Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN: 2456-9992
ABSTRACT: Grazing conflicts in Northern Kenya is invoking heightened concern which is drawing the attention of many stakeholders,
communities and Governments alike. These conflicts are as a result of many conspiring factors in the North of Kenya. However, most of the
grazing conflicts occur on the already established community conservancies, before they filter out to the private ranches and conservancies.
The objective of this study was to use Geographical Information Systems to evaluate the available forage on 4 conservancies in Laikipia and
Isiolo counties, as part of a larger study undertaken to predict grazing conflicts in Northern Kenya. We used Normalised Difference
Vegetation Index (NDVI) to classify the vegetation into 11 classes using MODIS 1km spatial resolution. A 27-year rainfall data of the area
was obtained from the Meteorological department for correlation with the satellite images on land use changes in the study area from 1990-
2017. NDVI maps were developed to depict spatial and temporal vegetation trends to draw conclusions on the availability of forage in the
study area. The results were presented in NDVI maps, tables and graphs for easy interpretation. The results showed that large areas have
transited from one land use type to another in the study period, encompassing both reduction and increase in size of various vegetation
classes. It also shows that in most areas, green vegetation classes have changed to the negative as depicted in reduction in the spatial
resolution. The low greenness indicated lesser availability of browsable biomass mostly in the months of January to April, and June to
September, while the browner colours indicated mostly bare grounds around the same seasons. The results further showed that there is a
positive correlation between the low precipitation and increase in grazing conflicts, with the months of January-April being the most
affected. The results will be useful to grazing planners, drought managers and regional and national governments in mitigation of grazing
conflicts.
Key words: Wet Season, Dry season, Drought, Participatory GIS (PGIS), MODIS
From the figure of long term monthly rainfall data above resource in the study area, since these determine the
we came up with the seasonal variation of rainfall across seasonality of the grazing forage and water resources
the study area. We can deduce that the study area has across the study area.
primarily two wet seasons, which is April to May, and
October to November. There are also two dry seasons Rainfall and grazing conflicts
from January to March and June to September. Rainfall According to the PGIS data and responses obtained from
supports primary production of natural vegetation and the social survey, precipitation and forage availability are
croplands (Ericksen, 2011); therefore the temporal and critical in determining the grazing conflicts in the northern
spatial distribution and rainfall seasonality is very critical
Kenya. The Table below shows the reported number of grazing conflicts versus the average monthly rainfall data:
Table 1: The distribution of rainfall and the grazing conflicts in the study area
COUNTIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Isiolo 16.4 11 28 80.7 27.7 5 3.7 1.8 1.7 28.4 73.1 36.2
Laikipia 21 12 42.1 92.8 60.4 34.8 41.3 42.4 39.9 58.6 63.1 28.3
Lewa 35.9 37.8 112 314.5 189.2 30.4 44.2 39 401 197 274 72.8
Conflicts 20 18 10 2 12 20 23 22 3 8 4 16
Average LT precip 73.3 61 182.1 487.9 277.3 70.2 89.3 83.2 443 284 410 137
Average Montly
18.3 15.2 45.5 122 69.3 17.5 22.3 20.8 111 71.1 103 34.3
Precip
From the table 1 above, it can be seen that most of the months with the most depressed vegetation indices.
grazing conflicts occur between January and April, while Below is a correlation between the rainfall availability and
these are the months with the lowest precipitation in the grazing conflicts in the study area:
study area. This supports literature that these are the
R2 is a statistical measure of how close the data is to the fitted regression line. When R2 is 0.969 (90.6%) % it indicates that
the precipitation explains 90.6 % of the occurrences of the grazing conflicts in the 4 conservancies.
