Professional Documents
Culture Documents
n “An outgrowth of MRP initiated in the 1970’s as a new n Many ERP vendors do not do all of the
computer-based approach to planning and scheduling implementation.
of material requirements and inventory, featuring time-
n Example: SAP
phased order point” -- Rockford Consulting Group.
n alliance partner - professional services firm (e.g.
Accenture)
n “Integrating the enterprise through the internet.
n platform partner - provides hardware
Extending the enterprise to the Internet” -- IBM.
n technology partner - provides operating systems and
database systems
n “Computer-based systems designed to process an
organization’s transactions and facilitate integrated and n complementary - tools that run with SAP product
real-time planning, production, and customer response”
-- O’Leary 2000.
1
Sample ERP Modules Enterprise Process Flow
n enterprise portals
n financials Forecast reqmts Planning Processes Customer forecast
n human resources
n mobile business Purchase reqmts Procurement Order capture
Returns/repairs
n Three important components of ERP configuration n Consider the U.S. Company - International Sneaker Company
(ISC) with worldwide sales using SAP R/3:
n Models - represent the “world” encompassed by the
Ordering - a sales representative from ISC takes and order from a
system such as organizational structure.
n
n Production - R/3 alerts the warehouse to ship the portion of the order
Process
Commit- Configur- Credit Collec- that is in stock to the retailer. In addition, R/3’s manufacturing
Proposal Delivery Billing
ment ation Check tion software schedules the production of the remainder of the order. An
invoice is printed up in Portuguese.
n Labor - When scheduling production, R/3 notes that there is a
Process maps into multiple integrated SAP modules (in function-based legacy shortage of workers to handle the order. It alerts the personnel
systems, these would not have been integrated and information exchanged manually): manager of the requirement to hire temporary workers
n Purchasing - R/3’s materials planning module notifies the purchasing
Sales & Sales &
Sales & Distrb. manager that it is time to order new raw materials and also of the
Distrb. Distrb. amounts that need to be ordered.
SAP Module
Product. n Order Tracking and More Ordering - The Brazilian retailer logs onto
Mtrls
Planning ISC’s R/3 system through the Internet and sees that a portion of the
Mgmt
order has been completed. In addition, the retailer uses this a n an
opportunity to place yet another order.
Financials Financials
2
Integration of ERP systems ERP Manufacturing Components
n Existing ERP systems of the client server era n APS tools offer fast, feasible and optimal solutions for
planning and scheduling problems.
comprise 3 areas: n With APS cycle times, throughput times and inventory
can be reduced. Forecasts are more accurate and
n Database Systems transportation is optimized.
n Communication Protocols n APS is often build on finite capacity scheduling. While
n User Interface Framework ERP systems based on MRP methods do not consider
actual availability of production resources (e.g. it is
assumed that material can be obtained in the
specified lead-time), with finite capacity scheduling
many constraints from the recources, processes and
materials can be included.
3
ERP/APS Integration Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
Customer order Sales/Customer service (history, forecast, orders) Example: IBM [26]
ERP IBM reorganized its customer service with CRM software from
Siebel Systems. Every salesperson can now access a centralized
Safety Customer customer history database. IBM is also about to connect its CRM
Stock Forecasted Routings orders with its SAP R/3 ERP, so that customers can access data, such as
level orders (end item) order history or shipment status, via an internet portal. In 2000 the
Planned portal, the IBM.com site received 99 million visits for self-service
orders and support. With that IBM could avoid approximately 2 billion in
costs.
ASAP
Capacity APS Promise
Date
n CRM manages the customer relationship from the first n Portals are personalized user interfaces, which enable
contact to servicing after the purchase, thus improving employees, customers and suppliers to access the information
the quality of customer services. they need for decision-making.
n CRM applications can be divided into: n While graphical user interfaces (GUI) were organized by
product functions, portals are organized by the role of their
n Front office applications , such as
user, i.e. a CFO accessing a portal is shown different
n Sales force automation
n Prospect information information than an employee working in quality assurance.
n Customer profiles
n Campaign management for direct mailing and special
promotions
n Outward-facing portals offer information access to a
company´s trading partners. These portals can contain
n Back office applications , such as storefront components as well as service information.
n Call center management
n Integration with manufacturing, warehousing, transportation
n Service and repair
n Warranty management
4
Portals / Enterprise Information Portals (EIP) Enterprise Application Integration (EAI)
n The functions of a portal are complex. It shows its users data n Compared to internally developed middleware, EAI packages
from structured (databases, ERP) and unstructured provide more flexibilty in adding data sources or supporting
(webpages, e-mails) sources. It also includes a search engine business process changes.
and might include groupware products as well as business
intelligence tools.
n EAI packages are often faster implemented, cheaper and
better functioning than point -to-point solutions.
n Some companies allow customers to use portals to access
information, such as bills of material, performance data of
n They also allow for real time data sharing, thus providing
production processes and quality system data.
good system integration.
n ERP vendors are starting to implement portals into their ERP n They often make use of XML (extensible markup language)
systems.
data exchange and messaging.
