You are on page 1of 4

A 2-10 GHz Digital CMOS Phase Shifter for Ultra-

Wideband Phased Array System


Dong-Woo Kang and Songcheol Hong

Dept. EECS, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)


373-1, Guseong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-701, Republic of Korea

Abstract — This paper describes a digital true time-delay synthesized with lumped spiral inductors. An analog phase
phase shifter implemented in 0.18-µm CMOS process for shifter in SiGe was implemented a varactor loaded line
ultra-wideband phased array application. The phase shifter where both series and shunt elements are adjusted to
exhibits linear phase change versus frequency, digital control,
low insertion loss, and reduced circuit size. Shunt-series continuously vary the phase [5]. A multiband phase shifter
peaked load increases the bandwidth of the phase shifter, was designed by employing a distributed amplifier
yielding a flat gain response over a wide bandwidth. The between varactor-tuned LC networks [6]. However, the
fabricated circuit demonstrates a measured 157.5o phase overall performance of the phase shifters are limited by
tuning range in steps of 22.5o at 10 GHz. the low quality factors of varactors and inductors in
Index Terms — CMOS integrated circuit, phase shifters, silicon technology.
phased arrays.
This paper presents the design and development of a
digital distributed phase shifter in 0.18-µm CMOS process
I. INTRODUCTION for ultra-wideband phased array system. The proposed
phase shifter exhibits low insertion loss over an ultra-
An ultra-wideband system is an emerging solution for
wideband frequency band while maintaining a reduced
high-data rate broadband communication, high-resolution
circuit size and low power consumption.
radar, and precision-positioning fields. In a wideband
phased array antenna, a progressive phase shift between
successive radiating elements must be a linear function of II. CIRCUIT DESIGN
frequency in order to scan to be frequency insensitive over
a wide signal bandwidth [1]. This can be achieved through
the use of true time-delay phase shifters.
One of the easiest ways to implement a true time-delay
phase shifter is by using the switched delay-line technique.
However, many researchers have studied on the
distributed analog phase shifter with diode-loaded
(a)
transmission line due to its low power consumption and
low insertion loss. This technique has been demonstrated
using Schottky junction varactors [2],
microelectromechanical system (MEMS) bridges [3], or
thin-film ferroelectric barium strontium titanate (BST)
varactors [4]. A tunable delay line consists of a high-
impedance transmission line periodically loaded with (b)
voltage variable capacitors. By applying a single bias
voltage to varactors or MEMS bridges, the effective Fig. 1. (a) The distributed analog phase shifter (b) The digital
distributed capacitance of the synthetic transmission line distributed phase shifter
can be changed, which in turn changes the phase velocity, Fig.1 (a) shows a conventional varactor-loaded
and thus the associated time delay through the line. The transmission line phase shifter. The relative phase shift
major drawback of the distributed analog phase shifter is can be controlled by varying the capacitance C. At
the considerably large chip area. frequencies well below the Bragg frequency, the
In recent commercial silicon integrated circuit maximum possible differential phase shift of n T-sections
technologies, RF phase shifters can be developed using is given by [6]
loaded line where the required transmission line section is

1-4244-0530-0/1-4244-0531-9/07/$20.00  2007 IEEE 395 2007 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium
Authorized licensed use limited to: Arizona State University. Downloaded on July 19,2010 at 23:26:34 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
∆ φ = 2 π f 0 n L ( C max − C min ). (1)

where Cmin and Cmax are the minimum and maximum


capacitance of the varactor, respectively, and fo represents
the center frequency. The phase control range is limited by
a given capacitance tuning ratio. Furthermore, as the
capacitance of the varactor varies, the characteristic
impedance Zo changes and is given by

(a) (b)
L L
Z0 max = Z0 min = . (2)
C min C max Fig. 3. (a) Shunt and series peaking load (b) Simplified
model

