Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I.I u
i
VlttttKV C|,MI'>I< »Tioi O' TMIS P»0E (MJi«n ttmir I nlaratf1
KP A!) INSTRUCTIONS
5»
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE UEf-OKf. COMPLETING FORM
I •>E«,0«T NUMBER 1. OOV< ACCESSION NO 3 RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER
in C. D. Sorensen, M. L. Lin,
Allemand, A. 0. Oladipupo,
IV. E. Ries, C. D.
A. Block-Bolten, N00014-80-C-0384
B SrhnPHpr, K. T. Ulrich. N. S. Tsal
i. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10 PRO0RAM ELEMENT. PROJECT. TASK
< Department of Materials Science & Engineering ARE* » WORK UNIT NUMBERS
Unclassified
is«, DECL ASFIFICATION/OOWNGRAOINO
SCHEDULE
17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT Col th» abalracl anlarad In Block 10, II dfflaranf Iron R.porl)
*0 ABSTRACT fCnnffrtut. on riWH »frf« It nmr mmmmry mud Idmnttty by btork m.tnhmt)
This report summarizes progress during the fourth year of research on the
physics of arc welding processes. Studies include vapor emission from weld
•.\> pools, development of a high speed infrared temperature monitor, digital
signal analysis of weld noise voltages, convection and surface depression
of the weld pool, pulsed current gas metal arc welding, of titanium, contact
tip wear in gas metal arc welding of titanium, fracture toughness of TY-80
weldments, and sensitization of 304 stainless steel welds.
%'-"<'."-*. «*.
••:-::-:::v:w:^^
"^.•r^, ' v i»vy^'. w^nnnwi *-i-n.w^ x •-.-*
by
T. W, Eagar, G. B. Hunter, G«'J. Dunn, Cr. D. Sorexisen
M. L. Lin, D. E. Ries, C. D. Allemand, A. 0. Oladipupo,
A. Block-Bolten, R. Schoeder, K. T. Ulrich, N. S. Tsai
B
^
Distribution/
Availability codes"
[Avail and/or"-
Special
85 t o c* Q
tämtitt
— i^—— • ii i •.««.«•«.•
•:••'
Table of Contents
Page
A
ABSTRACT
i. INTRODUCTION
v. AUTOMATION OF WELDING 11
A. Signal Analysis of Welding Noise Voltage 11
B. Convection and Surface Depression of Arc Weld Pools 20
SUMMARY 22
REFERENCES 23
}:•'•:
i
&z&£&m&^^
Page
®£Z&&^^ ::v::^^
• R» IHM •!'•"•' »i i'ufu'vii'V'imvii'i iiiMiwr.i'.'iviTi'.'i t>'vi TT. • »T«-^
ABSTRACT
e^ofci ziuciijs C\
the weld pool,'pulsed current gas metal arc welding of titanium,' contact tip
wear in gas metal arc welding of titanium; fracture toughness of HY-80 weld-
ments; and sensitization of 304 stainless steel welds. flfUoL>cr?eJz; -Spr-'r/r^">/ , Jy*
s.
.:-.::-.£tfr^:^::^^
I. INTRODUCTION
damental in nature, but attempts have been made to interface the studies
with specific U. S. Navy programs. The best example of the directed programs
S&yfe&S&^fe^
II. SPECTROSCOPY OF ARC WELDING
analysis which has been published previously (1), and was expanded in a
recent technical paper (see Appendix A). A brief description of the results
Mr. G. J. Dunn
Metal vapors in gas tungsten welding arcs are being studied in order
made to study the effects of small additions of aluminum and calcium vapors
on the electrical and thermal conductivities of argon and helium plasmas con-
taining iron vapor. It was shown that, when an inert gas containing other
metal vapors is considered rather than a pure inert gas, the effects of low
have found. It has been concluded that the effects of these minor elements
coefficient of the weld pool, may be more important in explaining the poor
^^V.^-/^ :-:vX^,s£ffi':v:^
TiTiiniinv'i"jiin"'J'.".'|.l<J'.ll.l-.|f.'<,:>,.'r°fj.1 • w v.! IT '-.— w snv •j'l .-••*—r:." • \r r.
the upper region of the arc. In this case, the simple binary composition
plasma model is valid, and the dramatic effects of even very small amounts
of metal vapor on the arc transport properties may significantly alter the
Mr. G. B. Hunter
the equipment and new techniques developed for this study. The basic approach
previously (2).
v
Many of the problems encountered in this work have centered on the
i cathode proximity focused image tube to the S20 photocathode Silicon Intensified
reflections occurring in the face plate of the tube, near field glare within
the tube, and the production by the photocathode of bright spot artifacts in
the Image. Even without the tube, the SIT detector has various nonlinearities
in its signal response to radiation intensity, not all of which have been
platinum strip with unknown spectral emissivity values. This work will be
'&MM<tä^ä^mrmbte$m
• C-»T-BWaWY ll'^l VI
Navy for advanced systems. During the past year, studies have continued on
pulsed current gas metal arc welding and have commenced on contact tip wear
During the past year, this work has produced one thesis, the abstract
to produce high speed movies of metal transfer during the welding process.
Copper contact tips wear very rapidly when titanium electrodes are used
in gas metal arc welding. The goals of this project are to identify the
mechanisms causing the increased wear and to find methods to reduce the
wear. This work has produced one thesis to date. The abstract of this
10
Mr. A. 0. Oladipupo
HY-80 steel. The abstract for a thesis discussing this work is included in
11
V. AUTOMATION OF WELDING
One possible sensor Is the arc Itself, which Is known to respond to geometric
effort, the effects of surface depression and convection on weld pool shape
and defect formation are being studied. These latter topics are of great
Mr. C. D. Sorenson
the important features from the spectrum of the system, which can be very
noisy and thus tends to mask these important features. During the past
contract period, our efforts to refine and improve our signal processing
waveforms. The improvements made in each of these areas are discussed below.
occur, we have refined and tested our signal processing methods. Among other
things, we have altered our analysis so that it includes the input (current)
The analysis which was used previously on the weld signals (3) assumed
that the input current to the arc-puddle system was well known, or at least
detect defects. This meant that any change in the input of which we were
both the input and the output of a system. The functions which we chose
are the frequency response function and the coherence function (4). These
input and output information, and thus are able to separate the effects due
to changes in the arc from changes in the input. Secondly, they provide
a measure of the degree of correlation between input and output, and thus
information or merely spurious noise. Figures 1 and 2 show the input and
output spectra which are combined to yield a gain and phase function along
puddle oscillation.
has been made to determine the sensitivity of our analysis technique to changes
tion. A sinusoid of various amplitudes was summed onto the voltage from a
weld '-K order to observe the changes in the system transfer function. Figure
3 shows the gain function for three such experiments. The amplitude of the
imposed sine wave was 1%, 0.3% and 1.1% of the average arc voltage in figures
3a, 3b, and 3c respectively. Note the ability to easily observe the peak for
the sinusoid in the 0.3% disturbance, and the visible peak even at 0.1%.
13
H
W
Z
111
a
at
tu
I I I I 1111 I I I I llll
18.0 100.0 1000.0
INPUT AUTOSPECTRUM
>•
l-
M
(0
z
hJ
G
tu
95
llll llll I I I I llll i
10.0 100.0 1000.0
OUTPUT AUTOSPECTRUM
I I I I llll i i i i iiii r
1Q.0 100.0 1000.0
FREQUENCY, HZ.
