3.

What do we learn about Sam Houston’s IDENTITY by looking at this

Sam Houston Primary Source Investigation painting?
On April 21, 1836, in the wake of the defeats at the Alamo and Goliad, Texas
soldiers assembled a surprise attack on Mexican General Antonio López de Santa 4. Complete the hashtag based on the painting:
Anna and the Mexican Army. Led by Texas General Sam Houston, the victory at the #TexansAre____________________________________
Battle of San Jacinto concluded the Texas Revolution. This oil-on-canvas work, The
Surrender of Santa Anna, by artist William Henry Huddle, depicts the morning
after—April 22, 1836. The defeated Santa Anna, dressed in the white pants of a
private, is brought to the wounded and reclining General Houston. Other important
historical figures shown in the painting include the famous Texas scout Erastus Your Answers
"Deaf" Smith (bottom right with rifle), Secretary of War Thomas Jefferson Rusk Take a close look:

Content
(leaning against tree), and Colonel Mirabeau B. Lamar (behind Rusk), who later What is happening?
Who is portrayed?
became the second president of the Republic of Texas.
What is said about them?
Does it tell the whole story?
Is there any information about who
created it, or when and where it was
created?

Origin
Caption, date, or publisher?
If not, examine content for clues. What
is the context of this image? What was
going on at the time?
What was the purpose of this image?
Who was this source meant for? What
events, conditions or grievances might

Motive
have inspired the creation of your
image?
How are these things portrayed? What
does your source have to say about the
context in which it was created?
Does the source present a fair depiction
of people, events or conditions?
Or does it mislead by presenting false
or exaggerated information? Do you
Analysis

think the source represents the views of

1. Who do you think drew this image – a supporter of Texas or a a majority of people – or the views and
supporter of Mexico? What’s your evidence of this? attitudes of a smaller group?
Does it mislead people in any way?
Does it glorify a particular leader while
ignoring their faults or failures?
2. How would the other perspective have changed how this might
have been drawn?