CHAPTER IV

THE DATA ANALYSIS

4.1 The Data

This study was conducted by applying an experimental research. There

were two groups in this research, namely experimental and control group. The

students in experimental group were taught by applying SAVI model while the

students in the control group were taught without applying SAVI approach .The

population of this research was the eleventh grade of SMA Yayasan Pendidikan

Harapan Bangsa. Since all classes are homogeny, the sample was taken randomly.

XI IPA-1 was decided as an experimental group and class XI IPA-2 was decided

as a control group. The research was conducted during three weeks. The treatment

was given to the experimental group in three meetings after administering the pre-

test. Indeed, the students in experimental group had better speaking achievement

than those in control group. After administering the treatment, the post-test was

done to both groups to measure the students’ achievement in speaking.

This research applied an objective test called speaking test. The students’

speaking test was scored by calculating the six component scale (grammar,

vocabulary, comprehension, fluency, pronunciation and task). After conducting

the research, the researcher got the data of the students’ scores in pre-test and

post-test from both experimental and control group.

The mean for the experimental group is 66 while the mean of the control

group is 63. It can be assumed that the means of the pre-test score of both groups

were not significantly different. But there were 15 students failed in experimental
group and 20 students failed in control group. It caused most of the students did

not have confidence to speak. They are worry to make mistakes.

4.2 Data Analysis

1. Testing Reliability of the Test

Before analyzing the data, the researcher obtained the reliability of the test

by using Kuder Richardson formula (KR-21) after trying out the instrument. The

calculation shows that the coefficient of reliability of the test is 0.67.This

coefficient of reliability is substantial. It means the test is reliable because the

reliability can be seen from the highness of the score and this is in line with Best

(2002: 308).

2. Analyzing the Data Using T-test Formula

To find out whether the applying of SAVI model had a significant effect on

the senior high school students’ speaking achievement, the result of the test was

calculated by using t-test formula. The calculation shows that:

Mx =11.91

X2 = 51.79

Nx = 35

My = 10.26

Y2 = 55.497

Ny = 35
t -test = 5.36

4.3 Testing Hypothesis

The basis of testing hypothesis in this research is:

 If t-observed > t-table, the alternative hypothesis will be accepted; the null

hypothesis will be rejected

 If t-observed ≤ t-table, the null hypothesis will be accepted; the alternative

hypothesis will be rejected

In this research, the value of t-table for the degree of freedom (df) 68 at

level of significance (α) 0.05 is 1.996. The result of computing t-test shows that

the value of t-test is higher than the value of t-table as follows:

Table 4.1

The Results of the T-Test Calculation

t-obs > t-table (α = 0.05) with df 68

5.36 > 1.996 (α = 0.05) with df 68

Based on the calculation above, it is concluded that alternative hypothesis

(Ha) is accepted and null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. It means that “The students’

achievement in speaking taught by SAVI model is higher than taught without

applying SAVI model.”

4.4 Research Findings

The result of this research shows that there is difference of out between

both of groups. Based on statistics calculation, the mean of control group and

experimental group is different. The mean score of the experimental group is

higher than control group. The calculation of the t-test shows that the t-observed

(5.36) is higher than t-table value (1.996) for the degree of freedom (df) 68 at the

level of significance (α) 0.05. The difference took place because the effect of

different treatment for each groups. The experimental group was taught by SAVI

Model while the control group was taught by applying conventional or lecturing

method. Based on theoretical and statistical findings, the researcher concludes that

teaching speaking in oral descriptive text by applying SAVI Model has more

significant effect than that without applying SAVI Model. It was proven by the

students’ speaking achievement in oral descriptive text taught by applying SAVI

Model was higher than taught without SAVI Model.

 CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

5.1 Conclusion

Based on the research findings, the researcher concludes that there is a

significant effect of applying SAVI Model on senior high school students’

speaking achievement since the students’ speaking achievement in oral descriptive

text by applying SAVI Model is higher that taught without applying SAVI Model.

Therefore, the alternative hypothesis is accepted and null hypothesis is rejected. It

was proven statistically with t-observed > t-table 5.56 > 1.996; df= 68, α = 0.05

5.2 Suggestions

Based on the conclusions above, the results of the findings contribute

some valuable suggestions for those who are interested in teaching speaking in

oral descriptive text as follows:

1. For the students, to use SAVI model while speaking in the class so they can do

oral descriptive text easily.

2. For the teachers, to apply SAVI model so that they can improve their

students’ achievement in oral descriptive text; and

3. For all the readers, may this research bring them into good understanding how

to improve the students’ speaking ability by applying SAVI model.