CROSS SPECTRUM
Figure I: Systems Spectra
1 .00-
0.80—j
0.60-
0.40—
0.20—
0.00- I I I I I III i i i i mi r
10.0 100.0 1000.0
COHERENCE FUNCTION
10.0»
I I I I Mil i—i i i i MM r
10.0 100.0 1000.0
PHASE FACTOR
&ftK&:&^^
15
10"
10 -i
H
<
CD
10 -2
10 -3
10' 10' 10
0"
Z 10 -1
H
<
CD
10"
10 -3
Z 10"' «
<
CD
TT i 11 in 1—i i i i mi r—r~r
10' 10* t-0"
FREQUENCY, HZ
(e) Sine wave amplitude of 0.1% of arc voltage.
Figure 3. Gain plots for a weld signal with a 400 Hz sine wave imposed.
&i&&ft£ft^^
. I !•'-••«• '.'• ••• '
16
sampling rate, since both the current and the voltage are sampled. This
of new software. However, this has been completed during the current
pendent of the input to the system, the input signal is of great importance,
as the quality of the input signal affects our ability to measure the fre-
carried out to determine the optimum current waveform for probing the arc.
noise. Representative plots of these signal types together with their gain
that the gain should be 0.1 for all frequencies up to 20 kHz for this system.
As can be seen, the rectangular pulse yields spurious gain results, even
though the signal seems to be very smooth. For this reason, the narrow
refinement. The double pulse is much better, although the resulting gain
the relative widths and separation of the two pulses. A circuit is being
17
UJ
Q
ZD
h-
H
2
10» ä
III 1 0
's
\
H
<
CD
I0-2 g
I .00 —
~w
UJ
0.80 —
^060 —I
T
UJ
&.
UJ0.40 -
X
o
O0.20 —l
0.00
MIM 1—I I I III rr
10' 10' 103
FREQUENCY, HZ
T 1 I I I INI 1 1 I I I Mil
a
10 10=
FREQUENCY. HZ
1 .00
0 80 —|
y
Q
£ 0 40 —
I
O
O0.20 —\
0 00 I I III 1 1 I I I I III 1 1 I I I MM
18' 10* 10"
FREQUENCY, HZ
Figure 3. Tia« end frequency plots for double rectingnlir pulse.
*. •' *m *"
ÜJ
Q
H
-I
Q.
<
T T
"• T" T "T
8.0 10.0 20.0 38.e 48.8 58.8
TIME, SEC X18"s
10"
-I
Z 18
H
<
CD
IB"2 J
10
-3
TTTT1
10'
1 1 I I I I III
18 s
1 1 I I I MM
10=
^r
FREQUENCY, HZ
1 .00
0.80
u
20.60
Ul
QL
LU040
X
O
U 0.20
0.00 1 1 I I I I III
10' 10' 10 =
FREQUENCY, HZ
•^•^i^ilV;^-::'-^:^
20
designed and tested which will allow us to make these changes. The input
waveform which yields the smoothest reliable gain function is random noise.
This is the form of input which is usually used for system identification.
The largest drawback to the random noise waveform is the lack of availability
into two groups: a study of arc welding defects, and a study of puddle dynamics.
In the first case, various kinds of geometric and chemical defects will be
the weld puddle and the density of the liquid metal. Independent measurements
This study has produced two technical papers. The first of these,
Li>,7.-i^JJ
21
One additional paper has been prepared based upon studies conducted
ESfc&ta^^^^
l'V'TI'-.'^n.n.n, « \w* q_.^T. T» y. jm .'»•.' I i. I }t ,i I'll I II ••»••_• .'^."-» "•-'•• •,'•' I
22
SUMMARY
During the past year, significant progress lias been made in all areas
of this project. The research conducted over this time involved spectrographic
toughness of HY-80 weld metal, and sensors for automation of arc welding.
'
23
REFERENCES
1
L'^A ;:;^
^
riM'. •'. •.•••••.'•:i|. nii'.'j'vi". "i'i'i'i'i ii • .»•_**»*•» I
24
APPENDIX A
(Accepted by "Metallurgical Transactions B")
ABSTBACT
steel weld pools have been made in order to test a vaporization model based
on thermodynamic data and the kinetic theory of gases. It is shown that the
model can cotrectly predict the dominant metal vapors that form but that the
in the cooler regions of the metal. Values of the net evaporation rates for
different alloys have bten measured and are found to vary by two orders of
magnitude. Estimated maximum weld pool temperatures based upon the model are
welds.
25
i. nrntonjcnow
Loss of alloying elements from the veld pool due tj vaporisation is
important for a number of reasons. Firstly, if the loss is great enough, the
[2], arc stability, and fume formation [3]. Thirdly, it has been shown that
pressures of metal vapors above steel veld pools [5]. This analysis provided
and copper alloy veld pools vhere different metal vapors dominate. The
results of the calculations are then compared vith experimental results from
Both steel samples and aluminum alloy samples vere subjected to extended
reading emission spectrometer. The chamber vas supplied vith a lens guiding
the light to the spectrometer grating. A mirror imaging device was provided
to ensure uniform position of the work and the electrode. The hearth was
water cooled and the entire system was purged with argon flow. The rotating
12.5 cm diameter 304 steel samples but the rotation has not proven useful.
obtained from stationary arc welds where the arc length was more
controllable.
(502, 505, 5151 and 5212 steels) or 1.1mm wire (410 steel) or 2.4 mm
diameter wires (308L and 309L steels). The thoriated tungsten electrodes of
1.6 mm diameter were mounted as shown in Figure 1. Each steel sample was
weighed before and after each experiment, yet only the 308L and 309L
stainless steel samples gave resonable weight loss results (Fig. 2), as other
steels were too readily oxidized in spite of the welding grade argon
environment. The small amount of impurities in this gas stream and the
oxidation over the course of the experiment in these other steels. The
compositions of the steel and Al-alloy samples used are given in Table I.
The sizes of the Al-alloy samples are specified in the caption of Figure 8.
melted steel wires and on shavings drilled out of craters of the Al-alloy
>&&&$&v*i&k^
27
logarithms of the standard preasure of the pure element and the activity of
where
The vaporization rate can be predicted from the kinetic theory of gaaes [6],
-2,
rA - 44.331 PA(-^)1/2l8 ' s"1 ] (2)
where
-2
PL - rA(LA-/!HA)[watt •. cm"*]
M» !
where
^^-^^^^^^^^^^C^ ftl^&fcft^^^
28
where, t, it time.
diagramt for aluminum, copper and iron base alloys as shown in Figuret 3, 4
mixing.
elements in ternary and higher order systems can often be neglected [5],
however, strong interactiont where compounds tend to form in the liquid metal
cannot be neglected.
At shown previously for steels [5], equation (4) can be combined with
the arc surface energy distributions of Nestor [7] to produce upper limits on
the surface temperature of the weld pool. Figure 6 shows such an upper bound
mm£mmm*mm$m?m&mt<m&L&i-: . .^^^^^^^t^^
'•W-Tr' IP '.F 'l* f'V» • 1 - X —H •••% ^'. • X ^T''.' 'T1T'1^~ T VVTTf^ "V TV! ^ f V V %!'
29
analysis for a number of aluminum alloys. The upper bound analysis assumes
that all of the power input to the weld pool is lost by vaporisation of the
metal. Since this is clearly not true, a least upper bound on the
temperature of the weld pool surface can be obtained if one knows what
((5).
1 1
V
,•0"»
aluminum alloys were arc melted for unusually
Due to problems of oxidation, only two of the stainless steel samples gave
by Figure 5.
alloys with varying zinc and magnesium contents were selected. Aluminum
•
•V '
alloys were selected because the Zn and Mg have very high vapor pressures as
[»"••.' compared to aluminum; and as seen in Figure 6, this significantly lowers the
II Mg vapor dominates,
r •'«•
w
K 4 ** .
y".
