Age * Value_compare_to_cost_of_production Crosstabulation

Value_compare_to_cost_of_production

a. b. d. Output e.
200%>expenses 100%>expenses c. 50%>expenses =exenses Output<expenses Total

Age a. Below 25 Count 15 6 9 0 0 30

% within Age 50.0% 20.0% 30.0% .0% .0% 100.0%

b. 25-35 Count 15 15 7 7 0 44

% within Age 34.1% 34.1% 15.9% 15.9% .0% 100.0%

c. 35-45 Count 7 23 24 20 3 77

% within Age 9.1% 29.9% 31.2% 26.0% 3.9% 100.0%

d. 45-55 Count 11 12 27 22 7 79
% within Age 13.9% 15.2% 34.2% 27.8% 8.9% 100.0%

e. Above 55 Count 1 4 16 1 8 30

% within Age 3.3% 13.3% 53.3% 3.3% 26.7% 100.0%

Total Count 49 60 83 50 18 260

% within Age 18.8% 23.1% 31.9% 19.2% 6.9% 100.0%

Education * Value_compare_to_cost_of_production Crosstabulation

Value_compare_to_cost_of_production

a. b. d. Output e.
200%>expenses 100%>expenses c. 50%>expenses =exenses Output<expenses Total

Education a. No education Count 18 21 36 24 3 102

% within Education 17.6% 20.6% 35.3% 23.5% 2.9% 100.0%

b. Up to primary Count 18 26 32 21 8 105

% within Education 17.1% 24.8% 30.5% 20.0% 7.6% 100.0%

c. Secondary Count 2 10 7 5 7 31

% within Education 6.5% 32.3% 22.6% 16.1% 22.6% 100.0%

d. College Count 5 3 8 0 0 16

% within Education 31.3% 18.8% 50.0% .0% .0% 100.0%

e. university Count 6 0 0 0 0 6

% within Education 100.0% .0% .0% .0% .0% 100.0%

Total Count 49 60 83 50 18 260

% within Education 18.8% 23.1% 31.9% 19.2% 6.9% 100.0%

 family_member_involed_with_cultivation * Value_compare_to_cost_of_production Crosstabulation

Value_compare_to_cost_of_production

e.
a. b. c. d. Output Output<expense
200%>expenses 100%>expenses 50%>expenses =exenses s Total

family_member_involed_with a. Only one Count 28 14 37 26 7 112

_cultivation % within 25.0% 12.5% 33.0% 23.2% 6.3% 100.0%
family_member_involed_with
_cultivation

b. two members Count 16 24 31 13 3 87

% within 18.4% 27.6% 35.6% 14.9% 3.4% 100.0%

family_member_involed_with
_cultivation

c. 3-5 Count 5 20 10 11 8 54

% within 9.3% 37.0% 18.5% 20.4% 14.8% 100.0%

family_member_involed_with
_cultivation

d. More than 5 Count 0 2 4 0 0 6

% within .0% 33.3% 66.7% .0% .0% 100.0%

family_member_involed_with
_cultivation

e. Not mentioned Count 0 0 1 0 0 1

% within .0% .0% 100.0% .0% .0% 100.0%

family_member_involed_with
_cultivation
Total Count 49 60 83 50 18 260
% within 18.8% 23.1% 31.9% 19.2% 6.9% 100.0%
family_member_involed_with
_cultivation

Profession_before_become_a_farmer * Value_compare_to_cost_of_production Crosstabulation

Value_compare_to_cost_of_production

a. b. e.
200%>expense 100%>expense c. d. Output Output<expens
s s 50%>expenses =exenses es Total
Profession_before_become a. Student Count 23 10 5 2 0 40
_a_farmer % within 57.5% 25.0% 12.5% 5.0% .0% 100.0%
Profession_before_become
_a_farmer

