Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3, AUGUST 2006
Abstract—In this paper, a technique based on interval arith- suggested in [13]. Theoretical aspects of three-phase distribu-
metic is presented for considering the uncertainties of the input tion load flow solution have been studied in [14]. An adaptive
parameters in the power flow solution of three-phase unbalanced power flow method with improved convergence characteristics
radial distribution systems. The uncertainties in both the load
demand and the feeder parameters have been considered. The has been introduced in [15]. A method for incorporating trans-
results obtained from an interval arithmetic-based power flow former nodal admittance matrices into the backward/forward
solution have been compared with those obtained from repeated sweep algorithm has been described in [16].
load flow simulations. In all the above works, the analyses have been carried out as-
Index Terms—Interval arithmetic, power flow, three-phase dis- suming the input quantities (loads at different buses and feeder
tribution system. parameters) are known and fixed. However, in real-life situa-
tions, the values of these input quantities may contain a signif-
icant amount of uncertainties. These uncertainties might occur
I. INTRODUCTION due to: 1) error in the calculation or measurement of the feeder
parameters and 2) error in the metered, calculated, or forecasted
ECAUSE of its application in many distribution system de-
B cision algorithms such as network planning, volt/var con-
trol, service restoration, feeder reconfiguration, state estima-
values of the demands in the system load buses. In [17], use
of interval arithmetic has been first proposed to incorporate the
uncertainties into the power flow solution of a transmission net-
tion, etc., distribution system power flow analysis is nowadays work. In this work, the authors have used a small five-bus trans-
an integral component of distribution system planning, opera- mission network for illustration.
tion, and control functions. Now, due to various reasons, such Motivated by the work of [17], this paper proposes to apply
as unbalanced consumer loads, presence of single, double, and the interval arithmetic to the power flow algorithm of a three-
three-phase line sections, existence of asymmetrical line sec- phase unbalanced radial power distribution system to account
tions etc., present-day distribution systems are primarily un- for the uncertain input quantities. Basically, in this approach, the
balanced in nature. As a result, for reliable and accurate solu- uncertain input quantities are represented as interval numbers
tions, three-phase load flow study of the distribution systems (instead of fixed numbers), and subsequently, interval arithmetic
is required. To cater to this need, substantial effort has been is used to compute the power flow solution of the distribution
devoted in the literature for developing efficient and accurate system. This paper is organized as follows. In Section II, the
three-phase load flow algorithms for distribution systems. In the fundamental concepts of interval arithmetic used in this paper
early endeavors, a direct solution approach using the impedance are discussed. The algorithm for power flow analysis of the
matrix of the unbalanced network [1] and the Gauss ap- three-phase unbalanced radial distribution system using interval
proach [2] have been suggested. Subsequently, different other analysis is described in Section III. Numerical results obtained
techniques, such as the backward/forward sweep algorithm [3], for different cases of input parameter uncertainties are presented
the three-phase fast decoupled power flow algorithm [4], [5], in Section IV. Lastly, Section V concludes this paper.
the rectangular Newton–Raphson-based method and its fast de-
coupled version [6], the current injection method [7], the phase II. INTERVAL ARITHMETIC
decoupled method [8], etc., have also been developed. Another The following notations have been used throughout the paper
direct approach, which utilizes two matrices developed from the to describe the fundamental concepts of interval arithmetic and
topological characteristics of the distribution system, has been application of it to the three-phase radial distribution system
introduced in [9]. In a series of papers, Chen et al. have de- power flow algorithm.
veloped the models for three-phase co-generators, transformers, A lowercase letter, such as , denotes a scalar (real) number.
and loads necessary for three-phase distribution load flow anal- A lowercase letter with subscript “I,” such as , denotes a real
ysis [10]–[12]. Models for voltage control devices have been interval number.
With these notations, the basic concepts of interval arithmetic
Manuscript received July 5, 2005; revised December 8, 2005. Paper no. are described below.
TPWRS-00399-2005. An interval number is the set of real numbers
The author is with the Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute
of Technology, Roorkee 24 667, India (e-mail: biswafee@iitr.ernet.in). such that . and are known as the lower
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.876698 limit and upper limit of the interval number, respectively. It is
0885-8950/$20.00 © 2006 IEEE
DAS: CONSIDERATION OF INPUT PARAMETER UNCERTAINTIES IN LOAD FLOW SOLUTION 1089
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
where
Fig. 1. Typical radial distribution system.
(5)
quently, the complex interval arithmetic has been used to com-
The distance between two interval numbers is defined as [18] pute the power flow solution.
The basic feeder model used in this paper is same as that
depicted in [3, Fig. 1] and hence is not again shown in this paper.
