Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DESIGN EXAMPLE
DISPLACEMENT –BASED SEICMIC DESIGN [PUSHOVER ANALYSIS]
Duyet Nguyen
Dimitrios Pachakis
Helge Frandsen
8 February 2016
SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF PILED WHARVES
2 PILED WHARFSEISMIC
NONLINEAR SEISMICANALYSIS
DESIGN EXAMPLE
METHODS| | 8
27FEBRUARY 2016
October 2015
SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF PILED WHARVES
3 PILED WHARFSEISMIC
NONLINEAR SEISMICANALYSIS
DESIGN EXAMPLE
METHODS| | 8
27FEBRUARY 2016
October 2015
CONTENTS
Comparison of results
4 PILED WHARFSEISMIC
NONLINEAR SEISMICANALYSIS
DESIGN EXAMPLE
METHODS| | 8
27FEBRUARY 2016
October 2015
Sample structure
6.0m
Service Loads:
Berthing load: 1200 kN / bent (7.0m)
Mooring load: 500 kN / bent (7.0m)
Crane load: 4000 kN WL at crane rail pos.
UDL: 40 kN/m2
7.0m
Geotechnical parameters:
γ K Φ
Soil layers
[kN/m3] [kN/m3] [Degree]
Quarry Run 20.0 44,000 40
Sand 19.0 25,500 36
5 PILED WHARFSEISMIC
NONLINEAR SEISMICANALYSIS
DESIGN EXAMPLE
METHODS| | 8
27FEBRUARY 2016
October 2015
Seismic design considerations
Structure is located in moderate to high seismic area
6 PILED WHARFSEISMIC
NONLINEAR SEISMICANALYSIS
DESIGN EXAMPLE
METHODS| | 8
27FEBRUARY 2016
October 2015
Design cases A B C
35000
D E F
+4.0mCD
Design PGA :
+0.0mCD
0.25g
QUARRY RUN
0.40g 1
1.5
(0.1-400) KG
0.60g -20.8mCD
-22.8mCD
MEDIUM DENSE TO
DENSE SAND
7 PILED WHARFSEISMIC
NONLINEAR SEISMICANALYSIS
DESIGN EXAMPLE
METHODS| | 8
27FEBRUARY 2016
October 2015
Modelling
Rigid
C.G. of deck
𝐌𝐌𝐩𝐩
𝐄𝐄𝐄𝐄𝐞𝐞𝐞𝐞𝐞𝐞 =
𝚽𝚽𝐘𝐘
Rigid
Lp
element
Pile plug
Lplug
R.C section
properties
Composite section
properties 𝐄𝐄𝐄𝐄𝐞𝐞𝐞𝐞𝐞𝐞 = 𝐄𝐄𝐄𝐄
Pile section
Top of soil properties
Pile structural
Soil spring
𝐏𝐏𝐢𝐢
𝐊𝐊 𝐢𝐢 =
𝐘𝐘𝐢𝐢
Pile modelling
Soil – [p-y curves by Reese et al.]
8 PILED WHARFSEISMIC
NONLINEAR SEISMICANALYSIS
DESIGN EXAMPLE
METHODS| | 8
27FEBRUARY 2016
October 2015
Modelling
A B C D E F
35000
3000 6000 6000 6000 6000 6000 2000
+4.0mCD
+0.0mCD +1.2
-2.8
20000
STEEL
TUBULAR PILES
QUARRY RUN
-10.8 (0.1-400) KG
20000
20.0m
-14.8
20000
-20.8mCD -18.8
20000
-22.8mCD
20000
Spring 1.0m Spring 0.5m
SPRING SPACING: 0.5m
MEDIUM DENSE TO
20000
14000
10000
-49.0mCD
9 PILED WHARFSEISMIC
NONLINEAR SEISMICANALYSIS
DESIGN EXAMPLE
METHODS| | 8
27FEBRUARY 2016
October 2015
Analysis steps
S1. Run static pushover analysis & display pushover curve
S2. Determine displacement demand [capacity spectrum]
8.0
a - (m/s2) Displacement Response
7.0 Spectra
6.0 Reduced Displacement
Response Spectra
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0 d - (m)
0.0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20
10 PILED WHARFSEISMIC
NONLINEAR SEISMICANALYSIS
DESIGN EXAMPLE
METHODS| | 8
27FEBRUARY 2016
October 2015
Analysis steps
S4. Re-push model to ∆D & save hinge output
S5. Checking the plastic curvature by interaction diagram
15000
N - kN Plastic curvature
θ p / Lp = Φ p
10000
5000
-5000
-10000
Φ - 1/m
-15000
-0.04 -0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04
11 PILED WHARFSEISMIC
NONLINEAR SEISMICANALYSIS
DESIGN EXAMPLE
METHODS| | 8
27FEBRUARY 2016
October 2015
Results
A B C D E F
35000
+4.0mCD
D813-14.2mm
QUARRY RUN
Case 2: Class 3/4 1
1.5
(0.1-400) KG
D1220-(12.5-20.6)mm
-20.8mCD
-22.8mCD
MEDIUM DENSE TO
Case 3: Mixed class 1/2 + 3/4 DENSE SAND
D1016 – (12.5-17.5)mm
D1220-(16.0-23.8)mm
12 PILED WHARFSEISMIC
NONLINEAR SEISMICANALYSIS
DESIGN EXAMPLE
METHODS| | 8
27FEBRUARY 2016
October 2015
Results A B C
35000
D E F
Pile weight per bent & Displacement 3000 6000 6000 6000 6000 6000 2000
140 +4.0mCD
120 PGA=0.25g
+0.0mCD
100 115.3
80 93.6
60 79.5 78.3
40 Class Class Mixed EC8-2 1.5 D1220-20.6mm
1
20 1/2 3/4 =>
0
C1-D813 C2-1220 C3-1016 LD-1220 -20.8mCD
D1016D1520-25mm
12.5 => 16.0mm
120 400 ∆ - mm Case 1-D813
W – t/bent Case 1-D813
110 Case 2-D1220 300
Case 2-D1220
100 Case 3-D1016 Case 3-D1016
90 200
80
100
70
PGA/g PGA/g
60 0
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
13 PILED WHARFSEISMIC
NONLINEAR SEISMICANALYSIS
DESIGN EXAMPLE
METHODS| | 8
27FEBRUARY 2016
October 2015
Results
Bending moment in crossheads
-15000 -20000
Static- H
Static- H Static-S
Static-S -15000
-10000 PGA=0.25-H
PGA=0.25-H PGA=0.25-S
PGA=0.25-S -10000
-5000 -5000
0 0
5000
5000
10000
Class 1/2 – D813 Class 3/4 – D1220
10000 15000
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
-15000 -50000
Static- H
Static- H Static-S
Static-S -40000
-10000 PGA=0.25-H
PGA=0.25-S PGA=0.4g-H PGA=0.4g-S
-30000
-5000
-20000
0 -10000
0
5000
10000
10000
20000
Mixed – D1016 Class 3/4 – D1220/1620
15000 30000
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36
15 PILED WHARFSEISMIC
NONLINEAR SEISMICANALYSIS
DESIGN EXAMPLE
METHODS| | 8
27FEBRUARY 2016
October 2015
Q&A
helge.frandsen@rhdhv.com
16 PILED WHARFSEISMIC
NONLINEAR SEISMICANALYSIS
DESIGN EXAMPLE
METHODS| | 8
27FEBRUARY 2016
October 2015