Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PVP2016
July 17-21, 2016, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
PVP2016-63546
(a)
(a)
(b)
Fig. 4. The results of tensile test simulation; (a) variation of the
stress triaxiality with equivalent plastic strain, extracted in the
center of tensile specimens and (b) assumed multi-axial fracture
strain loci.
(a)
(b)
Fig. 8. Determined failure criterion; (a) comparison of
experimental J-R curve with simulated results, (b) dependence
of the critical accumulated damage, c, on the element size.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Energy Efficiency &
Resources Core Technology Program of the Korea Institute of
Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted
financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry &
Energy, Republic of Korea. (No. 20131520202170).
REFERENCES
(b) [1] Gurson AL. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void
Fig. 10. Comparison of through-wall cracked pipe test results nucleation and growth. Part 1-yield criteria and flow rules for
with simulated ones; (a) load – load line displacement curve and porous ductile media. J Engng Mater Tech. 1977;99:2–15.
(b) load line displacement – crack growth curve. [2] Tvergaard V, Needleman A. Analysis of the cup-cone fracture
in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall. 1984;32:157–69.
[3] Rousselier G. Ductile fracture models and their potential in
CONCLUSIONS local approach of fracture. Nucl Engng Des. 1987;105:97–111.
In this study, test data for material properties and full-scale [4] Cornec A, Scheider I, Schwalbe K-H. On the practical
welded pipes are summarized from original data in Pipe Fracture application of the cohesive model. Engng Fract Mech.
Encyclopedia. Finite element analysis are conducted for basic 2003;70:1963–87.
experiments with reasonable procedures to determine the [5] Xu J, Zhang ZL, Qstby E, Nyhus B, Sun DB., Constraint
parameters of damage model and material constants in the effect on the ductile crack growth resistance of circumferentially
equation of fracture strain. Then, determined damage model cracked pipes, Engng Fract Mech. 2010;77:671–84.
and fracture strain are applied to ductile tearing simulation for [6] Ruggieri C, Dotta F. Numerical modeling of ductile crack
large-scale welded pipes. Crack initiation and maximum loads extension in high pressure pipelines with longitudinal flaws.
are expected to characterize the fracture behavior of full-scale Engineering Structures. 2011;33:1423-38
welded pipes. From the results of simulation, deformation [7] Yin S, Williams PT, Klasky HB, Bass BR. Analysis of ductile
response and characteristic loads are compared with crack growth in pipe test in STYLE project, In: Proceedings of
experimentally measured values to verify the application of the 2012 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. Paper
damage model on weld material. As a result, the predictions of PVP2012-78518; 2012.
finite element damage analysis are in good agreement with [8] Hojo K, Watanabe D, Application of Gurson model to Ni-
experiments. based alloy weld Joint pipe with an axial or a circumferential
surface flaw (phase II). In: Proceedings of the 2013 ASME
Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Paper PVP2013-97654;
NOMENCLATURE 2013.
A, B, C material constants in multi-axial fracture strain locus [9] Hojo K, Ogawa N, Application of Gurson model to Ni-based
ao initial crack length alloy weld Joint pipe with an axial or a circumferential surface
a crack growth flaw In: Proceedings of the 2012 ASME Pressure Vessels and
t pipe thickness Piping Conference, Paper PVP2012-78171; 2012.
rm mean radius of pipe [10] Oh CK, Kim YJ, Baek JH, Kim WS. Development of stress-
θ half circumferential crack angle modified fracture strain for ductile failure of API X65 steel. Int
f (stress-modified) multi-axial fracture strain J Fract. 2007;143:119-33
ep, ep equivalent plastic strain and increment [11] Oh CS, Kim NH, Kim YJ, Baek JH, Kim YP, Kim WS. A
σ e, σ m effective stress and mean normal stress, respectively finite element ductile failure simulation method using stress-
σ1, σ2, σ3 principal stress components modified fracture strain model. Engng Fract Mech.
Le element size 2011;78:124–37.
, accumulated and incremental damage, respectively [12] Kim JH, Kim NH, Kim YJ, Hasegawa K, Miyazaki K.
c critical damage for cracking Ductile fracture simulation of 304 stainless steel pipes with two
JR J-resistance circumferential surface cracks. Fatig Fract Engng Mater Struct.
2013;36:1067–80.