Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Explain the problems associated with internet commerce in the matter of borders and jurisdiction.
1. Must comply with same laws and regulations that govern the operations of all businesses
2. Face complicating factors
3. Web extends company’s reach beyond traditional boundaries- becomes international business
4. Company can become subject to many more laws quickly than a traditional brick and mortar
business
5. Web increases speed and efficiency of business communications
6. Web creates network of customers who often have significant levels of interaction with each
other
7. Can face rapid and intense reactions from many customers
8. E-commerce exists in a borderless environment. Hence, create concern – whose jurisdiction,
where to take action, what test & laws to be followed when individual resides outside
jurisdictional area. This calls for single jurisdiction
Distinguish between subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction. Explain with examples
Subject-Matter Jurisdiction
1. The system by which a court specializes in hearing cases related to a particular issue, or subject
matter, such as family or criminal cases.
2. Subject-matter jurisdiction is a court’s authority to decide a particular type of dispute.
3. For example, in the United States, federal courts have subject-matter jurisdiction over issues
governed by federal law (such as bankruptcy, copyright, patent, and federal tax matters), and
state courts have subject-matter jurisdiction over issues governed by state laws (such as
professional licensing and state tax matters).
4. If the parties to a contract are both located in the same state, a state court has subject-matter
jurisdiction over disputes that arise from the terms of that contract.
5. The rules for determining whether a court has subject matter jurisdiction are clear and easy to
apply. Few disputes arise over subject-matter jurisdiction.
6. Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the fact that certain courts have the authority to hear
certain matters. Example: For instance, a criminal court would not preside over a divorce case.
The divorce case would instead be heard by the family law court, as these are the only courts
with the authority to grant a divorce, and rule on child custody. Similarly, a family law court
would not be able to sentence a defendant in a criminal matter.
Personal Jurisdiction
1. Personal jurisdiction is, in general, determined by the residence of the parties.
2. A court has personal jurisdiction over a case if the defendant is a resident of the state in which
the court is located. In such cases, the determination of personal jurisdiction is straightforward.
3. However, an out-of-state person or corporation can also voluntarily submit to the jurisdiction of
a particular state court by agreeing to do so in writing or by taking certain actions in the state.
One of the most common ways that people voluntarily submit to a jurisdiction is by signing a
contract that includes a statement, known as a forum selection clause, that the contract will be
enforced according to the laws of a particular state.
That state then has personal jurisdiction over the parties who signed the contract regarding any
enforcement issue that arises from the terms of that contract.
Example: Denise and Walter spent their entire married life in Colorado. Denise moved to New
Mexico, established residency and sued for divorce. If Walter has virtually no contacts with New
Mexico, the New Mexico court has no personal jurisdiction over him. As a practical matter, this
means the court may award Denise a divorce, but cannot make any decisions affecting the division
of property, an award of alimony or child support, or a determination of custody and visitation
because these matters affect Walter's rights as an individual. If, however, Walter and Denise spent
five weeks every summer during their marriage in New Mexico, the court may rule that Walter's
contacts with New Mexico are sufficient for there to be personal jurisdiction in New Mexico.
Example: The homeowner files a civil lawsuit in Nevada, but Jack complains to the court that,
because the homeowner hired the services of his business, which is based in California, it has no
jurisdiction. The lawsuit should be filed in California. Generally, the Nevada court has no jurisdiction
over Jack or his construction company, as they are based in another state. That court can, however,
assert in personal jurisdiction, over Jack and his company, and hear the case where the work was
done.
Explain the concept of contract formation for the web. Describe the problems associated with
contract formation on the web
Contract formation
1. Any contract includes three essential elements: an offer, an acceptance, and consideration.
2. The contract is formed when one party accepts the offer of another party.
3. An offer is a commitment with certain terms made to another party, such as a declaration of
willingness to buy or sell a product or service. An offer can be revoked as long as no payment,
delivery of service, or other consideration has been accepted.
4. An acceptance is the expression of willingness to take an offer, including all of its stated terms.
Consideration is the agreed upon exchange of something valuable, such as money, property, or
future services.
5. When a party accepts an offer based on the exchange of valuable goods or services, a contract
has been created.
6. An implied contract can also be formed by two or more parties that act as if a contract exists,
even if no contract has been written and signed.
7. People enter into contracts on a daily, and often hourly, basis. Every kind of agreement or
exchange between parties, no matter how simple, is a type of contract. For example, every time
a consumer buys an item at the supermarket, the elements of a valid contract are met:
● the store offers an item at a stated price.
● the consumer accepts this offer by indicating a willingness to buy the product for the stated
price.
● the store exchanges its product for another valuable item: the consumer’s payment.
8. Contracts are a key element of traditional business practice, and they are equally important on
the Internet. Offers and acceptances can occur when parties exchange e-mail messages, engage
in electronic data interchange (EDI), or fill out forms on Web pages.
9. When a seller advertises goods for sale on a Web site, that seller is not making an offer, but is
inviting offers from potential buyers. If a Web ad were a legal offer to form a contract, the seller
could easily become liable for the delivery of more goods than it has available to ship. When a
buyer submits an order, which is an offer, the seller can accept that offer and create a contract.
If the seller does not have the ordered items in stock, the seller has the option of refusing the
buyer’s order outright or counteroffering with a decreased amount. The buyer then has the
option to accept the seller’s counteroffer.
Warranty disclaimer
1. Sellers can avoid some implied warranty liability by making a warranty disclaimer.
2. A warranty disclaimer is a statement declaring that the seller will not honour some or all
implied warranties.
3. Any warranty disclaimer must be conspicuously made in writing, which means it must be easily
noticed in the body of the written agreement.
4. On a Web page, sellers can meet this requirement by putting the warranty disclaimer in larger
type, a bold font, or a contrasting color.
5. To be legally effective, the warranty disclaimer must be stated obviously and must be easy for a
buyer to find on the Web site.
6. The warranty disclaimer is printed in uppercase letters to distinguish it from other text on the
page.
Unit 2
Refer chapter 1
Unit 1