Professional Documents
Culture Documents
R.J. GODLEWSKI
Everything that an individual sees, feels, hears, smells, or even tastes must first progress
into the wiring of the human brain for processing. In and of itself, this “extraordinary
instrument of calculation and control” is durable, adaptable, and quite capable of lasting
for a hundred years if properly cared for and nourished, but it remains tainted by its
operating system – the human mind.1 The thoughts and actions an individual acquires
since birth serve as a virus, force the brain into more of a reducing valve, and limit that
individual‟s abilities and thoughts.2
As with most electronic computers, the human brain is rarely pushed to its full
capacity. Its function seldom addressed past eating, sleeping, working, and more often
than not entertaining its owner. Unlike the electronic version, however, the human
computer consumes everything the individual‟s five senses throw at it and fuse all into
the proverbial “sixth sense” that all individuals possess but few acknowledge. These few
include professional gamblers and late nineteenth century gunslingers, people whose
lives survived on the “ability to judge an adversary‟s character and intent immediately.”3
As for the rest, they routinely ignore their environment until it becomes too late to act.
Such neglect leads to deception, itself a subject “about which so little generally is
known.”4 If not properly contained, deception leads to such atrocities as brainwashing
and mental bullying.5 These devices serve little but to convince the uninitiated to
undertake a path or thought detrimental to their well-being. Classes on the „art‟ of
TACTICAL EXTRACTIONS COUNTERTERRORISM PAPER 04-2010
negotiation often include the dictum that everything the student wants or needs are
controlled by someone else. Applied to the powers of perception, the dictum may read,
“Everything the individual sees or hears is controlled by someone else.” How can this
be?
All human individuals progress through life affected by two avenues of maturity.
The first is “progressive learning”, a linear path from infancy to adulthood where the
individual rebels from, and ultimately acquiesces to, the combined influences of
guardianship and heritage.6 The second comprises asymmetrical influences and cover
education/religion/work/conflicts, friendships/associations/heroes/leaders, and
fears/desires/resentments/fantasies, etc (see Figure ) as the individual passes from the
“certainty of childhood” towards the “confidence of adulthood.”7 Maturity – with
susceptibility to influence virtually extinguished – usually sets in by thirty-five years of
age.
Commercial advertising thrives on illusion. So, too, does everything produced for airing
on television. Fortunately, for the world, these deceptions are easy to distinguish once
common sense and pragmatism are considered. For instance, one asks, “How effective
can Viagra® be if a bunch of guys are sitting around a recording studio at 2 A.M.
singing instead of being at home in bed with their wives?” The writers of the television
commercial obviously overlooked this tidbit of human practicality when they parodied
Elvis Presley‟s Viva Las Vegas.
Other examples are not so obvious. Consider Fox News Channel personality
Glenn Beck. Renowned for his efforts to restore American Constitutionalism, less known
2
TACTICAL EXTRACTIONS COUNTERTERRORISM PAPER 04-2010
(or scrutinized) are his Mormon beliefs that mandate his actions. These conflicts of
interests include:8
Mormons believe that when they die, they become „gods‟ in their own right,
possessing of their own planet in some distant realm of outer space (They also
believe that the God of Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, etc. was once a
mortal man who became god through his own actions). How, therefore, does
Mr. Beck address the issue of inalienable rights? Why is it that he prefers to use
the term “Creator” (which suggests human, superhuman, as well as supernatural)
instead of the much more popular “God” when discussing America‟s founding?
When eighty-four percent of the United States today believes in “God,” why does
Mr. Beck attempt to explain to his viewers that the founding fathers envisioned
anyone‟s God as appropriate?9
Nothing suggests that Glenn Beck‟s public intentions are invalid. However, they must be
addressed vis a vis the commentator‟s private beliefs. Any individual capable of
forfeiting his native Christianity for a highly secretive non-Christian cult merely to
marry a woman begs for scrutiny.10 Could such an individual remain true to a nation? It
depends upon the power exerted by the Asymmetrical Influences model discussed
above.
“Fully loaded” automobiles are depicted whereas the prices shown represent that
for more stripped down versions, leading viewers to believe that a real bargain
might be in the offering;
Bare-minimum interest rates are promoted, even though few (if any) consumers
qualify for such “0% APR” rates. Similar to this, are pronouncements by
companies such as Publishers Clearinghouse that profess, “You are one of three
finalists!” for giveaways surpassing $10 Million. This author (R.J. Godlewski)
3
TACTICAL EXTRACTIONS COUNTERTERRORISM PAPER 04-2010
once worked for an envelope manufacturer where six million such “Three
finalists” envelopes were produced.11
Deceptions in the commercial sector ruin finances, but generally avoid destroying lives.
