BY: DEAN FERDINAND A. TAN. L.LM STAGES IN CIVIL PROCEDURE, Plow chart in Ordinary Civil Action. Pol phen 2 commreld Rebre CM alt eal - kame [ sexeemesreen | commer Som many Aad aa lc leniny aed of Particulard Preottus, heady pailegoorsh arse Taiment W/ Leave] [Supplemental aswel] (PEST ~ Ake last pleading [apse] Asserts & € leer y3ow 1197 Order of TOAAL skorts here(Surcrohutta Evndone l) [fxtereention] > © rectal ce ce nearer eve afer appeal be rote reraare Veender Pe obfe — 1 FILING OF THE ‘COMPLAINT AND PAYMEN'T OF DOCKET FEES DETERMINATION BY THE JUDGE IF THE CASE FALLS UNDER SUMMARY. PROCEDURE/DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. [GevANGE AND SeRvice OF sumMONS] RENDER JUDGMENT IN CASE. DEFENDANT FAILED TO FILE ANSWER Finn OF ANSWER WITHIN To DAYS] RELIMINARY CONFERENG gu SUBMISSION OF POSITION PAPER AND AFFIDAVITS OF WITNESSESPETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE RTC To THE COURT OF APPEALS WITHIN FI 5 SUPREME COURT WITHIN FIPTEEN (15) DAYS UNDER RULE 4S t " [ExecuTion oF Juhavinn UNDER RULES] - FLOW CHART IN SMALL CLAIMS CASES. Piling of Statement of Claims (S00) —— + Payment of Deck:t Fee/Motion to ste Defendant fs a Respore w/its 10 lays from foeeipt poe ‘amination of te te Ch ‘udgiment ‘on he AMlcgation ithe ‘laim on the day SOC ‘Execution Disaissal of de Calne Plain fal x Defendant whe appears entitle 1 judgment on permissive coumler ‘Approved by the Const udgment ‘Compromise abi ‘Comp Disauissal of both Claim and Counter prejudice parties fai earing before ‘Judge who ‘conducted the Decision on We proceeding before the1. APPEAL PROCESS FROM MTC/MCTC TO'SC: FILE A PETITION FOR REVIEW ON CERTIORARI UNDER RULE 45 TO THE SUPREME COURT WITHIN 15 DAYS FROM NOTICE OF JUDGMENT, RESOLUTION OR FROM NOTICE FINAL ORDER OR FROM THE DENIAL OF THE SAME. IN CASE OF ADVERSE JUDGMENT, FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR NEW TRIAL UNDER RULES. WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS-FROM NOTICE OF JUDGMENT IW CASE OF DENIAL OF THE MOTION FOR ECONSIDERATION OR WEW TRIAL FILE A PETITION FOR REVIEW ON CERTIORARI UNDERIRUDE 45 WITH THE SUPREME COURT WITHIN PUTEEN (15) DAYS FROM NOTICE OF THE JUDGMENT OR THE ORDER OF THE DENIAL OF THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR NEW TRIAL IN CASE OF ADVERSE DECISION ON THE PETITION FOR REVIEW, FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR NEW TRIAL WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS FROM NOTICE OF THE JU ENT UNDER I CASE OF DENIAL OF THE MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL OR RECONSIDERAT!ON, FILE A PETITION FOR REVIEW WITH THE COURT OF APPEALS WITHIN FIFTERN (35} DAYS FROM NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR THE DENIAL OF THE MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL OR RECONSIDERATION UNDER IN CASE OF ADVERSE JUDGMENT FILE A’, MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL OR ECONSIDERATION WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS FROM NOTICE OF JUDGMENT UNDER auLeaTRANSMITTAL OF “THE RECORDS OF RE CASE TO THE REGIONAL TRIAL {APPEAL BY NOTICE OF APPEAL WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS 0 TTR a (20% DA FROM NOTICE OF MENT DECISION OR FINAL ORDERS APPLYING 7, mTc/MCTC FRESH PERIOD RULE TO BE FILED WITH THE MTCIE FILING OF MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL OF RECO nS On onwrHIN THE PERICD OF TABES BD PERFECTING AN APPEAL EXCEPT IN SUM PROCEDURE DECISION JUDGHEN iW OR MUNICIPAL, 2. APPEAL PROCESS URISDICTION) TO THE COU | AGGRIEVED OR SNDER RULE 92 TOF ORDER SORSE OF DENIAL OF THE TY MAY FILE A RECONSIDERATION OR NEW TRIAL BE ON ritin 18 DAYS FROM RECEIT DENYING THE PETITION SSF DENIAL OF THE MOTION FOR CEDERATION Of NEW TRIAL LF A RETITION FOR UNDER RULE 43 ON (w WITHIN DGMENT OR OF THE g FROM NOTIC sRATION OR NEW DE: RVIEVED PARTY MAY FILE & MOTION BOR ATpN OR NEW TRIAL JDER'RULW 52 08 '5) DAYS FROM NOTICE OF CONSIDE} Be wrrviw FIFTEEN ( DECISION OF FINAL ORDER ——EAGGRIVED