16 Filed 06/29/18 Page 1 of 2
~.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
AT KANSAS CITY
Defendants, by and through their attorneys, Lathrop Gage, LLP, hereby move the Court
for a 7-day extension of time within which to file Defendants' Reply in support of their Motion
to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. In support of this motion, Defendants' state and
allege as follows:
1. On June 25, 2018, Plaintiff filed his response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss
file their Reply in support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint.
Defense Counsel will be out of town next week and Defendants need additional time in order to
4. Counsel for Wells Fargo communicated with Plaintiff on June 29,20182018, via
5. This is Wells Fargo's first request for an extension of time to file its Reply in
support of its Motion to Dismiss. This request for an extension will not cause undue delay and is
29724491v5
,.- SUBMITTED BY:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that on June 29, 2018, a copy of the foregoing was sent
2
6/13/2018 Gmail - Wilmington v. Muathe: WF rfa answers, WF rfp responses, WF irag answers pdf
I have been waiting for your discovery responses via regular mail over the last few days I have NOT yet received any1hing' via regular mail as per your November 11th,
2016 certificate of service.
I have to, and will, object that there is a disturbing pattern you have now established right from the beginning where your certificates of service say you mailed a
pleading but it never arrives via regular mail, or even worse in one instant it was mailed several days well after the date stated on the certificate of service.
This is improper!
I have been busy with two federal cases and two Kansas court appeals (one moving to the KSC soon) so would like to take a look at your discovery responses but they
have NOT arrived in the mail as per your certificate of service.
Could you send the discover pleadings since I haven't received them.
Eric Muathe
[Quoted text r.idden]
"And Iherefore our contemplation of this source, as the power which we want, gives us Ihe ability 10 use that power. And the way we use this process is to contemplate
ourselves as surrounded by the conditions which we weot to produce."> Thomas Troward.
Namaste,
Eric Muathe
CEO 1 Founder
Encare Financial Inc.
http://w.w/.mt;athe.com
6/13/2018 Gmail - Wilmington v. Muathe: WF rfa answers, WF rfp responses, WF irog answers pdf
Eric:
We are fed-exing you the hard copies of the discovery pleadings and documents for overnight delivery. We get used to emailing everything these days and
sometimes forget that you have requested hard copies. Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Matt
r
From: Eric Muathe [mailto:mualhedolcom@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 1:05 PM
To: Hubbard, Matt
Subject: Re: Wilmington v. Muathe: WF rfa answers, WF rfp responses, WF irog answers pdf
This is a complaint against Kansas attorney [ehan K. Moore (KS #22081) of Lathrop
Gage LLP, 2345 Grand Blvd., Suite 2200, Kansas City, MO 64108-2618
As regards a pending Crawford County Kansas foreclose case styled Wilmington Trust N.A.,
vs Eric Muathe et al., case number 14-CV-86P ...
It has come to my attention that since January 25th, 2018 Plaintiffs attorney [ehan K
Moore has filed several pleadings with the court (including a motion for summary
judgment) WITHOUT ANY SUCH PLEADINGS/FILINGS BEING SENT TO ME - THE
DEFENDANT.
Ijust became aware of the filing of these pleadings, around June 12th, 2018, when a case
summary docket print out was attached to a pleading in a currently pending federal court
case styled Eric Muathe vs. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et a!. CASE NO. 2:18-cv-02064-CM-JTT.
The said docket printout - labeled "Exhibit B" - is attached to this complaint. Defendant is
not aware if any other pleadings have been filed by the Plaintiffs attorney since the June
1st, 2018 date of the above mentioned docket print out.
Defendant believes that - at the very least - failure to follow KS.A 60-205 violates the
Kansas rules of professional conduct - in particular rule 226 - 3.4 Advocate: Fairness to
Opposing Party and Counsel.