Table 2: The trends of the longterm precipittion vesus the NDVI (2001-2017):
The figures show that most of the areas under the study maintained a 17-year NDVI range of between 0.1 to 0.4 avareaging
0.32 on the more drier area and 0.5 on the higher regions. The trends can be further summarised in the graph of longterm
precipition versus NDVI as shown in the figure below:
In the figure above, R2 is 0.719, indicating that availbility of precipitation determines 71.9% of Vegetation indices in the
study area. This means that the lower the precipitation the lower the vegetation index and vise versa. The vegetation indices
derived from the MODIS earth reflectance for 1990 and 2014 are therefore spread on a wider satelite image for the study area
in the figure below:
Fig 3: 1990 Average spatial NDVI for the study area in 1990 -2014
The satelite imagery above shows a comparison of the up the western and some parts of the eastern to south-
vegetation index and landuse changes on the study area eastern of the conservancy. This could be due to
between 1990 and 2014. In 1990, it shows that Nasuulu, ( establishment and adherence to grazing blocks advocated
far north), was mostly composed of wooded grasslands by the conservancy management. Leparua Consevancy,
(central to northeast of conservancy), which was rapidly however portrayed a almost equal amount of wooded
transisting to open grassslands (northwest). There were grasslands and open grasslnds, with more open grasslands
few patches of open forests (central), which is today seen to the northwest, a situation that has significantly changed
as depleted evidence of dry acacia rangeland. In 2014, it today. Lewa in 1990 showed and NDVI of more open
shows more than 50% of the land use has transited from grasslands followed by wooded grasslands. There were
wooded grasslands to open grasslands as seen on the north patches of open forests between the boundary with
and northwest (boundary with Samburu). On its central Ngarendare forest,and vegetated wetlands (dams or
region, a more hilly area, evidence of open forest exists gullies), while evidence of annual croplands existend on
compared to 1990s. This could be attributed to gains its northwestern tip bounder with Leparua (probably along
through creation of community conservancy which Ngarenight river). However in 2014 a balance between
implements more controlled grazing plans. Ilngwesi in wooded and open grasslands with the latter more on the
1990 portrayed NDVI of more wooded grasslands and eastern and the north-eastern boundary as compared to
almost balanced amounts of open forests and open 1990s. This can be attributed to the fact that Lewa
grasslands. A closer look shows a tendency of transition converted from Livestock ranching to wildlife
fom wooded grasslands to open grasslands from southwest conservation, giving way to a growing populations of
towards northwest. However, in 2014 more open elephants and the other ungulates, with different foraging
grasslands have taken over from the north towards the characteristics than livestock. Annual and perennial
centre of the conservancy. More open forests have taken croplands has encroached more of its eastern line. In
1990s, there were fewer settlements along the Lewa forest to a mixture of annaual/perenial croplands mainly
eastern boundary, whereas farming population increased due to farming encroachment on opengrassland. In 2014,
towards the turn of the millennium, more water sources more conversion of dense forests to open forest and
were accessible through drilling boreholes and pipelines wooded forest is taking place on its northern boundary
leading to more settlements and farming activities. The tending to the south, while the perennial/annual croplands
patches of vegetated wetlands to the south have have not changed significantly. The spread of open
disappeared, with two key wetlands developing on its grasslands/woodlands could be partly attributed to
central area. These are most likely the manmade dams. At increasing livestock populations especially during drought
the same time, Ngarendare forest portrayed an NDVI of times, coupled by doubling populations of wildlife
moderate to dense forest, with its northern boudery (elephants etc) in the forest since 1990s. The table below
showing transition from moderate forest to open shows the land cover class statistics between 1990-2016
grasslands along its boundary with Lewa. Its southern as derived from the GIS
boundery portraid evidence of transition from moderate
Value Landcover Area – 1990 (ha) Area – 2014 (ha) Change (ha) (+/-)
1 No Data 0.99 81.54 80.55 +
2 Dense Forest 4174.29 4174.29 -382.14 -
3 Moderate Forest 40.32 165.06 124.14 +
4 Open Forest 160.38 687.06 526.68 +
5 Wooded Grassland 69937.65 62657.01 -7280.64 -
6 Open Grassland 25699.68 32199.66 6499.98 +
7 Perennial Cropland 3.24 20.52 17.28 +
8 Annual Cropland 895.05 1753.11 858.06 +
9 Vegetated Wetland 32.67 98.91 66.24 +
10 Open Water 10.35 13.86 3.51 +
11 Other land 728.73 214.47 -514.26 -
From the Table 4 above it can be seen that dense forest woodlands and forests to transits to open grass lands. The
have decreased by 382 ha, while the wooded grasslands annual cropping system has increased by 858 ha reducing
have also reduced by 7280.6 ha and is rapidly being land for livestock keeping and wildlife conservation. This
converted to open grasslands. This phenomenon can be would explain the emergence of human wildlife conflicts
partly attributed to increasing livestock numbers, as well within the larger Laikipia-Samburu regions. Besides,
as increasing population of elephants and the ungulates. perennial cropping has increased slightly by 17 ha. This
We postulate that due to previous incidences of poaching could be attributed to adoption/change of livelihood from
in the 1990s, and increased better security in the recent pastoralism to small-scale agriculture as seen taking place
past, some parts of Laikipia and Isiolo have become the at Leparua on the northern border with Lewa, or due to
refuge for elephants and other larger mammals. There has settlement of farming communities in previously pastoral
also been establishment of private wildlife conservancies, areas. The figure below shows the most recent (2017)
further assuring the elephants and browsers of better appearance of the vegetation indices on the study area.