b. Worker/daylabor/ other Count 4 24 32 12 0 72

% within 5.6% 33.3% 44.4% 16.7% .0% 100.0%

Profession_before_become
_a_farmer

c. Small businessmen Count 15 19 27 16 0 77

% within 19.5% 24.7% 35.1% 20.8% .0% 100.0%

Profession_before_become
_a_farmer

d. Other Count 7 6 14 13 18 58

% within 12.1% 10.3% 24.1% 22.4% 31.0% 100.0%

Profession_before_become
_a_farmer

e. No other profession Count 0 1 5 7 0 13

% within .0% 7.7% 38.5% 53.8% .0% 100.0%

Profession_before_become
_a_farmer
Total Count 49 60 83 50 18 260

% within 18.8% 23.1% 31.9% 19.2% 6.9% 100.0%

Profession_before_become
_a_farmer

Proportion_of_land * Value_compare_to_cost_of_production Crosstabulation

Value_compare_to_cost_of_production

a. b. d. Output e.
200%>expenses 100%>expenses c. 50%>expenses =exenses Output<expenses Total

Proportion_of_land a. 100% Count 16 16 14 8 7 61

% within Proportion_of_land 26.2% 26.2% 23.0% 13.1% 11.5% 100.0%

b. 75-100% Count 20 30 46 17 11 124

% within Proportion_of_land 16.1% 24.2% 37.1% 13.7% 8.9% 100.0%

c. 50-75% Count 13 10 21 25 0 69
% within Proportion_of_land 18.8% 14.5% 30.4% 36.2% .0% 100.0%

d. 25-50% Count 0 4 2 0 0 6
 % within Proportion_of_land .0% 66.7% 33.3% .0% .0% 100.0%
Total Count 49 60 83 50 18 260

% within Proportion_of_land 18.8% 23.1% 31.9% 19.2% 6.9% 100.0%

Caltivation * Value_compare_to_cost_of_production Crosstabulation

Value_compare_to_cost_of_production

a. b. d. Output e.
200%>expenses 100%>expenses c. 50%>expenses =exenses Output<expenses Total

Caltivation a. Own land Count 27 31 32 12 18 120

% within Caltivation 22.5% 25.8% 26.7% 10.0% 15.0% 100.0%

b. Crop exchange Count 4 7 38 12 0 61

% within Caltivation 6.6% 11.5% 62.3% 19.7% .0% 100.0%

c. Share cropping Count 15 22 11 26 0 74

% within Caltivation 20.3% 29.7% 14.9% 35.1% .0% 100.0%

d. sharecropping trilateral Count 3 0 2 0 0 5

% within Caltivation 60.0% .0% 40.0% .0% .0% 100.0%

Total Count 49 60 83 50 18 260

% within Caltivation 18.8% 23.1% 31.9% 19.2% 6.9% 100.0%

Purpose_to_cultivate * Value_compare_to_cost_of_production Crosstabulation

Value_compare_to_cost_of_production

a. e.
200%>expense b. c. d. Output Output<expense
s 100%>expenses 50%>expenses =exenses s Total

Purpose_to_cultivate a. Relased from Count 30 23 59 39 18 169

unemployment % within 17.8% 13.6% 34.9% 23.1% 10.7% 100.0%
Purpose_to_cultivate

b. commercialized cultivation Count 7 31 20 10 0 68

% within 10.3% 45.6% 29.4% 14.7% .0% 100.0%

Purpose_to_cultivate

3. Paternal profession Count 7 4 4 1 0 16

% within 43.8% 25.0% 25.0% 6.3% .0% 100.0%

Purpose_to_cultivate

4. To strengthen ownership Count 5 2 0 0 0 7

 % within 71.4% 28.6% .0% .0% .0% 100.0%
Purpose_to_cultivate
Total Count 49 60 83 50 18 260

% within 18.8% 23.1% 31.9% 19.2% 6.9% 100.0%

Purpose_to_cultivate

Hours * Value_compare_to_cost_of_production Crosstabulation

Value_compare_to_cost_of_production

a. b. d. Output e.
200%>expenses 100%>expenses c. 50%>expenses =exenses Output<expenses Total