• ."»VI
!tiL* &*y&k&S&&&S3&&^ • vvcv
•jriTi» •»L,m^1 »•: »•: PTf ••» '7i' • .'TW .'ji T» •"» TF ' T ' .r ' ir*^y
30
IV Al vapor dominates.
the sine isopleth of Figure 2 veil above the Mg isopleth for this alloy.
Alloys 5083 and 5456 belong to group II as seen in Figure 9 and 10.
This is again consistent with the predictions made from Table II and Figure
3.
Alloys 6061 and 2024 belong to group III as shown in Figures 11 and 12
respectively. This result is not as easily predicted from Figure 3 since the
exact composition of the alloy and the temperature of the veld pool surface
clearly shov a simultaneous rise in the spectral signals for both Mg and Zn.
the vapor later than Mg; probably due to kinetic limitations since Zn is more
r-i" dilute in the alloy. The gradual rise of both elements is most likely due to
increase in the size of the veld pool vith time. Alloy 1100 is the only
Summarizing, Figures 8 to 12 shov the analyses taken from the veld pools
of different Al-Alloys during extended time velding. The "075 Alloy vith
content stays constant. In Figures 9 and 10, the Mg-vapor dominated 5083 and
5456 alloys shov Mg-content falling off, vhile Zn-content stays constant, or
belov the detection level. Figures 11 and 12 for alloys 6061 and 2024 prove
that both these alloys exhibit mixed vapor domination and both Zn and Mg
IZ#
rr^r*v—r'viir'i" \' iwyriv* r
ö
31
•' also shown changes in Zn only for the 7075 alloy, changes in Mg only for 5083
and 5A56 alloy, and changes both in Mg and Zn content for the 2024 and 6061
alloys.
•
rate, apparent long term (mean) evaporation rate, and apparent evaporation
per unit of energy have been calculated. The latter value is normalized to
gross energy input [8,9] which is half of the total arc power input, as the
other half is lost to the environment and does not enter the weld pool. All
that the net power lost by vaporization is much less than one percent of the
total power input to the metal. As will be discussed later, this is much
less than the abolute evaporative power loss, however, much of the absolute
IV.. DISCOSSIOW
The preceeding results indicate that the model can effectively use
existing thermodynamic data to predict the dominant metal vapors above the
weld pool; however, it would be useful if one could predict weld pool surface
temperature and hence the rate of alloy element loss. This proves to be a
Quigley, et al. [9] have estimated the evaporative power loss from a gas
true, it would reduce the upper bound temperatures based on 100 percent
evaporative power loss as shown in Figure 6 and in Table II. Indeed if one
• :>;^ w±i&:
32
percent of tbe total power, tbe surface temperature limit would drop by 200
to 500°C for aluminum alloys. Table II snows that tbe surface temperature of
aluminum alloy arc welds could vary from just above tbe melting temperature
to 700°C superheat depending on alloy composition and the amount of heat lost
by vaporization.
As shown in Table III and Figures 8 through 12, weight loss measurements
based on alloying element loss from the weld samples gives net evaporative
losses between zero and 95[ug • s1 . cm2]. This corresponds to maximum net
however, it is believed that more metal than this is vaporized from the
center of the pool and then recondenses on cooler regions, thus recycling
welding even though there is only 10 ppm Ca in the steel. The only way this
much vapor condenses back into the pool rather than is lost, it is believed
that a larger fraction of Zn recondenses back to the pool than is lost from
the 7075 alloy in Table II. If the temperature were low enough for only
0.015 percent of the power to be lost by vaporization, then the liquid would
power at the center of the 7075 alloy pool must be lost by zinc vaporization.
Much of this power is recovered at the edges of the pool as the vapor
&k£tt.<titä^^
<-••-" »-' •• »H-'"."».'VJI^H. r. ML I'••HI
33
one assumes that the power lost from the electron beam weld pool is 6000
values predicted by the model presented here as seen in Table IV. Indeed,
these results are perhaps the most conclusive in showing that evaporative
power losses set an upper limit on the surface temperature of a weld pool.
In general, these power losses probably lie between 1 and 10 percent of the
total power, but the value varies somewhat with alloy content and with input
power density. These losses provide a prediction of maximum arc weld pool
surface temperatures between the melting point and 1600°C for aluminum alloys
and between 2000°C and 2500°C for steels. The high energy density processes
such as laser and electron beam can produce even higher surface temperatures
V. COMCIPSIOHS
which can predict the dominant metal vapors that form during welding in the
evaporative power loss in arc welding lies between 1 and 10 percent of the
vaporization rates place upper limits on the surface temperature of the veld
34
alloys when using electron bean welding, but the results for arc welding are
somewhat lower than the temperatures often assumed for arc weld pools. It is
concluded that the metal vaporisation from the weld pool places a limit on
the maximum temperature of the pool which is significantly less than the
energy are very small indicating that the vapors are subjected to multiple
VI. ACCTOWLKDCEMEMTS
equipment.
35
538-588.
2018-2108.
895-900.
united States. S. A. David, ed., ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1982, pp. 53-73.
Vacuum Technique, John Wiley, Hew York, 1962, pp. 691-737 and pp.
15-21.
57 pp. 127s-133s.
37
FTCU1E CAFnOWS
steel, 2 - for 309L stainless steel; average voltage 11V, current set
additions.
Fig. 4 Copper Alloys: Vapor pressures for some constituent alloy additions.
Fig. 6 Normal mode and Cathode Spot Mode temperature distributions for the
the peak power density in watt ' cm . The plots are based on Fig. 3
pool. Points B and C mark 102 and 1Z energy going into evaporation
J
•!•- 1- •!.- triu.'«- w- "J" J- • •-' /• / .• I-•.'••••'..-' J- ' -• .» •T'.' •- ;- •.• J","-'l,"7 "••; J,.,fV' /. '.".T "."?.'.• TT, V.n
38
for pure aluminum. Curves 2 are those based on Nestor for pure Al.
vapor phase. Only after long periods of time does iron start to
Fig. 8 Loss of Zn versus energy input in [KVA min] from Aluminum Alloy
were 2.3% and 5.6% respectively. The voltage during tests varied
between 12.5 and 15V; current was set between 125A and 150A; the
Fig. 9 Aluminum Alloy 5083. Loss of Mg versus energy input. The change in
and current were 15V and 125A. The longest experiment lasted
45 min.
Fig. 10 Aluminum Alloy 5456. Loss of Mg versus energy input. The changes in
••»
«.* ».-f «•••.. I/. »-•••-•• «.V-. .-. A ••••• L\ ./.-• .-,.-..-..-..... -• ./ •--. .-• ••••*•••.• •:>::•:-->;:.: -;-:y >:--:S^-::-y:-^i^v:
'TCvr^ •->«.T* \ i Tur'vnr T^-.f '.' • v -' * r wj*. ;>•*•) n \*w 'jr'j if ? -j - .' v'' r „'»-*-..— y'v.'wur1:" v ;r
_-_-•.- -_--i
39
15V, current was set between 125 and 150A The longest experiment
lasted A5 min.
Fig. 12 Aluminum Alloy 2024. Loss of Mg and Zn content versus energy input.
the current was set at 150A. Longest experiment lasted 30.2 min.
observed for the 6061 Aluminum Alloy. The Mg/Al signal ratio is
magnified 10 times.