(6) The impedance matrix of a feeder section between nodes and
is given by [3]
A complex number , where “ ” is the complex
operator, is defined as a complex interval number if both its real
and imaginary parts are interval numbers. The complex conju-
gate of , denoted as , is given by . For any two (11)
complex interval numbers and ,
the addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division operations
are defined as [18] If any particular phase of this feeder section does not exist,
then the elements in the corresponding row and column of
(7) this matrix would all be zero. Now, when no uncertainties in
(8) the feeder parameters are involved, all the matrix elements
etc. in (11) are fixed complex quantities. However,
(9) in the presence of uncertainties, each of these elements would
be represented by complex interval quantities.
(10) Fig. 1 illustrates a typical radial distribution system with
where and buses and branches. For the purpose of
. power flow analysis, the voltage of the root node is as-
It is to be noted that the expressions in (7)–(10) can be eval- sumed to be known, and a flat voltage profile (equal to the
uated using the fundamental relationships given in equations voltage of the root node) has been assumed for the initial
(1)–(4). voltages of all the other nodes of the network. Thus, in a
An interval vector is a vector whose elements are all interval per unit system, the voltage of the root node and the ini-
numbers, and the elements of a complex interval vector are all tial voltages of the other nodes have been assumed to be
complex interval numbers. Similarly, the elements of an interval p.u., p.u.,
matrix and a complex interval matrix are interval numbers and and p.u. for phases a, b, and c,
complex interval numbers, respectively. The addition, subtrac- respectively. With these initial voltages, the following steps are
tion, and multiplication operations of two complex interval vec- executed for iterative solution of the distribution system.
tors (or matrices) obey the same corresponding rules for addi- Step 1: At iteration “k,” the three-phase nodal current injec-
tion, subtraction, and multiplication of two complex (non-in- tions at node are calculated as
terval) vectors (or matrices), and the resulting expressions can
be evaluated by using (1)–(4) and (7)–(10).
where, in (12), is the complex interval cur- tion systems that have been obtained after making certain sim-
rent for phase a (b, c) at node corresponding to the th plifications in the original IEEE 13-bus, 34-bus, and 123-bus
iteration, is the constant, pre-specified, radial distribution test feeders [19]. The simplifications adopted
complex interval injected power at phase a (b, c) of node in this paper are essentially the same simplifications followed
is the complex interval voltage in [20]. However, for the sake of completeness, these simplifi-
of phase a (b, c) of node at the th iteration, and cations are mentioned also in this paper as follows.
is the total complex interval shunt admittance 1) The transformers, voltage regulators. and the switches are
connected at phase a (b, c) of node . omitted, and hence, the corresponding feeder sections and
Step 2: At this step, known as the backward sweep, the cur- nodes are deleted.
rents in each branch are calculated starting from the feeder sec- 2) The distributed load along any feeder section is lumped and
tion in the last layer and progressively moving toward the root allocated equally between the two terminal nodes of that
node. Thus, with reference to Fig. 1, at iteration “k,” the com- particular feeder section.
plex interval current at branch “L” is calculated as 3) All the spot loads have been assumed to be constant PQ
load and star connected.
With these three modifications in place, the resulting loading
patterns and feeder parameters in any of these three test sys-
(13)
tems are henceforth termed as “base loading pattern” and “base
feeder parameter,” respectively, of that particular test system.
where, in (13), is the complex interval current For all these three test systems, three different cases have been
for phase a (b, c) flowing through feeder section at the th considered in this paper: 1) uncertainties only in the load pa-
iteration, and is the set of feeder section connected to node rameters, 2) uncertainties only in the feeder parameters, and 3)
. uncertainties both in the load and feeder parameters. However,
Step 3: In this step, known as the forward sweep, starting due to space limitation, the results obtained only in the IEEE
from the root node and progressively moving toward the last 123-bus system are shown in this paper.
layer, the node voltages are updated from the knowledge of the
latest updated voltages of the previous nodes. Thus, with refer- A. Uncertainties in Load Parameters Only
ence to Fig. 1, at iteration “k,” the voltages at the node are In this case, the feeder parameters have been kept fixed at their
calculated from the knowledge of the voltages of the node as corresponding “base feeder parameters,” and uncertainties are
assumed to be present only in the load parameters. As already
mentioned in Section I, the uncertainties in the load parame-
ters have been taken into account by assuming that the loads
are varying over a certain range or interval. For this purpose,
it has been assumed that for each phase of each node, the un-
(14) certainties in its real and reactive loading values are limited to
% variation with respect to the corresponding values at the
where, in (14), is the complex interval “base loading pattern.” Thus, for phase a of node , the real
voltage of phase a (b, c) of node at the th iteration, and and reactive loads are assumed to vary over the intervals of
etc. are the complex interval elements of the KW and KVAR, respec-
impedance matrix of the feeder section . tively, where and are the real and reactive power loads,
Step 4: For each node , the distance between its respectively, of phase a of node at the “base loading pattern.”