Hours a. Up to 4 hours Count 12 11 9 0 0 32

% within Hours 37.5% 34.4% 28.1% .0% .0% 100.0%

b. 4-6 hours Count 7 20 24 24 0 75

% within Hours 9.3% 26.7% 32.0% 32.0% .0% 100.0%

c. 6-8 hours Count 13 24 34 26 0 97

% within Hours 13.4% 24.7% 35.1% 26.8% .0% 100.0%

d. 8-10 hours Count 14 5 16 0 0 35

% within Hours 40.0% 14.3% 45.7% .0% .0% 100.0%

e. 10-12 hours Count 3 0 0 0 18 21

% within Hours 14.3% .0% .0% .0% 85.7% 100.0%

Total Count 49 60 83 50 18 260

% within Hours 18.8% 23.1% 31.9% 19.2% 6.9% 100.0%

Liking * Value_compare_to_cost_of_production Crosstabulation

Value_compare_to_cost_of_production

a. b. d. Output e.
200%>expenses 100%>expenses c. 50%>expenses =exenses Output<expenses Total

Liking a. 100% Count 28 13 14 7 18 80

% within Liking 35.0% 16.3% 17.5% 8.8% 22.5% 100.0%

b. 75-100% Count 7 30 42 20 0 99

% within Liking 7.1% 30.3% 42.4% 20.2% .0% 100.0%

c. 50-75% Count 12 15 21 23 0 71
% within Liking 16.9% 21.1% 29.6% 32.4% .0% 100.0%

d. 25-50% Count 2 2 6 0 0 10
 % within Liking 20.0% 20.0% 60.0% .0% .0% 100.0%
Total Count 49 60 83 50 18 260

% within Liking 18.8% 23.1% 31.9% 19.2% 6.9% 100.0%

Reason_for_failure_to_cultivate

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid a. Lack of fund 113 43.5 43.5 43.5

b. Land position 28 10.8 10.8 54.2

c. Climate 87 33.5 33.5 87.7

d. Lack of resources 32 12.3 12.3 100.0

Total 260 100.0 100.0

Get_higher_return

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid a. 100% 44 16.9 16.9 16.9

b. 75-100% 115 44.2 44.2 61.2

c. 50-75% 87 33.5 33.5 94.6

d. 25-50% 14 5.4 5.4 100.0

Total 260 100.0 100.0

Reason_for_failure__to_get_higher_return

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid a. Lack of fund 123 47.3 47.3 47.3

b. Land position 37 14.2 14.2 61.5

c. Climate 70 26.9 26.9 88.5

d. Lack of resources 27 10.4 10.4 98.8

e. lack of technology 3 1.2 1.2 100.0

Total 260 100.0 100.0
 Avoid_risk

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 0.Not answered 1 .4 .4 .4

a. 100% 42 16.2 16.2 16.5

b. 75-100% 53 20.4 20.4 36.9

c. 50-75% 114 43.8 43.8 80.8

d. 25-50% 50 19.2 19.2 100.0

Total 260 100.0 100.0

Reason_for_failute_avoid_risk

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid o. Not answered 1 .4 .4 .4

a. Lack of fund 62 23.8 23.8 24.2

b. Land position 15 5.8 5.8 30.0

c. Climate 122 46.9 46.9 76.9

d. Lack of resources 35 13.5 13.5 90.4

e. lack of technology 25 9.6 9.6 100.0

Total 260 100.0 100.0

Contribution_of_loan_in_agricultural_production

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid a. Positive to return 69 26.5 26.5 26.5

b. Indifferent to return 77 29.6 29.6 56.2

c. Negative to return 112 43.1 43.1 99.2

d. Not answered 2 .8 .8 100.0

Total 260 100.0 100.0

 Reason_for_losses

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid a. Lower marker price 10 3.8 3.8 3.8

b. Higher distribution cost 49 18.8 18.8 22.7

c. Higher production cost 85 32.7 32.7 55.4

d. Inefficiency 115 44.2 44.2 99.6

e. Natural Disaster 1 .4 .4 100.0

Total 260 100.0 100.0

Inefficiency_in_production_is_due

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid a. Low seed quality 14 5.4 5.4 5.4

b. Unavailability of tech 79 30.4 30.4 35.8

c. Not adopting modern tech 97 37.3 37.3 73.1

d. Other 70 26.9 26.9 100.0

Total 260 100.0 100.0

Inefficiency_in_distribution_is_due

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid a. More channels 43 16.5 16.5 16.5

b. Higher transportation 55 21.2 21.2 37.7

c. Higher fluctuation in 88 33.8 33.8 71.5

market

d. Other 70 26.9 26.9 98.5

e. Not answered 4 1.5 1.5 100.0

Total 260 100.0 100.0