<, *
40
4)
U
> K O
CO
vO
O
o
CM
m ««» so
£ • • • •
CM <«• •H O
V
09 CTt CO 00 O
O CM r-1 \0 IT» H
o o o o o
5 00
m o o o o o
V
a
9
4J m en *o .-4 •* o
10 9 O r»
o
ao
o
m
•*
vo
o
CM
o
o
a r» in m vo i-i
•H 3 CM
g
e
s eo
u o O 00
u o o o o\ o• o•
CM H SO
«I CM CM
n
>
I
a
to m m m m m
£ m m
OOOOOf-lt-lrH
C
o
a
o 01 O
r*.
I».
oo
o
r^
m
o
o m m
CO CM \D
o
00
&
5 \0
00
•*
o\ 00
oo
QA
t*»
ov
r>»
so
or»
m
ao
so
to
iH i-i CM•J •J
at o CM m m ftoo C* -»
<u 1-t o o iH CMo o o
4-1 «» m m m m co co co
to
41
1
V
00
H
Ov vO
£ 0)
00
CM
-SI-
00 B sr CN m t-e 6 CM ON lO
ac H fH o ON
• rH O ON
«
<S£Q «
iH
*i»
ON
^» <N
K CO
CJ *
ON
x«.
NO
*».
M o ^ 00 « « 1 CJ-»» r«. « «
fH IT» CN
ON
• '«is CN
•fl-
at o • '»& o ON rH
rH ON 00 CM rH r«. NO
«X
6
•ft CN
«
to
£ 8 H
• j
«H
>> M 4J NO 4-1
o m CO 1
• cd
U B w B B B : 6
• 2 £ 2 N N
11
O -H fH O -H IM
o Cv. 0
cd o
* > Q
I
1-1
•>
o
«H
>>
o
rH
I 3 M
*
^
co
co 4J m u B
oo h CO » U -H O
K o 0) -H O o fH o 01 CO O O rH
•H «r» » B O iH n » B O •H
B o
0 0) H O
OH
<D
Q
rH
(0
o
Q) iH O 0) CN 00
o
o
* 00
B
m
r>»
ON
CM tn
* 00
6
00
00
if»
CO sr O
* « •N
•>:
PL,
•X
00
«ss U
i-i
«
iH
*
ON
•">. CM
K CO
CJ
rH
«
rH
«
ON
ON
"--«,
4J
Tt
fH
rH
u^ CN iH * • CJ »»» CO sr « CO
B
0>
iH
| CN O o H o £ fH m o 0) u
* uS ST rH t>. 1 4-1 S m rH r*. •O 0)
CM iH IH CO 00 iH rH 00
N i
r-l CO
t-l
•* O
B X
CO
O
•« 6
O
%o 2
eg c •H u B ft a a)
CO b N «1 « N 4-1 « fi
rH
X>
«
s9
CD
*-*
m
h 6
cd
O -H * ff
sft »X
IT»
U B
cd
O -H ** •fft B
N •sa» w
o
H U CN
• ei. i CM p. e CU 4J
B
0)
a
B
o
CO
> o
0 B
N O :5 s M
CN
f—i «o
B
CM
0) I O
H Ss >>
o
iH K
O
fH »X
8 §V
u
cd
IM
3 3 4J CM
*->
f—• 4J
CJ
M
U
O
U sr U Ti rH U -H > Ü
9 CN 0) co O O fH NO oi a O o rH
CO o
CM
*
O
B
0>
O
tH
fH o
NO
3 B
O IU
o
H
rH Bo
• CM
O CO
0)
a) CM Q a p VJ H b
B 4-1 NO 9
CO 4J
I I cd
^- M
| O CJ 0)
00 fH ST 01 rH 00
B ON fH O 00 lO sr
-* o
e
at
CJ «
<fl X
K CO
CJ
o
CM
"x.
NO
fH
••^
CO
fH
2 1«J as- K CO
rH
*»^ rH
rH
rH
ON
oo
CN >
I oo
*m • * tx U « **s» 1*1*
•o
0)
3! CJ ^
o X
CO
ST
i»»
*
00
«
m
CJ -».
e X
O
CM
«
sr
«
CO
o sr
• 4-1 Z
a
NO
ro NO • 4J Z CM NO 00
l-t »H fH ON m iH ON r»
cd i 9
9 £> r». o y
U • o rH
tH • ft sr sr o C8
« o
(0
CJ e
IS]
j ;
• c*
6
§ ?H CN
o
e^s
fH
•
4J
CO
h fi
O -H SI •
SI
•
«
3* »X
CM
cd
H B
O IH
a E
4J
I 2 *
«S to
o
(J
o at
CM *o
I
01
•
1
o
« o
> o
B
N
6
N o £2 sr1
c*>
>» cv o
o •4 o M •o o.
fH rH O CO
3 >
3
o
4J
U <H
4J
h -H
X
«I
rH -O
o 0) 0)
» B
O
a. a
V
O
o
iH
O
fH
iH NO
m
sr
a> a
o 0
a. o
8
iH
o
rH
rH
II
^5^^>^^\<^>^^i^^
42
(Figure #)
Apparent Evaporation '. Percent of Source of
•r<>,
'V 00 o\ o CM
Evaporation «a-
o
to
o NO
o CM
i-l NOo
o CM
Lost by
NO CO
i-l 1 o CM
• CM 1 o O o o
o o• o• o o• o o o
o o o d o d d d
Per Gross Energy
<*• o o NO NO 00
•
1 i
'
[pgj_1xl03]
-iH oo o\ CO CO . CO CO
CO «a-
Input*
•H
O
.-( c
(0 o
0 i-l
1-t 4J i-H
tJ SI 1 1—• iH IT» iH fl IT» oo I-l m iH
01 U >v/-^
l-l O MfÄ | i-H co iH en fH CO CM I-I CO iH CO
O Q. M < »-) «o CO CO r» ON CO CO
oi a u i 60 NO \0 i-l NO i-l NO i-i NO
.9 > C _1 p.
4 H W W w_'
U
O 1
60
£ C
Q ^ C
•J 9 O •—'
«0 -H CM o
CO
.o «J
9 33 «8
0) 4J 1
E CM
0) •-' M u
o h O
a B o. 0* i
i-H
o
•
'
? iH
? • o
•u
CM
• CM CO
• *
o a. C « 4-> « CO
CM CM
i-l
I-l i-l iH CO
O
ON
£
, Apparent Initial
Net Evaporation
4J -H
•H *J
[ygs_1cm~2]
ON en NO o CM O O o
•
' 1 d • cd
Rate
U1 ON t-t CM
ON •H I-I ,»^s. -o
o\ |
01 oo
N«^
3
•o
60 IM 9
01 9 01 cd
z •H
•i
Vl
9
id 4-i « *X O
M 9 « 9 •H
O 01
N
e
S 9
N
60 9
CM ff 3 N
a f 9
N f a
9
4J
id
10
u u
01 •H
>N
aO
60 NH
U
V 4J
9 O
CO NO iH 01 o
oo NO CM CO
o o o o 09
r» m NO CM CO B
O o
M U
60 VH
f M
M
M
H
M
* *
*
:^&&&::i&&£^^
t
•o '
43
1
e 4-1
o CO
1
•ft
u
u « « o 4J
V « r~ *»•* <*> to
CD CO ^^ O m rH
Ü m a« 1
U
P^
•
^*
•H
W
HI
fa
9
m
o
oo
iH
00
«a-
rH £
•«•
o
CO
if"! iH O f^J o o o o o
V. iH o o o o o o o •» •M m
"^j»'
k
s^ c»2CU i-H O fl
+1
iH
+1
rH
+1
4J rH
+1
4J o o
m
o
•»
rH
+1
V- O +1 4J vD
• .*> iH CO P. e o o o o o O O +1 +i +1 o
cd w o o o m o o 00 00 O o o o
;§ OX 9s r» CM 00 00 o m a» o CM <r
1 «** «J V H i-l o> rH rH «H t-H rH rH CM r-l 00 •*
w 9 _ s^
^ CM CM rH
SI
•J u
CO g
.C «0
•> U CU
^ % CO «
M
V
yy u
CO
V»' I
I >>
V* «4-1 »-5 CO
Ja fa -H O fa
0 o o
as H p.
