Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This is a NEW complaint against Kansas attorney [ehan K. Moore (KS #22081) of
Lathrop Gage LLP, 2345 Grand Blvd., Suite 2200, Kansas City, MO 64108-2618.
I recently sent a complaint, dated June 18th, 2018, against the above named attorney. The
complaint was centered on the attorney filing pleadings in the case, and not sending me
any copies of these pleadings.
Even after sending the previous attorney complaint this attorney went ahead, and yet
again, filed two pleadings on June 21st, 2018 in the subject matter case without sending
the pleadings, or notifying me in any shape, or form, that new pleadings had been
filed. See the attached summarized docket printout.
I found out that there had been new pleadings filed when I went online to check on the
case docket on July 8th, 2018.
It should be noted that since my June 18th, 2018 attorney compliant this attorney has
mailed me a four-page pleading from a separate pending federal court case using priority
mail. See the attached copy of the envelope and pleading.
It is important to note that this is not the first time that pleadings have not been sent to me
by attorneys from the same Lathrop Gage LLP law firm. Attorney Matthew Hubbard
similarly had not been mailing hard copy pleadings to me as per his certificate of services.
Attorney Matthew Hubbard does not dispute this fact. The difference being that
attorney Matthew Hubbard had sent me a copy of his court fillings via email but neglected
to send me hard copies as per his certificate of service. See the attached, Nov 16th, 2016,
email communication.
Here no service of filed pleadings of any kind have been sent to me since January
2:ith,2018.
Please investigate this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
Case Number: 86
Defendants
Party 1
IDefendant Number: 1
Description
sex; M IRace:
I
~H=e=lg=h=t=:============================================== ,-W_c...;ig:::.l_lt_: _
Defense Attorney
Party 2
IDefendant Number: 2
Description
Party 3
IDefendant Number: 3
Description
II--Scx: I_Racc; _
https:/Iwww.kansas.gov/countyCourts/searchlrecords?execution=e1 s4 1/20
7/8/2018 Office of Judicial Administration - Kansas District Court Records Search
Action 152
Action 153
Action 154
Action 155
Action 156
Action 157
https:llwww.kansas.gov/countyCourts/search/records?execution=e1 54 20/20
!
I
I
I
[p) --------------111!f.~'~~'lrr~I!.~·;l.~I/t(~
r-------
D
US POSTAGE
FD612;J"" 18
rum 64108
' I ~;!*'~:!i ,~;""}t!i~~,,{'~t'III !!
II i,tffi~i(eH~,r.tm~;:lili
'. ,
I;
L . PRIORiTvMAll2=-DAYTM -----·'1
i
1 jFHAN
Lal.hrnp MOORE
& Gage LLP ",'
-- '-;--"----1
","O~'<V"/D," l\7~_"JJ1<
I
2345 Grand B!vd, Ste 2400
Ki-J/'lsi'i<; City MO 64108-2642 0001 I LATHROP
-GAGE
2345 GRAND BOULEVARD, SUITE 2200
KANSAS CITY, MO 64108.2618
:
I
:ROO3-1
ERIC MUATHE
I 1410 BITNER TER
ERIC MUATHE
PITTSBURG KS 66762-6146
I 1410 BITNER TERRACE
!
i IIi II 11'111,I I Ii I 111111111
'1Ill!l! .
III JII "1i:
98.~.!.?_~i~~o.'~!..._~"_."
L."~=,,,_•.~,._-,..•~.._.~~.I!.~§~~~~
I.._-_._- ----_., .. JI
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
AT KANSAS CITY
ERIC M. MUATHE, )
)
Plaintiff, )
v. )
Case No.2: 18-CV -02064-CM-JPO
)
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., )
)
Defendants. )
)
ORDER
Having considered Defendants' unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File their
Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, and finding
that Plaintiff has agreed to the requested extension of time and good cause has been shown for
Defendants are granted a 7-day extension of time, through and including July 19, 2018, within
which to file Defendants' Reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended
Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JUDGE
Case 2:18-cv-02064-CM-T JJ Document 16 Filed 06/29118 Page 2 of 2
'Co.. filed in good faith. Accordingly, good cause exists for the requested extension of time.
WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that the Court enter an order granting
Defendants a 7-day extension of time, until July 16,2018, within which to file Defendants'
Reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. A proposed Order
Respectfully submitted,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically
with the Court on June 29, 2018, and sent via U.S. Mail to the following:
2
?07?<1<10Iv';
Case 2:18-cv-02064-CM-TJJ Document 16 Filed 06/29118 Page 1 of 2
ERIC M. MUATHE, )
)
Plaintiff, )
v. )
Case No. 2:l8-CV-02064-CM-JPO
)
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., )
)
Defendants. )
)
Defendants, by and through their attorneys, Lathrop Gage, LLP, hereby move the Court
for a 7-day extension of time within which to file Defendants' Reply in support of their Motion
to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. In support of this motion, Defendants' state and
allege as follows:
l. On June 25, 2018, Plaintiff filed his response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss
3. Defendants respectfully request a 7-day extension of time, until July 16, 2018, to
file their Reply in support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint.
Defense Counsel will be out of town next week and Defendants need additional time in order to
4. Counsel for Wells Fargo communicated with Plaintiff on June 29,20182018, via
5. This is Wells Fargo's first request for an extension of time to file its Reply in
support of its Motion to Dismiss. This request for an extension will not cause undue delay and is
29724491v5
- SUBMITTED BY:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that on June 29, 2018, a copy of the foregoing was sent
2
6/13/2018 Gmail - Wilmington v. Muathe: WF rfa answers, WF rfp responses, WF irog answers pdf
I have been waiting for your discovery responses via regular mail over the last few days I have NOT yet received anything' via regular mail as per your November 11 tho
2016 certificate of service.
I have to, and will, object that there is a disturbing pattern you have now established right from the beginning where your certificates of service say you mailed a
pleading but it never arrives via regular mail, or even worse in one instant it was mailed several days well after the date stated on the certificate of service.
This is improper!
I have been busy with two federal cases and two Kansas court appeals (one moving to the KSC soon) so would like to take a look at your discovery responses but they
have NOT arrived in the mail as per your certificate of service.
Could you send the discover pleadings since I haven't received them.
Eric Muathe
[Ouoted text hidden]
"And therefore our contemplation of this source, as the power which we want, gives us the ability 10 use Ihal power. And the way we use this process is to contemplate
ourselves as surrounded by the conditions which we want to produce."· Thomas Troward.
Namaste.
Eric Muathe
CEO I Founder
Encare Financial Inc.
http://w.~.J.mualhe.com
6/13/2018 Gmail - Wilmington v. Muathe: WF rfa answers, WF rfp responses, WF irag answers pdf
Eric:
We are fed-exing you the hard copies of the discovery pleadings and documents for overnight delivery. We get used to emailing everything these days and
sometimes forget that you have requested hard copies. Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Matt
r
From: Eric Muathe [mailto:muathedotcom@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 1:05 PM
To: Hubbard, Matt
Subject: Re: Wilmington v. Muathe: WF rfa answers, WF rfp responses, WF irog answers pdf