Professional Documents
Culture Documents
THE range of bactericidal and bacteriostatic antibiotics available for topical and
systemic use during the last few years has been increasing. With their use,
however, the resistance of micro-organisms has increased in ratio and so amplified
that the maintenance of sterilisation of burns and large traumatic skin losses is
still an incompletely solved problem. The number of new antibiotics shows how
difficult it is to keep pace with the growing resistance and maintain a protective
cover against bacterial invasion. The use of antibiotics is also connected with a
recrudescence in the degree and severity of infections. As pointed out by Clarkson
(1963), four out of every five deaths from burns can still be ascribed to generalised
infection or septicmmia. Tumbusch et al. (1962) found that in sixty-three
hospitalised cases of burns, there was a 5o per cent. mortality due to Staphylococcus
aureus septicmmia and IOO per cent. mortality within forty-eight hours due to
pseudomonas septicmmia. Every extensive infected burn can therefore be
considered as being an open door allowing infection to penetrate into the deeper
layers.
Fortunately, because of the excellence of the blood supply, facial burns do not
usually result in full-thickness destruction of the skin. Conservative management
of the burned area is therefore often successful. The povidone-iodine spray was
found to be of great help in obtaining a marked decrease in the picture of mixed
bacterial flora, and in the rate of infection, thus enabling wounds to heal quickly
and with as little impairment as possible.
Skin Grafting.--Skin grafts are taken after consideration of the area burned,
or the part of it planned to be desloughed. The defects are covered by means of
big sheets in one or more pieces or by strip grafting. The former method is more
easily done when the defect is small and there is adequate skin available, and the
results are more likely to be cosmetically acceptable. The latter procedure,
however, is the only way when dealing with large areas of skin loss, or where there
is any doubt about infection of the area to be grafted. The amount of skin grafts
saved in this way is considerable as it covers a much larger surface, and also limits
infection or necrosis to definite parts, and allows one to alternate homografts with
autografts. Immediate skin grafting of the desloughed area is sometimes impossible
because oozing from the wound would result in the development of seromata and
possible loss of the grafts. Delayed skin grafting can easily be performed in the
ward by specially trained staff and with the necessary precautions for asepsis.
Superficial infection was effectively controlled by the use of povidone-iodine spray
on the grafted area. It also did not interfere with the viability of skin grafts or
delay healing, thus confirming the opinion of others (Georgiade et al., I958 ;
Games et al., I959).
seven patients revealed a progressive resistance to these, and most of the common
antibiotics. Nine patients were treated on admission with povidone-iodine, and
six of these, although they had never had treatment with an antibiotic spray,
developed resistance against these antibiotics. This is of particular interest for
it shows the apparent existence of resistant groups of bacteria in normal hospital
conditions.
Within twenty-four hours following the use of povidone-iodine spray, a change
was noticed in the appearance of the wound; a dry film covered the burn when
treated initially with povidone-iodine spray, sealing it off from surrounding tissues.
In infected burns pus secretion was inhibited and normal red granulation tissues
,developed within a few days. Direct examination showed a reduced number of
pus cells accompanied by a lower count of micro-organisms. In some cases the
profuse mixed growth consisted of coagulase-positive staphylococci, Pseudomonas
pyocyaneae, proteus and hmmolytic streptococci, and this was reduced to one group
of coagulase-positive staphylococci after the use of povidone-iodine. These
coagulase-positive staphylococci were the most common infective organisms, and
although considerably reduced in number by povidone-iodine, could always be
traced in infected areas. Their presence, however, did not interfere with the
"taking " of skin grafts, and this was in accordance with the p H of the defects.
The surgical cases showed a greater variety in the type of micro-organisms,
and the extensive lacerations developed a mixed profuse growth of Staphylococcus
aureus, Pyocyaneus, Bacillus coli, Proteus, and hmmolytic streptococci.