^ 53 s rS &
en C
ts]
CU cu
£ H
CO
I CO CO CO
1-4 > O >
3 0
\S to 00 4-1 c
V" \ ct) B CO O O
<U •H 4J "H
* fc X 4J co e 4J •
CO CU "H CO
* 'S,
**_ to C -H CU
00 c
u
9
-HO
S a> »•« e
p ao o)
4J
3 C 00
X
00
X S £ £ £ CO
H
l-l
s
4J
t- 4-1 CO
. "j « u
u ^^ 0)
*. -'
-. .'
1
0)
as
co 4-1
»" H Ü
* •
o
u
1
> C CO 4J
M 9 CU c
fa -H
CO
rH
0) CO 3 9
01 4J 4-1 rO
JÜ u CO C CO
(0 9 t-i CU 4J
» • * H u V »
a a
Kfi u
0J
s >>
0) 00
00
c
1-1
£<
icfl
a
I
H fa
a> m H -3- rH orH o
rH <t rH oo
CM ON CM O o o o
rC
u
11
»fl
I
H
•a c
cu w
r~ c^
f^ o
r4
>C
O Cv
O (N r^ rH
m
CN| o o m m
-»
rH v*
00
m
CM rH CM
00 0> CM rH in
o <r o>
o m
4-1
CO
4-1 i-t CJ r-l CM rH rH t-i rH rH rH rH rH rH rsi CM CM CM B
•*» • 60 u e-;
f • c •H O u
•^ •H •o O o
iv *o CU rH 9 c
"Cv iH
0)
fa
&* U
O
T4 CM
$>; 2 O 4J CO
"» E co CU
S 8-* fa u
• BOO 9
«J •H iH & oo
\ u X «0 •H
v3 •H
•a sS ti
14-1
i CO
fa
cu "rJ
»*, • CU
<4-l 9
V»
1
o
c iH
1 CO
rC
u
o • CO
co m o
•H
4-1 ;
N o
CO
CO
I-t u
£> a j= -C CU U-l
S * 4J u 01
fe o >• rH 6 •H "r-i 4-1 CO
-V
u O CO
r-l 4J
rH CU
c
•H
»
CO
»
CO
CO
I
rH
4J
CO
a
1 < X P
D <T
rs
B >£>
m
rH
Ä
J-l
r»
rH rH 1 CO
*J
%v 1 3 30 CU CU vO /-N
»'
Ov 3S ü -1
H
|o
F
o
LO
<r
m
o
x>
D
r^
CU
4J
V
4-1 o
1 c
CO
«
^^
1
Wi CO CM H
1
•
t*".
Argon 44
(Spectometer W electrode
Sample
0
0 RSP
Drive
0
3
0
Water
Inlet
Figure 1
o
o
* I o
ro
\1 CM
o
o
o
CM
!/
I I M
CM
0)
\ u
9
00
i \
4 \ o
o
o
Vr
\
1 I I LJI
q IO ID
cvi Ö
>/.
..%
;^is&&^^
'." IP "_» Hl' ijl ".'»»I r T1 1 "»P' •• HP II •• I .•l'LIHHHWI^WHlW'n.l|i.l^lllgWlplffllU"JHll Jl •••
47
Ü
w
d6o-i
ai&^&^&sa^
' -• ' r n w j • p w • • i»•• u •'••- *.• •. '^ •. • . i'. < • 'T'l'L'vi'rn .•'{•• ;• j j, j JI r»
2000-C 48
«73*
•s.st-
S \ VvsS
-*oh ff
fc— \ \ \ VK
1 1—I i I i l\\ I 1 63
4X> 4.4 90 594 6.8
Figure 5
&SSfok&^^^
50
-I
— CD CJCM 00
IO £ooO
inro j^to
o
IO CM _ CO
in
O IO o
IO IO IO o
o
£ä&&&&;;^
r-^
: ; töti&Sft^^^ ÜÜ*V>J^:
r? • •.- w .• w y w ST^T-W r«-imr^nr^ I ^j";ic-•
C S
52
O
o
0)
u
N
1-1
5 N o
00
e
ro
00
O o
2
10 (0
o
CM
o o o
5 IO ro
53
£ Q
N o
T O
O
o
00
o
1^
o
cx>
0)
io 1-1
8
00
N
o s
o
ro
o
CM
X i
Q o o O
10 ro c\i
I k »—• » J 1 • U ,-,,.tf.,„,,.., .-MJ...^ I .. , ^ |l,, Jl J | _.!! «I.JII _, II, , , ,„, M,, , ,j ,| |H|»J»j|
T^T«B
ox vl- a
'
C O O o o o o
Nod 0 0 0 0 54
T T i—i—rr
O
O
c
N
o of o
3
6C
2 N o
00
O <
*
CD o2
<0 ^
O
CD
l>
o
Csl
i i i i i i i
o»^. _: o o> (0
— d ö d ö
* 10 CM — 55
So °-o Q 9
o o
T—r—i—r
ft.
.•£>
m
o
o
01
u
9
<$ m
H
•>Vj
o> c
z
*• 5 N
C\J o 1
O o <
CM 8 /
K*
• i."
8/ a
o» io + <y o
56
.vL< <
<
o
CD
SOIJDJ |Du6;s
HI.
1
viww in»1» w,r>T J1 11 'j i j i j i .n n .m ,i i j i ji ii.i ü.'i'.mm
57
APPENDIX B
I Ocean Engineer
,and
Master of Science in Naval Architecture and Marine
Engineering
*
ABSTRACT
feäa^ara^^ K&yX^iftvC'l
58
he.
I
forces tend to hamper Controlled metal transfer when weiding
titanium. These unbalanced forces result in weld pool
turbulance, uncontrolled droplet transfer and ultimately
nonuniform weld bead formation and spatter. The use of
rectangular pulsed current wave forms was investigated with
respect to metal transfer control and ultimate weld bead
shape uniformity.
An experimental space consisting of three independent
variables including base current (1^), peak current (lp) and
frequency (f) , keeping the average current constant was
investigated. Average current (Iav) was chosen based on the
minimum DC level which produced a desired weld bead size.
By changing the energy input at constant lav using
rectangular pulsed wave forms, changes in metal droplet
transfer and resulting weld bead shape and uniformity were
recorded. The experimental technique used for recording
metal droplet transfer consisted of high speed photography
(6/000 frames per second) using a balance of laser back
lighting and arc illumination to record the size and
frequency of formation of individual droplets. The current
signal (high or low) was recorded on the film next to each
high speed picture to allow real time analysis of droplet
transfer as a function of pulsed current input. Data was
taken using a multi-frequency level Box-3ehnken design space
grid allowing for statistical analysis of dependent
59
the high light emission from the arc creates a number of practical
light source of even greater intensity than the arc. This very intense
While this approach provides a very good image of the metal transfer, the
the arc light can result in loss of structural information about the arc
plasma.
been used to take moving pictures of a filler wire and droplets in a gas
,^<^ /.v> v. • ^wyi ifirfiV,. -f. / .y^ /.v. iv •.. yiA. <- <i»". Ji <r* +. ,*. >•. -r-V-V. tl/swtJ'iPJvif- J-. v. „». /. *. +. -'.»». •/-. A »-. <r- .»- «•. >•. •*. «. -r. <M
.>
61
&
#>
such high intensity that it blinds the detector and prohibits direct
observation.
of the electrode and the detaching metal drops. Later, it will be shown
plasma.
