Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Some people associate “martial law” with human rights violations. This
made me realize how warped our understanding of martial law is.
Martial Law is actually a remedy to protect the state. Under our present
constitution, the president may place the Philippines or any part thereof under
martial law, when there is “invasion or rebellion, when the public safety requires
it.” (Art. VII, Section 18 of the Constitution)
It was easy for former President Marcos to place the Philippines under
martial law before because under the 1973 and 1935 Constitutions, the power to
proclaim martial law can be exercised in case of “imminent danger” of invasion or
rebellion. However, under the present Constitution, this power can only be
exercised in case of “actual” invasion or rebellion and only when public safety
demands it. Hence, the mere threat of rebellion, without an actual public and
armed uprising, cannot be a valid justification for declaring martial law.
It can be gleaned from the foregoing that our president cannot just declare
martial law whenever he wants to. There are specific requirements.