security. This has on the other hand pressurised the
In January 2017, Nasuulu, Ilngwesi, Leparua displays classes of Laikipia-Isiolo-Samburu landscape. This will
large portions of bare lands, with Lewa displaying its help the future grazing planners and wildlife managers to
north-western tip towards Isiolo. In April, more vegetation recommend setting up of wildlife sanctuaries within the
greenness is depicted, with Ngarendare showing a bigger landscape, or establish well managed migratory corridors
NDVI than other conservancies. This is supported by the to mitigate vegetation loss. A study is also recommended
rainfall seasonality (see fig 1.) to find out the changes in community livelihoods as a
result of adoption of different economic activities by
Conclusions indigenous communities as a result of diminishing grazing
There are tremendous changes in land use and vegetation resources in northern Kenya.
characteristics taking place across Laikipia and Isiolo
landscapes. From the analysis of satellite images above, it Acknowledgements
is clear that large areas have transited from one landuse This study would not have been successful without the
type to another, encompassing both reduction and increase support of Ilngwesi, Ngarendare and Lewa WC staff for
in size of different classes (see table 4). Of importance is allowing me to access, conduct and search information in
to note that in most areas, life vegetation classes have their areas. I also appreciate the staff of Kenya
reduced in sizes as depicted in reduction of the green Meteorological Department and the Regional Centre for
colour resolution. This could be as a result of different Resource Surveying and Mapping for their assistance.
pressure sources like farming and human settlements,
increase in wildlife and livestock numbers leading to over References:
grazing and degradation. As noted by Edwin Kisio, a [1]. Ericksen P, et al. (2011). Mapping and valuing
research officer at Lewa Research and Monitoring ecosystem services in the Ewaso Ng’iro Watershed.
Department, elephants’ numbers have more than ILRI
quadrupled since 1990s. This has brought immense
pressure on Lewa and Ngarendare forest due to their [2]. Jatzold.R. (1995). Climatology of Northern and North
destructive behaviour on vegetation and their mode of East Kenya. In Range Management Handbook of
feeding. This has contributed to widespread negative Kenya Vol.11. Ministry of Livestock and Marketing.
change of vegetation resolutions on the Lewa-Ngarendare
landscape, as seen in figure 3&4 above. [3]. Holme, A.McR., Burnside, D.G. and Mitchell, A.A.
(1987). The development of a system for monitoring
Recommendations trend in range condition in the arid shrublands of
We recommend further studies to ascertain the role of Western Australia. Australian Rangeland Journal
elephants and larger ungulates in the changing landuse 9:14-20.
Appendices:
Longterm NVDI versus Rainfall
NDVI_2001_2017 (Ave_17
Station_name years) Precipitation (Ave_17 years)
ACH.PST- ISIOLO 0.199698 29.74756
COLCHECCIO 0.375576 57.93611
RUMURUTI AG 0.391583 49.61227
LOLLDAIGA 0.502089 52.36205
LAIKIPIA AIRBASE
(NANYUKI) 0.47944 47.75284