n Pros and cons of portals n EAI products can be divided into 3 categories:
n Pros: n Application integration:
n Streamlines information access and dissemination
Integration at the data level; applications exchange
n Enables improved decision-making information using some type of data transport layer
n Saves time and money by improving resource
n Enterprise application integration packages are used to tie n Connecting applications with those of suppliers and
ERP systems to internal and external applications. customers is more complicated than those within the firm,
because of business issues like:
n They comprise applications and the underlying messaging
and data transformation tools to link the applications. n Which internal systems have to be linked with which
supplier?
n EAI is used to connect:
n How soon needs a company to respond to the partner´s
n ERP and plantfloor
purchase order?
n ERP systems that are used at specific facilities to the
5
Business Intelligence (BI) Data Warehouse
n Business intelligence (BI) is a decision support tool that n “A data warehouse ... collects, organizes and processes
enables the user to access and analyze information captured data from all sorts of transactional systems for reporting
by the company´s information systems. purposes.”
n BI allows a rearranging of the data and its analysis for n DW databases are running parallel to and separate from
correlations and patterns. operational databases.
Source: SAS
6
Application Service Provider (ASP) ERP for SMEs
n Now ASP offer applications that can be integrated with an n With a saturated market for ERP in big companies, now
existing ERP system ERP vendors target small and medium-sized companies
(SME).
n This partially outsourced model n Important market:
n reduces the dependency on the ASP
n allows more flexibility in choosing a mix of applications n 96% of all manufacturers in the U.S. have less than
that fit the bussiness scenario 250 employees.
n keeps the control over sensitive data in-house
n Requires often less money than a pure in-house ERP n The European ERP mid-market was over $4 billion in
system 2000.
n The integraion between ASP application and the in -house n Reasons for midsize companies to consider ERP technology include:
ERP is critical and might cause problems. n Pressure from suppliers or customers
n Business process reengineering
n Computer platform changes
n Software that analyzes the system, maps the applications and
discovers missing data links is available. n Midsize companies wish systems that match their business processes
(most important criterion for ERP selection), have a low price a nd are
flexible and easy to implement.
n Some vendors offer “accelerated” implementation methods that are
priced low, but often offer only a minimal fit with existing business
processes.
n Outsourcing ERP functions to an ASP might also be a solution for
SME.
7
Internal Focus of ERP Extended Supply Chain
n 70% of ERP implementations fail to achieve their corporate n With the development of technology, some believe that
goals. demand for ERP services is decreasing and many ERP
specialists are more interested in CRM and e-commerce
projects.
n The ERP market is evolving rapidly, but the core ERP
functions are still in very high demand.
n The key is to learn about ERP outside of its core
functionalities, which means exploring new methods of
implementation, establishing skills in programming
languages and developing a strong business focus.
n AMR Research presentation!
8
Survey Continued ERP Issues
benefits realized?
n Only 12% of customers had over 5% of their
suppliers or customers feeding data into their
systems
n But, on average, 78% of a company’s products were
being planned using the software (i.e. pervasiveness The following slides are taken from three
different benchmarking studies and organized
within the four walls is impressive) by Dr. Stratman in the College of Management
at Georgia Tech
n Users will upgrade, but aren’t buying the suite Replace legacy system 4.06
Simplify and standardize systems 3.85
n 35% of respondents plan to add additional sites Improve communication with suppliers and customers 3.55
% respondents
Mabert et al., 1999 study of 479 U.S. manufacturing firms Mabert et al., 1999 study of 479 U.S. manufacturing firms
9
Motivation for ERP Implementation Costs
Poor/uncompetitive performance 28
Complex, ineffective business practices 22
% respondents
Mabert et al., 1999 study of 479 U.S. manufacturing firms AMR Research
1000
SAP Expenditures (US$ Millions)
7 to 12 months 25.2%
100 13 to 18 months 24.1%
19 to 24 months 21.3%
25 to 36 months 11.3%
10 37 to 48 months 6%
1
<1 1-10 10-25 >25
% respondents
Company Sales (US$ billions)
Conference Board study of 186 SAP implementations Mabert et al., 1999 study of 479 U.S. manufacturing firms
Training (8%)
Responsible for sizeable overrun 11%
Other (9%)
Responsible for moderate overrun 28%
Hardware (11%)
No effect 24%
Software (13%)
Responsible for moderate underrun 31%
% respondents
Benchmarking Partners study of 500 executives from 300 firms Conference Board study of 186 SAP implementations
10
Consultant Usefulness Importance of Aptitudes
n For those organizations that had positive n The relative importance of organizational aptitudes
experiences with consultants, reasons given on ERP competence:
included: n ERP training (.83)
n Higher acceptance of the system by line and n IT Skills (.82)
production workers n Business Process Skills (.82)
n Quality of their planning efforts was better n Executive Commitment (.76)
n Extent of support was greater n Project Management (.74)
n Better at resolving conflicts n Learning (.7)
n Strategic IT Planning (.66)
Time in Months
Benchmarking Partners study of 500 executives from 300 firms Benchmarking Partners study of 500 executives from 300 firms
30 Inventory reductions 27
Phased by site
Increase in on -time deliveries 20
Phased by module 22.1 7
Procurement acquisition cost reductions 17
Mini Big Bang 16.8 5 Increase in inventory turnover 15
Big Bang 14.9
Average % improvement
Time in Months
Mabert et al., 1999 study of 479 U.S. manufacturing firms AMR Research, Gartner Group
11