THE SHADOWSIAPH
lens 1 (placed at a distance of twice its focal length from the sphere)
into the hole of a diaphragm placed at the focus of the lens. A narrow
placed behind the diaphragm. All the laser light passes through this
filter, except the part blocked by the opaque sphere and a small fraction
which is absorbed by the filter. This simple apparatus may thus be used
length of lens q behind the diaphragm and is relayed to the high speed
To understand how the light from the arc is excluded from the
ivii1 iTi-VTTii.-v fyr^rvrv\'Tv^m s n.i kill ^Tiki v v * >. w g wu^ i
T
62
shadowgraph, one oust remember that light from the arc is not collimated
but is emitted in all directions. The arc light is not focussed on the
diaphragm, and most of it is rejected at this point. The small portion
of arc light that passes through the diaphragm (which acts as a spatial
filter) is rejected by the narrow band interference filter. The arc
light is nearly completely blocked by both the spatial and the wavelength
filter, and only the laser light reaches the film to produce a red
background with a sharp shadow of the object as seen in Figure 2.
The resolution of the image is limited by the diaphragm and by the
quality of the imaging optics. Dse of good quality 35 mm camera lenses
and reasonably large diaphragm openings, (e.g. 1.5 to 3 mm), have
produced acceptable resolution.
There are a number of considerations which make this system more
practical:
:dr 1. The object on the first image plane is reversed such that the camera
j£ records an upside down picture. This is reversed by adding another
lens (2, Figure 3) that produces a secondary, rightside up image.
This lens can also be used as a relay lens to increase the distance
/
from the object to the camera.
2. The camera lens diameter (4, Figure 3) is usually much smaller than
the beam diameter at the level of the camera lens. Therefore, much
of the field is lost; however, this may be restored to full object
size by a field lens (3) placed on the second image plane.
3. The camera lens has a diaphragm that is normally used to adjust the
film exposure. In the directed light system described, light from a
point in the object area reaches a well defined and small part of
£fe&ivfr$f#Sfr:^
i - i• 11. u •».? • '•_•». i •."-.'-.' -jT -v '."v» «• L »• '• ^ *. • •- i'.'",' •- • i • f • M '' • v -.• " • '.• my j' .• J!/ j" \r: wv wt v»
63
the camera lena. Therefore, the earner a-lens-diaphragm does not act
not wanted, the camera lens diaphragm should be kept vide open and
before test runs with the high speed camera were made. The aperture
of the 35 mm camera was opened wider than the beam, and the focal
length of its lens was taken into account to estimate the correct
4. When studies are performed in a glove box, the laser beam can be
introduced into and led out of the glove box through glass windows
this information can be retrieved if one removes the 633 nm laser filter,
thus letting some of the arc light through the system. The balance
between the laser and the arc light is reached by adjusting the diameter
of the diaphragm hole and by adding a neutral density filter where the
narrow band filter had been located. This produces an image of the
and front-illuminated by the blue arc light (Figure 4). The arc itself
SäÜ&^}^^
uf v-w •- w\-irrrjr T^~
64
the film. The instrumental parameters of this system are given in Table
1.
COWCLOSIOH
B:'&&tf&^^
65
FICD1K CAPTIOUS
light and admit laser light only. Note that in this diagram
shown in the object area and its shadow is traced to the film.
of the image plane and the chief ray through the center of
1 in which a field lens has been added. The filler wire and a
for the film to record the arc path. An erector lens and a
Figure A: Gas metal arc welding of titanium: (a) Cathode plasma jet
forms; (b) jet repels metal drop; (c) drop detaches, jet
.iiii-.V.-^ .-,!^L-^-»i.v..V.V.^. . i.V. .-.V, v/.-.V.-. ..._•.-_-,-_. A. « ^1l L-jp \ .1-• o-.- -.
66
y.'*Y,<-X&Y*/S;yS*tt •-.>;.•;.;,•:•>;-:•>:•:•
67
TABLE 1
Expander with spatial filter: Spindler & Hoyer 258 Model 038655
Spacer Ring: 10 mm
68
LENS I
DIAPHRAGM
INTERFERENCE
FILTER
CAMERA LENS 2
i&^^i&&£^^ cl^^:^i^i^Ä»i
••I »I • i • i • I • • _p !in
Vi
70
SPATIAL FILTER
WINDOW
WINDOW
LENS I
ERECTOR LENS 2
•."V.
CAMERA LENS 4
71
APPENDIX D
by
Bachelor of Science
ABSTRACT
fi&foteft^^^^ vV
L%1
<° .'•-
72
APPENDIX E
CHARPY ENERGY OF
BT-80 STEEL
by
fe ABSTRACT
LViV, ::£Ktf
73
•i
nitrogen content. This it believed to be significant considering the
»mill measured nitrogen content of the veld metal.
£iv:-y^^:£^^
74
APPENDIX F
(Presented at ASME Winter Annual Meeting,
Boston, MA, November 1983) •
ABSTRACT agreement has been found between empirical data and the
predicted values of weld pool geometry at low currents,
The relative importance of surface depression and when the current is increased to higher ranges, e.g.,
convection In determining the depth of weld penetra- •ore than 250 amperes, more scatter is obtained. It la
tion In stationary CTA welds has been studied. The believed that surface depression and convectlve flow
results Indicate that a deep crater depression forms in the weld pool may begin to play important roles in
on the surface of a steel weld pool at currents in these higher current regimes.
excess of 250 aaperea. During the transition fron Rosenthal [1,2] first used point and line heat
shallow to deep penetration, the depression grows from sources moving at a constant speed to calculate pure
one millimeter or less to four or five millimeters with conduction heat transport In plates of semi-infinite
an Increase of only twenty amperes. Such a dramatic thickness. Tsal [3] found that the inconsistency
change cannot be explained due to the plasma Jet momen- between the experimental weld pool shape and the
tum alone. It is proposed that the major cause of the predicted value based on the simple point source theory
deep penetration at these current levels is a vortex can be reduced to a large extent by assuming a dis-
which Is created by circumferential rotation of the tributed heat source on the weld surface. It was found
weld pool. Some evidence suggests that the deep vortex that the Introduction of the distributed heat source
is self-stabilizing and that this creates a hysteresis can match the predicted values of weld geometry
In the weld penetration as the current Is ramped upward reasonably well with the empirical data at low currents.
and downward through the transition from shallow to At high currents, much larger errors are found, which
deep penetration. It is believed that this vortex suggest that effects other than thermal conduction and
depression is the major cause of "finger" penetration the distributed heat source may be Important.
In CMA welding as well. Generally, depression of the weld pool surface has
Travelling GTA welds were also made to Investigate received little attention. Ishizaki [It] studied
the effects of deep surface depression on weld defect depression in gas metal arc welds but no extensive
formation. High speed clnemaphotography was used to study of surface depression in gas tungsten arc
show the flow behavior from the front to the back of welding has been found in the literature. Most investi-
the weld pool. In steels, and In titanium alloys, gators believe that surface depression results from the
this flow Is most likely driven by surface tension impinging plasma jet. Such jets have been studied in
gradients. It was found that the deep vortex penetra- steelmaking [5], however, these results can hardly be
tion and the rearward fluid flow can explain humped applied to the weld pool due to the large differences
bead, undercutting and tunnel bead defects. It is in dimension Involved and to the fact that the equations
believed that a similar mechanism is responsible for derived are based upon empirical results in which the
hollow bead defects in stovepipe welding. parameters are different from those in in gas tungsten
arcs.