Case 21, a pregnant woman who was involved in an accident and sustained
complete degloving of the leg from knee to foot, with concomitant fractures of the
pelvis, spine, and ribs, is a typical example of mixed growth and of the effect of
povidone-iodine on it. Culture grew Staphylococcus aureus and Pyocyaneus on
28th April 1963. Although the wound was sprayed twice daily with neomycin,
bacitracin, and colomycin, culture on 6th May 1963 revealed infection with
Bacillus coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pyocyaneus. Starting on 9th May 1963,
povidone-iodine was sprayed on the infected area, and culture on I3th May 1963
showed that all the micro-organisms were eliminated with the exception of
Staphylococcus aureus. This culture was repeated on 25th May 1963 and showed
Staphylococcus aureus resistant to neomycin and bacitracin, but the appearance of
the wound had improved so much that it was possible to graft the defects successfully
after a few days.
Initial treatment with a topical antibiotic spray was carried out in seven
patients until resistance appeared. Treatment was therefore discontinued and
povidone-iodine substituted and the healing period was considerably shortened.
Seven patients were treated from the outset with povidone-iodine spray and
healing was uneventful ; five of these were contaminated by antibiotic-resistant
bacteria, one of which did not show any infection clinically, and there was no
bacterial growth in another.
CONCLUSIONS
The cases presented here are small in number but the results suggest that the
new non-toxic germicidal agent Betadine (povidone-iodine) is able to control
infection and protect epithelial growth when used in the treatment of burns and
traumatic skin losses. It has the advantage over antibiotic skin sprays in that it
2C
150 BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY
is not subject to potential resistances and is effective even when the antibiotic
sprays have become ineffective.
SUMMARY
The management of burns and skin trauma with topical antibiotics is proving
to be progressively less satisfactory. Cultures and sensitivity tests revealed in
most patients a growing resistance to locally applied antibiotics. Resistant groups
of micro-organisms were found in patients who had not previously been treated
with common antibiotic sprays. Cross-infection under normal hospital conditions
emphasises the need for a germicidal agent which is itself not subject to potential
resistance. Povidone-iodine aerosol spray was used as a microbiocidal agent in
an attempt to lower the incidence of infection. This treatment reduced infection
to a minimum, and the range of micro-organisms was lowered to one group of"
Staphylococcus aureus.
Treatment was found to be most effective when povidone-iodine was used
immediately after injury. Crust formation following topical spray provided a
protective cover against infection, and allowed the injured epithelium to heal in
an ideal environment. Povidone-iodine aerosol spray and antiseptic solution are
now used routinely for every plastic surgical procedure.
REFERENCES
BOGASH, R. C. (1956). Bull. Amer. Soc. Hosp. Pharm., 13, 226.
CANTOR, A., and SttELANSKI, H. A. (1951). Pamphlet on " Further Considerations of
Gerrninicidal Capacity Testing."
CLARKSON, P. (I963). Brit. J. Surg., 5o, 457-
COrn)ICE, ]. W. V., SUESS, J. E., and SCUDDER, J. (1953). Surg. Gynec. Obstet., 97,
39 and 361.
DUTTMANN, G. (1941). Zbl. Chit., 12, 53o.
GARNES, A. L., DAVIDSON, E., TAYLOR, L. E., FELIX, A. J., SHIDLOVSKY, B. A., and
PRIGOT, A. (1959). Amer. J. Surg., 97, 49.
GEORGIADE, N., EIRING, A., GEORGIADE, R,, RICHARD, FL., and PICKRELL, K. (I958).
Plast. reconstr. Surg., 21, 459-
GEORGIADE, N. G., MATTON, G. E., and yon KESSEL, F. (I962), Plast. reconstr. Surg.,
29, 648,
HECttT, W. G., and WEESE, H. (1943). Mftnch. reed. Wschr., 90, II.
JORESS, S. M. (I962). Ann. Surg., 155 , 296.
LOWBURY, E. J. L., LILLY, H. A., and BULL, J. P. (1963). Brit. reed. J., I, 1251.
SCHULZ, E. (1941). Dtsch. reed. Wschr., 67, 779.
SHELANSKI, H. A., and SHELANSKI, M. V. (1956). J. int. CoIL Surg., 25, 727 •
TUMBUSCH, W. T., VOGEL, E. M., BUTKIEWlCZ, J. V., GRABER, C. D., LARSON, O. L., a n d
MITCHELL, E. T. (1962). " Report of the Proceedings of the First International
Congress on Research in Burns," p. 235. Washington : National Research Council.
WEESE, H. (1948). Die Pharmazie, 8, 337.