three-phase voltages of present iteration and those of pre- Similarly, for the remaining two phases of node and for all
vious iteration, henceforth denoted by , is calculated at the three phases of all the other nodes, the intervals of variation
each iteration “k” by the following procedure. For each of load demands have been decided.
phase, e.g., phase a, the voltages and are com- When the load demands in a system vary within some inter-
plex interval numbers, and hence, they can be expressed as vals, the bus voltages and feeder power flows (for all the three
and . Subsequently, phases) also vary within certain intervals. These intervals have
the distance between and is calculated as been calculated by performing load flow study using the algo-
. Similarly, the quantities rithm described in Section III. For further reference, this algo-
(distance between and and (distance between rithm would henceforth be termed as “interval load flow method
and are also calculated. Finally, is calculated (ILFM).” For this purpose, the voltage error tolerance limit has
as . If been chosen as 0.000001 p.u. in this paper, and the algorithm
(“n” is the number of buses in the system) is less than a specified took nine iterations to converge.
tolerance limit, the load flow is considered to be converged; For comparison purpose, the intervals of variations of bus
otherwise, the algorithm goes back to step 1. voltages and feeder power flows for all the three phases have
also been calculated by repeated power flow simulations
IV. SIMULATION RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (RPFS). In this method, the load demands for all the three
The proposed algorithm described in the previous section has phases at any bus have been fixed at some arbitrary value
been applied to three different three-phase radial test distribu- within their corresponding, pre-specified intervals (the intervals
DAS: CONSIDERATION OF INPUT PARAMETER UNCERTAINTIES IN LOAD FLOW SOLUTION 1091
Fig. 3. Phase-b voltage profile for load uncertainties only. (a) Magnitude.
(b) Angle (degree).
Fig. 2. Phase-a voltage profile for load uncertainties only. (a) Magnitude.
(b) Angle (degree).
Fig. 5. Phase-a voltage profile for feeder parameter uncertainties only. (a) Mag- Fig. 7. Phase-c voltage profile for feeder parameter uncertainties only. (a) Mag-
nitude. (b) Angle (degree). nitude. (b) Angle (degree).
Fig. 8. Phase-a voltage profile for both feeder parameter and load parameter
uncertainties. (a) Magnitude. (b) Angle (degree).
Fig. 6. Phase-b voltage profile for feeder parameter uncertainties only.
(a) Magnitude. (b) Angle (degree).
[12] T. H. Chen and Y. L. Liang, “Integrated models of distribution trans- [18] G. Alefeld and J. Herzberger, Introductions to Interval Computa-
formers and their loads for three phase power flow analysis,” IEEE tions. New York: Academic, 1983.
Trans. Power Del., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 507–513, Jan. 1996. [19] W. H. Kersting, “Radial distribution test feeders,” IEEE Trans. Power
[13] P. A. N. Garcia, J. L. R. Pereira, and S. Carneiro, “Voltage control de- Syst., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 975–985, Aug. 1991.
vices models for distribution power flow analysis,” IEEE Trans. Power [20] H. Wang and N. N. Schulz, “A revised branch current based distribution
Syst., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 586–594, Nov. 2001. system state estimation algorithm and meter placement impact,” IEEE
[14] K. N. Miu and H. D. Chiang, “Existence, uniqueness and monotonic Trans. Power Syst., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 207–213, Feb. 2004.
properties of the feasible power flow solution for radial three phase
distribution network,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Fundam. Theory
Appl., vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 1502–1514, Oct. 2000.
[15] Y. Zhu and K. Tomsovic, “Adaptive power flow method for distribution
systems with dispersed generation,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 17, Biswarup Das (M’02) received the B.E.E. (Hons.) and M.E. degrees from
no. 3, pp. 822–827, Jul. 2002. Jadavpur University, Calcutta, India, in 1989 and 1991, respectively, and the
[16] Z. Wang, F. Chen, and J. Li, “Implementing transformer nodal admit- Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from IIT Kanpur, Kanpur, India, in 1998,
tance matrices into backward/forward sweep based power flow analysis with specialization in electric power systems.
for unbalanced radial distribution system,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Since 1998, he has been with Department of Electrical Engineering, IIT
vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1831–1836, Nov. 2004. Roorkee, Roorkee, India, where he is presently an Associate Professor.
[17] Z. Wang and F. L. Alvarado, “Interval arithmetic in power flow anal- His current research interests are in the area of FACTS, distribution automa-
ysis,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1341–1349, Aug. 1992. tion, distributed generation, and renewable energy sources.