PARTY MAY FILE AN APPEAL BY FILES \ NOTICE OF APPEAL AND RECORD ON R APPROVAL WITH RTC AND COPY mine APPLLANT FILES A (CE OF APPEAL AND RECORD ON APPEAL APPROVAL WITH RTC AND COPY IS ON APPELLEE, TRIEVED PARTY MAY FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR NEW TRIAL UNDER RULE 37fwITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS FROM NOTICE OF THE FINAL JUDGMENT OR ORDER ] a —<—<——a ~«d”dL FINAL JUDGMENT OR ORDER OF THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT IN THE EXERCISE OF ‘ORIGINAL JURISDCITION. _ PROCESS FROM RTC (APPEI °PEA}S TO THE SUPREME CO! ENTRY OF TN CASE OF DENIAL OF PETITION FOR REVIEW TLE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR NEW TRIAL UNDER RULE 52 OR 53 TO THE SUPREME COURT WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS. CASE OF DENIAL OF MOTION FOR a RECONSIDERATION OR NEW TRIAL FILE A PETITION FOR REVIEW OW CERTIORARI UNDER RULE 45 WITH THE SUPREME COURT. WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS PLUS PAYMENT OF DOCKET AND OTHER LAWFUL t TW CASD OF ADVERSE DFCISION, FILE A MOON FOR RECONSIDERATION OR NEW TRIAL UNDER BULE 52OR 53 WITHIN FIFTEEN TN CASE OF DENIAL OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OR NEW TRIAL FILE A >ETITION FOR REVIEW BEFORE THE COURT OF APPEAL WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS PLUS. 1 OF DOCKET AND OTHER LAWFUL Rar LATE) TO THE URT:ll CASE OF ADVERSE DECIBION OF TH 1. TRIAL COURT ON APPEAL FILE A. MOTION FOR RECONSI Brion ECONSIDERATION OR NEW TRIAL ONSIDERATION OR NEW TRIAL, APPEAL 0 THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT BY NOTICE OF APPEAL (15 DAYS) OR BY RECORD OW APPEAL (30 DAYS) AND PAYMENT OF APPEAL DOCKET AND OTHER LAWPUL FEES. FILING OF NOTION TOR RECgNSDERATION OR NEW TRIAL UNDER ROLE 87/ EXCEPT CASES UNDER SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS AND SMALL 4. APPEAL PROCESS FROM QUASI-JUDICIAE BODIES (RULE SiPREME COURT RENDERS JUDGMENT [MAY AFFIRM, REVERSE, OR MODIFY GUDOMENT EARLIER RENDERED BY THE LOWER COURT. TN CASE OF DENIAL OF THE MOTION FOR. RECONSIDERATION, AGGRIEVED PARTY MAY eee OETITION FOR REVIEW ON CERTIORARI UINDEne RUCE 45 WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS: FROM NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR NOTICE OF THE ORDER DENYING THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, TN CASE OF ADVERSE RESOLUTION. AGGRIEVED PARTY MAY FILE A MOTION FOR MO CONSIDERATION UNDER RULE 52 WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAY: TN CASE OF DENIAL OF THE MOTION FOR. RECONSIDERATION, AGGRIGVED PARTY MAY pike A PETITION FOR REVIEW TO THE COURT OF "APPEALS UNDER/RULE 43 WITHIN (15) DAYS FROM NOTICE OF THE IUDGMENT, ORDER OR AWARD. = TUGRIEVED PARTY MAY FILE A PETITION FOR REVIEW MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION WitHtN FIFTEEN (15) OR TEN (10) DAYS AS MANDATED BY THEIR OWN RULESDFCIBION OF HE OFFICE ene EOF THE OMBUDSMAN, TRALECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (IPO), DUREAU OF (ON (BID) AND BUREAU OF FOOD AND DRUGS (BFAD) 5. APPEA S APP’ PROCESS FROM CA/CTA/Sandiganbayan/RTC- sc: TODGMENT AND EXECUTION) SUPREME COURT RENDERS JUDGMENT (MAY AFFIRM, REVERSE, OR MODIFY JUDGMENT EARLIER RENDERED BY LOWER COURT) iE COURSE, PARTIES (ORANDA OR TF PETITION 15 GIVEN DU! E RE SUBMIT ME BRIEF. ShIsS PETITION OR COPIES OF PETITION ON WER COURT. ET FEES AND serv VERSE PARTIES AND LO' avs APPROPRIATE DOC! ag TAL OF THE MOTION FOR Maw TRIAL, AGGRIVED PARTY W REVIEW ON CERTIORART an Th CASE OF DENU RECONSIDERATON OR PETITION FO! MAY FIL TUELATING ONLY TO QUESTIONS OF LAW) wii 1s DAYS FROM NOTICE OF JUDGMENT on MNAL ORDER OF THE LOWER COURT, OR OF THE F MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL OR RECONSIDERATION, TN CASE OF FINAL JUDGEMENT, ORDER OR RESOLUTION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS, SANDIGANBAYAN, COURT OF T AX APPEAL OR RECOWAL TRIAL COURT AGGRIVED PARTY MAY FILE R RECONSIDERA TIO: Ww TRIAL WITHIN FIFTEEN (15 DAYS)