INTRODUCTION Numerous studies (6-12] have shown that the con-
vectlve pattern In the weld pool influences heat flow
In order to improve productivity, more use is and weld bead size. It is believed that the motive
being made of automated welding; however, as a result, forces for fluid flow in the weld pool are (1) the
a number of problems arise which seldom occur In manual electromagnetic force (Lorentz force), (2) the buoyancy
welding. Two of the most fundamental concerns are seam force (thermal convection), (3) the surface tension
tracking and control of weld bead geometry, both of force, and (4) the impinging gas jet force. There is
which must be controlled if a reliable weld is to be little agreement as to which of these forces dominate
produced. In this paper several of the factors under specified welding conditions; however, most
controlling weld bead geometry will be discussed. One authors agree that Increasing the welding current is
of the difficulties encountered in a priori prediction expected to increase the intensity of convectlve fluid
of weld shape is that many parameters must be taken flow because higher current density and heat flux will
Into account because all are found to have more or less enhance the driving forces for fluid flow, which in
influence en the weld pool geometry. If the welding turn will influence the penetration profile.
process is to be automated with closed loop control of Fluid flow and surface depression are also
the weld zone size, it Is desirable to more fully responsible for the formation of weld defects such as
understand the mechanisms which Influence heat and humping and undercutting of the weld bead. Humping and
fluid flow in the molten weld pool so that the influence undercutting are common in high travel speed and high
of those process parameters can be understood. Most current GTAW welding. The mechanisms of formation of
of the fundamental research work on Ras tungsten arc these defects have been discussed by several
welding has been limited to low current ranges, i.e., researchers [7,13,14)] however, no satisfactory
less than about 200 amperes due to instabilities in the
i
explanations have been proposed. Surface tension and
liquid pool and to the presence of defects such as arc force were mentioned as the forces which produce
humping and undercutting at higher currents. While good these defects, but the mechanisms are still poorly
ftftttr^
1» Y"»\." L« .»»'.l "'i ••»•»"« "V "%»\' •» il I'.'IVÜV'IVTA l"-". s.' V WS
75
understood. The purpose of the present paper is to matter will be discussed subsequently.
assess the validity of previously explained mechanisms
and to quantify the relative importance of surface
depression and convection in determining the shape of
arc weld pools.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
(a)
Fig. 2(b)
SO
40-
Fig. 5(a)
20-
2SQA
.- Fig. <t Top view of humped welds.
volume of liquid fills the cavity formed by the deep Figures 8 and 9 show the calculated surface depression
surface depression. for'different values of RQ and wf. It can be seen that
as the forced angular velocity Wf increases, the maxi-
DISCUSSION mum surface depression depth Increases sharply and the
shape is similar to the observed finger-type depression.
It will be uhown that previous models of weld con- In addition, as Ro increases, the depth of finger-type
vection are not capable of explaining the behavior noted surface depression also increases. This means that
above. In this paper a new model will be presented wider, higher current welds are more susceptible to
which may explain the observed behavior. The first formation of deep surface depression since RQ is greater.
problem to be considered is the abrupt transition from In addition, it will be noted that the vortex depression
shallow to deep penetration as seen in Figures 1 and 2. does not depend on the density of the metal, whereas
metal density has a direct influence on surface depres-
Compound Vortex sion caused by plasma jet forces. In practice, the
Usually the plasma Jet force is mentioned as the deep depression is found to be no greater in aluminum
cause of deep surface depression; however, if this is than in steel. This agrees with the vortex model of
true, one would not expect an abrupt increase in depres- depression whereas the plasma jet model predicts two to
sion within the transition current range as shown in three times greater penetration in aluminum than in
Figure 6, since the plasma jet force increases in a steel.
smooth manner as the square of the arc current [IS],
In addition, a simple analysis indicates that the plasma
jet only has sufficient force to depress the pool by
1 mm at 300 amperes (see the Appendix). A possible
mechanism which may explain the observed sudden Increase
of surface depression and the depth of the depression 10 Rnv/«c
is a compound vortex as shown in Figure 7. Such a vor- 20 R.v/t.c
30 R«v/«.c
tex can be developed at high welding currents due to a
D R Ro-0.5
o
. JT-V. y^Z- -
C
w
f
t.a I.«
V7
Rod I a I disi one«.
—
Fig. 8 Depth induced by compound vortex with a small
forced vortex region R0 • 0.5 mm.
V One might question the source of the circumferen-
Free Vortex Fore ed Free Vortex tial flow which produces the vortex; however, the cause
Vortex of this circumferential flow has been discussed by
Mlllere et al. [16]. In essence, an arc perfectly
Fig. 7 Structure of the compound vortex. Assuming aligned along the axis of symmetry cannot produce a
no transition region between the forced circumferential flow, but any perturbation from the
and free vortex. central axis is unstable and will grow until a circum-
ferential flow is produced.
circumferential rotation of the liquid. A compound
vortex consists of a forced vortex in the central zone
of the liquid pool together with a free vortex in the
regions farther away from the central zone. The depth
produced by a forced vortex in an infinite large liquid
pool is
2 2
Y < R
2g — o
J
V- <;V
R y
2>^Ro t • I • 4 •
Radial dlttoo. • mm
with the oriRin referred to point B In Figure 7 where F"iq. 9 Depth induced by compound vortex with a larqe
wf is the forced angular velocity in the forced vortex forced vortex reqion R 1.5 rom.
region, R0 is the radius of the forced vortex region
and | is the acceleration of gravitv.
. '.
%äS&&£& s -• V «• I^frÄ^Z^ "AV.V.V
.'• .'• .'• .•..•;.•. ^A
IT"\.H "M'T.T^.'!^, I ' ^" •_•• "V" "T ' "\. ^- I ^.' ' *. ITT"
78
When Che current Is low, the plasma Jet force Is theory, since a vortex and surface tension can extract
believed to be the dominant factor in determining the all liquid from the bottom of the cavity whereas the
surface depression. As current increases, the vortex plasma jet momentum would probably leave behind a thick
intensity Increases. In the transition current ranges, film of liquid.
In addition to the plasma jet force, the vortex may be
strong enough to cause finger-type surface depression Defect Formation
of the liquid puddle. Some of the mechanisms of defect formation at high
currents can also be explained by deep surface depres-
Heat Distribution In Arc Column at High Currents sion and fluid flow in the liquid pool. As shown in
In Figure 3, it is shown that the area and the Figure 12, at high welding currents, a deep surface
width of weld increases with time while the depth of crater Is formed. As current enters the liquid metal,
weld is nearly constant. This implies that the deep it will diverge. This divergence of current path causes
surface depression of the weld pool at high currents a pressure gradient which induces fluid flow. Since
may greatly modify heat flow and current flow In the arc the solid metal has higher electric conductivity than
column, since the central region of the weld pool the liquid metal, moat of the current entering the pool
receives little heat from the arc column at high cur- will flow to the front part of the arc, while less cur-
rents. rent passes through the elongated weld pool behind the
In the low current range, the gas-liquid interface arc as shown in Figure 12(b). The unbalanced distribu-
Is essentially planar and heat distribution in the arc tion of current flow in the crater will usually push
can be approximated by a Gaussian distribution. How- liquid metal forward as seen in Figure 12(b). However,
ever, in the high current range, a Gaussian distribution surface tension forces push the liquid metal backward
may no longer represent the true heat distribution. because the temperature In the front part of the arc is
This maldistribution is caused by the deep surface de- higher than behind the arc. Thus, in the initial stage
pression of the anode surface, most of the current will of formation of humped weld beads, surface tension
flow to the side surfaces of the crater instead of being forces and electromagnetic forces compete to drive the
liquid metal. In later stages, the liquid metal behind
the arc becomes swollen, bringing it closer to the
electrode and attracting more of the current to the
liquid metal behind the arc. Finally, most of the cur-
rent will flow to the humped weld bead behind the arc
and the electromagnetic force will push the liquid metal
backward in the same direction as surface tension forces.