This indicates that there is trade off between the matching of the common gate MOSFET can be used as an effective
performance and the amount of phase per section. means of switching between VDD and GND. Moreover, it
Fig.1 (b) shows the concept of the digital distributed provides high gain, high output resistance, and high
phase shifter [7]. Note that the series inductance and shunt reverse isolation.
capacitance are fixed value. The input signal propagates In general, shunt-peaking is a form of bandwidth
along the artificial transmission line. By tailoring the enhancement in which a one-port network is connected
voltage across each capacitor in succession, the phase shift between the amplifier proper and the capacitive load. In
is incremented by the steps of the single-section phase case of shun-peaking, the maximum bandwidth is 2
shift while maintaining a good matching performance. The times that of the uncompensated case [8]. To increase the
maximum possible differential phase shift of n T-sections bandwidth, a series inductor can be inserted between a
can be written as shunt peaking inductor and a capacitive load. Fig.3 (a)
shows the output of phase shifter with shunt-series
∆ φ = 2 π f 0 ( n − 1 ) LC . (3) peaking load. A series inductor (L2) is added between the
output of phase shifter and the rest of the network. Fig.3
We can see that the phase tuning range increases with the (b) shows the simplified model for small signals. The
section number n. Even if the differential phase shift capacitance C1 represents the loading on the output node
varies, the characteristic impedance of the artificial of the distributed phase shifter. The capacitance C2 is the
transmission line is constant, resulting in a good matching input capacitance of a subsequent stage. Compared to an
performance. ordinary shunt-peaked topology, the combination of shunt
For circuit implementation, the phase selection in and series peaking can provide three distinct resonance
parallel is realized by the distributed active switch using a frequencies, thereby improving the bandwidth of the phase
cascode MOSFET as shown in Fig.2 [7]. shifter by a factor of 2 3 [9].
A single T section consists of series inductances and gate
capacitance of common source MOSFET. The cascode
MOSFET operates as active switches, as the gate bias (Vp)

Fig. 2. The schematic of a single T-section.


Fig. 4. Schematic of a 3-bit distributed phase shifter

396
Authorized licensed use limited to: Arizona State University. Downloaded on July 19,2010 at 23:26:34 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Fig.4 shows the schematic of the proposed phase shifter.
An RF signal applied at the input end of the gate line
travels down the artificial transmission line to the
terminating resistor. The input signal sampled by the gate
circuits at different phases is transferred to the drain load
through the activated cascode cell. The differential phase
shift can be obtained by selecting one of the active
cascode switches in parallel. Because the artificial line has
lossy components, which are series resistance and shunt
conductance, the gate voltage throughout the gate line will
unequally excite the gates of common gate MOSFETs.
This results in a significant loss variation of the phase
shifter between each state. In order to minimize the state-
Fig. 6 Measured relative phase response.
to-state loss variation, the size of common gate MOSFET
must increase as the differential phase shift increases.
The drain of each active switch is combined with binary
tree to maintain a same time delay. Hence, the relative
phase shift is only dependent on the input artificial
transmission line. The output of the binary tree is
connected to shunt-series peaked load. A second stage is
common source amplifier with shunt peaking inductor in
order to enhance the overall gain. A source follower is
used as an active buffer for wideband output matching.
o
In this design, the LSB of the phase shifter is 22.5 . The
o o
circuit provides eight phase states between 0 and 157.5 in
o
increments of 22.5 at the design frequency of 10 GHz. Fig. 7 Measured gain response.
For a 50 Ω port impedance and a design frequency of 10
GHz, capacitance Cgs and inductance Lg are determined as
0.125 pF and 0.312 nH, respectively.

III. FABRICATION AND MEASUREMENT


The proposed 3-bit distributed phase shifter was
fabricated using TSMC’s 0.18-µm CMOS technology,

Fig. 8 Measured input return losses.

Fig. 9 Measured output return losses.

