August 21, 2018

Suffolk County DAs Office

One Bullfinch Place
Boston, MA 02114

Attn: ADA Brian Spring

RE: Docket 1601CR6216, Unlawful Wiretap?

Dear ADA Spring:

On Wednesday, July 11,2018 I was entered in as Pro Se by Judge Byrne.

On Friday, July 13, 2018,I went to the Clerk's Office to obtain a copy of the file to begin
preparing for my defense. A woman with brown hair explicitly stated I could not have a copy of
the entire file, specifically copies of warrants allegedly issued on 10/21/16 by Judge Michael
Coyne and one obtained by the Probation Department on or about May 2017 by an unknown
judge.

On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 10:56 am, I called you to inform you the clerk's office refused to
provide me with a complete copy of the file which I need in order to defend myself pro se
I attempted to call the Clerk's Office numerous times in order to speak to a supervisor in order to
get a complete copy of the file.
I again contacted you on July 13, 2018 at 12:15 to inform you again, the clerk's office outright
refuses to provide me with a complete copy of the file I need in order to defend myself.
I again attempted to contact the Clerk's Office on Friday, July 13, 2018 at 3:10 on and I spoke to
a Keith. No last name just Keith. Keith agreed I do need a complete copy of the file to defend
myself, which includes the 2 alleged warrants that were allegedly issued resulting in 2 arrests.

Keith at the Clerk's Office first attempted to lie & tell me Case Law prevented them from
providing me with a copy of the signed warrants allegedly issued on 10/21/16 by Judge Michael
Coyne and the other on or about 5/2018.

Keith put me on hold and attempted to claim ​Office Policy​ now prevents them from providing
me with a complete copy of the file. I did inform the clerk's office I notified you about their refusal
to provide me with a complete copy of the file I need in order to determine exactly what I'm
being charged with.

I'm not entertaining anything Keith claims because you and I both know Office Policy case law
doesn't exist, let alone apply to obtaining a copy of the file to defend myself.

On Friday, July 13, 2018 at 3:30 pm, I again contacted you and informed you of my very
interesting call with Keith at the Clerk's Office. I requested you contact me.

I again contacted you on July 17, 2018, July 19, 2018 and again on July 19, 2018.
As of this date, you have refused to speak to me.

It's been over a month, I have not received a copy of the file.

Attorney Brad Stanton did notify me via email no warrants exist. Which coincides with what the
Clerk's told me prior to my false arrest on 3/23/17.
Attorney Brad Stanton did email me a motion to dismiss and stated that he did file it regarding
NO SERVICE OF A SUMMONS TO APPEAR WAS EVER MADE. He Attorney Stanton included
a copy of 2 envelopes, but no Summons.

Please be advised that Judge Summerville did state on 2/6/18 in the Adam Scott case,the
Prosecution cannot move forward when no service has been made.

No warrants issued for my arrest on 10/21/16 or some time in May 2018, which requires a
Judge's signature.

No Summons to appear. No return service on the arrests. No file to defend myself. No call back
from your office. 21 days before pretrial, and the Clerk's Office and the Suffolk County DAs
Office have gone above and beyond to guarantee I cannot defend myself against unknown
charges.

I also sent you a letter regarding the issue with Attorney Meg Stanley mailing me fabricated law
enforcement titles for my accuser Steven Rand, which she claims your office disclosed to her.
Additionally, Attorney Meg Stanley was never appointed by the Court to represent me, yet she
clearly states she had contact with the DAs Office regarding Steven Rand's ID. Which is
exculpatory evidence. It proves my Self Defense in alleged Wiretapping charges and it's also
evidence against Attorney Meg Stanley, and as I've stated to 4 public defenders, she will be
charged.

I have also informed your office and 6 public defenders and Meg Stanley, I want Steven Rand
charged with impersonation of numerous federal law enforcement, and your office has Steven
Rand's 6/22/16 email to me to support his impersonation of various law enforcement. One of
those law enforcement titles my accuser clearly states in that email he's not. But he's allowed to
impersonate law enforcement during these proceedings.

We'll need to reschedule the September 11, 2018 hearing to a later date until your office
produces a complete copy of the file, or dismiss the charges with prejudice.

Sincerely,

Audra TOOP

P.O. Box 1018

Saugus, MA 01906
857-236-1701

audra.again@gmail.com