Respectfully submitted,
Cc:
EXHIBITB
Case 2:18-cv-02064-CM-TJJ Document 11-2 Filed 06/01/18 Page 2 of 4
5J31i2018 Case Summary
5 Show/Hice Participants
Michael J Abrams
2345 Grand Blvd., Suite 2800
Kansas City, ;vIa 64108-2684
(816) 292-2000
Otimortgage rnc
C/O The Corporation Company
https:lldistrictfi.ler.kscourts.orginotiiyicmsFuIIHislory.html?pageAction"QueryCmsFuIiHist¬iiierCaselnfold,,307157&caseNumber-=2014-CV-000086-P&companylrl=
Case 2:18-cv-02064-CM-T JJ Document 11-2 !=iled 06/01/18 Page 3 of 4
5/31/2018 Case Summary
Number: 260402
Designation of Lead CounselDocument ID Number: 261178
Plaintiffs Suggestions in Opposition To Defendants ~lotion to Dismiss Plaintiffs PetitionDocument lD Number: 261278
DeFendantsReply in Support of Defendants /·10Iionto Dismiss for Lack of Standing Document lO Number: 262228
Generated from document Case Hgmt Conf flied Feb 9, 2015
Assignment Order-Hen. Janice RusseliDocument lO Number: 268657
Letter From Elaine BradshawDocument ID Number: 268679
Letter from Judge Russellfrocument lO Number: 273382
Motion For Disqualification of Judge Plus Request For Oral ArgumentsDocument lO Number: 277243
1'1otionFor Telephonic Hearing Document lO Number: 276733
f ~'s ,•. ::'}- .2.:. J. t;" Objection to Hearing Document ID Number: 277678
Notice of Filing of Motion of Disqualification Which is AttachedDocument [D Number: 277680
Letter from Judge Wachter Document ID Number: 277342
Motion For Disqualification fo Judge Plus Affidavit in SupportDocument ID Number: 278982
Letter From Judge Robert Fleming Document ID Number: 280019
Assignment No. 14 (Ward Iimited)Document 1DNumber: 280790
).,-,-:...,
Order Granting Change of JudgeDocument lD Number: 281703
Designation of Lead Counsel Document ID Number: 282546
Assignment No 21 - Hon. Richard SmithDocument ID Number: 282840
Notice Of HearingDocument lO Number: 285712
Motion For ConbnuanceDocument ID Number: 287139
Motion For Disqualification of Judge PluSRequest for Oral ArgumentsDocument ID Number: 2871~0
['<lotionTo Determine Jurisdiction Plus Request for Oral ArgumentsDocument ID Number: 287141
Order Denying Change of Judge And Granting Request For Continuance. Copies Mailed to all parties.Document ID Number: 287332
Motion For Disqualification of Judge Plus Affidavit in Support Document ID Number: 288949
Designation of Lead Counsel Document ID Number: 295032
OrderDocument ID Number: 302145
Assignment No. 15 (Creitz Iimited)Document ID Number: 303278
Certificate of Service Document ID Number: 303884
Order For Further Rndings And Counterclaim Document IO Number: 303885
Letter From Eric MuatheDocument lD Number: 305710
Response to Requet For Clarification Document ID Number: 306073
Letter Pursuant to K5A 60 237 Objecting Premature Discovery Document ID Number: 306510
Supplemental ~1otionFor Disqualifiction Of Judge Richard Smith Document IO Number: 306970
Defendants 1'10tionto Stay Discovery Document ID Number: 308550
'·c·· Order Overruling Defendants Motion For Disqualification Document ID Number: 309806
Plaintiffs l>lemorandum In Opposition To Defeildant Eric Muathe's r-ionon To Stay Discovery Document ID Number: 309307
Notice Of HearingDocument ID Number: 313856
letter From Eric Muathe to Elaine BradshawDocument ID Number: 313928
Motion For ContinuanceDocument lO Number: 313930
Letter From Eric Nuathe to Elaine Bradshaw Document ID Number: 313932
Motion For ContinuanceDocument ID Number: 313933
Plaintiffs Response TO Defendants ~10tion For ContinuanceDocument ID Number: 314232
Plaintiffs Response to Defendants Motion For Continuililce Document lD Number: 315662
Order on Pending Motion Document ID Number: 316128
Letter Requesting Clarification and Request For 30 Day Extension to File Answer and/or CounterclaimDocument 10 Number: 317492
Clerks Fourteen Day Extention of Time To File An Answer and/or CounterclaimDocllment 10 NUmber: 317445
Letter From Eric f'1uathe Requesting "Answer/Counterclaim" To Be filed In The case AleDocument ID Number: 318081
Answer to Petition + Counterclaim Document lD Number: 318087
Order On Letter Requesting Clarlficaton and Request for 30 day extension to File Answer/or CounterclaimDocument 10 Number:
318816
Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Eric Muathe's Answer/Counterc!aim MOT: Motion (Generic),
1'1emOrandumin Support of Motion to Strike Answer and Counterclaim INF: Hemorandum
Notice of Hearing Motion to Strike NOT: Notice - No service Required
Letter Dated June 21 2016 to Clerk of the CourtDocument ID Number; 323166
Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Defendants Answer/Counter Claim Document lD Number: 323168
letter Dated June 272016 To Clerk of the CourLDocument lD Number: 323170
Amended Answer to Petition + Counterclaim Document TO Number: 323172
Military Service Affidavit AFF: Affidavit (Generic)
Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment MOT: Summary Judgment
Scheduling OrderDocument lD Number: 323998
Letter Dated July 7th 2016 to Clerk of the CaurtDocument lD Number: 324258
Objection to Proposed Scheduling OrderDocument lD Number: 324259
11t1ps:fldistrictfiler.kscourts. orglnoUfy/cmsF ullHistory.h tml ?pageAction=QueryCmsF uliH ist¬ifierCase Infold=307157 &casi?N umber=2014-CV-000086-P &compa nvld=:
Case 2:18-cv-02064-CM-TJJ Document 11-2 Filed 06/01/18 Page 4 of 4
5131{2018 Case Summary
..• )"J
Defendants Response to Plalniffs Motion for Summary Judgment Requesting Continuance or Extension of Time to Respond Under
KSA 50-256(f) with Affidavit IncorporatedDocument JD Number: 325921
Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims MOT: Dispositive
Plaintiffs Memorandum in Support of ~ltn to Dismiss Counterclaim INF: ~iemorandum
Request for Statement of Monetary Damages MOT: Motion (Genenc)
Certificate of Service INF: Information (Generic)
Motion for Sanctions and Request For Oral ArgumentsDocument LD Number: 328471
Motion To Determine the Nature and Cause of Summons and Request For Oral ArgumentsDocument LD Number: 328473
Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Defendant Eric l-1uathe's Counterclaims and Request for Oral
ArgumentsOocument ID Number: 329154
Notice of Withdrawl of Counsel And Entry of Appearance of Substituted CounselDocument ID Number: 329343
Motion for Extension of Time MOT: ~10tion (Generic)
Response To Plaintiff's Request For Statement of Monetary Damages And Request for Oral ArgumentsDocument ID Number: 329637
Notice Of HearingDocument !D Number: 330982
t~otion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Discovery Request MOT: i"iotion (Generic)
Motion to Amend Scheduling Order "'lOT: Motion (Generic)
Plaintiff's Second Motion for Extension of TIme to Answer or' Otherwise Respond NOT: Motion (Generic)
Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time ORD: Orcer- No Service Required
Order Granting Extension of TIme to Respond to Discovery Requests ORD: Order - No Service Required
Order Granting Second ~1ction for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respon ORD: Order - No Service Required
Amended Scheduling Order ORO: Order - No Service Required
Plaintiffs Unopposed Third "'1Gtion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise "'lOT: Motion (Generic)
Amended Assignment Order ORO: Order Originated by Judge
Order Granting Extension of TIme to Respond ORD: Order - No Service Required
Certificate of Service DIS: Discovery (Generic)
Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Amend the October 6, 2016, Scheduling Order MOT: Motion (Generic)
Second Amended Scheduling Order ORO: Order (Generic)
Certificete of Service 0[5: Discovery (Generic)
Moton To Strike All of Plaintiff's Out of Time Second Discovery ResponsesDocurnent!D Number: 366659
Notice of Hearing NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required
Motion to Compel Response to Discovery Document ID Number: 367924
Plaintifr's Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel NOT: Response
Defendants Objection to Proposed Order Document 10 Number: 372850
Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel and Entry of Appearance of Substituted Counsel NOT: Notice - No Sheriff Service Required
Motion to Amend Scheduling Order t40T: MO"on (Generic)
Amended Scheduling Order ORD: Order (Generic)
Defendant's Response to Piaintiffs Motion To Amend Scheduhng OrderDocument!D Number: 395135
Motion to Amend Scheduling Order "lOT: ("iotion (Generic)
Proposed Second Amended Scheduling Order ORD: Order (GeneriC)
Proposed Second Amended Scheduling Order ORD: Order (Generic)
Plaintiff Wilmington Trusts r~obon for Summary Judgment on Muathe's Counterclaim MOT: Summary Judgment
Plaintiffs Memo in Support of its t4otion for Summary Judgment INF: ~1emorandum
A INF: Exhibit
B iNF: Exhibit
C INF: Eyhibit
D INF: Exhioit
E INF: Exhibit
F INf: Exhibit
https:Jldistrictfiler.kscourts.org/notify/cmsFuIiHistory.html?pageAction=QueryCmsFuIlHist¬ifierCaselnfold=307157&caseNumber=2014-CV-OOOO86-P&companyld=
June 18th, 2018
As regards a pending Crawford County Kansas foreclose case styled Wilmington Trust N.A.,
vs Eric Muathe et at case number 14-CV-86P ...