Thus, both the electromagnetic force and the metal is
completely removed from beneath the arc. This unsteady
motion can explain formation of humped weld beads.
liquid metal Is depleted. The concentration of solidi- described In this paper and the resulting convection
fied metal along the centerllne of the weld coupled In' the weld pool may lead to improved methods of
with a depletion along the edges results In undercut- avoiding these problems In welded construction.
ting.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
APPENDIX
Pgh + o (i + i)
•:•: ::S/A:KW^
-\^~-j- T_- < * LP r ••• • •• IF • ß —« • «- • -u -Ti* '-•• VL« V V •'. • '. • '. T <•'. *'. •LWT'if^ L*Hr«nVP%lV^^ ' J.^ r." T." <m
81
APPENDIX G
(Accepted by Welding Journal)
ABSTRACT
shape of the surface depression under the action of the arc pres-
INTRODUCTION
asumption that the arc pressure depresses the surface of the veld
82
very »nail (less than 1 BUD) at currents up to 240 amperes, but the
the work performed by the arc pressure displacing the liquid. The
ANALYTICAL MODEL
late this shape under the action of arc pressure subject to the
pool.
form
^^••^•y::^
83
the interfscitl energy between the gss and the liquid phase and
where Gj = 2nrw.
The second constrsint requires that the work performed by the arc
84
done in this case is given by the area ACD. This would be the
on the path chosen, the efficiency may vary fro» 0% to 100% for
R
f
where G2 • Tlparc2nr1' *nd I GG2dr is tAe
fraction of work done by the arc
'o
force on the molten pool. The next tern G« is given by
1/2
G3 . .,:-:][i1 •. i) 2l1JI
<*=> <r2nr
L dr
«here I Gjdr
c is the difference of surface energy with and
'0
without surface depression of the molten pool, and finally
G s
h+w h .2
4 pg2nr(h-«)(H + j ' " Pf2nrh(H - 2> * pg2nr(= - «H)
ff&y^:;^
r-rw—w irm .'•rr.'r'^r' w - rr.i
>y
85
L
r ..
Ar 2n A 2 2
J - ro2nr|l
L
+ (At) J1 dr + | (Eh + * - * )di
•»0 dr Jo 2 2
1/2
If we define F - o2nr[l
L
+ (djE) J1 + Hh + ** - **
dr 2 2
then J - I Fdr
•»0
v.
Again nsing eq(2), eq(3) can be reduced to
where Gj • pg2nr- .
s We now define
1/2
G G € G - 2 1 +
6 " 2" 3" 5 ^arc "* ~ ^"f *—) J + o2n - pg2nr-
where j Ggdr is the difference of work performed by the arc force and the
total system energy which is the summation of potential energy and sur-
face energy.
,nd are
where Xj ^2 Lagrange multipliers; one has a function which must
86
1/2. -1/2
dt (1
t* ? v [<>«rw +
h»<nP.re-pfw) + X-r - (1-X.Hl+t2)
dr
do
dr - or L-)l
•(ot + rtrr
t
• t* J
eq(4)
if one sets
dw
*m
m*. eq(S)
t - 0 at r - 0
w • 0 *t r = R
;-#:i5&ft&^^
87
£•:•
i
not influence the result provided the gas-liquid boundary does not
equal to 7.84 g/ca' and 2.7 g/cm respectively. For the distribu-
tributions are shown in Figure 4(b) and 4(c). Figure 4(b) is for
pure iron while Figure 4(c) is for aetal with high concentrations
values were available. The half width of the weld pool is assumed
the arc pressure dits froa the 300 ampere curve is assumed. While
88
C*
the veld pool. Two values, 50% and 100%, are used to account for
RESULTS
a 300 ampere arc, the maximum value is less than 1.3 mm for a 1 cm
wide liquid steel puddle. This .is much less than the experimen-
face depression for steel is 0.49 mm and for aluminum the maximum
10, low density liquid has a maximum depth 160 percent larger than
89
sion depth is found to vary only 20% for high density metal and
40% for low density metal due to these different surface tension
distributions.
seems reasonable as long as the width of the weld pool does not
.v
extend beyond the region of the arc plasma. As can be seen in
depth increases only 80% when the weld pool width increases from
large, the maximum depth increases 140% when the «eld pool width
(less than 2 mm), however; when the arc pressure is very high as
90
large. Ibis aay imply that at higher currents, the depth of sur-
DISCUSSION
depression is sbout 4.5 mm. From the model of the sre pressure,
it is seen that the arc pressure cannot explain the deep surface
face depression which was calculated for steel is 1.28 mm. Ibis
higher currents.
&;#&:£&^^^
iui'.'i»j»vu»u'ft'n'vii't"fi » ' • • • » •• _• • .•' y "^"^ .• _"•:»
91
circumferential flow may come from the toroidal flow on the plane
notion on the plane normal to the arc axis increases with the
excess ive.
shallow and does not significantly influence the shape of the weld
\-\ri\^\V &&&£&&&^
»'".»i -"1 --v -". --* rrm -.* -." :
92
tration seen in gas tungsten arc spot welds. GNAW and SAIT beads.
At even higher currents (above abont 5C0 amperes), the arc pres-
sure is strong enough that it stay explain mach of the deep surface
boundary. In sucb a case, the current froa the arc, or the heat,
direct arc heat does not reach the bottom of the vortex, as shown
in Figure 13. Above 430 aaperes, the arc pressure becomes signi-
ficant and together with the vortex, deepens the depression as the
current is increased.
- •.- • v! — i v v" • v • ?• ' j"' '.r • \." ' j»' ji '•..• '• _F - j - r "m •_• - • •
93
••«
CONCLUSIONS
veld pools. At even higher currents, arc force may become impor-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
APPENDIX
s s
i
w r
f
D.i
2g
D, ( — • -- )
2g Rj r2
•\--v^^>^^
\jfl\> • ."•• -'• •[>
11«»'i IF'i ••"'»• i _' I'Tiri.-'P U"i<ji ^i .pi l* ' ji _• ••_ > -ji -, * •i - u -.» -• > j - i »• -l • i, • •• • i •" • —>m|nrwT7T^TTT<T1
94
LIST OF SYMBOLS
o : surfsce energy(erg/cn )
g : gravitational acceleration(csi/sec* )
itafe:-;^::^
in^.i.i i.f j-jmji •'.•• L» i'.•»!.• •• l"J l" '.•'JFflPJUWy.WlffJTJ.". P. A1:*. '••'.•! »•_'-'.' -P. -'.. -TF»TT^"F|
95
/
TABLE I
Calculated maximum depth of surface depression
96
- ft
* Iltis represents magnification of the 300 ampere arc pressure data given
in Figure 5.