Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PC
Contents
Dupuit flow towards a trench is a common problem in civil engineering. Let’s consider
the example shown in Fig. 5.1. It corresponds to a steady state flow with known
upstream and downstream head.
Let’s open the input file and examine the data (Fig. 5.2). Under Control/Analysis &
Drivers, we see that the problem is defined as Plane (strain) flow, with a Time
dependent/steady state driver. A single time step is sufficient in this case since flow is
steady, but iterations (within the step) will be needed to find the free surface.
- “no flow” on the upper and lower edge; this is a default boundary condition,
which does not need any input.
- Imposed pressure: select FE model/Boundary Condition/Pressure
BC/Update Parameters , click on the left boundary; if parameter screen does
not pop up, use scale, change sign, then diagram show reverse, then repeat:
update parameters and click again on pressure diagram, values can now be
updated.
- The third type of boundary condition is a seepage condition, it is implemented as
a seepage element: go back to FE model/Seepage/Direction/Show a set of
black line segments will point outwards of the seepage boundary (Fig. 5.3). This
type of boundary condition is used whenever a seepage out- or inflow can be
expected. The boundary condition will impose a flow proportional to the difference
of pressure between in- and outside the boundary, if the medium is saturated
inside, and a “no flow” condition if the medium is not saturated inside.
Seepage
boundary condition
no flow
Flow % pressure
Pressure difference
boundary
condition
Analysis/Run Analysis can be performed in 1 step, but a few iterations are needed to
find the free surface.
Remarks:
- The free surface does not change too significantly in this problem, when K v is
changed, but the outflow does. When Kv is increased permeability and therefore
outflow increases.
- The free surface corresponds to zero pressure, pressures above the free surface
are positive, but their contribution to total stress in the medium is multiplied by
the saturation, so that the effective water pressure above the free surface is in
fact zero: ij ij ' Sp ij and Sp 0 above the free surface.
tot
5.2 Theory
In table 5.1, the continuity equation expresses that a local source induces a divergent
flow divergence and a local time-dependent pressure variation. The flow conditions can
be transient, in this case all terms of the continuity equation are active, or steady
state, in which case there is no pressure change in time and the corresponding term in
the equation, cp , can be ignored.
_______________________________________________________________________
Table 5.1 Equations of partially saturated underground flow
_______________________________________________________________________
If the flow is confined, the medium fully saturated, and the flow condition steady, then
the problem is linear; it can be solved in a single step without iterations. But most of the
time the exact position of the free surface is unknown a priori, it is part of the problem to
be solved, the problem becomes therefore nonlinear and iterations are needed even for
the steady state flow, a fortiori within each time-step in the transient case.
Material data needed include Darcy’s coefficient K, and F, the fluid’s specific weight, in
the basic version; all other parameters are selected by default. In the advanced
version the fluid compressibility F and two new coefficients are introduced, (1/) [m], a
measure of the thickness of the transition from full saturation to residual saturation, and
Sr which is the second parameter.
_______________________________________________________________________
Table 5.2 Material data for flow problems
Material data and Sr depend strongly on the granulometric structure of the medium,
values taken from literature are given in Table 5.3.
_______________________________________________________________________
Table 5.3 Flow parameters from [Yang & al. 2004]
Type of soil Sr
Gravely Sand 100 0
Medium Sand 10 0
Fine Sand 8 0
Clayey Sand 1-1.7 0.23-0.09
[Yang & al. 2004] Factors affecting drying and wetting soil-water characteristic curves of
sandy soils. Canadian Geotech. J. 41, pp. 908-920, 2004.
_______________________________________________________________________
Pressure is prescribed at nodes where the pressure is known, it is used here to introduce
boundary conditions corresponding to the left free surface, a linear pressure distribution.
A “no flow” condition, q=0, is imposed at the bottom, this condition is natural, it is
applied “by default”, like the zero surface traction present by default in deformation
analysis.
5.2.2.2 Seepage
The seepage boundary condition, in red on the figure, enables us to handle seepage on
free surfaces, a situation which is frequently encountered, and it also serves to model
drains; it corresponds to a Darcy type equation over a pressure jump. The seepage
element has two layers, internal and external. External pressure, zero by default, is
prescribed on the external layer, and internal pressures are computed by the program on
the internal layer. The boundary condition will switch automatically from no flow to
pressure driven flow, depending on internal saturation, see Table 5.4.
_______________________________________________________________________
Table 5.4 Equation of seepage boundary condition [Aubry & Ozanam, 1988]
𝑚
𝑞𝑜𝑢𝑡 = 𝐾𝑣 𝐾 𝑝𝑒𝑥𝑡 − 𝑝int ; 𝐾𝑣 is specified by the user, by default 𝐾𝑣 = 1
𝑠
− 𝑤𝑒𝑛 𝐾𝑣 0 ∶ no outflow takes place, 𝑡𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑤𝑖𝑡𝑐𝑒𝑑 𝑜𝑛
𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑤𝑒𝑛 𝑆𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑆 < 1 𝑖𝑠 detected 𝑖𝑛 𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑛.
− 𝑤𝑒𝑛 𝐾𝑣 is large: internal and external pressure will be forced equal, and seepage flow takes place.
𝑇𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑤𝑖𝑡𝑐𝑒𝑑 on 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑤𝑒𝑛 𝑆𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑆 = 1 𝑖𝑠 detected 𝑖𝑛 𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑛.
Referring to Figure 5.7 we observe that the water table intersects the soil surface above
the downstream water table. The position of the intersection is an unknown a priori; it
will depend on permeability, domain geometry and upstream head. We cannot therefore
anticipate which boundary condition to apply and where: pressure or “no flow”. This
situation will be handled by the “seepage surface element”. The seepage coefficient Kv
depends on the properties of the interface and is user defined. The condition will switch
automatically from “seepage” to “no flow” across the border when internal saturation is
detected to be less than 1, and vice-versa. As a rule, seepage boundary conditions will
be applied whenever boundary conditions are susceptible to change.
An example of transient flow with variable pressure head boundary conditions illustrated
in Fig. 5.8 is discussed next. A rectangular dam is subjected to a rapid filling followed by
a rapid drawdown on its upstream side. The analysis is carried out to determine the
time-evolution of internal pressures within the domain.
Remark:
- You can either follow the description of the mesh and boundary conditions
creation below, or open ZSOIL data: Ex_5_2_FillDrawDown2D.inp.
Remark:
- Observe that, for obvious reasons, pressure head boundary conditions are always
associated with seepage boundary conditions, since boundary conditions have to
be able to switch from imposed pressures to “no flow” condition q = 0.
Fig. 5.12 Load function associated with water level on the left boundary
5.3.4 Results
The evolution in pressure distribution as a function of time is illustrated in Figure 5.14.
Observe that the use of seepage boundary conditions allows to capture the strong
gradients along the boundaries, which result from the fast change in boundary
conditions.
Remark:
- In Fig. 5.14, pore pressures scale has been set to min = -1 and max = 0 in order
to identify clearly the free surface, corresponding to zero pressure.
5.4 References
[Aubry & Ozanam, 1988] Free Surface tracking through non-saturated models. In
Numerical methods in geomechanics: 757-763, Swoboda (ed.), Balkema, Rotterdam
[Yang & al. 2004] Factors affecting drying and wetting soil-water characteristic curves of
sandy soils. Canadian Geotech. J. 41, pp. 908-920, 2004.