1) Petitioners engaged in jewelry business and regularly sold items to respondent Brigida Luz. Respondent Narciso Deganos received several pieces of jewelry from petitioners totaling P382,816, which he was supposed to sell and remit the proceeds.
2) Deganos only remitted P53,207 and did not return any unsold items. Petitioners sued Deganos and Luz, claiming Deganos acted as Luz's agent. Luz denied authorizing Deganos or receiving any items.
3) The court found no agency relationship was created since Luz did not consent to or authorize Deganos' acts. Only Deganos was liable for damages
1) Petitioners engaged in jewelry business and regularly sold items to respondent Brigida Luz. Respondent Narciso Deganos received several pieces of jewelry from petitioners totaling P382,81…