Fig. 5 The chip photograph of the proposed phase which provides one poly layer for the gate of the
shifter. MOSFET and six metal layers for inter-connection. The

397
Authorized licensed use limited to: Arizona State University. Downloaded on July 19,2010 at 23:26:34 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
circuit draws a maximum 16 mA dc current from a 1.8 V IV. CONCLUSION
power supply; thus, the maximum power consumption is
This paper presents a 3-bit distributed phase shifter
28.8 mW. The 3-bit distributed phase shifter is biased at
using 0.18-µm CMOS technology. The phase shifter
Vg=0.9 V with the drain current varying from 5.7 mA to
exhibits a linear phase change versus frequency with a
6.0 mA. The gate bias of the common gate MOSFET is
purely digital control. The shunt-series peaked load
toggled between 0 V and 1.8 V. The gate biases of second
provides a relatively flat gain response over wideband
stage amplifier and source follower are 0.75 V and 0.7 V,
frequency ranges. The measured gain is better than -2 dB
respectively. The die photograph is shown in Fig. 5. The o
from 2 to 9 GHz. The maximum phase shift is 157.5 in
total die area is 1.3 mm × 1.2 mm. o
steps of 22.5 at 10 GHz. The proposed phase shifter can
Fig.6 shows the measured phase responses of the phase
be used in time-delay phased arrays, especially those
shifter. The differential phase shift increases linearly as
covering a wide bandwidth.
frequency increases. Phase errors are mainly caused by
inaccuracy of a microstrip line. Fig. 7 shows measured
insertion gain for the eight states. Over 2 to 9 GHz, the
gain is better than -2 dB. Fig. 8 shows the input return ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
losses. The input return losses of all states are below -15 This work was supported in part by the Agency for
dB. The output return losses are less than -7 dB as shown Defense Development, Korea, through the Radio
in Fig. 9. In the Fig. 10 and the Fig. 11, RMS phase error Detection Research Center at Korea Advanced Institute of
o
exhibits less than 4.5 and RMS amplitude error is less Science and Technology.
than 0.42 dB.
REFERENCES
[1] S. K. Koul and B. Bhat, Microwave and Millimeter Wave
Phase Shifters, Boston: Artech House, 1991, ch.1
[2] A. S. Nagra and R. A. York, “Distributed analog phase
shifters with low insertion loss,” IEEE Trans. Microw.
Theory Tech., vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1705-1711, Sep. 1999.
[3] N. S. Barker, and G. M. Rebeiz, “ Distributed MEMS true-
time delay phase shifters and wideband switches,” IEEE
Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1881-
1890, Nov. 1998.
[4] D. Kuylenstierna, A. Vorobie, P. Linner, and S. Gevorgian,
“Ultrawide-band Tunable True-Time Delay Lines using
Ferroelectric varactors,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech.,
Fig. 10 Measured RMS Phase Error vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 2164-2170, June, 2005.
[5] T. M. Hancock and G. M. Rebeiz, “A 12-GHz SiGe Phase
Shifter with integrated LNA,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory
Tech., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 977-983, Mar. 2005.
[6] C. Lu, A. –V. Pham, and D. Livezey, “Development of
Multiband Phase Shifters in 180-nm RF CMOS Technology
with Active Loss Compensation,” IEEE Trans. Microw.
Theory Tech., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 40-45, Jan. 2006.
[7] D.-W. Kang and S. Hong, “A 4-Bit CMOS Phase Shifter
using Distributed Active Switches,” IEEE Trans. Microw.
Theory Tech., submitted.
[8] T. H. Lee, The Design of CMOS Radio-Frequency
Integrated Circuits, Cambridge University Express, 2004,
ch. 9.
[9] S. Galal and B. Razavi, “40-Gb/s Amplifier and ESD
Fig. 11 Measured RMS Amplitude Error Protection Circuit in 0.18-um CMOS Technology,” IEEE J.
Solid-State Circuits, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 2389-2396, Dec.
2004.

398
Authorized licensed use limited to: Arizona State University. Downloaded on July 19,2010 at 23:26:34 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

You might also like