Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Edited by
James R. Lilley and Chuck Downs
In March 1996 in the closing days before Taiwan’s first presidential election, the
USS Nimitz carrier battle group, on duty in the Mediterranean, was redirected
through Southeast Asia toward Taiwan. As a military maneuver, the action was
complex but not exceptionally difficult. Yet because of its significance to regional
politics and diplomacy and its long-range implications for the preservation of
stability, the action could well be recorded as a watershed event in American
security policy in Asia.
The first popular election of a chief executive in China’s long history was
accompanied by a display of frustration from Beijing. China test-fired missiles into
areas near Taiwan’s two busiest ports, into commercial shipping and
transportation lanes. Naturally, concerns over the accuracy of Chinese missiles
and questions regarding China’s larger intentions worried Taiwan’s citizens.
Nevertheless, they turned out for the balloting and cast the majority of their votes
for the candidate who had so displeased Beijing, Lee Teng-hui.
Tensions on both sides of the Taiwan Strait rose as Chinese missile exercises
were staged to intimidate Taiwan’s voters. In Washington, members of the U.S.
Congress, demonstrating sympathy for and solidarity with Taiwan’s emergent
democracy, called on the Clinton administration to take steps to reassure
Taiwan’s citizenry and to reassert American power in the western Pacific. The
administration accomplished this by sending in the Nimitz carrier battle group.
The first carrier on the scene, the USS Independence, and a number of its
BusinessSummaries.com www.bizsum.com
reprinted with permission from the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
Page 3
auxiliary vessels, had already been ordered to waters off Taiwan to monitor the
missile exercises. Permanently stationed in Japan, the Independence would
routinely monitor any major regional military exercise. Sending the second
carrier, however, signaled American concern and resolve. When actions
themselves are clear signals, little needs to be said about intentions. The Nimitz
was redirected toward Taiwan, explained administration spokesmen at the
Pentagon and the White House, "in an effort to maintain peace and stability in the
Taiwan Strait."
International crises like the one in the Taiwan Strait can emerge and recede
without sustained public attention to the issues involved. All too often, the
causes, potential consequences, intense emotions, and estimated risks that are
clear at the time of a crisis fade immediately afterward. Especially in situations
like the crisis in the Taiwan Strait, where the risks to American interests were
high but the level of general knowledge among the American public was low,
crises can pass with little public debate. The absence of debate in turn can mean
that the lessons for policy makers are never learned, the root causes are never
addressed, and the ambiguities are never clarified.
Highlights
-XQH7HXIHO'UH\HUUHYLHZVWKHVRXUFHVRIWHQVLRQWKDW
7DL0LQJ&KHXQJDQH[SHUWRQ&KLQD
VPLOLWDU\REVHUYHV
BusinessSummaries.com www.bizsum.com
reprinted with permission from the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
Page 4
5LFKDUG$%LW]LQJHUDQDO\]HVKRZPXFK&KLQDLV
%DWHV*LOODVVHVVHV&KLQD
VVWHDG\SURJUHVVWRZDUG
BusinessSummaries.com www.bizsum.com
reprinted with permission from the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
Page 5
5LFKDUG')LVKHU-UUHIHUVWR&KLQD
VXVHRIVKRUW-range
:KLOHDQDO\VWVJHQHUDOO\DJUHHWKDWPLVVLOHVDUHQRZ
$PHULFDQSRZHULVUHDVVXULQJWR7DLZDQEXWWKH
BusinessSummaries.com www.bizsum.com
reprinted with permission from the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
Page 6
$FFRUGLQJWR7DHKR.LPWKHUHLVDJURZLQJDZDUHQHVVLQ
$UWKXU:DOGURQGLUHFWRURI$VLDQVWXGLHVDW$(,VHHNVD
BusinessSummaries.com www.bizsum.com
reprinted with permission from the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
Page 7
Conclusion
Crisis in the Taiwan Strait attempts to come to grips with all the complex factors
in a troubling situation--essentially the same effort American policy makers have
been making since the time of the Chinese civil war. America has tried to
maintain regional peace and security. Taiwan has been assured of our support
and China of our interest in peace. The United States does not seek a split
between Taipei and Beijing; it seeks to guarantee peace. China will not commit to
reunification through peaceful means alone, and Taiwan will not accept terms it
finds repugnant for reunification. Time may heal this simmering crisis; progress
has clearly been made in the past generation. Yet time is purchased by
deterrence, and deterrence is accomplished by military power at great cost and
considerable risk. Resolve is strong on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, and the
depth of commitment to seemingly irreconcilable principles cannot be dismissed
and will not readily be changed.
The events of March 1996 may be repeated, despite the fact that the crisis
probably redounded to the detriment of its instigators. Understanding the
instability of the situation in the strait and the probability of a similar situation
arising in the future, the authors of this book have assessed the critical factors
involved in the crisis. Their essays will inform a debate that is all too likely to be
heard again.
BusinessSummaries.com www.bizsum.com
reprinted with permission from the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research