Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Equipment may be classified according to the way in which forces are applied, as follows (Rumpf, loc. cit.):
1. Between two solid surfaces (Fig. 20-20a, crushing or attrition; Fig. 20-20b, shearing; Fig. 20-20c, crushing in a
particle bed)
2. Impact at one solid surface (Fig. 20-20d), or between particles (Fig. 20-20e)
3. By shear action of the surrounding medium (Fig. 20-20f, colloid mill)
4. Nonmechanical introduction of energy (Thermal shock, explosive shattering, electrohydraulic)
ROLL CRUSHERS
Once popular for coarse crushing, these devices long ago lost favor to gyratory and jaw crushers because of their
poorer wear characteristics with hard rocks. Roll crushers are still commonly used for both primary and
secondary crushing of coal and other friable rocks such as oil shale and phosphate. The roll surface is smooth,
corrugated, or toothed, depending on the application. Smooth rolls tend to wear ring-shaped corrugations that
interfere with particle nipping, although some designs provide a mechanism to move one roll from side to side to
spread the wear. Corrugated rolls give a better bite to the feed, but wear is still a problem. Toothed rolls are still
practical for rocks of not too high silica content, since the teeth can be regularly resurfaced with hard steel by
electric-arc welding. Toothed rolls are frequently used for crushing coal and chemicals. The capacity of roll
crushers is calculated from the ribbon theory, Q = dLs/2.96 ; where Q = capacity, cm3/min; d = distance
between rolls, cm; L = length of rolls, cm; and s = peripheral speed, cm/min. The denominator becomes 1728 in
engineering units for Q in cubic feet per minute, d and L in inches, and s in inches per minute. The actual capacity
of the crusher depends on roll diameter, feed irregularities, and hardness and varies between 25 and 75 percent
of theoretical capacity. Sturtevant two-roll crushers are available in capacities from 2 to 30 hp (1.5 to 22 kW).
ROLL PRESS
A novel comminution device, the roll press, has achieved commercial success. It is used for fine crushing,
replacing the function of a coarse ball mill or of tertiary crushers. Unlike ordinary roll crushers which crush
individual particles, the roll press is choke fed and acts on a thick stream or ribbon of feed. Particles are crushed
mostly against other particles, so wear is very low. Energy efficiency is also greater than in ball mills. In cement
clinker milling, wear is usually from 0.1 to 0.8 g/ton, and for cement raw materials it is between 0.2 and 1.2
g/ton, whereas it may be 20- to 40-in ball mills. New surface of 100 to 130 cm2/g is produced with cement. The
size of the largest feed particles should not exceed 0.04 × roll diameter (D). However, it has been found that
particles as large as 3–4 times the roll gap may be fed to an industrial press.
IMPACT BREAKERS
Impact breakers include heavy-duty hammer crushers and rotor impact breakers. Not all rocks shatter well by
impact. Impact breaking is best suited for the reduction of relatively nonabrasive and low-silica-content
materials such as limestone, dolomite, anhydrite, shale, and cement rock, the most popular application being on
limestone.
TUMBLING MILLS
Ball, pebble, rod, tube, and compartment mills have a cylindrical or conical shell, rotating on a horizontal axis,
and are charged with a grinding medium such as balls of steel, flint, or porcelain or with steel rods. The ball mill
differs from the tube mill by being short in length; its length, as a rule, is not far from its diameter. Feed to ball
mills can be as large as 2.5 to 4 cm (1 to 1a in) for very fragile materials, although the top size is generally 1 cm (a
in). Most ball mills operate with a reduction ratio of 20 to 200:1. The largest balls are typically 13 cm (5 in) in
diameter. The tube mill is generally long in comparison with its diameter, uses smaller balls, and produces a finer
product. The compartment mill consists of a cylinder divided into two or more sections by perforated partitions;
preliminary grinding takes place at one end and finish grinding at the discharge end. These mills have a length-to-
diameter ratio in excess of 2 and operate with a reduction ratio of up to 600:1. Rod mills deliver a more uniform
granular product than other revolving mills while minimizing the percentage of fines, which are sometimes
detrimental. Design The conventional type of batch mill consists of a cylindrical steel shell with flat steel-flanged
heads. Mill length is equal to or less than the diameter. Ball mills usually have liners which are replaceable when
they wear. At low speeds the charge may surge from side to side without actually tumbling; at higher speeds
tumbling with oscillation occurs. The use of lifters prevents this. Power consumption in a smooth mill depends in
a complex way on operating conditions such as feed viscosity, whereas it is more predictable in a mill with lifters.
Liner wear increases with the size, hardness, and sharpness of feed more than with ball size. Several studies
indicate that wear increases at least proportional to the square of mill speed in percent of critical. Both all-
rubber liners, and rubber liners with metal lifter bars are currently used in large ball mills. Both types have
rubber-liner plates, separated and held in place by lifter bars. Rubber liners have the following advantages:
Abrasion and impact resistance, 15 percent lower weight than steel, which makes replacement easier, lower
noise, and tight sealing against the shell. Lifters must be at least as high as the ball radius, to key the ball charge
and assure that the balls fall into the toe area of the mill. The criterion by which the ball action in mills of various
sizes may be compared is the concept of critical speed. It is the theoretical speed at which the centrifugal force
on a ball in contact with the mill shell at the height of its path equals the force on it due to gravity: Nc = 42.3/√D
where Nc is the critical speed, r/min, and D is diameter of the mill, m (ft), for a ball diameter that is small with
respect to the mill diameter. The numerator becomes 76.6 when D is expressed in feet.
Actual mill speeds range from 65 to 80 percent of critical. It might be generalized that 65 to 70 percent is
required for fine wet grinding in viscous suspension and 70 to 75 percent for fine wet grinding in low-viscosity
suspension and for dry grinding of large particles up to 1-cm (a-in) size. The speeds might be increased by 5
percent of critical for un baffled mills to compensate for slip. The chief factors determining the size of grinding
balls are fineness of the material being ground and maintenance cost for the ball charge. A coarse feed requires
a larger ball than a fine feed. The need for a calculated ball-size feed distribution is open to question; however,
methods have been proposed for calculating a rationed ball charge. The recommended optimum size of makeup
rods and balls is:
Where Db = rod or ball diameter, cm (in); D = mill diameter, m (ft); Ei is the work
index of the feed; nr is speed, percent of critical; ρs is feed specific gravity; and K is a constant = 214 for rods and
143 for balls. The constant K becomes 300 for rods and 200 for balls when Db and D are expressed in inches and
feet respectively. This formula gives reasonable results for production-sized mills but not for laboratory mills. The
ratio between the recommended ball and rod sizes is 1.23. Rod diameter may range from 10 to 2.5 cm (4 to 1 in)
Since the medium expands as the mill is rotated, the actual running volume is unknown. Ball mills have a large
field of application for wet grinding in closed circuit with size classifiers, which also perform advantageously wet.
In wet ball milling the grinding rate increases with solids content up to 70 wt % (35 vol %), due to pulp rheology.
Size Analysis
Reference: Perry’s Handbook for Chemical Engineers; Richardson & Coulson (V-2, E-5).
GAUARV CHUGH