Illusion in the social and political sectors, however, place entire nations at risk.
Islam, for example, represents the ideology of choice for terrorists attacking the
United States and the West in droves since the 1979 founding of the Islamic Republic of
Iran. Many media and political personalities, however, suggest that Islam is a “religion
of peace” despite that Muhammad, the founder of the sect, actively engaged within
several political assassinations to advance his cause.12 Moreover, Muhammad planned
sixty-five military campaigns and personally led twenty-seven of these.13 To suggest that
Islam – by virtue of the cult‟s founder – represents a peaceful religion is to ignore the
facts. Nor can one adequately hope for tolerance as Muhammad did not believe that
Trinitarian Christians (that is, the traditional Christianity of Roman Catholics, Russian
Orthodox, Protestants, etc. ) were remotely worthy of salvation.14
No one deceives without purpose. A husband might deceive his wife if he is cheating on
their marriage. A company might deceive a competitor to hide the development of a new
product. A football coach might deceive an opponent to shield an incoming play
selection. Radical Islamists might deceive Christians in order to „fit in‟ while planning
4
TACTICAL EXTRACTIONS COUNTERTERRORISM PAPER 04-2010
their demise. These scenarios show that deception can run the gamut from personal to
professional to catastrophic. The trick, therefore, is not knowing that one is being
deceived – for we are all saturated with deception – but to understand why we are being
deceived within each case.
5
TACTICAL EXTRACTIONS COUNTERTERRORISM PAPER 04-2010
The perceptive will see the existence of Islam as Muhammad‟s attempts to unify
the warring clans of Arabia run amok. Regardless, seventh century intentions do not
mesh with twenty-first century realities. Islam has abdicated to extremism and the
subsequent deception has transferred to suicide bombers (murderers deceiving the
world as pedestrians), improvised explosive devices (bombs deceiving the world as
ordinary articles), and al-Taqiyya (an all-encompassing, warrior ideology
masquerading as a “religion”). The Middle East‟s Muhammadanism is virtually the same
as sixteenth century Europe‟s Muentzeranism.21
1. Muhammad turned to, and advocated, violence during his period in Medina
when the tolerance and compassion suggested by his time in Mecca failed to win
converts;
2. The Quran promises paradise to those who die in war, stresses up close and
personal “hand-to-hand combat with knives”, mandates fighting even if badly
outnumbered, and advocates Maoist-style “mobile warfare”;22
3. The major terrorist attacks against the United States in 1979, 1983, 1985, 1988,
1993, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2001, etc. were carried out by Muslims – not Jews,
Christians, Mormons, Buddhists, Moonies, or atheists;
5. Following the September 11, 2001 attacks, the Iranians were the only Muslim
people who voiced solidarity with the people of the United States. Arab Muslims
largely danced in the streets;
6. Shiite Islam is the only major religious sect that possesses an official doctrine to
deceive non-believers for the purposes of “fitting in” until in they are in control;
The assumption made that “actions speak louder than words” suggests that Islam is
anything but a “peaceable” enterprise. In reality, it is a doctrine of war, social and
6
TACTICAL EXTRACTIONS COUNTERTERRORISM PAPER 04-2010
political law, and a means to conquer the world. Its primary deception is that the
foregoing is not considered as part of official Islamic teachings.
Deception works because those deceiving us know our limitations. For instance, a
photograph of trees shown to a group of students with the instructions to locate „the
man‟ hiding in the woods identifies this intimately.26 After giving up, the students
acquiesced to shock and disbelieve to learn that “the man” represented words
emblazoned across the whole of the photograph and not merely a human individual. The
instructor perpetrated the deception because he understood that the students‟ natural
inclination was to seek out a person and not a phrase.
The same technique holds true within the broader world. The Islamists speak of
“God” and the world assumes they mean religion. Similarly, the Mormons (the “Church
of Latter Day Saints”) speak of Jesus Christ and the world assumes they represent
Christians. Both assumptions are wrong. Islam is only partially religious (man‟s
relationship with God) and mostly political (man‟s relationship with other men) in
nature. Mormons believe that God was once a mortal human individual and believers
become gods equal to Jesus (a “perfected” human being) in their own right upon death,
which is diametrically opposed to Christianity. Regardless, these deceptions go on
because the world allows them to perpetuate.
Few bother to employ the senses. The sights and sounds of radical Islam are
nearly as deafening as the sights and sounds of Muslim silence towards their fanatical
brethren. When an atrocity against Western culture is undertaken, the Muslim world
remains silent vis a vis Islamic culpability, often exchanging hostility towards the
perpetrators for aggression against the victims. When the action in question is targeted
against the Muslim world, even if it merely represents rumor or innuendo (as in the case
of the recent “Quran burning” fiasco in Florida), the Islamic world erupts with calls of
“Jihad!” against America, Israel, and anyone else who had even remotely cast a
sorrowful glance upon the precious world of Muhammadanism.
