Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ANUJ JINDAL
WWW.ANUJJINDAL.IN
ECONOMIC SURVEY VOLUME 1 CHAPTER 6
CHAPTER-6
CLIMATE, CLIMATE CHANGE, AND AGRICULTURE
THEME
This chapter pursues three objectives - first, to document the effect of changes in climactic
patterns on temperature and rainfall. Second, to estimate the effects of fluctuations in weather
on agricultural productivity. And finally, to use these short-run estimates in conjunction with
predicted changes in climate over the long-run to arrive at estimates of the impact of global
warming on Indian agriculture. In the end, some policy implications have been given for Indian
agriculture.
OVERVIEW
As per Sir Arthur Lewis- economic development is always and everywhere about getting
people out of agriculture.
Agriculture cannot be the permanent source of livelihood due to its productivity level.
Transition requires higher productivity in agriculture to produce greater food supplies,
provide rising farm incomes and permit accumulation of human capital.
(b) Days with extremely high and low temperatures- Rise in the number of days with extremely
high temperatures, and a corresponding decline in the number of days with low
temperatures.
▪ Temperature increases have been particularly felt in the North-East, Kerala, Tamil
Nadu, Kerala, Rajasthan and Gujarat. On the other hand, Punjab, Odisha and Uttar
Pradesh have been the least affected.
▪ Rainfall deficiencies are more concentrated in UP, North-East, and Kerala,
Chattisgarh and Jharkhand. While, there has actually been an increase in
precipitation in Gujarat, Odisha and Andhra Pradesh.
Thus, spatially temperature increases and rainfall declines seem to be weakly
correlated.
IMPACT OF WEATHER ON AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY
The two key findings:
1. The impact of temperature and rainfall is highly non-linear and felt almost only when
temperature increases and rainfall shortfalls are extreme.
2. Extreme shocks have highly divergent effects between unirrigated (defined as districts where
less than 50 percent of cropped area is irrigated) and irrigated areas, almost twice as high in the
former compared to the latter.
Crop impacts - crops grown in rainfed areas - pulses in both kharif and rabi—are vulnerable to
weather shocks while the cereals—both rice and wheat—are relatively more immune.
• Temperature increases have been particularly felt in the North-East, Kerala, Tamil Nadu,
Kerala, Rajasthan and Gujarat. Parts of India, for example, Punjab, Odisha and Uttar
Pradesh have been the least affected.
• Increase in precipitation in Gujarat and Odisha and also Andhra Pradesh have been
noticed
Crop Impacts:
• Once again, largest adverse effects of weather shocks are felt in unirrigated areas.
• In a year where temperatures are 1°C higher farmer incomes would fall by 6.2% during the
kharif season and 6% during rabi in un-irrigated districts.
• 1°C increase in temperature would reduce agricultural growth by 1.7%, and a 100 mm reduction
in rain would reduce growth by 0.35%.
• Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), predict that temperatures in India are likely
to rise by 3-4° C by the end of the 21st century.
• Farmer income losses from climate change could be between 15 % and 18 % on average, rising
to anywhere between 20 % and 25 % in un-irrigated areas.
• On one hand, shocks reduce yields but on the other, lower supply should increase local prices.
But results indicate that the “supply shock” dominates – reductions in yields lead to reduced
revenues.
• A study by the IMF (2017) finds that for emerging market economies a 1 degree Celsius increase
in temperature would reduce agricultural growth by 1.7% and a 100 mm reduction in rain
would reduce growth by 0.35%
• Climate change models predict that temperatures in India are likely to rise by 3-4 degree
Celsius by the end of the 21th century. It implies that in the absence of any adaptation by
farmers and any change in policy (such as irrigation), farm incomes will be lower by around 12%
on an average in the coming years. Unirrigated areas will be the most severely affected, with
potential losses amounting to 18% of annual revenue.
• As per the observed decline in precipitation over the last 3 decades, farm incomes will decline
by 12% for kharif crops and 5.4% for Rabi crops.
• Models of climate change also predict an increase in the variability of rainfall in the long-run,
with a simultaneous increase in both the number of dry-days as well as days of very high rainfall.
This channel alone would imply a decrease in farm incomes by 1.2 percent.
• At least 3 main channels through which climate change would impact farm incomes- an increase
in average temperatures, a decline in average rainfall and increase in the number of dry-days.
• Taking into account, correlation among 3 channels, there are stark findings: farmer income
losses from climate change could be between 15% and 18% on average, rising to anywhere
between 20% and 25% in unirrigated areas.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
“more crop per drop” campaign should be accorded greater priority in resource allocation. The
power subsidy needs to be replaced by DBT so that power use can be fully costed and water
conservation furthered.
• Need to embrace agricultural science and technology- It will not only be vital in increasing yields
but also in increasing reliance to all the pathologies that climate change threatens to bring in its
wake: extreme heat and precipitation, pests, and crop disease, especially important for crops
such as pulses and soyabean that are most vulnerable.
• Use of weather based models- such as drones and building on the current crop insurance
program (Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana) to determine losses and compensate farmers
within weeks.
CONCUSIONS
India needs bottom up planning and benevolent-and-strategic top-down planning and reforms.
The cooperative federalism model of the GST Council that brings together the Center and States
could be promisingly deployed to further agricultural reforms and durably raise farmers’
incomes.