It has come to my attention that since January 25th, 2018 Plaintiffs attorney Michael J.
Abrams has filed several pleadings with the court (including a motion for summary
judgment) WITHOUT ANY SUCH PLEADINGS/FILINGS BEING SENT TO ME - THE
DEFENDANT.
Ijust became aware of the filing of these pleadings, around June 12th, 2018, when a case
summary docket print out was attached to a pleading in a currently pending federal court
case styled Eric Muathe vs. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al. CASE NO. 2:18-cv-02064-CM-JTT.
The said docket printout - labeled "Exhibit B" - is attached to this complaint. Defendant is
not aware if any other pleadings have been filed by the Plaintiffs attorney since the June
1st, 2018 date of the above mentioned docket print out.
Defendant believes that - at the very least - failure to follow K.S.A 60-205 violates the
Kansas rules of professional conduct - in particular rule 226 - 3.4 Advocate: Fairness to
Opposing Party and Counsel.
Respectfully submitted,
Cc:
EXHIBITB
Case 2:18-cv-02064-CM-TJJ Document 11-2 Filed 06/01118 Page 2 of 4
5131/2018 Case Summary
Michael] Abrams
https:/ldistrictfiler.kscourts.orginotify/cmsFuIiHistory.html?pageAclion=QueJyCmsFuIiHist&nolifierCaselnrold=307157&caseNumber=2014-CV-000086-P&companyld=
Case 2:18-cv-02064-CM-T JJ Document 11-2 Filed 06/01/18 Page 3 of 4
5/31/2018 Case Summary
Number: 260402
Plaintiffs Suggestions in Opposition To Defendants Notion to Dismiss Plaintiffs PetilionDocument 10 Number: 261278
Defendants Reply in Support of Defendants Molion lo Dismiss for Lack of Standing Document 10 Number: 262228
Generated from document Case Mgmt Coni filed Feb 9, 2015
Assignment Order-Hon. Janice RusseliDocument ID Number: 268657
,'- _ ..• - -.- - Letter from Elaine BradshawDocument 10 Number: 268679
Letter from Judge Russel/Document ID Number: 273382
Motion For Disqualification of Judge Plus Request For Oral ArgumentsDocument 10 Number: 277243
Motion For Telephonic Hearing Document ID Number: 276733
Objection to Hearing Document ID Number: 277678
Notice of Filing of Motion of Disqualification Which is AttachedDocument ID Number: 277680
Letter from Judge Wachter Document lD Number: 277842
Motion To Determine Jurisdiction Plus Request For Oral ArgumentsDocument ID Number: 287141
Order Denying Change of Judge And Granting Request For Continuance. Copies Mailed to all parties. Document lD Number: 287332
r~otion For Disqualification of Judge Plus Affidavit in Support Document ro Number: 288949
Designation of lead Counsel oocument ID Number: 295032
Order Document lD Number: 302145
(:;'··:;'1-2\:':/' Letter Dated June 21 2016 to Clerk of the CourtDocument lD Number: 323166
Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Defendants Answer/Counter Claim Document ID Number: 323168
https:/ldistrictfiler.kscourts.orglnotifylcmsFuliHistory.html?pageAction=QueryCmsFuIiHist¬ifierCaselnfold=307157&caseNurnber=2014-CV-000086-P&companyld=
L ~HROP
GAGE
2345 GRAND BOULEVARD, SUITE 2200
KANSAS CITY, MO 64108-2618
ERIC MUATHE
1410 BITNER TERRACE
PITTSBURG, KS 66762