7
TACTICAL EXTRACTIONS COUNTERTERRORISM PAPER 04-2010
That Islam continues as a “religion” is paramount to its survival. If the five billion
or so non-Muslim occupants of the planet determine the ideology to be a threat, it
effectively ceases to exist. So Muslims continue to tweak the sensibilities of their
neighbors, particularly those living within the heavily Judeo-Christian West. Islam thus
becomes not a warrior culture destined to rule the world, but a maligned “touchy feely”
victim persecuted by the infinitely horrible Western peoples. Deception.
The Islamic terrorists thrive within the digital information age, surpassing the
rest of the world in psychological warfare (read that, deception) capabilities.28 That
modern computer and graphics technologies can fashion alternate realities virtually
indistinguishable from the real thing magnifies this capability.29 Swamped with
televised images of dead infants, scorched mosques, and parading Americans, few
within the Middle East would pause to determine the validity of the images before
taking to the streets in protest and the Islamists understand this.
Compounding this situation, Islamic terrorists are able to fund, launder, plan,
recruit, conduct reconnaissance of targets, and practice their operations through social
networking and alternative reality sites such as Second Life. 30 These tactics are not
dissimilar to modern American political strategy, which also employ psychological
warfare and deception-based techniques.
Progressive politicians, known for their spin of public and media sentiment,
pounce upon the opposition. Apolitical Tea Party participants, for instance, become “Tea
Baggers” or “Domestic Terrorists” – descriptions designed to slander at best and indict
at worst. Allied liberal media outlets package demonstrations and criticisms of the
government to appear hostile or ignorant. Under the pretext of „entertainment‟,
television shows orchestrate popularity of certain beliefs while aggressively pursuing the
destruction of opposing thoughts.
All these examples are designed to saturate the human senses, making it
impossible to apply rational thought. Such urgency prevents the natural reflection upon
8
TACTICAL EXTRACTIONS COUNTERTERRORISM PAPER 04-2010
the truth that comprises human perception. Repetition further solidifies the distraction,
such as when the “Anybody but Bush!” period morphed into the “It‟s Bush‟s fault!” era
from 2008 onwards. Sustained, overpowering assaults upon the senses require
deflection through filtering of the intent, the perpetrator, and the method of the attack.
In other words, fighting deception of the consciousness through application of the
senses.
Managing Perceptions
Friendships,
Society Building
Associations, Co-
workers, Heroes,
Leaders, etc.
Competition/Aggression
Fears, Desires,
Fantasies,
Resentments, etc.
HUMAN Survival MIND Towards Maturity.
Education, Religion,
Work Experiences,
Alliance Building/Cooperation Conflicts, Disasters,
etc.
9
TACTICAL EXTRACTIONS COUNTERTERRORISM PAPER 04-2010
society building, and finally relaxation upon perceived entitlements. The deeper the
recesses of thought, the more survival oriented they become. The individual, however, is
a product of guardianship, associations, desires, fears, and their social environment.
Although the „brain‟ has matured over eons of existence, the „mind‟ remains juvenile
until maturity sets in during the individual‟s thirties.
To detect deception, the first course of action is to understand the target of the
practice. Deceivers calculate the habits, hates, and hobbies of the target.31 They also
focus on the individual‟s “Night-Side” that allows for blackmail opportunities.32 By
remaining vigilant and self-aware of his or her own lifestyle, the target can thwart the
deceiver by employing the truth. A writer, for instance, can fend off accusations of
ignorance (deception employed to suggest unprofessionalism) by referencing his or her
sources. Similarly, a commentator can likewise fend off charges of “foolishness” by
presenting their audience with biographical data or verifiable credentials.
Furthermore, the deception from the political left must be perceived, many of
whom equate Christian individuals with the excesses of Muslim doctrine. In this
context, they suggest that abusive priests, as but one example, legitimize abusive Islam.
This deception can be countered by proving that “abuse” of any sort is not official
Christian doctrine whereas Islamic extremism is often based upon Muhammad‟s actions
or the words of the Quran.
10
TACTICAL EXTRACTIONS COUNTERTERRORISM PAPER 04-2010
Conclusions
The planet remains inhabited by liars. At least this would appear to be the case with only
politicians, entertainers, military tacticians, and academics (remember “Global
Warming”?) examined. The truth of the matter is that “lying” is a human – not natural –
function. Certain animals deceive for survival, but they do not do so intentionally for
profit or gain. Politicians deceive to gain office, entertainers deceive to gain popularity,
academics deceive to gain recognition, and tacticians deceive to gain tactical advantage.
Being that deception is such a human endeavor, the human mind is hard-wired to
detect the practice. It is what makes the hair on the back of the neck stand erect even
when threats are not visual. It is also what makes women think twice about accepting a
drink from a stranger. Deceptions make the individual commit actions or entertain
thoughts detrimental to thousands of years of evolutionary survival. Such deceivers
rarely acknowledge the individual, such as when President Obama championed
socialized medicine (deceivers trend away from the use of the word “socialism” for
anything actually socialist in nature) or when House Speaker Pelosi tried to deceive
voters into waiting for the legislation to pass before they worried about what was within
the bill.
*************
R.J. Godlewski is an independent counterterrorism consultant and president of Tactical Extractions. His specialty is Middle Eastern
Terrorism and Improvised Explosive Device [IED] social networks.
11
TACTICAL EXTRACTIONS COUNTERTERRORISM PAPER 04-2010
Notes
1R.J. Godlewski, “Cultivating Creativity within Intelligence Analysis,” American Intelligence Journal 25,
no. 2 (2007/208), 85.
2 Ibid.
3R.J. Godlewski, “Human Intelligence: Perceiving an Enemy‟s Thoughts,” American Intelligence Journal
27, no. 2 (2009), 29.
4H. Keith Melton and Robert Wallace, The Official C.I.A. Manual of Trickery and Deception (New York:
William Morrow, 2009), 69.
5Haha Lung, Mind Control: The Ancient Art of Psychological Warfare (New York: Citadel Press, 2006),
47-56.
7 Ibid., 31-32.
10Glenn Beck was reared a Roman Catholic, but converted to Mormonism in 1990 as a condition to marry
his current spouse.
11Husky Envelope Products, Walled Lake, MI. I produced ~300,000 “you are one of three finalists”
envelopes during one afternoon shift alone in 1993. Six million envelopes to alert three individuals seems
a bit excessive.
12 http://www.muslimhope.com/Assassinations.htm
13 Will Durant, The Age of Faith (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1950), 170.
14Reza Aslan, No god but God: The Origins, Evolution, and Future of Islam (New York: Random House,
2006), 102.
15Christopher Simpson, Science of Coercion: Communication Research & Psychological Warfare 1945-
1960 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), 107.
16 Robert Baer, “A Dagger to the CIA”, in GQ: Politics, April 2010. http://www.gq.com/news-
politics/politics/201004/dagger-to-the-cia
12
TACTICAL EXTRACTIONS COUNTERTERRORISM PAPER 04-2010
17Peter Lance, 1000 Years for Revenge: International Terrorism and the FBI: The Untold Story (New
York: Regan Books, 2003), 308-316 [Not acknowledging that OKC conspirator Terry Nichols may have
visited WTC culprit Ramzi Yousef in the Philippines]. Yossef Bodansky, Chechen Jihad: Al-Qaeda‟s
Training Ground and the Next Wave of Terror (New York: Harper, 2007), 278-279 [That American
Airlines Flight 587 on November 12, 2001 may have been brought down by a bomb similar to two previous
Russian aircraft disasters].
20 Ibid.
21 Ralph Peters, “Rebels and religion: How fighters become fanatics”, Armed Forces Journal (January
2007), 28-31. Reformation-era Protestant extremist Thomas Muentzer was every bit as violent and fanatic
as today‟s al-Qaeda types. Five thousand of his followers met their fate in a violent crackdown near
Frankenhausen. Muentzer himself fled and tried to survive by “deceiving” the authorities “disguised as a
sick man in bed,” 31.
22H. John Poole, Tactics of the Crescent Moon: Militant Muslim Combat Methods (Emerald Isle:
Posterity Press, 2004), 173,
24Estimates of the total number of combatants during 1939-1945 approximate 105,542,100 individuals.
Source: John Ellis, World War II: The Encyclopedia of Facts and Figures (Military Book Club, 1993),
253-254.
25 Michael Dewar, The Art of Deception in Warfare (Devon: David & Charles Publishers, 1989), 27.
28Frank G. Hoffman, “Mind Maneuvers: The Psychological Element of Counterinsurgency Warfare can be
the Most Persuasive”, Armed Forces Journal (April 2007), 28-32.
John R. Vacca, Computer Forensics: Computer Crime Scene Investigation (Hingham: Charles River
29
30Steven Nutt and Josh Lyons, “Virtual Worlds and Terrorist Attack Planning”, Urban Warfare Analysis
Center (August 22, 2008), 3-9. Steven Nutt and Josh Lyons, “Virtual Worlds and Money Laundering”,
Urban Warfare Analysis Center (August 8, 2008), 3-8.
32 Ibid., 17.